Omental Lymph Node Transfer for Lymphedema Patients: A Systematic Review

Distribution of Perigastric Station 4d Lymph Nodes in Vascularized Gastroepiploic Lymph Node Transfer: An Anatomic Study and Case Series

BACKGROUND

Vascularized gastroepiploic lymph node transfer (VGLNT) is a well-accepted surgical treatment for restoring physiological function in chronic lymphedema. However, the inclusion of substantial lymph nodes (LNs) in the flap remains uncertain. This study aimed to identify the anatomical basis for reliable flap harvest for VGLNT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The anatomy of perigastric station 4d LNs was studied in healthy cadavers (n = 15) and patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) (n = 27). The omentum was divided into three segments: proximal, middle, and distal from the origin of the right gastroepiploic vessels. The flap dimension, number, location, size of LNs, and caliber of the vessels were reviewed. Eight patients underwent VGLNT for upper/lower limb lymphedema.

RESULTS

The mean numbers of LNs in the proximal, middle, and distal segment were 2.5, 1.4, 0.5 in the cadavers, and 4.9, 2.7, 0.7 in the gastrectomy specimens, respectively. The proximal third included a significantly greater number of LNs than the distal third in the cadaveric (p = 0.024) and ECG (p = 0.016) specimens. A total of 95% of the LNs were located within proximal two-thirds of the flap from the vessel origin both in the cadavers (21.0 × 5.0 cm) and in the gastrectomy specimens (20 × 3.5 cm). In VGLNT, the transferred flap was 25.5 ± 6.9 × 4.1 + 0.7 cm in dimension, containing a mean number of 6.5 ± 1.9 LNs. At postoperative 6 months, the volumetric difference was significantly reduced by 22.8 ± 9.2% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a distinct distribution pattern of station 4d LNs. Inclusion of the proximal two-thirds of the flap, which carries majority of the LNs, is recommended for VGLNT.

Five-year Follow-up Outcome of Total Omental Lymph Node Flap Transfer in Primary Lymphedema Patient

Lymphedemas are caused by the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial space, resulting from lymphatic system obstruction. In recent years, omentum flap transfer has gained popularity as a treatment for lymphedema due to its immunogenic and lymphangiogenic properties, which aid in reducing infection rate and volume. Moreover, omental flaps have angiogenesis capabilities, which can aid in successful chronic wound covering. Using a flow-through procedure after omental flap transfer can help reduce complications including venous congestion and steal phenomenon at the recipient site. We present a long-term follow-up of a case of primary lymphedema treated with omental flap transfer with flow-through figuration, demonstrating a gradual decrease in volume, reduced infection rate, and chronic wound coverage. This case report illustrates intriguing postoperative compartment effect and vascular concerns.

Vascularized omental lymphatic transplant for upper extremity lymphedema: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Vascularized omental lymphatic transplant (VOLT) is an increasingly popular treatment of extremity lymphedema given its promising donor site. While the success of VOLT in the treatment of lymphedema has been reported previously, several questions remain.

AIM

To further elucidate appropriate use of VOLT in the treatment of lymphedema, specifically addressing patient selection, harvest technique, and operative methods.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review of VOLT for upper extremity lymphedema was performed. Of 115 yield studies, seven were included for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies demonstrated significant reductions in extremity circumference/volume (average volume reduction, 22.7%-39.5%) as well as subjective improvements using patient-reported outcomes. Though studies are heterogenous and limited, when analyzed in aggregate, suggest the efficacy of VOLT in lymphedema treatment.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest systematic review of VOLT to date. VOLT continues to show promise as a safe and efficacious surgical intervention for lymphedema in the upper extremity. Further studies are warranted to more definitively identify patients for whom this technique is appropriate as well as ideal harvest and inset technique.

Lymphedema: Conventional to Cutting Edge Treatment

Lymphedema of the extremities related to oncologic therapies such as cancer surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy is a major long-term cause of morbidity for cancer patients. Both nonsurgical and surgical management strategies have been developed. The goals of these therapies are to achieve volume reduction of the affected extremity, a reduction in patient symptoms, and a reduction in associated morbidities such as recurrent soft-tissue infections. In this article, we review both nonsurgical and surgical management strategies. Traditional surgical therapy has focused on more ablative techniques such as the Charles procedure and suction-assisted lipectomy/liposuction. However, newer more physiologic surgical methods such as lymphovenous anastomoses and vascularized lymph node transfers have become a more common treatment modality for the management of this complex problem.

Impact of body mass index on long-term surgical outcomes of vascularized lymph node transfer in lymphedema patients

Background

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is a surgical procedure with high interest to treat lymphedema. Body mass index (BMI) is a well-described factor that increases the risk of lymphedema, but little is known about its influence on the surgical outcomes of lymphedema patients who undergo VLNT. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of preoperative BMI on the long-term surgical outcomes after VLNT in lymphedema patients.

Methods

We retrospectively compiled data of patients with International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage II or III lymphedema who were treated with VLNT from July 2010 to July 2016 at China Medical University Hospital. Preoperative and postoperative demographic and clinical data, such as limb circumference and number of infection episodes were reviewed. Statistical analyses compared circumference reduction rates and infection episode reduction between preoperative BMI categories was done. In addition, prediction of outcomes based on quantitative preoperative BMI was analyzed.

Results

A total of 83 patients met the inclusion criteria. Nine patients (10.8%) were normal weight, 43 (51.8%) were overweight, and 31 (37.3%) were obese. Compared with normal-weight patients, mean circumference reduction rates were significantly lower in overweight (P=0.005) and obese patients (P=0.02), but quantitative BMI was not correlated with circumference reduction rate (P=0.96). However, obese patients had a significantly greater reduction in infection episodes than normal-weight patients (P=0.03). In addition, greater BMI predicted greater reduction in infection episodes after VLNT (P=0.02).

Conclusions

VLNT is an effective surgical treatment, especially for lymphedema patients with higher preoperative BMIs. The results of our study suggest that this procedure considerably decreases the number of postoperative infection episodes per year in obese patients, even though preoperative BMI does not influence circumference reduction rate.