1
|
Christ SM, Youssef G, Tanguturi SK, Cagney D, Shi D, McFaline-Figueroa JR, Chukwueke U, Lee EQ, Hertler C, Andratschke N, Weller M, Reardon DA, Haas-Kogan D, Guckenberger M, Wen PY, Rahman R. Re-irradiation of recurrent IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in the bevacizumab and immunotherapy era: Target delineation, outcomes and patterns of recurrence. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100697. [PMID: 38046107 PMCID: PMC10689476 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction and background While recurrent glioblastoma patients are often treated with re-irradiation, there is limited data on the use of re-irradiation in the setting of bevacizumab (BEV), temozolomide (TMZ) re-challenge, or immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). We describe target delineation in patients with prior anti-angiogenic therapy, assess safety and efficacy of re-irradiation, and evaluate patterns of recurrence. Materials and methods Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of glioblastoma treated at a single institution between 2013 and 2021 with re-irradiation were included. Tumor, treatment and clinical data were collected. Logistic and Cox regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results One hundred and seventeen recurrent glioblastoma patients were identified, receiving 129 courses of re-irradiation. In 66 % (85/129) of cases, patients had prior BEV. In the 80 patients (62 %) with available re-irradiation plans, 20 (25 %) had all T2/FLAIR abnormality included in the gross tumor volume (GTV). Median overall survival (OS) for the cohort was 7.3 months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months. Acute CTCAE grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 8 % of cases. Concurrent use of TMZ or ICI was not associated with improved OS nor PFS. On multivariable analysis, higher KPS was significantly associated with longer OS (p < 0.01). On subgroup analysis, patients with prior BEV had significantly more marginal recurrences than those without (26 % vs. 13 %, p < 0.01). Conclusion Re-irradiation can be safely employed in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Marginal recurrence was more frequent in patients with prior BEV, suggesting a need to consider more inclusive treatment volumes incorporating T2/FLAIR abnormality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian M. Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gilbert Youssef
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shyam K. Tanguturi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Cagney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Diana Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ugonma Chukwueke
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eudocia Q. Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caroline Hertler
- Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David A. Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y. Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu JJ, Goldlust SA, Kleinberg LR, Honnorat J, Oberheim Bush NA, Ram Z. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians' choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19). Discov Oncol 2022; 13:105. [PMID: 36239858 PMCID: PMC9568629 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00555-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy, a noninvasive, anti-mitotic treatment modality, is approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) and newly diagnosed GBM based on phase III, EF-11 (NCT00379470) and EF-14 (NCT00916409) studies, respectively. The EF-19 study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of TTFields monotherapy (200 kHz) vs physicians' choice standard of care (PC-SOC; EF-11 historical control group) in rGBM. METHODS A prospective, post-marketing registry study of adults with supratentorial rGBM treated with TTFields therapy was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS; intent-to-treat [ITT] population) and secondary endpoint was OS per-protocol (PP). Subgroup and toxicity analyses were conducted. RESULTS Median OS (ITT population) was comparable with TTFields monotherapy vs PC-SOC (7.4 vs 6.4 months, log-rank test P = 0.053; Cox test hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.66 [0.47-0.92], P = 0.016). The upper-bound HR (95% CI) was lower than pre-defined noninferiority (1.375 threshold). In the PP population, median OS was significantly longer for TTFields monotherapy vs PC-SOC (8.1 vs 6.4 months; log-rank test P = 0.017; Cox test HR [95% CI], 0.60 [0.42-0.85], P = 0.004). TTFields therapy showed increased benefit with extended use (≥ 18 h/day [averaged over 28 days]). TTFields therapy-related adverse events (AEs) by body system were lower vs PC-SOC: mainly mild-to-moderate skin AEs. CONCLUSION In the real-world setting, TTFields monotherapy showed comparable (ITT population) and superior (PP population) OS vs PC-SOC in rGBM. In line with previous results, TTFields therapy showed a favorable safety profile vs chemotherapy, without new safety signals/systemic effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01756729, registered December 20, 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay-Jiguang Zhu
- University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston (UTHealth)/Memorial Hermann Hospital at Texas Medical Center, 6400 Fannin St., Suite 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | | | - Lawrence R Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jérôme Honnorat
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Hôpital Neurologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, SynatAc Team, MELIS Institute, INSERM U1314/CNRS UMR5284, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, East Group Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Cedex, France
| | - Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zvi Ram
- Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Establishment and Validation of CyberKnife Irradiation in a Syngeneic Glioblastoma Mouse Model. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143416. [PMID: 34298631 PMCID: PMC8303959 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides precise high-dose irradiation of intracranial tumors. However, its radiobiological mechanisms are not fully understood. This study aims to establish CyberKnife SRS on an intracranial glioblastoma tumor mouse model and assesses the early radiobiological effects of radiosurgery. Following exposure to a single dose of 20 Gy, the tumor volume was evaluated using MRI scans, whereas cellular proliferation and apoptosis, tumor vasculature, and immune response were evaluated using immunofluorescence staining. The mean tumor volume was significantly reduced by approximately 75% after SRS. The precision of irradiation was verified by the detection of DNA damage consistent with the planned dose distribution. Our study provides a suitable mouse model for reproducible and effective irradiation and further investigation of radiobiological effects and combination therapies of intracranial tumors using CyberKnife. Abstract CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (CK-SRS) precisely delivers radiation to intracranial tumors. However, the underlying radiobiological mechanisms at high single doses are not yet fully understood. Here, we established and evaluated the early radiobiological effects of CK-SRS treatment at a single dose of 20 Gy after 15 days of tumor growth in a syngeneic glioblastoma-mouse model. Exact positioning was ensured using a custom-made, non-invasive, and trackable frame. One superimposed target volume for the CK-SRS planning was created from the fused tumor volumes obtained from MRIs prior to irradiation. Dose calculation and delivery were planned using a single-reference CT scan. Six days after irradiation, tumor volumes were measured using MRI scans, and radiobiological effects were assessed using immunofluorescence staining. We found that CK-SRS treatment reduced tumor volume by approximately 75%, impaired cell proliferation, diminished tumor vasculature, and increased immune response. The accuracy of the delivered dose was demonstrated by staining of DNA double-strand breaks in accordance with the planned dose distribution. Overall, we confirmed that our proposed setup enables the precise irradiation of intracranial tumors in mice using only one reference CT and superimposed MRI volumes. Thus, our proposed mouse model for reproducible CK-SRS can be used to investigate radiobiological effects and develop novel therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
|