Diagnosis and Monitoring of Prostatic Lesions: A Comparison of Three Modalities: Multiparametric MRI, Fusion MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS), and Traditional TRUS

Three-dimensional ultrasound integrating nomogram and the blood flow image for prostate cancer diagnosis and biopsy: A retrospective study

Backgrounds

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common male cancer in the world and based on its high prevalence and overwhelming effect on patients, more precise diagnostic and therapeutic methods are essential research topics. As such, this study aims to evaluate the value of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound (3D-TRUS) in the detection, diagnosis and biopsy of PCa, and to provide a basis for clinical practice of PCa.

Methods

Retrospective analysis and comparison of a total of 401 male patients who underwent prostate TRUS in our hospital from 2019 to 2020 were conducted, with all patients having prostate biopsy. Nomogram was used to estimate the probability of different ultrasound signs in diagnosing prostate cancer. The ROC curve was used to estimate the screening and diagnosis rates of 3D-TRUS, MRI and TRUS for prostate cancer.

Results

A total of 401 patients were randomly divided into two groups according to different methods of prostate ultrasonography, namely the TRUS group (251 patients) and the 3D-TRUS group (150 patients). Of these cases, 111 patients in 3D-TRUS group underwent MRI scan. The nomogram further determined the value of 3D-TRUS for prostate cancer. The ROC AUC of prostate cancer detected by TRUS, MRI and 3D-TRUS was 0.5580, 0.6216 and 0.6267 respectively. Biopsy complications were lower in 3D-TRUS group than TRUS group, which was statistically significant (P<0.005).

Conclusions

The accuracy of 3D-TRUS was higher in diagnosis and biopsy of prostate cancer. Meanwhile, the positive rate of biopsy could be improved under direct visualization of 3D-TRUS, and the complications could be decreased markedly. Therefore, 3D-TRUS was of high clinical value in diagnosis and biopsy of prostate cancer.

Is targeted biopsy really needed when performing systematic prostate biopsy to raise the detection rate for prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen ≤10 ng/mL?

Targeted biopsy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and hypoechoic lesions on transrectal ultrasound has been implemented to increase prostate cancer detection rate.We compared the detection abilities of systematic prostate biopsy, hypoechoic lesion-targeted biopsy (HL-TBx), and cognitive magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) in patients with suspected prostate cancer. Between September 2014 and August 2016, 193 patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of 3 to 10 ng/mL underwent HL-TBx or MRI-TBx. In patients who refused magnetic resonance imaging examination before prostate biopsy, HL-TBx was performed. We compared cancer detection rates and pathologic outcomes between systematic prostate biopsy and HL-TBx or MRI-TBx.The cancer detection rates for HL-TBx and MRI-TBx were 40.8% and 43.8%, respectively, without a significant difference (P = .683). Of the 81 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, most patients (77 patients, 95.1%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer by systematic prostate biopsy. The detection ability for prostate cancer was significantly better for systematic prostate biopsy than for HL-TBx or MRI-TBx (P < .001).The detection abilities for clinically significant prostate cancer similar between HL-TBx and systematic prostate biopsy. Systematic prostate biopsy alone should be recommended for detection prostate cancer in patients with a prostate-specific antigen ≤10 ng/mL.

Barriers to obtaining prostate multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men on active surveillance for prostate cancer

Purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging is playing an ever‐bigger role in the management of prostate cancer. This study investigated barriers to obtaining multi‐parametric MRI (mpMRI) in African‐American men on active surveillance for prostate cancer in comparison to white men affected by the same type of cancer.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review of prostate mpMRI orders from August 2015 to October 2017 at a single health organization treating a diverse population was performed. Data was extracted from the electronic medical records and cancellations were examined based on the documented reason for mpMRI cancellation, race, median zip code household income, and distance from healthcare facility.

Results

Out of 793 prostate mpMRI orders, 201 (25%) went unscanned. Access to care issues accounted for 46% of unscanned orders. Patient cancellations were the most common, followed by difficulty contacting patients, and insurance denials. African‐American patients disproportionately went unscanned because institution staff were unable to contact patients (29% vs 10% in white men, P = 0.0015). Median zip code household income was significantly different between racial groups but did not vary between indication for cancellation.

Conclusions

African‐American prostate cancer patients' access to mpMRI is hindered more by barriers to care than White patients. Urology providers must consider these issues before using prostate mpMRI within their active surveillance pathways.

Quantitation of hypoechoic lesions for the prediction and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Hypoechoic lesions are not included as indicators for prostate biopsy. To discriminate the features of hypoechoic lesions, we investigated the ultrasonographic characteristics of hypoechoic lesions using numerical analysis in image. In addition, we evaluated previously suggested subjective parameters on hypoechoic lesion.

METHODS

We performed one-core targeted biopsy (TBx) for each hypoechoic lesion in up to two lesions in each patient before the 12-core systemic biopsy was obtained between July 2015 and May 2016. Image analysis data were analyzed using grayscale values and Hounsfield units (HU) to measure heterogeneity. Subjective evaluation of hypoechoic lesions including hypoechoicity, irregularity, vascularity, and microcalcification was also validated.

RESULTS

Of 157 patients (median age = 67.1 years, median prostate-specific antigen = 6.21 ng/mL) included in the study, 77 (49.0%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa), and 39 (17.0%) diagnoses were confirmed by the results of targeted cores. The existence of hypoechoic lesions was not a final predictor for PCa detection. In multivariate analysis using a combination of clinical and quantitative image analyses, the grayscale value was identified as a significant predictive factor for the presence of PCa and high-grade disease (Gleason score ≥ 7) on target lesions. The combination of clinical and image variables had the highest area under the curve (0.890) for detecting PCa in TBx.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method for the quantitation of hypoechoic lesions using grayscale images and HU is simple. Combined with the current clinical approaches, quantitative scoring of lesions can be useful for detecting PCa and making more precise diagnoses.

Indications for a second prostate biopsy in patients suspected with prostate cancer after an initial negative prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the indications for a second prostate biopsy in patients suspected with prostate cancer after an initial negative prostate biopsy.

METHODS

The present study included 421 patients who underwent repeat prostate biopsy between January 2007 and December 2015 at three hospitals. Clinicopathological data, including patient age, body mass index, history of prostate biopsy, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density, PSA velocity, and PSA fluctuation patterns, were analyzed. The patients were stratified into two groups based on the first PSA pattern (increase/decrease) within 1 year after the initial negative prostate biopsy.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was detected in 100 (23.8%) of the 421 patients at the second prostate biopsy. In patients with a PSA decrease at the first follow-up, prostate volume and number of increases in the PSA level from the initial prostate biopsy were predictors for prostate cancer diagnosis at the second prostate biopsy. In patients with a steady PSA increase after the initial prostate biopsy, prostate volume and number of biopsy cores were predictors for prostate cancer diagnosis at the second prostate biopsy.

CONCLUSION

The indications for a second prostate biopsy are a low prostate volume and a high number of increases in the PSA level among patients with a PSA decrease at the first follow-up and a low prostate volume and a high number of biopsy cores among patients with a PSA increase at the first follow-up.