Advances in optical biopsy for cancer diagnosis

Methods for bladder cancer diagnosis - The role of autofluorescence and photodynamic diagnosis

Bladder cancer is one of the most common Genito-urinary malignant tumors in humans. Improved diagnostic and therapeutic methods that aim to reduce rates of recurrence and progression of bladder cancer are needed. In current publications, one can find information on such methods as Raman spectroscopy, ultraviolet autofluorescence microscopy, confocal laser endoscopy, photoacoustic imaging, molecular imaging, multi-photon microscopy and many other new diagnostic techniques. These methods do not show significant adverse effects and are procedures well tolerated by patients as they use mostly physical phenomena that are neutral towards the human body. This review highlights the techniques of autofluorescence (AF) or laser induced fluorescence (LIF) and photodynamic diagnostics (PDD) which have been widely clinically studied for many years as a complement to cystoscopy. These methods can be performed during standard cystoscopy and they can be used in routine practice. This review shows that Autofluorescent and Photodynamic diagnostics are effective and have great potential in enhancing the diagnosis of bladder cancer. However, more research should be performed to help realize their full potential.

5-aminolevulinic-acid-based fluorescence spectroscopy and conventional colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical pre-malignancy

Background

Sensitized fluorescence diagnostics are based on selective accumulation of photosensitizer in the tissue where carcinogenesis has started. The present study compared topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-based fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) in vivo with conventional colposcopy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection.

Methods

We enrolled 48 patients who were referred for colposcopy because of high-grade changes in cervical cytology. Every inspected cervix was divided in to quadrants, and there were 174 quadrants included in the study. Each patient had a cytological smear, colposcopy, FS and histopathological analysis. For FS, 3% 5-ALA cream was used topically and after an average 135 min incubation, fluorescence spectra were recorded from the cervix in vivo. FS and colposcopy results were correlated with histopathology.

Results

All spectra were evaluated by a ratio of the protoporphyrin IX fluorescence intensity at 634 nm and autofluorescence intensity at 510 nm. For proper grouping of low-risk and high-risk cases, a threshold of 3.87 was calculated. Data per quadrant showed that FS had higher sensitivity than colposcopy (71.7% vs 67.4%) but specificity was greater for colposcopy (86.6% vs 75.6%). Combination of the methods showed higher sensitivity (88.0% vs 67.4%) but reduced specificity (88.0% and 69.5%), but it had the highest number of correctly identified high-risk changes and the highest (79.3%) accuracy. Data for each patient showed FS sensitivity of 91.2%, which was greater than for colposcopy (88.2%). Higher overdiagnosis resulted in decreased specificity for fluorescence methodology—71.4% versus 78.6% for colposcopy. In both cases, accuracy was 85.4% and effectiveness was >80%, which means that both methods can be used to determine high-risk cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The diagnostic sensitivity of 97.1% for this complementary diagnosis indicates that it could be the best choice for detection of high-risk changes.

Conclusions

5-ALA-based FS is an objective method, requiring short-term administration for appropriate fluorescence measurements. FS is a promising diagnostic tool with similar accuracy as colposcopy but with the potential advantage of providing objective results.