Agents for change: nonphysician medical providers and health care quality

Advanced practice nurses' experiences of patient safety: a focus group study

BACKGROUND

Patient harm from unsafe care is an increasingly global phenomenon leading to death or disability. Drawing on their expertise, Advanced Practice Nurses provide the opportunity to improve care quality and safety.

AIM

To explore Nurse Practitioners and Clinical Nurse Consultants' experiences in patient safety.

DESIGN

A qualitative design was used involving six audio-visually recorded focus group interviews. Participants working in an acute or community adult nursing speciality were involved.

METHODS

Twenty-eight Advanced Practice Nurses (female 82.1%, mean age 47.5 ± 10 years) were recruited by convenience and snowball sampling. After transcription of interview data, qualitative content analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Six categories were identified: patient safety as the highest priority (1), special contribution to patient safety (2), patients/relatives role in safety (3), multidisciplinary team approach (4), government regulation in safety (5), and further needs to improve safety (6). Advanced Practice Nurses saw themselves as role models and leaders for other healthcare staff through their expertise and professional experience and thus able to see the bigger picture in health. They identified as change agents at the system-level due to their decision-making ability and multi-professional team connectivity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasises the key position of extended nursing roles and the need for future development of patient safety strategies in hospitals and community care. As influential leaders, Advanced Practice Nurses are best placed to identify improvements. They play a central role in guiding the multi-professional team, the patient and their family, educating nursing staff, and identifying and addressing system-wide safety gaps to improve patient safety.

Results of the 2020 Survey of the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

An annual survey of chief residents in accredited North American radiology programs is conducted by the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A³CR²). The purpose of this study is to summarize the 2020 A³CR² chief resident survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was distributed to chief residents from 194 Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited radiology residencies. Questions were designed to gather information about residency program practices, benefits, fellowship or advanced interventional radiology (IR) training choices, and the integration of IR training. Subsets of questions focused on the perception of corporatization, non-physician providers (NPPs), and artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology and their relationship to the radiology job market.

RESULTS

174 individual responses from 94 programs were provided, yielding a 48 % program response rate. Extended emergency department coverage has steadily decreased over the last 5 years (2016-2020), however only 52 % of programs have independent overnight call (without attending coverage). Regarding the impact of new integrated IR residencies on training, 42 % indicated there was no appreciable impact on their DR or IR training, while 20 % indicated DR training for IR residents suffered and 19 % indicated IR training for DR residents suffered. Corporatization in radiology was perceived as the biggest potential threat to the future job market.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of IR residency did not detrimentally affect DR or IR training in most programs. Radiology resident perception of corporatization, NPPs, and AI may help residency programs shape educational content.

Shared decision-making among non-physician healthcare professionals: Enhancing patient involvement in women's reproductive health in community healthcare settings

OBJECTIVE

Shared decision-making (SDM) is an important approach to patient-centered care in women's reproductive healthcare. This study explored SDM experiences and perceptions among non-physician healthcare professionals.

METHODS

We completed 20 key-informant interviews with non-physician healthcare professionals (i.e., NP, RN, CNM, doula, pharmacist, chiropractor) living in Indiana (September 2019-May 2020) who provided community-based women's reproductive healthcare. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using an expanded grounded theory framework. Constant comparative analysis identified emergent themes.

RESULTS

Professionals noted community-based healthcare required contextualized decision-making approaches. Results identified listening, decisional ownership, and engagement strategies that enhanced SDM involvement. Findings suggested outcome-oriented SDM concepts, including decisional ownership and investigative listening to enhance SDM. Providers redefined 'challenging' patients as engaged in their healthcare and discussed ways SDM improved healthcare experience beyond one visit.

CONCLUSION

Findings offered insight into actionable and practical strategies for enhancing SDM in community-based women's reproductive healthcare. The findings offer strategies to improve SDM by addressing barriers and facilitators among professionals. This extends SDM beyond the patient-physician dyad and supports broader application of SDM.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Incorporating professionals' experiences into SDM concepts can enhance SDM in community-based women's healthcare practice, offering opportunities to support a culture of SDM across settings.

A National Survey of Quality Improvement Education in Physician Assistant Programs

PURPOSE

Quality improvement (QI) is emerging as a leadership and career track for physician assistants (PAs). Information on how PA programs teach QI is sparse. This study aimed to define how PA programs are providing education in QI through a national program survey.

METHODS

Curriculum survey questions were deployed as a part of the 2014-2015 Physician Assistant Education Association program survey. Questions were grouped into 4 categories: QI champion, pedagogy, integration strategy, and curriculum content. Differences between groups were analyzed, and logistic regression models were built to explore associations.

RESULTS

All 194 (100%) PA programs responded to the survey. There were 137 (70.6%) programs that were teaching QI. The median number of total instructional hours was 12 (interquartile range = 16, overall range = 109). There were 37 (27%) programs that were categorized as having a "mature curriculum." Mature curricula were significantly associated with a QI champion who is an expert from an outside department/institution (odds ratio [OR], 5.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-22.33) and with programs that have a QI capstone or thesis project (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.14-11.72) whose educational hours correlated more with experiential learning (r = 0.51, P < .01), small group sessions (r = 0.42, P = .01), and web-based modules (r = 0.36, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Quality improvement is an important skill set for PAs, but nearly one-third of PA programs do not have a QI curriculum. Mature curricula were associated with more experiential learning and project-based learning (including capstone/thesis). This study captured many elements of QI education for PAs, which can be used by programs to develop and improve their curricula.

Direct Engagement With Communities and Interprofessional Learning to Factor Culture Into End-of-Life Health Care Delivery

Aging patients with advanced or terminal illnesses or at the end of their lives become highly vulnerable when their cultural needs-in terms of ethnic habits, religious beliefs, and language-are unmet. Cultural diversity should be taken into account during palliative care delivery (i.e., noncurative, supportive care during advanced illness or at the end of life). Providers and systems deliver disparate palliative care to diverse patients. I present 2 strategies to improve how culturally diverse populations are served during advanced illness: (1) health service provider assessment of local populations to understand service populations' cultural needs and guide services and policy; and (2) interprofessional education to improve multicultural understanding among the health care workforce.