Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection

Expanding the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplants Through Detection of Donor-Derived DNA in Urine: Proof-of-Concept Study

Background

Approximately 10%-20% of kidney transplant (KT) recipients suffer from acute rejection (AR); thus, sensitive and accurate monitoring of allograft status is recommended. We evaluated the clinical utility of donor-derived DNA (dd-DNA) detection in the urine of KT recipients as a non-invasive means for diagnosing AR.

Methods

Urine samples serially collected from 39 KT recipients were tested for 39 single-nucleotide variant loci selected according to technical criteria (i.e., high minor allele frequency and low analytical error) using next-generation sequencing. The fraction of dd-DNA was calculated and normalized by the urine creatinine (UCr) level (%dd-DNA/UCr). The diagnostic performance of %dd-DNA/UCr for AR was assessed by ROC curve analysis.

Results

There was an increasing trend of %dd-DNA/UCr in the AR group before subsequent graft injury, which occurred before (median of 52 days) histological rejection. The serum creatinine (SCr) level differed significantly between the AR and non-AR groups at two and four months of follow-up, whereas %dd-DNA/UCr differed between the groups at six months of follow-up. The combination of %dd-DNA/UCr, SCr, and spot urine protein (UPtn)/UCr showed high discriminating power, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.00) and a high negative predictive value of 100.0%.

Conclusions

Although the dd-DNA-based test cannot eliminate the need for biopsy, the high negative predictive value of this marker could increase the prebiopsy probability of detecting treatable injury to make biopsy an even more effective diagnostic tool.

Evaluation of Early Renal Allograft Dysfunction from Living Donors among Egyptian Patients (Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Study)

BACKGROUND: Early renal graft dysfunction is a major problem in the early post-transplantation period and is considered a major cause of graft loss. Clinical diagnosis based on the clinical criteria alone is unreliable; therefore, biopsy remains the gold standard to differentiate between rejection and non-rejection causes. AIM: This study was designed to identify and differentiate between causes of early graft dysfunction during the first post-transplantation month and to correlate between histological lesions and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for accurate diagnosis and a better outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 163 renal allograft biopsies, performed in the first post-transplantation month over 6 years, were included in the study. New sections were prepared from the paraffin blocks and stained with conventional stains. Additional sections were prepared and treated by complement fragment 4d (C4d) and cluster differentiation 3 (CD3) antibodies for IHC evaluation. RESULTS: All the studied cases were from living donors. The mean patient age was 39 years with predominant males. The clinical indication for most biopsies (94.5%) was impaired graft function. Acute rejection (AR) was the main diagnostic category observed in (98/163, 60.1%); out of which, T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) was observed in (62/98, 63.2%). Drug toxicity was suspected in (53/163, 32.5%), acute tubular injury (ATI) not otherwise specified (nos) in (21/163, 12.9%), and other lesions including thrombotic microangiopathy were observed in the remaining biopsies. The most common cause of graft dysfunction in the 1st and 2nd weeks was AR representing. A significant correlation was seen between mild glomerulitis (g1) and mild peritubular capillaritis (PTC) 1, on the one side, and negative C4d staining, on the other side. No significant correlation was seen between moderate glomerulitis (g2) and moderate ptc2 at one side and positive C4d staining at the other side reflecting the poor association between the microvascular inflammation (“g” and “ptc” scores) and C4d positivity (r = 0.2). Missed mild tubulitis (t1) was found in a single case and missed moderate tubulitis (t2) was found in a single case detected by CD3 IHC. CONCLUSION: AR and drug toxicity account for the majority of early graft dysfunction, however, other pathological lesions, per se or coincide with them may be the cause. The significance of g2 per se as a marker for diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection requires further study. Considering C4d score 1 (by IHC) positive; also requires further study with follow-up.

The Spectrum of Histopathological Changes in the Renal Allograft - a 12 Months Protocol Biopsy Study

INTRODUCTION

Renal transplantation became a routine and successful medical treatment for Chronic Kidney Disease in the last 30 years all over the world. Introduction of Luminex based Single Antigen Beads (SAB) and recent BANFF consensus of histopathological phenotypes of different forms of rejection enables more precise diagnosis and changes the therapeutic approach. The graft biopsies, protocol or cause, indicated, remain a golden diagnostic tool for clinical follow up of kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

AIM

The study aimed to analyse the histopathological changes in renal grafts 12 months after the surgery in KTR with satisfactory kidney function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 12-month protocol biopsy study was performed in a cohort of 50 Kidney transplant recipients (42 from living and 8 from deceased donors). Usual work-up for suitable donors and recipients, standard surgical procedure, basic principles of peri and postoperative care and follow up were done in all KTR. Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including induction with Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or Interleukin-2R antagonist (IL-2R), and triple drug maintenance therapy with Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI), Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and Steroids were prescribed to all pts. Different forms of Glomerulonephritis (16), Hypertension (10), End Stage Renal Disease (13), Hereditary Nephropathies (6), Diabetes (3) and Vesicoureteral Reflux (2) were the underlying diseases. All biopsies were performed under ultrasound guidance. The 16 gauge needles with automated "gun" were used to take 2 cores of tissue. The samples were stained with HE, PAS, Trichrome Masson and Silver and reviewed by the same pathologist. A revised and uploaded BANFF 2013 classification in 6 categories (Cat) was used.

RESULTS

Out of 48 biopsies, 15 (31%) were considered as normal, 4 (8%), Borderline (BL-Cat 3), 5 (10%) as Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy (IF/TA-Cat 5), 5 (10%) were classified as non-immunological (Cat 6), 2 as a pure antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR-Cat 2) and T-cell Mediated Rejection (TCMR-Cat 4). The remaining 17 samples were classified as a "mixed" rejection: 7 (41%) ABMR + IF/TA, 5 (29%) ABMR + BL + IF/TA, 2 (11%) BL + IF/TA, 1 (5%) ABMR + BL, 1 (5%) ABMR + TCMR and 1 (5%) TCMR + IF/TA. The mean serum creatinine at the time of the biopsy was 126.7 ± 23.4 µmol/L, while GFR-MDRD 63.4 ± 20.7 ml/min, which means that the majority of the findings were subclinical. Among the non-immunological histological findings (Cat 6), 3 cases belonged to CNI toxicity, 1 to BK nephropathy and 1 to recurrence of the primary disease.

CONCLUSION

Our 12-month protocol biopsy study revealed the presence of different forms of mixed subclinical rejection. Use of recent BANFF classification and scoring system enables more precise diagnosis and subsequently different approach to the further treatment of the KTR. More correlative long-term studies including Anti HLA antibodies and Endothelial Cell Activation- Associated Transcripts (ENDAT) are needed.