Definitive Management of Open Tibia Fractures Using Limb Reconstruction System

Clinical outcomes of bone transport using rail fixator in the treatment of femoral nonunion or bone defect caused by infection

Purpose

The rail fixator can improve the treatment outcome and provide good stability in patients with femoral bone transport. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of bone transport using the Ilizarov technique by rail fixator in the treatment of femoral nonunion or bone defects caused by infection.

Methods

Clinical feature and treatment outcomes of 32 consecutive adult patients with femoral nonunion or bone defect caused by infection from January 2012 to January 2019 at a minimum of 2 years of follow-ups were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected on participants' demographic details. All difficulties related to bone transport were documented according to Paley's classification. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using ASAMI criteria at the last clinical visit.

Results

All 32 patients with an average follow-up of 33.5 months. There were 17 problems, 21 obstacles, and 8 complications, and the complication rate per patient was 1.4. The main complications were pin-site infection (53.1%), axial deviation (21.9%), joint stiffness (18.8%), the delayed union of the docking site (18.8%), soft tissue incarceration(15.6%), delayed consolidation(6.3%), malunion(6.3%), and refracture (3.1%). All the patients achieved bone union, and no recurrence of infection was observed. The excellent and good rates of ASAMI bone and functional results were 87.5% and 81.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

Bone transport using the Ilizarov technique is an effective method for the treatment of femoral nonunion or bone defect caused by infection, and rail fixators have obtained satisfactory results in terms of bone and functional results.

The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The overall objective of this study was to determine the patient-level socioeconomic impact resulting from orthopaedic trauma in the available literature. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in December 2019. Studies were eligible for inclusion if more than 75% of the study population sustained an appendicular fracture due to an acute trauma, the mean age was 18 through 65 years, and the study included a socioeconomic outcome, defined as a measure of income, employment status, or educational status. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Pooled estimates of the socioeconomic outcome measures were calculated using random-effects models with inverse variance weighting. Two-hundred-five studies met the eligibility criteria. These studies utilized five different socioeconomic outcomes, including return to work (n = 119), absenteeism days from work (n = 104), productivity loss (n = 11), income loss (n = 11), and new unemployment (n = 10). Pooled estimates for return to work remained relatively consistent across the 6-, 12-, and 24-month timepoint estimates of 58.7%, 67.7%, and 60.9%, respectively. The pooled estimate for mean days absent from work was 102.3 days (95% CI: 94.8-109.8). Thirteen-percent had lost employment at one-year post-injury (95% CI: 4.8-30.7). Tremendous heterogeneity (I2>89%) was observed for all pooled socioeconomic outcomes. These results suggest that orthopaedic injury can have a substantial impact on the patient's socioeconomic well-being, which may negatively affect a person's psychological wellbeing and happiness. However, socioeconomic recovery following injury can be very nuanced, and using only a single socioeconomic outcome yields inherent bias. Informative and accurate socioeconomic outcome assessment requires a multifaceted approach and further standardization.

Functional and radiological outcome in management of compound tibia diaphyseal fracture with AO monolateral fixator versus Limb reconstruction system

Introduction

Tibia being the most common fractured long bone represents 36.7% of all long bone fractures in adults with open fracture comprises 23.5% of all tibial shaft fracture. The lack of the muscular covering over anteromedial aspect of the tibia and poor blood supply predispose open tibial fractures to a 10-20 fold increased risk of developing infection than open fracture in any other anatomical areas and a nonunion rate as high as 28% has been reported in the literature.

Methods

We did a prospective study at our institute from 2014-2016 comprising 40 patients with compound tibia diaphyseal fracture managed with AO monolateral external fixator (Group 1) (n = 20) and Limb reconstruction system (Group 2) (n = 20) as primary and definitive tool. Final assessment for bone results and functional results were done using ASAMI (Association of the study and application of the method of Ilizarov) score.

Results

In our study bony outcome by ASAMI score shows 6 (30%) patients had Excellent, 5 (25%) patients had Good and 9 (45%) had Poor bony outcome from Group I. In group II, 12 (60%) patients had Excellent, 4 (20%) patients had Good, 2 (10%) patients had Fair, and 2 (10%) had Poor bony outcome. The functional outcome by ASAMI score shows 3 (15%) patients had Excellent, 8 (40%) patients had Good, 5 (25%) patients had Fair, 3 (15%) had Poor bony outcome from Group I. In group II, 9 (45%) patients had Excellent, 7 (35%) patients had Good, 2 (10%) patients had Fair, and 2 (10%) had Poor functional outcome.

Conclusion

Limb reconstruction system (LRS) offers several advantage over AO monolateral external fixator such as ease of application, versatility, stronger fixation, less fixator related complications, early weight bearing and early bony union for management of compound tibia diaphyseal fracture as primary and definitive tool.