1
|
Chen D, Wang J, Liu H, Xu T, Qiao J, Liu Q, Tan Y, Li Z, Cui L, Yang S. Coagulation Status in Women with a History of Missed Abortion. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:480-487. [PMID: 37737973 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01355-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study assess the status of coagulation function in a large series of reproductive-age women with a history of missed abortion in China. Likewise, we want to explore the association between coagulation and missed abortions, in order to evaluate whether they could be used as early predictive factors for missed abortions. A total of 11,182 women who suffered from missed abortion from Peking University Third Hospital and 5298 healthy age-matched reproductive-age women were enrolled in our study. Coagulation function tests (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time), fibrinolysis status detection (fibrinogen, D-Dimer), anticoagulation function tests (protein C, protein S and antithrombin III), and lupus anticoagulants (LAC) were examined. In addition, platelet counts were detected by automated hematology analyzer. Platelet aggregation (PAgT) was tested by light transmission aggregometry (LTA). Compared with healthy reproductive-age women, the level of D-Dimer, dRVVT-R, PC, PAgT, and platelet count was higher, and the antithrombin III (AT-III) activity was lower in women with a history of missed abortion. (P < 0.05). A total of 13.1% patients with a history of missed abortion were positive for LAC, and platelet aggregation rates were increased in 47.4% patients. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that D-Dimer, dRVVT-R, AT-III, PC, and PAgT had significant predictive value for missed abortion. In addition, a model based on coagulation function tests for predicting missed abortion was developed. These findings provide evidence of hypercoagulability in patients with a history of missed abortion. Lupus anticoagulant, PAgT, and D-Dimer were the strongest predictors of missed abortion.was to.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dandan Chen
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China
| | - Junxiong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Hongchao Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Tong Xu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Jiao Qiao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Yuan Tan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Zijing Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Liyan Cui
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
| | - Shuo Yang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clinical Efficacy and Safety Study of Mifepristone with Misoprostol Treatment in Patients with Missed Abortion. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2021; 2021:9983023. [PMID: 34621327 PMCID: PMC8492277 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9983023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Currently, medication abortion is widely used in clinical practice in China. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mifepristone with misoprostol treatment on the efficacy of patients with missed abortion (MA) and the safety of this drug regimen. 95 patients with MA treated in our hospital from February 2019 to April 2021 were collected as the subjects of this study, and the patients were divided into the control and the research groups according to different treatment modalities. Among them, 46 cases in the control group were treated by diethylstilbestrol combined with oxytocin and 49 cases in the research group were treated by mifepristone combined with misoprostol, and both groups underwent curettage after medication. The rates of complete abortion, time of embryo expulsion, time of operation, intraoperative bleeding, time of postoperative vaginal bleeding, amount of vaginal bleeding, rate of one-time curettage, the levels of serum estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), β-chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and interleukin-18 (IL-18), and the incidence of adverse effects in the two groups were examined and compared. Alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine (Scr) were used as indicators to evaluate the safety of the drug. The results showed that the rates of complete abortion and one-time curettage were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group, while the time of embryo expulsion, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative vaginal bleeding time, and vaginal bleeding were significantly lower than in the control group. The serum E2, P, and β-hCG levels before curettage in both groups were significantly higher, and IL-18 levels were significantly lower than those at the time of admission, with E2, P, and β-hCG levels increasing more and IL-18 levels decreasing more in the research group. After drug treatment, no abnormal changes in liver and kidney functions were observed in both groups, and the incidence of adverse reactions was at a similar and lower level in both groups. This shows that mifepristone with misoprostol is a safer and more effective drug regimen for the treatment of MA, which can regulate the levels of serum sex hormones and inflammatory factors in the body, promote the shedding of placental tissue, and create conditions for improving the rate of curettage.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghosh J, Papadopoulou A, Devall AJ, Jeffery HC, Beeson LE, Do V, Price MJ, Tobias A, Tunçalp Ö, Lavelanet A, Gülmezoglu AM, Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 6:CD012602. [PMID: 34061352 PMCID: PMC8168449 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012602.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Miscarriage, defined as the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before 24 weeks' gestation, is common with approximately 25% of women experiencing a miscarriage in their lifetime. An estimated 15% of pregnancies end in miscarriage. Miscarriage can lead to serious morbidity, including haemorrhage, infection, and even death, particularly in settings without adequate healthcare provision. Early miscarriages occur during the first 14 weeks of pregnancy, and can be managed expectantly, medically or surgically. However, there is uncertainty about the relative effectiveness and risks of each option. OBJECTIVES To estimate the relative effectiveness and safety profiles for the different management methods for early miscarriage, and to provide rankings of the available methods according to their effectiveness, safety, and side-effect profile using a network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (9 February 2021), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (12 February 2021), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness or safety of methods for miscarriage management. Early miscarriage was defined as less than or equal to 14 weeks of gestation, and included missed and incomplete miscarriage. Management of late miscarriages after 14 weeks of gestation (often referred to as intrauterine fetal deaths) was not eligible for inclusion in the review. Cluster- and quasi-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion. Randomised trials published only as abstracts were eligible if sufficient information could be retrieved. We excluded non-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least three review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We estimated the relative effects and rankings for the primary outcomes of complete miscarriage and composite outcome of death or serious complications. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Relative effects for the primary outcomes are reported subgrouped by the type of miscarriage (incomplete and missed miscarriage). We also performed pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analysis to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available methods. MAIN RESULTS Our network meta-analysis included 78 randomised trials involving 17,795 women from 37 countries. Most trials (71/78) were conducted in hospital settings and included women with missed or incomplete miscarriage. Across 158 trial arms, the following methods were used: 51 trial arms (33%) used misoprostol; 50 (32%) used suction aspiration; 26 (16%) used expectant management or placebo; 17 (11%) used dilatation and curettage; 11 (6%) used mifepristone plus misoprostol; and three (2%) used suction aspiration plus cervical preparation. Of these 78 studies, 71 (90%) contributed data in a usable form for meta-analysis. Complete miscarriage Based on the relative effects from the network meta-analysis of 59 trials (12,591 women), we found that five methods may be more effective than expectant management or placebo for achieving a complete miscarriage: · suction aspiration after cervical preparation (risk ratio (RR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41 to 3.20, low-certainty evidence), · dilatation and curettage (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.75, low-certainty evidence), · suction aspiration (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.62, low-certainty evidence), · mifepristone plus misoprostol (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.66, moderate-certainty evidence), · misoprostol (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.46, low-certainty evidence). The highest ranked surgical method was suction aspiration after cervical preparation. The highest ranked non-surgical treatment was mifepristone plus misoprostol. All surgical methods were ranked higher than medical methods, which in turn ranked above expectant management or placebo. Composite outcome of death and serious complications Based on the relative effects from the network meta-analysis of 35 trials (8161 women), we found that four methods with available data were compatible with a wide range of treatment effects compared with expectant management or placebo: · dilatation and curettage (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.06, low-certainty evidence), · suction aspiration (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.32, low-certainty evidence), · misoprostol (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.15, low-certainty evidence), · mifepristone plus misoprostol (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.84, low-certainty evidence). Importantly, no deaths were reported in these studies, thus this composite outcome was entirely composed of serious complications, including blood transfusions, uterine perforations, hysterectomies, and intensive care unit admissions. Expectant management and placebo ranked the lowest when compared with alternative treatment interventions. Subgroup analyses by type of miscarriage (missed or incomplete) agreed with the overall analysis in that surgical methods were the most effective treatment, followed by medical methods and then expectant management or placebo, but there are possible subgroup differences in the effectiveness of the available methods. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on relative effects from the network meta-analysis, all surgical and medical methods for managing a miscarriage may be more effective than expectant management or placebo. Surgical methods were ranked highest for managing a miscarriage, followed by medical methods, which in turn ranked above expectant management or placebo. Expectant management or placebo had the highest chance of serious complications, including the need for unplanned or emergency surgery. A subgroup analysis showed that surgical and medical methods may be more beneficial in women with missed miscarriage compared to women with incomplete miscarriage. Since type of miscarriage (missed and incomplete) appears to be a source of inconsistency and heterogeneity within these data, we acknowledge that the main network meta-analysis may be unreliable. However, we plan to explore this further in future updates and consider the primary analysis as separate networks for missed and incomplete miscarriage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay Ghosh
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Argyro Papadopoulou
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adam J Devall
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hannah C Jeffery
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Leanne E Beeson
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vivian Do
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Malcolm J Price
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Aurelio Tobias
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Antonella Lavelanet
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ioannis D Gallos
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Souizi B, Akrami R, Borzoee F, Sahebkar M. Comparison of the efficacy of sublingual, oral, and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the medical treatment of missed abortion during first trimester of pregnancy: A randomized clinical trial study. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020; 25:72. [PMID: 33088309 PMCID: PMC7554523 DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_393_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Background: This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of different routes of misoprostol administration, including sublingual, oral, and vaginal, on the induction of medical abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. Materials and Methods: This open-label, randomized clinical trial study was performed on 172 individuals in three parallel groups of vaginal, sublingual, and oral administration of misoprostol. The participants were randomized using permuted blocks of six. A dose of 600 μg of misoprostol every 6 h (maximum of 4 doses) was administrated to each group. Higham chart and demographic questionnaires were completed by the investigator. Data were analyzed using Stata software version 12. Results: The mean age of the participants was 29.81 ± 6.7 years, and the mean gestational age was 8.45 ± 2.32 weeks. We found a significant difference regarding the abortion success rate and the time interval between the administration of the drug among three groups (P = 0.036 and < 0.001 in turn). There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of severity and duration of vaginal bleeding until day 7 after induction (P = 0.091 and 0.143, respectively). Furthermore, we found statistically significant differences in some drugs, which induced side effects namely vomiting and headache, between the three groups (P = 0.032 and 0.028 in turn). Conclusion: The findings suggest that vaginal administration of misoprostol is more successful than the sublingual and oral route for complete abortion; vaginal administration of misoprostol is an appropriate alternative to curettage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behnaz Souizi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Rahim Akrami
- Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Fateme Borzoee
- Department of Operating Room, School of Paramedics, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Mohammad Sahebkar
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Misoprostol complications in second-trimester termination of pregnancy among women with a history of more than one cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2020; 63:323-329. [PMID: 32489977 PMCID: PMC7231932 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to investigate the complications due to misoprostol administration for second-trimester termination of pregnancy among women with history of 2 or more cesarean scarring. Methods The cohort of this retrospective study included 678 subjects who required second-trimester pregnancy termination, from 2013 to 2015 and treated with vaginal misoprostol of 100 to 400 µg. The subjects were divided into 3 groups based on their history of cesarean sections: without a history of cesarean section, with a history of one cesarean section, and with a history of more than one cesarean section and uterine scaring. Results The results showed that the success rate of misoprostol administration for pregnancy termination was 95.72%. The rate of bleeding as a complication was significantly higher in subjects with a history of more than one cesarean section than in other participants (risk ratio [RR], 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-4.0). The incidence of uterine rupture was higher in the group with a history of more than one cesarean section than in other groups. However, no significant difference was observed between the groups (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.27-7.6). There was a significant relationship between the need for other auxiliary treatments in the pregnancy termination and the history of uterine scarring (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.23-9.1). Conclusion The present study showed that pregnancy termination using smaller divided dose of misoprostol in patients with previous history of cesarean scarring may be associated with lower incidence of uterine rupture.
Collapse
|
6
|
van den Berg J, Hamel CC, Snijders MP, Coppus SF, Vandenbussche FP. Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:443. [PMID: 31775677 PMCID: PMC6880504 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2497-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early pregnancy failure (EPF) is a common complication of pregnancy. If women do not abort spontaneously, they will undergo medical or surgical treatment in order to remove the products of conception from the uterus. Curettage, although highly effective, is associated with a risk of complications; medical treatment with misoprostol is a safe and less expensive alternative. Unfortunately, after 1 week of expectant management in case of EPF, medical treatment with misoprostol has a complete evacuation rate of approximately 50%. Misoprostol treatment results may be improved by pre-treatment with mifepristone; its effectiveness has already been proven for other indications of pregnancy termination. This study will test the hypothesis that, in EPF, the sequential combination of mifepristone with misoprostol is superior to the use of misoprostol alone in terms of complete evacuation (primary outcome), patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs (secondary outcomes). METHODS The trial will be performed multi-centred, prospectively, two-armed, randomised, double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Women with confirmed EPF by ultrasonography (6-14 weeks), managed expectantly for at least 1 week, can be included and randomised to pre-treatment with oral mifepristone (600 mg) or oral placebo (identical in appearance). Randomisation will take place after receiving written consent to participate. In both arms pre-treatment will be followed by oral misoprostol, which will start 36-48 h later consisting of two doses 400 μg (4 hrs apart), repeated after 24 h if no tissue is lost. Four hundred sixty-four women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. Ultrasonography 2 weeks after treatment will determine short term treatment effect. When the gestational sac is expulsed, expectant management is advised until 6 weeks after treatment when the definitive primary endpoint, complete or incomplete evacuation, will be determined. A sonographic endometrial thickness < 15 mm using only the allocated therapy by randomisation is considered as successful treatment. Secondary outcome measures (patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs) will be registered using a case report form, patient diary and validated questionnaires (Short Form 36, EuroQol-VAS, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire). DISCUSSION This trial will answer the question if, in case of EPF, after at least 1 week of expectant management, sequential treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol is more effective than misoprostol alone to achieve complete evacuation of the products of conception. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov (d.d. 02-07-2017): NCT03212352. Trialregister.nl (d.d. 03-07-2017): NTR6550. EudraCT number (d.d. 07-08-2017): 2017-002694-19. File number Commisie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (d.d. 07-08-2017): NL 62449.091.17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce van den Berg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, GS 6500 The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte C. Hamel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, GS 6500 The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, GA 6525 The Netherlands
| | - Marcus P. Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, GS 6500 The Netherlands
| | - Sjors F. Coppus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, De Run 4600, Veldhoven, DB 5504 The Netherlands
| | - Frank P. Vandenbussche
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, GA 6525 The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harman Crowell EH, Crowell AM, Theiler RN. Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:309. [PMID: 31455215 PMCID: PMC6712846 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2454-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction of labor occurs in greater than 22% of all pregnancies in the United States. Previous studies have shown that misoprostol is more effective for induction than oxytocin or dinoprostone alone. The World Health Organization recommends vaginal misoprostol 25mcg every 6 hours and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends 25mcg vaginal misoprostol every three to 6 hours. Although route of administration and dosage of misoprostol has been extensively studied, little is known about the optimal dosing interval of vaginal misoprostol. METHODS The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of delayed vaginal misoprostol dosing, defined as any interval longer than 4.5 h, on time to vaginal delivery. Our hypothesis is that the routine dosing interval of 4 hours shortens times to vaginal delivery compared to delayed dosing, even when adjusted for the time of delay. Secondary objectives include the effect of delayed vaginal misoprostol dosing on cesarean section rate, operative vaginal delivery rate, maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 323 inductions of labor at one academic institution. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved a vaginal delivery within 24 h. The group who received all doses of misoprostol within a 4.5 h dosing window (Routine Dosing Interval Group) was compared with the group who had any dosing deviation (Delayed Dosing Interval Group). RESULTS Of 133 included patients, 64 subjects received routine interval dosing and 69 subjects received delayed interval dosing. The vaginal delivery rates within 24 h were 56% (36/64) and 20% (14/69), respectively (P < 10- 4). Spontaneous vaginal delivery rates were 86% (55/64) vs. 75% (52/69), respectively (P = .13). Kaplan Meier curves demonstrated statistically significant difference in time to vaginal delivery between groups, with a Cox Proportional Hazard ratio for routine dosing interval of 1.73 (P < 10- 5) unadjusted and 1.34 (P = .01) when adjusted for dosing delay. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study demonstrates a significant increase in delay-adjusted time to vaginal delivery when doses of vaginal misoprostol are delayed past 4.5 h.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Regan N. Theiler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Home-Based Extended Low-Dose Oral Misoprostol in Management of First-Trimester Pregnancy Loss in Low-Resource Communities: A Randomized Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2019; 69:501-508. [PMID: 31844364 DOI: 10.1007/s13224-019-01247-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a home-based extended low-dose oral misoprostol for management of first-trimester pregnancy loss. Materials and Methods A randomized trial that was conducted in the Woman's Health University Hospital and El-eman Maternity Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. One hundred and sixty patients were included. They were randomly assigned to receive four tablets of 200 μg misoprostol vaginally (max. 800 μg-hospital group) or 12 tablets orally, one every 3 h, over 2 consecutive days (max. 2400 μg-extended low-dose home group). For failed first dose, another similar second dose was given. Primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with 'medically completed miscarriages' in each group (including complete miscarriages + incomplete miscarriages with successful post-miscarriage misoprostol). Results The total number of patients with 'medically completed miscarriages' in home group was 65/79 (82.3%), which was comparable to the hospital group (52/71 or 73.2%) (P = 0.182). However, the majority of patients in home group had significantly successful miscarriages after a single course of low-dose oral misoprostol, experienced much less heavy bleeding attacks and had less systemic side effects. Conclusion In low-resource communities, the home-based extended low-dose oral misoprostol protocol proved high efficacy, safety and tolerability in management of first-trimester pregnancy loss.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lemmers M, Verschoor MAC, Kim BV, Hickey M, Vazquez JC, Mol BWJ, Neilson JP. Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 6:CD002253. [PMID: 31206170 PMCID: PMC6574399 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002253.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In most pregnancies that miscarry, arrest of embryonic or fetal development occurs some time (often weeks) before the miscarriage occurs. Ultrasound examination can reveal abnormal findings during this phase by demonstrating anembryonic pregnancies or embryonic or fetal death. Treatment has traditionally been surgical but medical treatments may be effective, safe, and acceptable, as may be waiting for spontaneous miscarriage. This is an update of a review first published in 2006. OBJECTIVES To assess, from clinical trials, the effectiveness and safety of different medical treatments for the termination of non-viable pregnancies. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (24 October 2018) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials comparing medical treatment with another treatment (e.g. surgical evacuation), or placebo, or no treatment for early pregnancy failure. Quasi-randomised studies were excluded. Cluster-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion, as were studies reported in abstract form, if sufficient information was available to assess eligibility. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS Forty-three studies (4966 women) were included. The main interventions examined were vaginal, sublingual, oral and buccal misoprostol, mifepristone and vaginal gemeprost. These were compared with surgical management, expectant management, placebo, or different types of medical interventions were compared with each other. The review includes a wide variety of different interventions which have been analysed across 23 different comparisons. Many of the comparisons consist of single studies. We limited the grading of the quality of evidence to two main comparisons: vaginal misoprostol versus placebo and vaginal misoprostol versus surgical evacuation of the uterus. Risk of bias varied widely among the included trials. The quality of the evidence varied between the different comparisons, but was mainly found to be very-low or low quality.Vaginal misoprostol versus placeboVaginal misoprostol may hasten miscarriage when compared with placebo: e.g. complete miscarriage (5 trials, 305 women, risk ratio (RR) 4.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.01 to 5.94; low-quality evidence). No trial reported on pelvic infection rate for this comparison. Vaginal misoprostol made little difference to rates of nausea (2 trials, 88 women, RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.43 to 4.40; low-quality evidence), diarrhoea (2 trials, 88 women, RR 2.21, 95% CI 0.35 to 14.06; low-quality evidence) or to whether women were satisfied with the acceptability of the method (1 trial, 32 women, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.64; low-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether vaginal misoprostol reduces blood loss (haemoglobin difference > 10 g/L) (1 trial, 50 women, RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.38 to 4.12; very-low quality) or pain (opiate use) (1 trial, 84 women, RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 101.11; very-low quality), because the quality of the evidence for these outcomes was found to be very low.Vaginal misoprostol versus surgical evacuation Vaginal misoprostol may be less effective in accomplishing a complete miscarriage compared to surgical management (6 trials, 943 women, average RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.50; Heterogeneity: Tau² = 0.03, I² = 46%; low-quality evidence) and may be associated with more nausea (1 trial, 154 women, RR 21.85, 95% CI 1.31 to 364.37; low-quality evidence) and diarrhoea (1 trial, 154 women, RR 40.85, 95% CI 2.52 to 662.57; low-quality evidence). There may be little or no difference between vaginal misoprostol and surgical evacuation for pelvic infection (1 trial, 618 women, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; low-quality evidence), blood loss (post-treatment haematocrit (%) (1 trial, 50 women, mean difference (MD) 1.40%, 95% CI -3.51 to 0.71; low-quality evidence), pain relief (1 trial, 154 women, RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.46; low-quality evidence) or women's satisfaction/acceptability of method (1 trial, 45 women, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.11; low-quality evidence).Other comparisonsBased on findings from a single trial, vaginal misoprostol was more effective at accomplishing complete miscarriage than expectant management (614 women, RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.45). There was little difference between vaginal misoprostol and sublingual misoprostol (5 trials, 513 women, average RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.16; Heterogeneity: Tau² = 0.10, I² = 871%; or between oral and vaginal misoprostol in terms of complete miscarriage at less than 13 weeks (4 trials, 418 women), average RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.03; Heterogeneity: Tau² = 0.13, I² = 90%). However, there was less abdominal pain with vaginal misoprostol in comparison to sublingual (3 trials, 392 women, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74). A single study (46 women) found mifepristone to be more effective than placebo: miscarriage complete by day five after treatment (46 women, RR 9.50, 95% CI 2.49 to 36.19). However the quality of this evidence is very low: there is a very serious risk of bias with signs of incomplete data and no proper intention-to-treat analysis in the included study; and serious imprecision with wide confidence intervals. Mifepristone did not appear to further hasten miscarriage when added to a misoprostol regimen (3 trials, 447 women, RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.47). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Available evidence from randomised trials suggests that medical treatment with vaginal misoprostol may be an acceptable alternative to surgical evacuation or expectant management. In general, side effects of medical treatment were minor, consisting mainly of nausea and diarrhoea. There were no major differences in effectiveness between different routes of administration. Treatment satisfaction was addressed in only a few studies, in which the majority of women were satisfied with the received intervention. Since the quality of evidence is low or very low for several comparisons, mainly because they included only one or two (small) trials; further research is necessary to assess the effectiveness, safety and side effects, optimal route of administration and dose of different medical treatments for early fetal death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marike Lemmers
- Academic Medical CenterDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyMeibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1105 AZ
| | - Marianne AC Verschoor
- Academic Medical CenterDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyMeibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1105 AZ
| | - Bobae Veronica Kim
- School of Medicine, The University of AdelaideRobinson Research InstituteAdelaideSAAustralia5006
| | - Martha Hickey
- The Royal Women's HospitalThe University of MelbourneLevel 7, Research PrecinctMelbourneVictoriaAustraliaParkville 3052
| | - Juan C Vazquez
- Instituto Nacional de Endocrinologia (INEN)Departamento de Salud ReproductivaZapata y DVedadoHabanaCuba10 400
| | - Ben Willem J Mol
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology246 Clayton RoadClaytonVictoriaAustralia3168
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mohammadi E, Jayaprakash G, Shiva A, Motallebzadeh N. Comparison of Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction of Vaginal Versus Oral Misoprostol in Treatment of Missed Miscarriage. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019; 7:955-958. [PMID: 30976339 PMCID: PMC6454167 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years' medical management with misoprostol is an effective alternative to surgical evacuation. But there is a dearth of evidence to reveal the effectiveness of the different routes of misoprostol and satisfaction rate among the patients treated with these routes. AIM This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and patient's satisfaction rate of vaginal versus oral misoprostol. METHODS It was a prospective non-interventional study. One hundred women of having missed abortion confirmed by ultrasonography examination were enrolled in the trial. Fifty-eight subjects were administered 200 mcg of oral and 42 subjects received 200 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every four hours up to four doses. If complete expulsion did not occur 12 hours after the last dose, the surgical evacuation was done. RESULTS There was no significant statistical difference between the effectiveness of treatment with vaginal (78.57%) and oral misoprostol (79.31%) (p = 0.928). The difference between Patients' satisfaction at the time of discharge for the vaginal group (64.29%) and oral group (65.52%) was not statistically significant (P = 0.991). There was an increase in patients' satisfaction for both groups at the follow-up session, but still, the difference was not significant (P = 0.897). CONCLUSION This study confirms that there is no statistical difference between the effectiveness and patient satisfaction of oral and vaginal misoprostol in the treatment of missed abortion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Geetha Jayaprakash
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, RR College of Pharmacy, Chikkabanavara, Bangalore, India
| | - Afshin Shiva
- Department of Pharmacy, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sun Y, Wang X, Li Y, Sun H, Wan L, Wang X, Zhang L, Fang Z, Wei Z. The decreased expression of TIPE2 protein in the decidua of patients with missed abortion and possible significance. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2017; 15:68. [PMID: 28851386 PMCID: PMC5576376 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-017-0285-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Missed abortion is a common occurrence for otherwise healthy women. Immunological factor is one of the most important reasons. Tumor necrosis factor-α-induced protein-8 like-2 (TIPE2) is a novel negative immune regulator related to several human diseases. However, the expression level and clinical significance of TIPE2 in missed abortion remain unclear. METHODS The expression of TIPE2 mRNA and protein in decidua and chorion from 36 missed abortion patients and 36 healthy controls was detected using quantitative real-time PCR, western blot and immunohistochemistry. In addition, serum TNF-ɑ and IL-10 levels were measured using flow cytometry. Serum estradiol and progesterone levels were measured by radioimmunoassay test. The correlations of TIPE2 protein levels with TNF-ɑ, IL-10, estradiol and progesterone were further analyzed. RESULTS TIPE2 protein levels were significantly lower in decidual tissues of missed abortion patients than those in healthy controls. The patients with missed abortion had significantly higher levels of serum TNF-ɑ, and lower levels of serum IL-10, estradiol and progesterone compared with healthy controls. The TIPE2 protein levels were positively related to serum IL-10 levels. CONCLUSION Our data indicate TIPE2 could play important roles in maintaining the maternal-fetal tolerance and decreased TIPE2 expression in the decidua may be related to the development of missed abortion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingshuo Sun
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Medical School, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong 250012 People’s Republic of China
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Yue Li
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Han Sun
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
- grid.415946.bDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Services, Linyi People’s Hospital, Linyi, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Lu Wan
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Xishuang Wang
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Lining Zhang
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhenghui Fang
- grid.452222.1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jinan Central Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, 105# Jiefang Road, Jinan, Shandong 250013 People’s Republic of China
| | - Zengtao Wei
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Medical School, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong 250012 People’s Republic of China
- 0000 0004 1761 1174grid.27255.37Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
- grid.452222.1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jinan Central Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, 105# Jiefang Road, Jinan, Shandong 250013 People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu HL, Marwah S, Wang P, Wang QM, Chen XW. Misoprostol for medical treatment of missed abortion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7:1664. [PMID: 28490770 PMCID: PMC5431938 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01892-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of misoprostol alone for missed abortion varied with different regimens. To evaluate existing evidence for the medical management of missed abortion using misoprostol, we undertook a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. The electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCOhost Online Research Databases, Springer Link, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Ovid Medline and Google Scholar. 18 studies of 1802 participants were included in our analysis. Compared with vaginal misoprostol of 800 ug or sublingual misoprostol of 600 ug, lower-dose regimens (200 ug or 400 ug) by any route of administration tend to be significantly less effective in producing abortion within about 24 hours. In terms of efficacy, the most effective treatment was sublingual misoprostol of 600 ug and the least effective was oral misoprostol of 400 ug. In terms of tolerability, vaginal misoprostol of 400 ug was reported with fewer side effects and sublingual misoprostol of 600 ug was reported with more side effects. Misoprostol is a non-invasive, effective medical method for completion of abortion in missed abortion. Sublingual misoprostol of 600 ug or vaginal misoprostol of 800 ug may be a good choice for the first dose. The ideal dose and medication interval of misoprostol however needs to be further researched.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang-Lin Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310008, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Sheeba Marwah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110029, India
| | - Pei Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310008, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qiu-Meng Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310008, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Wen Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310008, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|