Role of Gray Scale, Color Doppler and Spectral Doppler in Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Thyroid Nodules

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics of Parathyroid Gland Lesions

Background and Objectives: preoperative differentiation of enlarged parathyroid glands may be challenging in conventional B-mode ultrasound. The aim of our study was to analyse qualitative and quantitative characteristics of parathyroid gland lesions, using multiparametric ultrasound protocol—B-mode, Colour Doppler (CD), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)—and to evaluate correlation with morphology in patients with hyperparathyroidism (HPT). Materials and Methods: consecutive 75 patients with 88 parathyroid lesions and biochemically confirmed HPT prior to parathyroidectomy were enrolled in the prospective study. B-mode ultrasound, CD, and CEUS were performed with the subsequent qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acquired data. We used 1 mL or 2 mL of intravenous ultrasound contrast agent during the CEUS examination. Correlation with post-surgical morphology was evaluated. Results: seventy parathyroid adenomas were hypoechoic and well contoured with increased central echogenicity (44.3%), peripheral-central vascularization (47%), and polar feeding vessel (100%). Twelve hyperplasias presented with similar ultrasound appearance and were smaller in volume (p = 0.036). Hyperplasias had a tendency for homogenous, marked intense enhancement vs. peripherally enhanced adenomas with central wash-out in CEUS after quantitative analysis. No significant difference was observed in contrasting dynamics, regardless of contrast media volume use (1 mL vs. 2 mL). We achieved 90.9% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity, 93% positive predictive value (PPV), 87.3% negative predictive value (NPV), and 87.3% accuracy in the differentiation of parathyroid lesions prior to post-processing. In a quantitative lesion analysis, our sensitivity increased up to 98%, specificity 80%, PPV 98%, and NPV 80% with an accuracy of 96.4%. Conclusions: CEUS of parathyroid lesions shows potential in the differentiation of adenoma from hyperplasia, regardless of the amount of contrast media injected. The quantitative analysis improved the sensitivity and specificity of differentiation between parathyroid lesions. Hyperplasia was characterized by homogeneous enhancement, fast uptake, and homogeneous wash-out appearance; adenoma—by peripheral uptake, central wash-out, and reduced hemodynamics. The use of CEUS quantification methods are advised to improve the ultrasound diagnostic role in suspected parathyroid lesions.

The value of color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the value of color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on using color Doppler ultrasound, thyroid nodules, thyroid tumors, and Doppler ultrasound to diagnose the thyroid nodules. The outcome indicators in the articles had to include the numbers of true positives (TP), false positives (FP), false negatives (FN), and true negatives (TN). Subsequently, the Jadad tool was adopted to evaluate the quality of the included articles, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the experimental data.

RESULTS

A total of eight suitable articles were selected. The results showed that the estimated sensitivity and specificity of color Doppler ultrasound for the diagnostic of thyroid nodules were 0.46-0.89 and 0.00-1.00, respectively. The pooled estimate of sensitivity for the different articles was 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.89], and the pooled estimate of specificity was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.00-1.00). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) was 0.917, which was larger than 0.9, signifying high diagnostic accuracy. This suggests that color doppler ultrasound can realize the clinical diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

DISCUSSION

In summary, the results of this study could provide a clinical data for the promotion and application of color Doppler ultrasound in the clinical diagnosis of thyroid nodules, as well as further reliable data for follow-up clinical research on the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules.

Clinical applications of Doppler ultrasonography for thyroid disease: consensus statement by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology

Doppler ultrasonography (US) is widely used for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with thyroid cancer, and diffuse parenchymal disease, as well as for guidance in various US-guided procedures, including biopsy and ablation. However, controversies remain regarding the appropriate use and interpretation of Doppler US. Therefore, the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology organized a taskforce to develop a consensus statement on the clinical use of Doppler US for thyroid disease. The review and recommendations in this article are based on a comprehensive analysis of the current literature and the consensus of experts.

Differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules through a combination of multiple ultrasonography techniques: A decision-tree model

The present study aimed to establish a decision tree (DT) model by combining the parameters of conventional gray-scale ultrasonography (US), elastosonography (ES), color Doppler US (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules. A single-center, retrospective study of 321 thyroid nodules was conducted. For 222 nodules, parameters of conventional gray-scale US, CDUS, ES and CEUS were evaluated using univariate logistic regression. Factors for with P<0.10 were further assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Significant factors (P<0.05) were used to establish a DT. The diagnostic accuracy of this DT was then evaluated by its application to the other 99 nodules. After univariate logistic analysis, factors including gender, number of nodules and diffuse disease were excluded, due to P>0.10. The results of multivariate logistic analysis determined that the following factors were required for the DT: Extent of blood flow determined by CDUS (P=0.002), area ratio determined by ES (P=0.033), peak phase patterns determined by CEUS (P<0.001) and micro-calcification determined by conventional gray-scale US (P=0.015). When compared to the pathological or cytological results of 99 nodules, the resulting DT had a sensitivity of 98.6%, specificity of 80.1%, positive predictive value of 93.5% and negative predictive value of 95.5%. These results suggested that a DT combining conventional gray-scale US, ES, CDUS and CEUS may be helpful for differentiating between types of thyroid nodules.

Color Doppler ultrasonography diagnostic value in detection of malignant nodules in cysts with pathologically proven thyroid malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Today, the color Doppler ultrasonography is used to further evaluate suspected malignant tumors. This study investigates the malignant thyroid nodules using color Doppler.

METHODS

After extracting true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative among included studies, a quality was evaluated by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (with 95% confidence interval) were found using a random effect model. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) were used to assess relationship between sensitivity and specificity. The area under the curve of the SROC was calculated to estimate the performance of color Doppler ultrasound to distinguish malignant thyroid nodules. Our registration code in PROSPERO is CRD42018111198.

RESULTS

Of 1125 articles, 288 articles were selected for the further investigation. After excluding irrelevant and poor articles, 20 studies were included for the meta-analysis. According to a random effect model, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of color Doppler ultrasound to distinguish malignant thyroid nodules were estimated as 0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.83; [Formula: see text]) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.56-0.81; [Formula: see text]), respectively. The SROC curve consists of representing the paired results for sensitivity and specificity. According to SROC, AUC = 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.81) is between 0.75 and 0.92, so that color Doppler ultrasound has a good accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Color Doppler is a valuable non-invasive method for evaluating thyroid nodules, and it is a high-sensitivity diagnostic tool for assessing thyroid nodules. Resistive index > 0.75 and a pattern III or more in color Doppler predicts malignant with the confidence. Due to its precision, cost-efficiency, easy access, and non-invasive nature, color Doppler should be included in the standard clinical protocol for the decision-making period and the treatment evaluation.

A novel TIRADS of US classification

BACKGROUND

Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) is the assessment of a risk stratification of thyroid nodules, usually using a score. However, there is no consensus as to the version of TIRADS for reporting the results of thyroid ultrasound in clinic. The objective of this study is to develop a practical TIRADS with which to categorize thyroid nodules and stratify their malignant risk.

METHODS

A TIRADS scoring system was developed to provide more decision levels than standard scoring through the selection of the ultrasound features which include the calcification shape, margins, taller-than-wide, internal echo, blood flow quantization of features, setting of the weight, and calculation of the score. Ultimately, the accuracy of our TIRADS was evaluated by comparing with the results of current vision of TIRADS and thyroid radiologist in 153 patients who had US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

RESULTS

Classification results showed that the total accuracy reached 97% (100% of malignant and 95% of the benign) in 153 cases (benign:78, malignant:75). The percentages of malignancy is defined in our TIRADS were as follows: TIRADS 2 (0% malignancy), TIRADS 3 (3.6% malignancy), TIRADS 4 (17-75% malignancy), and TIRADS 5 (98% malignancy).

CONCLUSIONS

We established a novel TIRADS to predict the malignancy risk of the thyroid nodules based on six categories US features by a scoring system, which included a standardized vocabulary and score and a quantified risk assessment. The results showed that objective quantitative classification of thyroid nodules by our TIRADS can be useful in guiding management decisions.