Diagnostic Accuracy of B-mode USG and Doppler Scan for Ovarian Lesions

Application of O-RADS US combined with MV-Flow to diagnose ovarian-adnexal tumors

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the application of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US) combined with MV-Flow (Samsung Medison Co., Ltd.) to diagnose ovarian-adnexal masses.

METHODS

A total of 112 ovarian-adnexal masses (81 benign and 31 malignant) from 105 consecutive patients were analyzed. The O-RADS US and vascular index from MV-Flow (VIMV) were measured and compared with the reference standard. O-RADS US and MV-Flow were tested for consistency.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn for O-RADS US, MV-Flow, and their combination. The combined methods had the largest area under the curve (0.955), followed by O-RADS US (0.929) and MV-Flow (0.923). A mass was considered malignant when the O-RADS US classification was 5 and VIMV was ≥7.15. With this definition, MV-Flow had the highest sensitivity (87.10%), with consistent findings for the combined diagnostic methods and O-RADS US (83.87%). The specificity of the combined diagnostic methods (93.83%) was higher than that of MV-Flow (91.36%). O-RADS US had the lowest specificity (90.12%). The combined diagnostic methods had the highest coincidence rate (91.07%), and MV-Flow (90.18%) had a significantly higher coincidence rate than O-RADS US (88.39%). Both O-RADS US and MV-Flow showed good consistency among different physicians (former kappa, 0.974; latter intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.986). MV-Flow had a high consistency for the same physician (ICC, 1).

CONCLUSION

O-RADS US and MV-Flow exhibited good diagnostic efficacy, and their combined diagnostic efficacy was higher than that of each individually. O-RADS US and MV-Flow can improve the diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian-adnexal masses.

Additional value of Doppler ultrasound to B-mode ultrasound in assessing for uterine intracavitary pathologies among perimenopausal and postmenopausal bleeding women: a multicentre prospective observational study in Vietnam

PURPOSE

To determine the role of Doppler ultrasonography when combined with B-mode ultrasonography in diagnosing uterine intracavitary pathologies (UIPs) in perimenopausal and postmenopausal bleeding women.

METHODS

This multicentre prospective observational study included 150 women aged > 40 years with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), who were hospitalised at Hospital X and Hospital Y between June 2016 and June 2019. All participants underwent transvaginal B-mode ultrasound and transvaginal Doppler ultrasound, and the results of sonography were compared to histopathological endpoint.

RESULTS

The morphological features, structure, margin, border line of the endometrial-mass lesion, intracavitary uterine fluid, and Doppler signal clearly differed between benign and malignant intracavitary pathologies (p < 0.0001). However, echogenicity had a limited value in differentiating among UIPs (p = 0.1). The sensitivity and specificity of the pedicle sign in diagnosing endometrial polyps were 50.0% and 97.6%; for the circular pattern in endometrial fibroids were 46.2% and 100.0%; for the multiple vessel pattern in endometrial cancer were 64.0% and 96.0%; and for the scattered vessel pattern in endometrial hyperplasia were 43.96% and 56.43%, respectively. The additional value of Doppler ultrasound was greater than that of separate B-mode ultrasound in assessing UIPs in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

B-mode ultrasound used in combination with Doppler as a noninvasive tool was significantly valuable in the diagnostic procedures for UIPs in perimenopausal and postmenopausal bleeding women. Doppler ultrasound and B-mode transvaginal ultrasound should be used together routinely for discrimination between malignant diseases and benign endometrial changes. Further studies are needed to better understand the benefits of combining Doppler ultrasound and B-mode ultrasound in routine sonographic practice.