Clinico-Radiological Correlation of Subcoracoid Impingement with Reduced Coracohumeral Interval and its Relation to Subscapularis Tears in Indian Patients

Subscapularis tendon tear detection using axial internal rotation MRI: semiquantitative and quantitative analysis

Background

Magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the subscapularis tendon plays an important role in preoperative planning. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value and quantitative measurement of an additional internal rotation sequence in the detection of partial subscapularis tendon tears.

Methods

The study included 76 patients who underwent arthroscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) shoulder between January 2018 to December 2019. Three different sets of images were evaluated in each case to determine the diagnostic value in the detection of partial subscapularis tendon tears including Set 1: standard axial fat-suppressed proton density (PD/FS) image and sagittal fat-suppressed T2 weight image (T2W/FS) images, Set 2: standard axial PD/FS and internal rotation PD/FS images, and Set 3: standard axial PD/FS, sagittal T2W/FS and axial internal rotation PD/FS images. Subscapularis tendon tear was diagnosed by arthroscopy and patients with or without tears were grouped. The coracohumoral distance (CHD), coracoglenoid angle (CGA), coracohumeral angle (CHA), CHD difference and CHD ratio were evaluated and compared between groups using univariate and multivariate analysis. The interreader agreement was assessed. The cut-off point for the prediction of subscapularis tears was calculated.

Results

Twenty-nine shoulders revealed partial subscapularis tendon tears (29/76, 38.2%). Imaging Set 3 provided the highest sensitivity and accuracy {79-83% [confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.95], 75-76% (CI: 0.63-0.85)}, compared to image Set 2 [31-58% (CI: 0.15-0.76), 67-68% (CI: 0.55-0.79)] and Set 1 [17-21% (CI: 0.06-0.40], 61-66% (CI: 0.54-0.76)], and a moderate level of interobserver agreement (Kappa =0.55). Axial CHD [odd ratio (OR) =1.48, P=0.044], internal rotate CHD (OR =0.68, P=0.02), CHD difference (OR =2.58, P<0.001), and CHD ratio (OR =1.34, P<0.001) were associated with subscapularis tears. A CHD difference and CHD ratio of more than 0.04 mm and 1.01 achieved a 90% sensitivity and 72% specificity, both.

Conclusions

Internal rotation during MRI can increase diagnostic accuracy for subscapularis tendon partial tears. The CHD differences and CHD ratio are useful parameters to indicate subscapularis tears. This technique may improve preoperative management and reduce the consequences of delayed diagnosis and treatment.

Is it the subcoracoid impingement or the subacromial impingement that tears the subscapularis tendon? A comparison of the MRI findings of the operated and healthy shoulders of the patients

BACKGROUND

: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the etiological factors accepted as causes of idiopathic subscapularis tears are true or not when the comparison is made with the opposite side healthy shoulder of the patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for an isolated subscapularis tear.

METHODS

Sixteen patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between February 2016 and January 2018 and were diagnosed with isolated subscapularis tear were evaluated. The coracohumeral distance (CHDax), coracoid overlap (CO), and tuberculum minus cysts (TMC) were evaluated on the axial images of the MRI studies while the acromiohumeral distance (AHDsag), CHDsag, and subscapularis tendon slip number (STSN) on the sagittal oblique images and the AHDcor and SLAP lesion on the coronal oblique images. Degeneration of the coracoacromial ligament was evaluated during arthroscopy.

RESULTS

The mean CHDsag (11.26-10.08), CHDax (10.63-9.98), CO (14.2-15.43), AHDsag (8-7.66), and AHDcor (7.65-7.68) measurements (operated side-healthy side, respectively) were statistically similar (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between TMC and STSN in healthy and operated shoulders (p > 0.05). There was mild coracoacromial ligament fraying in 4 (25%) and obvious coracoacromial ligament fraying in 8 (50%) which indicated subacromial impingement in 75% of the patients.

DISCUSSION

The parameters of the coracoid process did not reveal any significant difference between the operated (for an isolated subscapularis tear) and opposite-side healthy shoulders of the patients. However, coracoacromial ligament degeneration was present in 75% of the patients.

Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?

Purpose

To study the effect of the coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid for causation of subscapularis tears and literature review for the need of coracoplasty.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 2013 to December 2017. The coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid in patients with arthroscopically diagnosed subscapularis tears (group A, n = 40) were compared with 2 control groups (group B, n = 38 [intact subscapularis with supraspinatus and infraspinatus cuff tears] and group C, n = 39 [intact rotator cuff]). Group A1 (n = 23) consisted of the isolated subscapularis and combined subscapularis + supraspinatus tears, and group A2 (n = 17) all the 3 rotator cuff tears. The measurements were made on preoperative axial magnetic resonance imaging. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the groups.

Results

The mean coracohumeral interval was 8.81 ± 2.69 mm in group A and 10.62 ± 2.21 and 10.39 ± 2.59 mm in control groups B and C, respectively; this difference was statistically significant (P = .002 and .01, respectively). The mean glenoid version in patients with subscapularis tears was -3.7°, whereas the mean version in patients with intact cuff was -3.4°, and this difference was not statistically significant (P = .74). The mean glenoid version was -4.69° ± 4.22° in group A1 and -3.28° ± 4.04° in group B, with no statistically significant difference (P = .07).

Conclusion

The coracohumeral interval was significantly decreased in patients with subscapularis tears. The glenoid was retroverted in the subscapularis group but was not statistically significant.

Radiological Variabilities in Subcoracoid Impingement: Coracoid Morphology, Coracohumeral Distance, Coracoglenoid Angle, and Coracohumeral Angle

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of coracoid morphology, coracohumeral distance, coracoglenoid angle, and coracohumeral angle variabilities on subcoracoid impingement development using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 200 patients (87 males with mean age of 51.1±15.2 years and 113 females with mean age of 52.6±10.7 years) undergoing shoulder MRI were included in this retrospective study. All MRI studies were performed with standard positioning. Coracoid morphology and subscapularis tendon were evaluated. Coracohumeral distance, coracoglenoid angle and coracohumeral angle were measured in all subjects. One-way ANOVA was used to assess the difference between the groups. For binary comparisons, Tukey post hoc analysis was done. Pearson correlation analysis was performed between variables. RESULTS Type C coracoid was more frequent in the tendinosis and tendon tear groups. There was a significant difference between type C coracoid and the other coracoid types for coracohumeral distance values (P=0.016). There was a statistically significant decrease in coracoglenoid angle values and coracohumeral distance in patients with subscapularis tendon pathologies (P=0.000). A statistically insignificant increase in coracohumeral angle values was found in the subscapularis tendon pathologies. There was a positive correlation between coracohumeral distance and coracoglenoid angle (R=0.749 P=0.000). There was a negative correlation between coracohumeral distance and coracohumeral angle (R=-0.668 P=0.000) and between coracoglenoid angle and coracohumeral angle (R=-0.605 P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS In subscapularis tendon pathologies, decrease in coracohumeral distance and coracoglenoid angle was observed. A new approach uses coracohumeral angle to evaluate subcoracoid impingement. A statistically insignificant increase in coracohumeral angle was noted.