Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion: To Treat or Not?

The Management of Acardiac Twinning: Twin Reverse Arterial Perfusion Sequence - An International Survey

INTRODUCTION

The optimal approach and therapy method for the acardiac twin with a reverse arterial perfusion sequence has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical practice patterns among international fetal therapy units in their management of these cases.

METHODS

A survey was sent to fetal centers across the world via email between December 2020 and December 2021.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 77% contacted centers. The most frequent ultrasound variables used in the evaluation of twin reverse arterial perfusion sequence include echocardiographic assessment of the pump twin and umbilical artery Doppler waveforms in the acardiac and pump twins, in 90% and 80% of the centers, respectively. Most centers in Europe and Latin America propose an in utero intervention in all cases. Most centers in Europe and Latin America prefer interstitial laser ablation, whereas radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is preferred in North America. The earliest gestational age for an intervention is on mean 13 weeks in Europe, which is earlier than the other geographic areas (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most centers agreed that antenatal evaluation should include echocardiography along with the UA Doppler waveform measurements, and the most frequently used interventions were interstitial laser ablation or RFA at a median between 14 and 26 weeks.

Twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence: A case report and a brief literature review

Twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence is rare in monochorionic twin pregnancies. TRAP sequence is distinct from other multifetal pregnancies in that one of the twins has normal anatomy while the other twin has a varied amount of characteristic abnormal features. In the literature, mortality is reported 100% in the abnormal twin. We report 1 case of TRAP sequence at our institution in which the diagnosis of TRAP sequence was missed in the first trimester at another hospital. The patient, a 33-year-old G1P0A0, did not have any follow-up after her first scan until the routine second-trimester ultrasound at our institution. Both the radiologist and the sonographer did not appreciate the differential diagnosis of TRAP sequence in their clinical decision-making. The TRAP diagnosis was established after the ultrasound performed at the fetal assessment unit in our hospital. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedure was performed to give the normal twin a chance to survive, but unfortunately, the prognosis was poor in this case. We conclude that diagnosing a TRAP sequence is very important early in the pregnancy for a positive outcome in the normal twin. A robust collaboration among radiologists and obstetricians is vital for the best outcome of the normal twin.