Effect of Metaboreflex on Cardiovascular System in Subjects of Metabolic Syndrome

Blood Pressure Response to Muscle Metaboreflex Activation is Impaired in Men Living with HIV

We investigated the muscle metaboreflex contribution to blood pressure response during dynamic handgrip exercise in men living with HIV (MLHIV) vs. without HIV (Controls). Pressor and heart rate responses were evaluated during metaboreflex activation through post-exercise muscle ischemia (PEMI) method and control exercise session (CER) in 17 MLHIV and 21 Controls. Protocols were performed randomly on the same day, being both sessions composed of 12 min, as follows: a) 3 min at rest, b) 3 min of dynamic handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, c) 3 min of recovery post-exercise with vascular occlusion (occlusion only in PEMI), and d) 3 min of recovery post-exercise without vascular occlusion. To assess metaboreflex response, differences between PEMI and CER in recovery post-exercise were calculated for blood pressure and heart rate. Systolic and mean blood pressure (P<0.01) were superior in the last 2 min of recovery with vascular occlusion at PEMI in relation to CER for both groups. No difference was found between groups for blood pressure and heart rate (P>0.05). However, metaboreflex response for systolic blood pressure was lower in MLHIV vs. Controls (4.05±4.63 vs. 7.61±3.99 mmHg; P=0.01). In conclusion, pressor response during metaboreceptor stimulation was attenuated in men living with HIV, which may suggest loss of muscle metaboreflex sensibility.

Muscle metaboreflex-induced increases in effective arterial elastance: effect of heart failure

Dynamic exercise elicits robust increases in sympathetic activity in part due to muscle metaboreflex activation (MMA), a pressor response triggered by activation of skeletal muscle afferents. MMA during dynamic exercise increases arterial pressure by increasing cardiac output via increases in heart rate, ventricular contractility, and central blood volume mobilization. In heart failure, ventricular function is compromised, and MMA elicits peripheral vasoconstriction. Ventricular-vascular coupling reflects the efficiency of energy transfer from the left ventricle to the systemic circulation and is calculated as the ratio of effective arterial elastance (E_a) to left ventricular maximal elastance (E_max). The effect of MMA on E_a in normal subjects is unknown. Furthermore, whether muscle metaboreflex control of E_a is altered in heart failure has not been investigated. We utilized two previously published methods of evaluating E_a [end-systolic pressure/stroke volume (E_aPV)] and [heart rate × vascular resistance (E_aZ)] during rest, mild treadmill exercise, and MMA (induced via partial reductions in hindlimb blood flow imposed during exercise) in chronically instrumented conscious canines before and after induction of heart failure via rapid ventricular pacing. In healthy animals, MMA elicits significant increases in effective arterial elastance and stroke work that likely maintains ventricular-vascular coupling. In heart failure, E_a is high, and MMA-induced increases are exaggerated, which further exacerbates the already uncoupled ventricular-vascular relationship, which likely contributes to the impaired ability to raise stroke work and cardiac output during exercise in heart failure.

Association Between Visceral Fat Accumulation and Exercise Tolerance in Non-Obese Subjects Without Diabetes

Background

We examined the associations between visceral fat accumulation, presence of the components of metabolic syndrome (MetS), and exercise tolerance in non-obese subjects without diabetes.

Methods

Seventy-four non-obese, non-diabetic Japanese men were enrolled. The subjects were divided into the following two groups: non-obese subjects without any MetS risk factors (n = 38, Group A) and non-obese subjects with one or two MetS risk factors (n = 36, Group B). Anthropometric and metabolic parameters were measured. The response of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP), and exercise tolerance were also evaluated with a cardiopulmonary exercise test using a bicycle ergometer.

Results

The body mass index, abdominal circumference, visceral fat area, and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance, were significantly higher, while levels of anaerobic threshold and maximal oxygen uptake were significantly lower in Group B than in Group A. The levels of resting HR, resting BP, and BP at maximal exercise were significantly higher in Group B than in Group A. There were no significant differences in the HR at maximal exercise as well as the HR and BP after exercise between the two groups. The visceral fat area was significantly and negatively correlated with exercise tolerance. Multivariate linear regression analyses demonstrated that visceral fat area, but not abdominal circumference, was significantly and independently associated with maximal oxygen uptake.

Conclusions

These data suggest that the visceral fat area is a significant determinant for exercise tolerance even in non-obese subjects without diabetes.