Storage Medium Affects the Surface Porosity of Dental Cements

[Comparison of the porosity characteristics of Portland cement, mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine by scanning electron microscopy]

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the porosity characteristics of Portland cement, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Angelus® and Biodentine Septodont® by scanning electron microscopy.

Materials and Methods

Cements were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions and packed in cylindrical polyethylene tubes with an internal diameter of 10 mm and a height of 5 mm. The porosity of the samples was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskall Wallis test. The level of significance was established at 0.05.

Results

The largest size mean diameter valus was found with Portland cement (11.07). There were significant differences between the mean pore diameters (p = 0.05). MTA Angelus® had the largest number of pores, followed by Biodentine Septodont®, and finally, Portland. There were no significant differences in the pores of the three cements (p = 0.09).

Conclusion

The results of this comparative analysis of endodontic cements showed that Portland cement has a larger pore diameter than MTA Angelus® and Biodentine Septodont®, demonstrating that these latter two cements present better resistance and permeability properties, and thereby prevent microleakage.

The Effect of Biodentine Maturation Time on Resin Bond Strength When Aged in Artificial Saliva

Biodentine is a calcium silicate cement (CSC) that has been broadly applied in vital pulp therapy. The quality of the Biodentine-composite bond has a significant effect on the longevity of the definitive restoration. The aim of this study is to investigate the shear bond strength (SBS) between Biodentine and composite restoration at different maturation times of Biodentine aged in artificial saliva. Fifteen Biodentine discs were allocated into three groups (n = 5) based on the timeframe of performance of composite restoration: immediate (after 12  min), after 14 days, and after 28 days of Biodentine maturation. Total etch and rinse adhesive system and bulk-fill regular resin composite were used. The shear bond strength and the failure pattern were assessed. One-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test was applied for statistical analysis at p < 0.05. The highest (32.47 ± 8.18 MPa) and the lowest (4.08 ± 0.81 MPa) SBS values were recorded for 14 days and 12 min groups, respectively. Significant statistical differences were reported among the groups, and a high statistically significant difference was found between the immediate group and the other groups. Adhesive failure patterns were evident in all groups. More clinically acceptable bond strength between the Biodentine and overlaid composite restoration is at 14 days after Biodentine maturation. Delaying the coverage of Biodentine later than 14 days may significantly reduce the SBS. Using the artificial saliva as an aging medium may affect the SBS between Biodentine and composite material.

Esterases affect the physical properties of materials used to seal the endodontic space

Materials used to seal the endodontic space are subjected to enzymatic degradative activities of body fluids and bacteria.

OBJECTIVES

To assess effects of simulated human salivary, blood and bacterial esterases (SHSE) on physical properties of typical restorative material and root canal sealers.

METHODS

Specimens of set methacrylate-based resin composite (BisfilTM2B; RC), calcium-silicate sealer (EndoSequence®; BC) or epoxy-resin sealer (AH-Plus®; ER) were tested after up to 28Days exposure to phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or SHSE, using ANSI/ADA-57:2000 and ISO-6876:2012.

RESULTS

Regardless of media, microhardness increased with time for BC remained unchanged for ER and decreased for RC (p < 0.05). SHSE moderated the increase for BC compared to PBS (28.0 ± 4.8 vs. 38.1 ± 7.9 KHN) at 7Days, and enhanced the decrease for RC at 7Days (55.6 ± 7.1 vs. 66.3 ± 6.5 KHN) and 28Days (52.3 ± 9.2 vs. 62.6 ± 8.5 KHN). Compressive strength was enhanced only for BC by either media. BC expanded with time for both incubation conditions; SHSE moderated the expansion compared to PBS at 7Days (0.026 ± 0.01% vs. 0.049 ± 0.007%). Shrinkage of ER was similar for both incubation media and was lower than that for RC (p < 0.05). Shrinkage of RC was enhanced by SHSE compared to PBS at 7Days (0.5 ± 0.07% vs. 0.38 ± 0.08%). Weight loss was lowest for ER and highest for BC (p < 0.05). It was enhanced by SHSE compared to PBS for BC at 28Days (2.40 ± 0.2 vs. 2.96 ± 0.19 W L%), and for RC at 7Days (0.54 ± 0.09 vs. 0.80 ± 0.1 W L%).

SIGNIFICANCE

Simulated body fluids and bacterial esterases affected the physical properties of test materials, suggesting potential impacts on sealing ability and resistance to bacterial ingress, and tooth strength ultimately affecting their clinical performance.

Porosity analysis of MTA and Biodentine cements for use in endodontics by using micro-computed tomography

Background

The purpose of this study is to compare the porosity of two repair cements, White ProRoot® MTA and Biodentine®. These samples were analyzed by using micro-computed microtomography.

Material and Methods

Sixteen samples were used in the study that were divided according to the composition of the materials used. White ProRoot® MTA (n = 8) and Biodentine® (n = 8) were the samples prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. They were placed in silicone molds of 5 ± 0.1mm in height and an internal diameter of 5 ± 0.1mm, 24 hours after its preparation, the samples were scanned through a micro-CT, the porosity results were analyzed statistically by independent “t” tests.

Results

It is evident that Biodentine® has better porosity properties than ProRoot® MTA. The results of the study quantify a smaller number of pores per surface, a smaller volume in each pore per mm3 and a lower total porosity present in samples of Biodentine® unlike ProRoot® MTA samples which is larger in both.

Conclusions

The results obtained in computerized microtomography endodontic biomaterial samples concluded that Biodentine® has a lower porosity than ProRoot® MTA.

Key words:Porosity, microleakage, micro-CT, endodontic cements.