What to Know About Biopsy Sampling and Pathology in Vasculitis?
Curr Rheumatol Rep 2022;
24:279-291. [PMID:
35895226 DOI:
10.1007/s11926-022-01082-6]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
To summarize the histologic findings of vasculitis, and to give some practical considerations on biopsy samples.
RECENT FINDINGS
The larger use of imaging and the discoveries of serological markers in the diagnosis of vasculitis have increased the clinical recognition of these entities. Nevertheless, biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis in most cases. So far, biopsies are also useful to obtain information about prognosis and to guide a more specific treatment. In recent years, less invasive diagnostic approaches have become available, lowering the risks related to the procedure and permitting a definite diagnosis in most cases. Histological examination permits a definite diagnosis of vasculitis. However, the findings may be nonspecific if not evaluated in the proper clinical setting. The interaction between clinicians and pathologists is crucial to obtain a definite diagnosis.
Collapse