Lesson of the month (1): cabergoline - 'i eat funny on that'

Exploring neuroadaptive cellular pathways in chronic morphine exposure: An in-vitro analysis of cabergoline and Mdivi-1 co-treatment effects on the autophagy-apoptosis axis

The complex impacts of prolonged morphine exposure continue to be a significant focus in the expanding area of addiction studies. This research investigates the effectiveness of a combined treatment using Cabergoline and Mdivi-1 to counteract the neuroadaptive changes caused by in vitro morphine treatment. The impact of Methadone, Cabergoline, and a combination of Cabergoline and Mdivi-1 on the cellular and molecular responses associated with Morphine-induced changes was studied in human Neuroblastoma (SK-N-MC) and Glioblastoma (U87-MG) cell lines that were exposed to prolong Morphine treatment. Cabergoline and Mdivi-1 combined treatment effectively influenced the molecular alterations associated with neuroadaptation in chronic morphine-exposed neural cells. This combination therapy normalized autophagy and reduced oxidative stress by enhancing total-antioxidant capacity, mitigating apoptosis, restoring BDNF expression, and balancing apoptotic elements. Our research outlines morphine's dual role in modulating mitochondrial dynamics via the dysregulation of the autophagy-apoptosis axis. This emphasizes the significant involvement of DRP1 activity in neurological adaptation processes, as well as disturbances in the dopaminergic pathway during in vitro chronic exposure to morphine in neural cells. This study proposes a novel approach by recommending the potential effectiveness of combining Cabergoline and Mdivi-1 to modulate the neuroadaptations caused by morphine. Additionally, we identified BDNF and PCNA in neural cells as potential neuroprotective markers for assessing the effectiveness of drugs against opioid toxicity, emphasizing the need for further validation. The study uncovers diverse effects observed in pretreated morphine glioblastoma cells under treatment with Cabergoline and methadone. This highlights the potential for new treatments in the DRD2 pathway and underscores the importance of investigating the interplay between autophagy and apoptosis to advance research in managing cancer-related pain. The study necessitates an in-depth investigation into the relationship between autophagy and apoptosis, with a specific emphasis on protein interactions and the dynamics of cell signaling.

Neuropsychiatric Effects in Patients With Invasive Prolactinomas Treated With Cabergoline

Background and objective Invasive prolactinoma accounts for 1-5% of all prolactinomas. Its mass and compromise of the diencephalon and frontal and temporal lobes may result in a range of neuropsychiatric symptoms that are often missed during initial evaluations. Cabergoline is a dopaminergic agonist used as the first-line treatment for these patients; however, its effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in this particular setting remains unexplored. In this study, our primary objective was to describe the epidemiology of neuropsychiatric comorbidities in Mexican patients with invasive prolactinomas. The secondary aim of the study was to describe how these comorbidities are modified by treatment with cabergoline, through follow-up with standardized clinical scales. Methods This was a retrospective analytic study. Data were pulled from clinical records and evaluations of patients at baseline and at six-month follow-ups.  Results A total of 10 patients were included in the study. None of them had any prior psychiatric diagnosis. At the initial evaluation, 70% were diagnosed with depression or anxiety. During follow-up, two patients developed neuropsychiatric symptoms; there was a significant reduction in tumor size but no difference was found in clinimetric scores for neuropsychiatric comorbidities. Conclusions Patients with giant prolactinomas may present with several neuropsychiatric symptoms throughout the course of their disease. Although there are several mechanisms involved, it is important to keep in mind that cabergoline may interfere with the dopaminergic pathways involved. This study was underpowered to determine the association but can serve as a pilot for further research on this topic.

Impulse control disorders in hyperprolactinemic patients on dopamine agonist therapy

Dopamine agonists (DAs) represent a mainstay of therapy for hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas. The widespread use of DAs, including bromocriptine, cabergoline and (in some countries) quinagolide, has led to the emergence and recognition of impulse control disorders (ICDs) that may occur in association with DA therapy.Such ICDs include pathological gambling, compulsive shopping, hypersexuality and punding (the performance of repetitive tasks), among others. These manifestations can lead to substantial harms to patients and their families, if left undiagnosed and untreated. Several risk factors that may increase the risk of ICDs have been proposed, including younger age, male gender, smoking and alcohol use and history of depression.The diagnosis of ICDs in hyperprolactinemic patients treated with DAs requires a high index of suspicion and a systematic approach, using available screening questionnaires. However, it should be noted that available test instruments, including questionnaires and computerized tasks, have not been validated specifically in hyperprolactinemic patients. Hyperprolactinemic patients who develop ICDs should be withdrawn from DA therapy or, at a minimum, undergo a DA dose reduction, and considered for psychiatric consultation and cognitive behavioral therapy. However, the role of psychopharmacotherapy in hyperprolactinemic patients with ICDs remains incompletely characterized.Patient counseling regarding the risk of ICDs occurring in association with DA therapy, early detection and prompt intervention may mitigate potential harms associated with ICDs. Additional studies are needed to fully characterize risk factors, underlying mechanisms and identify effective therapies for ICDs in patients with hyperprolactinemia receiving DAs.

Binge-Eating Disorder and Type 2 Diabetes: A Review

OBJECTIVE

To familiarize health care providers with diagnosis and treatment of binge-eating disorder (BED), a common comorbidity of type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS

Literature review of binge eating and T2DM. Key words used in search include BED, T2DM, obesity, and treatment.

RESULTS

The prevalence of BED in patients with T2DM appears to be much higher than the 2% to 3.5% prevalence seen in the general population. Studies suggest that up to 20% of patients with T2DM have an underlying eating disorder, the most common of which is binge eating. BED is probably underdiagnosed, even though there are multiple simple tools that providers can use to improve screening for the disorder. Though the relationship between BED and hemoglobin A1c control can vary, it appears that binge-eating behaviors can worsen metabolic markers, including glycemic control. Various medications used by patients with diabetes have been associated with new-onset BED, and treatment may be as simple as removing or replacing such agents. Several medications have been found to significantly reduce binge-eating frequency, and potentially, weight. Patients with BED generally benefit from psychotherapy, including cognitive behavioral therapy.

CONCLUSION

BED, only recently added to the International Classification of Disease-10 diagnostic list, is very common in patients with obesity and T2DM. The diagnosis is important to establish, as treatment or referral for treatment, could potentially improve many of the comorbidities and metrics of T2DM.

Impulse Control Disorders in Dopamine Agonist-Treated Hyperprolactinemia: Prevalence and Risk Factors

CONTEXT

There are growing reports of dopamine agonist (DA)-induced impulse control disorders (ICDs) in hyperprolactinemic patients. However, the magnitude of this risk and predictive factors remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine ICD prevalence and risk factors in DA-treated hyperprolactinemic patients compared to community controls.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter cross-sectional analysis of 113 patients and 99 healthy controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed a neuropsychological questionnaire consisting of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS21), Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (QUIP-S), Hypersexual Behavior Inventory (HBI), Hypersexual Behavior Consequences Scale and Social Desirability Response Set Scale. Demographic and clinical data were collated to determine ICD risk factors. Patients testing positive for an ICD were offered a semistructured psychological interview.

RESULTS

Patients were more likely than controls to test positive by QUIP-S for any ICD (61.1 vs 42.4%, P = .01), hypersexuality (22.1 vs 8.1%, P = .009), compulsive buying (15.9 vs 6.1%, P = .041) and punding (18.6 vs 6.1%, P = 0.012), and by HBI for hypersexuality (8.0 vs 0.0%, P = 0.004). Independent risk factors were male sex (odds ratio [OR] 13.85), eugonadism (OR 7.85), Hardy's tumor score and psychiatric comorbidity (OR 6.86) for hypersexuality, and age (OR 0.95) for compulsive buying. DASS21 subset scores were higher in patients vs controls and in patients with vs without different ICDs. Only 19/51 (37.3%) interviewed patients were aware of the relationship between DAs and ICDs before the study.

CONCLUSIONS

DA therapy poses a high, previously underestimated risk of ICDs, especially in the form of hypersexuality in eugonadal men.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Impulse control disorders in patients with hyperpolactinemia treated with dopamine agonists: how much should we worry?

Dopamine agonists (DAs) represent a cornerstone in the management of patients with hyperprolactinemia and have an important role in the treatment of neurologic disorders, including Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome. A growing body of evidence has identified impulse control disorders (ICDs) as possible adverse effects of DA therapy. A variety of ICDs may occur in patients treated with DA, including compulsive shopping, pathologic gambling, stealing, hypersexuality and punding (repetitive performance of tasks, such as collecting, sorting, disassembling and assembling objects). These behaviors can have devastating effects on patients' life and family. In the present review article, we summarize available data on ICDs in patients with hyperprolactinemia as well as other disorders. Possible risk factors for the emergence of ICDs in patients treated with DA are discussed and the putative pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the development of ICDs in this setting are reviewed. In addition, strategies for the early identification and management of ICDs in patients on DA are discussed. In conclusion, a wide variety of ICDs can occur in patients treated with DA, including those with hyperprolactinemia. The development of ICDs can have serious implications for patients' well-being and family. Endocrinologists and other physicians involved in the care of patients on DA therapy must be aware of this potential adverse effect, counsel patients regarding pertinent symptoms and regularly evaluate treated patients for the development of ICDs. Early detection of ICDs and discontinuation of DA therapy can mitigate the potential harms associated with ICDs in these patients.

Treating prolactinomas with dopamine agonists: always worth the gamble?

Dopamine agonists are the treatment of choice for all patients with prolactinomas. They are generally safe, effective, and well-tolerated. However, a link between their use and the development of impulse control disorders has been well recognized in the field of neurology for some time, and evidence for a similar effect in endocrine patients is emerging. This has mainly been revealed through clinical case reports, plus a small number of comparative studies of varying robustness. We review the current available literature and discuss the implications for clinical practice, in particular emphasizing the need for clinicians to be alert to these uncommon but serious adverse effects.