An unusual case of orthopnea

Cervical Spine Stenosis Causing Diaphragmatic Paralysis: A Case Study and Narrative Review of Clinical Presentations and Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Case report and narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the therapeutic role of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of diaphragmatic paralysis secondary to spinal cord and nerve root compression.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Phrenic nerve dysfunction due to central or neuroforaminal stenosis is a rare yet unappreciated etiology of diaphragmatic paralysis and chronic dyspnea. Surgical spine decompression, diaphragmatic pacing, and intensive physiotherapy are potential treatment options with varying degrees of evidence.

METHODS

The case of a 70-year-old male with progressive dyspnea, reduced hemi-diaphragmatic excursion, and C3-C7 stenosis, who underwent a microscopic foraminotomy is discussed. Literature review (MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar) identified 19 similar reports and discussed alternative treatments and outcomes.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Phrenic nerve root decompression and improvement in neuromonitoring signals were observed intraoperatively. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated, and after 15 months, he experienced significant symptomatic improvement and minor improvement in hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis and pulmonary function tests. All case reports of patients treated with spinal decompression showed symptomatic and/or functional improvement, while one of the 2 patients treated with physiotherapy showed improvement. More studies are needed to further describe the course and outcomes of these interventions, but early identification and spinal decompression can be an effective treatment.

OCEBM LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-4.

Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction Secondary to Cervical Neuroforaminal Stenosis: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Phrenic nerve dysfunction has been associated with cervical neuroforaminal stenosis in limited case reports and case-controlled studies. It is unclear if magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine should be included in the workup of patients with pulmonary dysfunction. A systematic review of the current literature was conducted on the topic to provide an outline of the body of knowledge and some guidance for neurosurgeons that receive these patient referrals.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted through the PubMed database to identify articles related to phrenic nerve dysfunction secondary to cervical stenosis.

RESULTS

A total of 12 case reports were found. The median subject age was 64 years, 11 were male. Presenting symptoms included shortness of breath (n = 9), radiculopathy (n = 7), myelopathy (n = 5), reduced pulmonary function (n = 6), weakness (n = 4), and neck pain (n = 5). Ten of these patients underwent surgical intervention, all having improvements in their pulmonary and neurological symptoms at follow-up ranging from 10 days to 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical stenosis, resulting in neuroforaminal stenosis, may be related to phrenic nerve dysfunction in select patients with idiopathic diaphragmatic paralysis or pulmonary dysfunction. Surgical decompression improves pulmonary and neurological symptoms.

Dyspnea Associated with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Case Report and Review of Literatures

When a patient presents with dyspnea, most physicians immediately associate it with cardiopulmonary diseases but not with the neurologic ones. Dyspnea due to cervical spondylosis rarely occurs, making it under-recognized. We report a case of a 57-year-old man who complained of dyspnea a month after his traffic accident. Chest X-ray showed a left diaphragm elevation, and cervical computed tomography (CT) revealed foraminal stenoses at C3/4, C4/5, and C5/6 on both sides, especially C3/4 on the left side. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at C3/4 and C4/5 were performed via a standard anterior cervical approach. Foraminal stenoses due to osteophyte were found to be more severe in the left side; therefore, thorough foraminotomies were performed. Titanium-coated polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cages filled with an artificial bone graft were inserted into both intervertebral spaces. His dyspnea improved immediately after the operation. Postoperative spirometry showed a gradually improving respiratory function. Therefore, cervical spondylosis should be considered to cause dyspnea, although it is an atypical symptom. Considering previous reports, outcomes achieved with surgical treatment were better than that with conservative therapy for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy-related dyspnea.

Association Between Diaphragmatic Paralysis and Ipsilateral Cervical Spondylosis on MRI

PURPOSE

Diaphragmatic paralysis (DP) is an important cause of dyspnea with many underlying etiologies; however, frequently no cause is identified despite extensive investigation. We hypothesized that cervical spondylosis (CS), as manifest by cervical neuroforaminal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is an underrecognized cause of unilateral DP.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed assessing cervical spine imaging utilization in the investigation of unilateral DP, and the contribution of CS to its pathogenesis. To assess the relationship between CS and DP, comparison was made between severity of ipsilateral and contralateral foraminal stenosis on cervical spine MRI in individuals with idiopathic DP, and to controls with DP of known etiology.

RESULTS

Record searches identified 334 individuals with DP who were classified as idiopathic (n = 101) or DP of known etiology (n = 233). Of those with idiopathic DP, only 37% had undergone cervical spine imaging. Cervical spine MRIs, available for 32 individuals from the total cohort identified (n = 15 idiopathic DP, n = 17 DP of known etiology), were reviewed and severity of CS graded (0-2). In idiopathic DP, CS was significantly more severe (grade 2 stenosis) on the side of DP at C3-C4 (73% affected vs 13% unaffected side; p = 0.031) and C4-C5 (60% affected vs 20% unaffected side; p = 0.0039), while no difference was observed in DP of known etiology. Overall severity of CS across all cervical spine levels was significantly worse in idiopathic DP versus those with DP of known etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

In unilateral idiopathic DP, severity of CS is associated with DP laterality and is an underrecognized cause of diaphragmatic dysfunction. We propose that evaluation of 'idiopathic' DP should routinely include cervical spine imaging, preferably by MRI.