Contrast-enhanced sonography of autoimmune pancreatitis: comparison with pathologic findings

Nonhypovascular pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: CEUS imaging findings and differentiation from other types of solid pancreatic lesions

OBJECTIVES

To observe and assess the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with iso-/hypervascular solid pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

70 pancreatic lesions (all confirmed by surgery or biopsy pathology) that manifested iso-/hyperenhancement on CEUS were retrospectively studied from January 2018 to January 2022, including 24 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), 15 mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), 24 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) (14 hyper-PNETs, 10 iso-PNETs), and 7 solid pseudopapillary tumors of pancreas (SPTP). 65 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) that manifested hypoenhancement on CEUS were retrospectively studied from January 2020 to January 2022. CEUS patterns and the clinical and pathologic features were analyzed, and the diagnostic ability of CEUS for iso/hyperenhanced solid pancreatic lesions was assessed.

RESULTS

Centripetal enhancement, heterogeneous enhancement, early washout, and hypoenhancement in the late phase mostly appeared in iso-/hyper-PDACs (p < 0.05). Heterogeneous enhancement in small lesions (< 3 cm) as the diagnostic criterion for iso-/hyper-PDACs had an accuracy of 74.3% and a specificity of 91.3%. Iso-PNETs more commonly had larger tumor sizes and more often showed heterogeneous enhancement than hyper-PNETs (p = 0.007, p = 0.035, respectively). The characteristics of the combination of isoenhancement, homogeneous enhancement, and synchronous wash-in/out for MFP had a high accuracy of 90%. Capsular enhancement with heterogeneous enhancement inside for SPTP had an accuracy of 97.1%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS enhancement patterns have potentially great value in the differentiation of iso-/hyperenhanced pancreatic lesions.

Imaging diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is challenging and should be achieved through the comprehensive evaluation of clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological evidence, as there is currently no single reliable diagnostic modality. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can reveal pancreatic parenchymal and ductal features in much more detail than any other existing imaging modality. In this article, we focused on three applications of EUS, i.e., conventional EUS imaging, EUS elastography (EUS-EG), and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS), for the diagnosis of AIP. Diffuse hypoechoic areas, diffuse enlargement, bile duct wall thickening, and peripancreatic hypoechoic margins on conventional EUS are characteristic features of AIP, and the frequencies of these findings are significantly higher in AIP than in pancreatic cancer (PC). EUS-EG of the pancreatic parenchyma in AIP showed homogenous stiffness and that the elasticity of the pancreas may change after steroid therapy. CEH-EUS revealed focal or diffuse iso-enhancement in most AIP cases and hypo-enhancement in most PC cases. However, some AIP cases show a contrast enhancement pattern similar to that of PC. It should be noted that EUS findings of AIP may differ depending on its stage or disease activity. Differentiation from PC has become an increasingly important issue in the process of diagnosing AIP, and EUS, including elastography and contrast enhancement, could be a promising imaging modality for this purpose.

Role of transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

The most important thing in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is to suspect the possibility of AIP. In the acute phase, diffuse pancreatic enlargement is a highly specific finding of AIP compared to focal enlargement. Though the sensitivity is low, high-frequency transducers can detect the capsule-like rim sign and penetrating duct sign. Those findings are characteristic of AIP and useful for differential diagnosis with pancreatic carcinoma. In focal AIP, both contrast-enhanced US showing iso/hypervascularity and elastography showing increased stiffness not only in the focal enlargement but also in the surrounding parenchyma are also useful for differential diagnosis. Furthermore, changes over time after the two-week steroid trial, such as resolution or measurable reduction in parenchymal enlargement and a decrease in the mean shear-wave velocity on elastography, are also cardinal features of AIP. Since AIP is a pancreatic manifestation in immunoglobulin G4-related disease, evaluation of other organs, including the biliary tract and salivary glands, is particularly useful in focal AIP. A characteristic US finding of bile ducts is three-layered (high-low-high pattern) wall thickening with a markedly thickened middle layer. US can also detect wall thickening of bile ducts, which show no abnormalities on cholangiography. These findings are useful for differential diagnosis with cholangiocarcinoma. Multiple hypoechoic areas in submandibular glands are characteristic US findings of sialadenitis in type 1 AIP, and the sensitivity is higher than that of physical examination. US can further contribute to the diagnosis of AIP by employing elastography and contrast-enhanced US in addition to high-frequency transducers.

An initial trial of quantitative evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis using shear wave elastography and shear wave dispersion in transabdominal ultrasound

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine therapeutic efficacy and prognosis prediction of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) using shear wave elastography (SWE) and shear wave dispersion (SWD) in transabdominal ultrasound (US).

METHODS

The subjects were 23 patients with diffuse type 1 AIP who underwent SWE and SWD, and 34 controls with a normal pancreas. Elasticity and dispersion were defined as the pancreatic elastic modulus (PEM) and dispersion slope, respectively. PEM and dispersion slope were compared between AIP and control cases, and the short-term therapeutic effect and long-term prognosis were examined.

RESULTS

PEM (30.9 vs. 6.6 kPa, P < 0.001) and dispersion slope (15.3 vs. 13.0 (m/sec)/kHz, P = 0.011) were significantly higher in AIP cases than in controls. Among the 17 AIP patients followed-up in two weeks after treatment, these parameters were 12.7 kPa and 10.5 (m/sec)/kHz with median decrease rate of 37.2% and 32.8%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the change in the size of pancreatic parenchyma (14.4%, P = 0.026). Fourteen of these subjects were followed up for >12 months, during which 2 had relapse; diabetes improved in 5 and worsened in 2; in 60% of cases, the pancreatic parenchyma was atrophied. The % change in PEM after two weeks was tended to be higher in non-atrophy cases.

CONCLUSION

SWE and SWD measurement in US may be useful for quantitative assessment of AIP and evaluation of short-term treatment efficacy.

Autoimmune pancreatitis - An ongoing challenge

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare form of chronic pancreatitis. The first descriptions of the disease date back to the 1990s. Etiology is multifactorial, with the use of genetic, environmental and complex immunological mechanisms. It is classified into two subtypes. Type 1 is part of a group of diseases called IgG4-related disease. Clinically is autoimmune pancreatitis manifested by icterus and abdominal discomfort. It can rarely present as acute pancreatitis. There is also a completely asymptomatic form of the disease. The diagnosis is based on abnormalities in histology, imaging methods, serology, the involvement of other organs in relation to IgG4-related disease, and a significant positive response to corticosteroid therapy. Differential diagnosis between the focal form of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer can be complicated, with endosonography playing an important role. In the treatment, we use corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants including biological therapy. Patients with the asymptomatic disease should also be treated to prevent late complications and exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. In addition to drug treatment, endoscopic and/or surgical treatment may be necessary. Even after recovery, the disease can relapse. The relationship between autoimmune pancreatitis and malignancies has not been clearly confirmed. The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive look at autoimmune pancreatitis and translate latest scientific knowledge into clinical practice.

Ultrasound diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumors

INTRODUCTION

Advances and widespread use of various diagnostic imaging modalities have dramatically improved our ability to visualize and diagnose pancreatic diseases. In particular, ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases plays an important role from screening to diagnosis as a simple and safe examination method.

METHODS

The basic scanning method of transabdominal pancreatic ultrasonography, characterization, and differential diagnosis by ultrasonography including contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for solid pancreatic tumors are reviewed with reference to various papers.

RESULTS

In recent years, the ability to visualize and diagnose pancreatic mass lesions has been dramatically improved with advances in ultrasound equipment. In particular, CEUS using an ultrasound contrast agent has made it possible to evaluate hemodynamics in organs or lesions as well as in the flow signal of arterial blood vessels, and it has played an important role not only in diagnosis of the presence of a lesion but also in the qualitative diagnosis. The enhancement behavior and pattern with CEUS of pancreatic solid tumors is shown in text and Fig. 9. Moreover, the flow chart for diagnosing pancreatic solid tumors with CEUS classifying the enhancement behavior and pattern for pancreatic solid tumors on CEUS is shown (Fig. 10). In meta-analyses, the pooled sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinomas and other pancreatic focal masses with CEUS was 86-90%, and the pooled specificity was 75-88%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a minimally invasive and useful diagnostic method that can be used to make a simple and quick qualitative diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. CEUS provides a lot of information important for diagnosis, and has led to changes in the conventional diagnostic systems in pancreatic diseases.

Pancreatic Ultrasound: State of the Art

An ultrasound (US) study is often the first imaging approach in patients with abdominal symptoms or signs related to abdominal diseases, and it is often part of the routine workup. The pancreatic gland, despite its retroperitoneal site, can be efficiently examined with US thanks to advances in US technologies. Nowadays, a pancreatic US study could be considered complete if multiparametric, including the use of Doppler imaging, US elastography, and contrast-enhanced imaging for the study of a pancreatic mass. A complete US examination could contribute to a faster diagnosis, especially if the pancreatic lesion is incidentally detected, addressing second-step imaging modalities correctly.

Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Differentially Diagnosing Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer

Background/Aims

Differentially diagnosing focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (f-AIP) and pancreatic cancer (PC) is challenging. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) may provide information for differentiating pancreatic masses. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of CEH-EUS in differentiating f-AIP from PC.

Methods

Data were collected prospectively and analyzed on patients who underwent CEH-EUS between May 2014 and May 2015. Eighty consecutive patients were diagnosed with f-AIP or PC. PC and f-AIP were compared for enhancement intensity, contrast agent distribution, and internal vasculature.

Results

The study group comprised 53 PC patients and 27 f-AIP patients (17 with type-1 AIP [15 definite and two probable], two with probable type-2 AIP, and eight with AIP, not otherwise specified). Hyper- to iso-enhancement in the arterial phase (f-AIP, 89% vs PC, 13%; p<0.05), homogeneous contrast agent distribution (f-AIP, 81% vs PC, 17%; p<0.05), and absent irregular internal vessels (f-AIP, 85% vs PC, 30%; p<0.05) were observed more frequently in the f-AIP group. The combination of CEH-EUS and enhancement intensity, absent irregular internal vessels improved the specificity (94%) in differentiating f-AIP from PC.

Conclusions

CEH-EUS may be a useful noninvasive modality for differentially diagnosing f-AIP and PC. Combined CEH-EUS findings could improve the specificity of CEH-EUS in differentiating f-AIP from PC.

Management of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an IgG-4-related systemic disease that can manifest as a pancreatic disorder or another disorder of presumed autoimmune origin. Type 2 disease is typically characterized by absent IgG-4-positive cells. As patients often present with acute pancreatitis, obstructive jaundice, or pancreatic mass, it is imperative to exclude malignancy, a more common diagnosis. AIP may respond to corticosteroids, and has a strong association with other immune-mediated diseases. Recent literature suggests the benefit of immune-modulating therapy, including rituximab, although no consensus exists. This review covers the essentials of diagnosis, but focuses primarily on management of AIP.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis: An Update on Diagnosis and Management

There is an evolving understanding that autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 systemic disease. It can manifest as primarily a pancreatic disorder or in association with other disorders of presumed autoimmune cause. Classic clinical characteristics include obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, and acute pancreatitis. Thus, AIP can be difficult to distinguish from pancreatic malignancy. However, AIP may respond to therapy with corticosteroids, and has a strong association with other immune mediated diseases. Although primarily a pathologic diagnosis, attempts have been made to reliably diagnose AIP clinically. AIP can be classified as either type 1 or type 2.

Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Transabdominal Ultrasonography to Diagnose Early Chronic Pancreatitis

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to establish the relationship between the grade of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic blood flow as measured by contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasonography (CEUS) and to diagnose early CP easily. Methods. This pilot study was conducted in 8 patients with CP, 7 patients with early CP, and 6 control participants. After injecting 0.015 mL/kg of perflubutane by manual bolus, values in one region of interest (ROI) in pancreatic parenchyma and one ROI including the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were measured. Results. The ratio of blood flow in the SMA and pancreatic parenchyma increased with grade of CP and was significantly higher in patients with CP (5.41; 2.10–11.02) than in patients with early CP (2.46; 1.41–5.05) and control participants (2.32; 1.25–3.04) (P = 0.0279, P = 0.0142, resp.). The ratio of blood flow in the SMA and pancreatic parenchyma correlated with grade of CP (rs = 0.5904, P = 0.0048). Conclusion. The ratio of blood flow correlates with grade of CP on CEUS. This safe and convenient method may be useful to diagnose early CP.

Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

In response to the proposal of the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the Japanese diagnostic criteria in 2011, the 2009 Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP required revision.

METHODS

Three committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from 1,843 articles published between 1963 and 2012 (obtained from Pub Med and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid.

RESULTS

The professional committee created 13 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis of AIP, 6 for extra-pancreatic lesions, 6 for differential diagnosis, and 11 for treatment.

CONCLUSION

After evaluation by the moderators, amendments to the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP have been proposed for 2013.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of exocrine versus neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been developed to better characterize the microvasculature of solid masses in several organs, including the pancreas. In this study, we assessed CEUS accuracy in differentiating exocrine from endocrine pancreatic tumors.

METHODS

A total of 127 patients with single, undetermined pancreatic masses were prospectively examined with transabdominal ultrasound and CEUS, before surgical resection or percutaneous biopsy.

RESULTS

Exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tumors showed different intralesional vascularization patterns: 98.9% (90/91) of exocrine tumors were hypoenhancing, whereas 95.8 % (23/24) of endocrine tumors had a hypervascular supply. A hypoenhancing pattern, indicative of ductal adenocarcinoma, had a significant (P < 0.001) diagnostic accuracy of 91.3% with a sensitivity of 96.8%, a specificity of 85.3%, a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of 94.7% and 90.6%, respectively. The hyperenhancing pattern, indicative of endocrine tumors, had a significant (P = 0.031) diagnostic accuracy of 73.8% with a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 60.0%, a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 83.3% and 60.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound has a valuable diagnostic accuracy in differentiating exocrine from endocrine pancreatic tumors, which is a fundamental step to address appropriate histological evaluation, therapeutic approach, and follow-up.

Vascularisation pattern of chronic pancreatitis compared with pancreatic carcinoma: results from contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound

Discriminating between focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is always a challenge in clinical medicine. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound using Doppler techniques can uniquely reveal different vascularisation patterns in pancreatic tissue alterated by chronic inflammatory processes and even allows a discrimination from pancreatic cancer. This paper will describe the basics of contrast-enhanced high mechanical index endoscopic ultrasound (CEHMI EUS) and contrast enhanced low mechanical index endoscopic ultrasound (CELMI EUS) and explain the pathophysiological differences of the vascularisation of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Furthermore it will discuss how to use these techniques in daily clinical practice.

Assessment of Chronic Pancreatitis: Use of Whole Pancreas Perfusion With 256-Slice Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare perfusion computed tomography (CTP) characteristics of the normal pancreas with those of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and to examine the possibility of evaluating pancreatic exocrine function with CTP. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (control group, n = 18; CP group, n = 14) who completed the whole pancreas CT perfusion examination with 256-slice CT were studied. Four parameters, including perfusion (PF), peak enhancement intensity (PEI), time-to-peak (TTP), and blood volume (BV), were measured and compared between the control and CP groups, and between patients with and without exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) in the CP group. Pancreatic exocrine function was determined via serum trypsinogen. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the distribution of PF, PEI, and BV in different pancreas regions, namely, the head, body, and tail (P > 0.05). PF, PEI, and BV of the CP group were significantly decreased, and TTP was significantly increased compared with the control group (P < 0.05). A significant decrease of PF, PEI, and BV and increase of TTP were observed in patients with EPI than in patients without EPI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion CT is an appropriate imaging technique to diagnose CP and may be useful as a screening test to rule out early EPI.

Contrast enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of IgG4-negative autoimmune pancreatitis: A case report

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disorder frequently manifesting as a mass-like lesion that may lead to obstructive jaundice. We report here a case of pancreatic obstruction with painless jaundice, and elevation of CA 19-9 without elevation of serum IgG4. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CE US) revealed the possibility of AIP, and the final pathological findings confirmed the diagnosis.

Dynamic quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with time-intensity curve (TIC) in differentiating pancreatic diseases.

METHODS

Patients who underwent contrast-enhanced EUS between January 2007 and June 2009 were analyzed retrospectively, including 48 with pancreatic ductal cancer (PC), 14 with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), 13 with mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), and 16 with pancreatic endocrine tumor (PET). After intravenous injection of contrast agent, contrast imaging pattern, TIC-based quantitative evaluation, and diagnostic ability of EUS in combination with TIC to diagnose benignancy or malignancy were assessed.

RESULTS

Hypovascular and heterogeneous pattern (42/48) in PC, isovascular and homogenous (21/27) in AIP and MFP, and hypervascular and rapid stained (16/16) in PET were observed. The echo intensity reduction rate from the peak at 1 minute was the greatest in PC followed by MFP, AIP, and PET (P < 0.05). The diagnostic accuracies based on contrast imaging pattern (84.0%) and TIC (88.0%) were higher than those based on B-mode imaging (82.6%) and dynamic computed tomography (81.3%). In EUS in combination with TIC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rose up to 95.8%, 92.6%, and 94.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced EUS with the dynamic quantitative analysis preparing TIC increased the diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic diseases.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the pancreas

The introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has led to major improvements in the diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound (US). The innovative use of CEUS for study of the pancreas has created the need for a definition of the most frequent dynamic features of solid and cystic masses. CEUS is less expensive compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and is able to significantly improve the accuracy of US, allowing better characterization and staging of pancreatic pathologies.

Japanese consensus guidelines for management of autoimmune pancreatitis: I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

As the number of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is increasing in Japan, practical guidelines for managing AIP need to be established. Three committees [the professional committee for developing clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee of moderators] were organized. Fifteen AIP specialists extracted specific clinical statements from a total of 871 articles in the literature using a PubMed search (1963-2008) and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panelists individually rated these clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than 7 on a 9-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. The professional committee developed 13, 6, 6, and 11 CQs and statements for the concept and diagnosis, extra-pancreatic lesions, differential diagnosis and treatment, respectively. The expert panelists regarded them as valid after two-round modified Delphi approaches.After evaluation by the moderators, the Japanese clinical guidelines for AIP were established. The digest versions of the present guidelines have been published in the official journal of the Japan Pancreas Society, "Pancreas." Full versions divided into three series are scheduled to be published in the present and followings two issues in the Journal of Gastroenterology with approval of Professor Go VLW, the Editor-in-Chief of "Pancreas."

Autoimmune pancreatitis: a challenging diagnostic puzzle for clinicians

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a form of pancreatitis with autoimmune stigmata that may present as either focal or diffuse gland involvement. In focal forms, autoimmune pancreatitis shares demographic, clinical, biochemical and imaging features with pancreatic cancer. Since autoimmune pancreatitis is a benign disease and steroid therapy can rapidly resolve symptoms, improve radiological findings and avoid unnecessary surgery, the current clinical challenge is how to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic neoplasia. Even though definitive diagnosis of the disease is difficult, several diagnostic criteria have been proposed and progress has been made in imaging studies. The management of this unique form of pancreatitis should, therefore, be handled in centres with knowledge of all aspects of the disease. This article briefly reviews clinical aspects of autoimmune pancreatitis with a focus on its diagnostic imaging and management.

Japanese clinical guidelines for autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

As the patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) are increasing in Japan, the practical guideline for managing AIP is required to be established.

METHODS

Three committees (the professional committee for making clinical questions [CQs] and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators) were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from a total of 871 literatures by PubMed search (approximately 1963-2008) and from a secondary database and made the CQs and statements. The expert panelists individually rated these clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than 7 on a 9-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid.

RESULTS

The professional committee made 13, 6, 6, and 11 CQs and statements for the concept and diagnosis, extrapancreatic lesions, differential diagnosis, and treatment, respectively. The expert panelists regarded them as valid after a 2-round modified Delphi approach.

CONCLUSIONS

After evaluation by the moderators, the Japanese clinical guideline for AIP has been established. Further studies for the international guideline are needed after international consensus for diagnosis and treatment.

DCE-MRI in experimental chronic pancreatitis

To assess pancreatic perfusion in experimental chronic pancreatitis (CP) by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DCE MRI on a 1.5 T MR scanner was performed on 21 piglets with the ligation of pancreatic duct. They were divided into four groups based on pathology, including seven normal pigs and seven, three and four piglets with grade I, II and III CP, respectively. The signal intensity measured in the pancreatic body on DCE MRI was plotted against time to create a signal intensity-time (SI-T) curve for each piglet. The steepest slope (SS), time-to-peak (TTP) and peak enhancement ratio (PER) of the SI-T curve were noted. In the four groups, on the SI-T curve derived from DCE MRI, the SS was, respectively, 10.88 +/- 1.20, 10.59 +/- 1.02, 6.67 +/- 1.31 and 5.48 +/- 1.97%/s (F = 20.509, p = 0.000) from normal piglets to piglets with grade III CP. The TTP was 13.82 +/- 3.09, 12.31 +/- 5.52, 20.55 +/- 3.79 and 37.26 +/- 14.56 s (F = 10.681, p = 0.000) and the PER was 62.95 +/- 20.20, 60.44 +/- 20.00, 46.33 +/- 22.70 and 67.65 +/- 32.66% (F = 0.529, p = 0.668), respectively. The SS (r = -0.719, p = 0.000) and TTP (r = 0.538, p = 0.012) of the SI-T curve was correlated to the severity of CP, respectively. DCE MRI has a potential to diagnose moderate to advanced CP. The SS and TTP of the SI-T curve were correlated to the severity of CP.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas

Ultrasound is often the first examination performed in patients with suspicion of pancreatic disease. The introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has led to great developments in the diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound. Dynamic observation of an enhancement allows a highly sensitive evaluation of any perfusion of the abdominal organs. Study of the pancreas is a new and promising application of CEUS, and can be used to characterize pancreatic lesions visible with conventional ultrasonography (US). This article reviews the clinical and surgical applications of CEUS in different pancreatic diseases and in their management.

[Autoimmune pancreatitis]

Autoimmune pancreatitis has been established as a special entity of pancreatitis. It is an enigmatic disease since it is adding an autoimmune etiology to the existing causes of pancreatitis. Morphological hallmarks of the disease are narrowing of the pancreatic duct system and the bile duct by periductal lymphoplasmocytic inflammation. This results in many cases in obstructive jaundice due to a mass-forming lesion in the pancreatic head mimicking pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Therefore, patients will frequently undergo surgery. Histopathologically, the disease can be diagnosed by IgG4-positive plasma cells. Serologically, patients may present with elevated serum IgG and IgG4 levels. Other autoantibodies are also described. Association with other autoimmune manifestations in a wide range of organs is frequent. Autoimmune pancreatitis will respond to steroid treatment, which is of specific importance because pancreatic cancer is one of its clinical differential diagnoses. It is important to positively diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis, especially if the bile ducts are affected, since cholangitis may be or become a prominent problem before or after surgery.

Resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: depiction of tumoral margins at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

To evaluate if contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) improves the depiction of tumoral margins of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in relation to tumor enhancement, using pathology as criterion standard.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-one patients affected by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were investigated at CEUS with a second-generation contrast medium of sulfur-hexafluoride microbubbles. Sixty-seven (27.8%) of 241 tumors were resected. By consensus, 2 radiologists reviewed the CEUS examination results of the 67 tumors judging the enhancement as low (hypovascular lesions, hypoechoic tothe adjacent parenchyma) or high (iso- or hypervascular lesions, iso- or hyperechoic to the adjacent parenchyma). The resected tumors were evaluated at pathology for the presence of positive neoplastic (R+) or negative neoplastic (R-) resected margins.

RESULTS

Of the 67 resected tumors, 35 (52.3%) were R-, whereas 32 (47.7%) were R+. Moreover, at CEUS, of the 67 resected tumors, 43 (64.1%) were hypovascular with low enhancement and 24 (35.8%) were iso-hypervascular with high enhancement. In the R- group, 27 (77.1%) of 35 tumors were hypovascular. In the R+ group, 16 (50%) of 32 lesions were hypovascular.

CONCLUSIONS

At CEUS the depiction of tumoral margins of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is more accurate in low enhancement than in high enhancement. The pattern of enhancement of pancreatic adenocarcinoma influences the depiction of tumoral margins at CEUS.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: with special reference to a localized variant

In 2006, the Japan Pancreas Society revised the diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) so as to more clearly define its morphological, pathological, and immunological features, as follows: (1) diffuse or segmental narrowing of the main pancreatic duct with an irregular wall and diffuse or localized enlargement of the pancreas recognized by imaging studies; (2) high serum gamma globulin, IgG, or IgG4 levels, or the presence of autoantibodies; and (3) marked interlobular fibrosis and prominent infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells in the periductal area, occasionally with lymphoid follicles in the pancreas. Establishing a diagnosis of AIP has become easier with knowledge of its immunological abnormalities, including serum IgG4 levels. However, the localized form of AIP sometimes mimics pancreatic cancer. The rate of focal mass formation in patients with AIP is reportedly 24%-43%; however, there have been few reports on the histological findings of localized AIP, in contrast to mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP). Our review of patients who had undergone resection due to a preoperative diagnosis of MFP with possible cancer revealed 72% to be patients with localized AIP. For the discrimination of these conditions, it is important to recognize the characteristic ultrasonographic findings of AIP, i.e., (1) diffuse or localized enlargement and hypoechogenicity of the pancreas; (2) rarity of calcification, cystic lesions, and peripancreatic fluid collection; (3) thickened layer structure of the bile duct wall; (4) iso/hypervascularity in the swollen portion of the pancreas; (5) attenuation of pancreatic swelling and bile duct wall thickening after steroid therapy; and (6) multiple hypoechoic masses in various organs, including the pancreas. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography is potentially a useful tool in the differential diagnosis and for assessment of the efficacy of steroid therapy by enabling evaluation of the vascularity of the lesions. Along with the presence of IgG4-positive plasma cells, verification of obliterative phlebitis is highly specific for the histological diagnosis of AIP.

Ultrasonography of the pancreas. 4. Contrast-enhanced imaging

The introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has lead to great developments in the diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound. Second generation contrast media, characterized by harmonic responses at low mechanical index of the ultrasound beam, have already proven usefulness in the study of the liver but other abdominal organs can take advantage from the dynamic study during continuous ultrasonographic scans. The dynamic observation of the enhancement allows the perfect evaluation of the abdominal organs perfusion. The perfusion of the pancreas is well correlated to the semeiology of the gland parenchymography at CEUS. The study of the pancreas is a new and promising application of CEUS. CEUS can be used to better identify pancreatic lesions respect to conventional Ultrasound (US) or to characterize pancreatic lesions already visible at US. Moreover the staging of some pancreatic lesions can be improved by the use of contrast media. This article will review the clinical application of CEUS in the different pancreatic pathologies.

Pancreatic imaging: current and emerging technologies

This review discusses the current imaging modalities for the diagnosis and staging of solid and cystic pancreatic lesions and for the assessment of acute and chronic pancreatitis, and the future role of emerging technologies in the management of pancreatic diseases. Multidetector row spiral computed tomography is superior to conventional single-detector row spiral computed tomography in the detection and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Positron emission tomography is a sensitive but relatively nonspecific diagnostic modality. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography fusion may improve the staging accuracy for pancreatic cancer. Echo-enhanced ultrasound may have an emerging role in evaluating pancreatic masses. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration for cytology is the single best method for diagnosis and staging of nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer with a high accuracy for determining tumor resectability. In acute pancreatitis, a modification of the standard computed tomography severity index, which places greater emphasis on extrapancreatic complications, has shown superior correlation with various patient outcome measures. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is still the test of choice for morphological evaluation of chronic pancreatitis, whereas magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography offers a noninvasive alternative in selected patients. Endoscopic ultrasound can be useful for detecting early chronic pancreatitis. Secretin-stimulated imaging techniques may eventually provide a noninvasive method of reliably assessing pancreatic exocrine function.

Mass-forming pancreatitis: Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

AIM: To assess the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with a second-generation contrast medium in the differential diagnosis between mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS: From our radio-pathology database, we retrieved all the patients affected by mass-forming pancreatitis or pancreatic carcinoma who underwent CEUS. We evaluated the results of CEUS in the study of the 173 pancreatic masses considering the possibilities of a differential diagnosis between mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic tumor by identifying the “parenchymographic” enhancement during the dynamic phase of CEUS, which was considered diagnostic for mass-forming pancreatitis.

RESULTS: At CEUS, 94% of the mass-forming pancreatitis showed intralesional parenchymography. CEUS allowed diagnosis of mass-forming pancreatitis with sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 97.8%, positive predictive value of 91.2%, negative predictive value of 97.1%, and overall accuracy of 96%. CEUS significantly increased the diagnostic confidence in the differential diagnosis between mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma, with receiver operating characteristic curve areas from 0.557 (P = 0.1608) for baseline US to 0.956 (P < 0.0001) for CEUS.

CONCLUSION: CEUS allowed diagnosis of mass-forming pancreatitis with diagnostic accuracy of 96%. CEUS significantly increases the diagnostic confidence with respect to basal US in discerning mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic neoplasm.

New advances in pancreatic imaging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Exciting new developments and applications of imaging techniques in pancreatic diseases have emerged. This review discusses these new advances and how they are improving our ability to diagnose malignancies and inflammatory lesions, to grade severity of pancreatitis, and to stage pancreatic cancer accurately.

RECENT FINDINGS

A new computed tomography severity index shows promise for grading the severity of acute pancreatitis. Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable with computed tomography in staging acute pancreatitis. Analysis of pancreatograms and textural changes of the parenchyma may prove helpful in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography may prove to be a useful way to judge the degree of inflammation and fibrosis in autoimmune pancreatitis and to monitor response to steroid therapy. The debate over the best means of staging pancreatic cancer has focused on endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography. Preliminary studies with contrast enhanced ultrasonography report improved diagnostic and staging capabilities with pancreatic cystic and solid neoplasms. Improvements in positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans may improve the detection of neuroendocrine tumors.

SUMMARY

These new advances will help refine the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic diseases.

Contrast-enhanced sonography of pancreatic carcinoma: correlations with pathological findings

BACKGROUND

We examined contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonographic findings of pancreatic carcinoma in relation to the pathological findings in resected specimens to evaluate correlations between observations made by this modality and the pathological findings.

METHODS

The pathological findings of surgical specimens obtained from 16 patients were examined in relation to the contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography findings. Lesion vascularity was examined by contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography from 20 to 50 s after the injection of Levovist (Schering, Berlin, Germany) (early phase), and lesion enhancement was also monitored at approximately 90 s after injection (delayed phase).

RESULTS

Contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography showed positive enhancement in 12 of the 16 lesions (peripheral tumor region alone, n = 9; entire tumor, n = 3), while the other 4 lesions showed no contrast enhancement in any region. Twelve enhanced regions (9 peripheral tumor region and 3 entire tumor regions) detected by contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography showed: (1) mild fibrosis with inflammation, in 10 regions (83%); (2) the presence of both carcinoma cells and residual acinar cells in 8 (67%); and (3) presence of relatively large arteries in 2 (17%). In contrast, 13 non-enhanced regions (4 entire tumor regions and 9 central regions) showed: (1) severe fibrosis in 10 regions (77%); (2) necrosis in 7 (54%); and (3) mucin in 4 (31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonographic findings of pancreatic carcinoma are influenced by interstitial histological features associated with tumor growth.