Sonographic evaluation of early-stage breast cancers that undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Prediction of complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancers: The utility of shear wave elastography and superb microvascular imaging in pretreatment breast ultrasound

PURPOSE

To investigate whether multiparametric parameters of pretreatment breast ultrasound (US) and clinicopathologic factors are associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer.

METHODS

Between November 2018 and September 2022, 88 patients who underwent NAC and subsequent surgery were included in this study (median age, 55 years; interquartile range [IQR], 45, 59.3). Multiparametric breast US including grayscale, shear wave elastography (SWE) and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) of pathologically proven invasive breast cancers were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological and multiparametric parameters of breast US, including size, SWEmax, SWEratio and vascular index on SMI (SMIVI) were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors predicting pCR after NAC. AUROC curve analysis was performed to determine the predictors' optimal cut-off values and diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

The pCR group (n = 24) showed a significantly smaller tumor size, lower SWEmax, higher Ki-67 index, higher hormone receptor negativity and negative axillary lymph node metastasis compared to the non-pCR group (n = 64). Multivariate regression analysis showed that SWEmax (adjusted odds ratio[aOR] = 0.956, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.919-0.994, P = 0.025) and Ki-67 index (aOR = 1.083, 95 % CI = 1.012-1.159, P = 0.021) were independently associated with pathologically complete response. The optimal cut-off values for predicting pCR were 27.5 % for Ki-67 with an AUC of 0.743 and 134.8 kPa for SWEmax with an AUC of 0.779. A combination model including clinical factors and SWEmax showed the best diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.876.

CONCLUSION

A higher Ki-67 index and lower SWEmax measured on pretreatment breast US were independently associated with pCR in invasive breast cancer after NAC.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer: 2022 Update

Imaging plays a vital role in managing patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as treatment decisions rely heavily on accurate assessment of response to therapy. This document provides evidence-based guidelines for imaging breast cancer before, during, and after initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Surgical Planning after Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Multimodality Imaging-Based Approach Focused on MRI

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) today represents a cornerstone in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer and highly chemo-sensitive tumors at early stages, increasing the possibilities of performing more conservative treatments and improving long term outcomes. Imaging has a fundamental role in the staging and prediction of the response to NACT, thus aiding surgical planning and avoiding overtreatment. In this review, we first examine and compare the role of conventional and advanced imaging techniques in preoperative T Staging after NACT and in the evaluation of lymph node involvement. In the second part, we analyze the different surgical approaches, discussing the role of axillary surgery, as well as the possibility of non-operative management after-NACT, which has been the subject of recent trials. Finally, we focus on emerging techniques that will change the diagnostic assessment of breast cancer in the near future.

Can breast MRI and adjunctive Doppler ultrasound improve the accuracy of predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND

To examine the accuracy of MRI and Doppler ultrasound (US) for detecting residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer and evaluate whether adjunctive Doppler US improves the MRI accuracy.

METHODS

We reviewed 276 invasive breast cancer cases treated with NAC. Tumors were classified into four subtypes based on estrogen receptor and HER2 status. Response to NAC was evaluated using contrast-enhanced MRI and Doppler US. Residual Doppler flow was assumed to indicate a residual tumor. MRI and Doppler findings were compared with the histopathological findings of resected specimens. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as neither in situ nor invasive cancer left.

RESULTS

Of the 276 tumors, imaging complete responses were observed using MRI and Doppler US in 62 (22%) and 111 (40%), respectively, whereas pCR was achieved in 44 (16%). MRI and Doppler US predicted residual tumor with 88% and 69% sensitivity, 80% and 91% specificity, 87% and 73% accuracy, 96% and 98% PPV, and 56% and 36% NPV, respectively. The accuracies of MRI and Doppler US were significantly higher for HER2-negative than HER2-positive tumors (p < 0.001 and p = 0.043, respectively). Seven (26%) of 27 false-negative cases identified by MRI were correctly diagnosed as positives with adjunctive Doppler US.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MRI accurately detected residual tumor with 87% accuracy, this was still not sufficient to meet clinical demands and differed with tumor subtype. Adjunctive Doppler US in cases that appear to show a complete response on MRI might reduce chances of false negatives and increase the NPV of MRI for predicting residual tumor.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer

Patients with locally advanced invasive breast cancers are often treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definitive surgical intervention. The primary aims of this approach are to: 1) reduce tumor burden thereby permitting breast conservation rather than mastectomy; 2) promptly treat possible metastatic disease, whether or not it is detectable on preoperative staging; and 3) potentially tailor future chemotherapeutic decisions by monitoring in-vivo tumor response. Accurate radiological assessment permits optimal management and planning in this population. However, assessment of tumor size and response to treatment can vary depending on the modality used, the measurement technique (such as single longest diameter, 3-D measurements, or calculated tumor volume), and varied response of different tumor subtypes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (such as concentric shrinkage or tumor fragmentation). As discussed in further detail, digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, US and MRI represent the key modalities with potential to help guide patient management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Predicting Treatment Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography

PURPOSE

To prospectively investigate ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography (US-guided DOT) in predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-eight breast cancer patients, with a total of 93 lesions, were included in our study. Pre- and post-last chemotherapy, size and total hemoglobin concentration (THC) of each lesion were measured by conventional US and US-guided DOT 1 day before biopsy (time point t0, THC THC0, SIZE S0) and 1 to 2 days before surgery (time point tL, THCL, SL). The relative changes in THC and SIZE of lesions after the first and last NAC cycles were considered as the variables ΔTHC and ΔSIZE. Receiver operating characteristic curve was performed to calculate ΔTHC and ΔSIZE cutoff values to evaluate pathologic response of 93 breast cancers to NAC, which were then prospectively used to predicate response of 61 breast cancers to NAC.

RESULTS

The cutoff values of ΔTHC and ΔSIZE for evaluation of breast cancers NAC treatment response were 23.9% and 42.6%. At ΔTHC 23.9%, the predicted treatment response in 61 breast lesions for the time points t1 to t3 was calculated by area under the curve (AUC), which were AUC₁ 0.534 (P=.6668), AUC₂ 0.604 (P=.1893), and AUC₃ 0.674(P =. 0.027), respectively; for ΔSIZE 42.6%, at time points t1 to t3, AUC₁ 0.505 (P=.9121), AUC₂ 0.645 (P=.0115), and AUC₃ 0.719 (P=.0018).

CONCLUSION

US-guided DOT ΔTHC 23.9% and US ΔSIZE 42.6% can be used for the response evaluation and earlier prediction of the pathological response after three rounds of chemotherapy.

Imaging Considerations and Interprofessional Opportunities in the Care of Breast Cancer Patients in the Neoadjuvant Setting

OBJECTIVE

To discuss standard-of-care and emerging imaging techniques employed for screening and detection, diagnosis and staging, monitoring response to therapy, and guiding cancer treatments.

DATA SOURCES

Published journal articles indexed in the National Library of Medicine database and relevant websites.

CONCLUSION

Imaging plays a fundamental role in the care of cancer patients and specifically, breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting, providing an excellent opportunity for interprofessional collaboration between oncologists, researchers, radiologists, and oncology nurses. Quantitative imaging strategies to assess cellular, molecular, and vascular characteristics within the tumor is needed to better evaluate initial diagnosis and treatment response.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses caring for patients in all settings must continue to seek education on emerging imaging techniques. Oncology nurses provide education about the test, ensure the patient has appropriate pre-testing instructions, and manage patient expectations about timing of results availability.

Has color Doppler a role in the evaluation of mammary lesions?

Has color Doppler a role in the evaluation of mammary lesions? A schematic review of color Doppler diagnostic criteria, indicating a benign or malignant lesion, are described.Malignant tumors have a tendency to show increased vascularization, but avascular tumors may be found as well as hypervascular benign tumors.Number of vessels, blood-flow velocity, and intra-tumoral vessel resistance assessed by color Doppler ultrasonography don't permit clear differentiation between malignant and benign tumors, but intra-tumoral blood-flow analysis well correlates with aggressiveness and histological grade of the mass, so a preoperative assessment using Color Doppler may give preliminary prognostic informations useful for therapeutic planning.Color Doppler ultrasound may be valuable also in assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in particular of antiangiogenesis treatments.Color Doppler ultrasound has many other useful applications in the evaluation of diseases of the female and male breast, that are reviewed in the paper.Color Doppler however is not conceived as a stand-alone examination, but associated with B-mode ultrasound that is quite effective as a diagnostic tool, often not requiring Doppler informations.

Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer

The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for the treatment of primary breast cancer has constantly increased, especially in trials of new therapeutic regimens. In the 1980 s, NST was shown to substantially improve breast-conserving surgery rates and was first typically used for patients with inoperable locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. Investigators have since also used NST as an in vivo test for chemosensitivity by assessing pathologic complete response. Today, by using pathologic response and other biomarkers as intermediate end points, results from trials of new regimens and therapies that use NST are aimed to precede and anticipate the results from larger adjuvant trials. In 2003, a panel of representatives from various breast cancer clinical research groups was first convened in Biedenkopf to formulate recommendations on the use of NST. The obtained consensus was updated in two subsequent meetings in 2004 and 2006. The most recent conference on recommendations on the use of NST took place in 2010 and forms the basis of this report.

Spatial registration of temporally separated whole breast 3D ultrasound images

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential for use of image volume based registration (IVBaR) to aid in measurement of changes in the tumor during chemotherapy of breast cancer. Successful IVBaR could aid in the detection of such changes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and potentially be useful for routine breast cancer screening and diagnosis. IVBaR was employed in a new method of automated estimation of tumor volume in studies following the radiologist identification of the tumor region in the prechemotherapy scan. The authors have also introduced a new semiautomated method for validation of registration based on Doppler ultrasound (U.S.) signals that are independent of the grayscale signals used for registration. This Institutional Review Board approved study was conducted on 10 patients undergoing chemotherapy and 14 patients with a suspicious/unknown mass scheduled to undergo biopsy. Reasonably reproducible mammographic positioning and nearly whole breast U.S. imaging were achieved. The image volume was registered offline with a mutual information cost function and global interpolation based on a thin-plate spline using MIAMI FUSE software developed at the University of Michigan. The success and accuracy of registration of the three dimensional (3D) U.S. image volume were measured by means of mean registration error (MRE). IVBaR was successful with MRE of 4.3 +/- 1.7 mm in 9 out of 10 reproducibility automated breast ultrasound (ABU) studies and in 12 out of 17 ABU image pairs collected before, during, or after 115 +/- 14 days of chemotherapy. Semiautomated tumor volume estimation was performed on registered image volumes giving 86 +/- 8% mean accuracy compared to the radiologist hand-segmented tumor volume on seven cases. Doppler studies yielded fractional volume of color pixels in the region surrounding the lesion and its change with changing breast compression. The Doppler study of patients with detectable blood flow included five patients with suspicious masses and three undergoing chemotherapy. Spatial alignment of the 3D blood vessel data from the Doppler studies provided independent measures for the validation of registration. In 15 Doppler image volume pairs scanned with differing breast compression, the mean centerline separation value was 1.5 +/- 0.6 mm, while MRE based on a few identifiable structural points common to the two grayscale image volumes was 1.1 +/- 0.6 mm. Another measure, the overlap ratio of blood vessels, was shown to increase from 0.32 to 0.59 (+84%) with IVBaR for pairs at various compression levels. These results show that successful registration of ABU scans may be accomplished for comparison and integration of information.

Anniversary paper: evolution of ultrasound physics and the role of medical physicists and the AAPM and its journal in that evolution

Ultrasound has been the greatest imaging modality worldwide for many years by equipment purchase value and by number of machines and examinations. It is becoming increasingly the front end imaging modality; serving often as an extension of the physician's fingers. We believe that at the other extreme, high-end systems will continue to compete with all other imaging modalities in imaging departments to be the method of choice for various applications, particularly where safety and cost are paramount. Therapeutic ultrasound, in addition to the physiotherapy practiced for many decades, is just coming into its own as a major tool in the long progression to less invasive interventional treatment. The physics of medical ultrasound has evolved over many fronts throughout its history. For this reason, a topical review, rather than a primarily chronological one is presented. A brief review of medical ultrasound imaging and therapy is presented, with an emphasis on the contributions of medical physicists, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and its publications, particularly its journal Medical Physics. The AAPM and Medical Physics have contributed substantially to training of physicists and engineers, medical practitioners, technologists, and the public.

Vascularity change and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer

For advanced breast cancer with severe local disease (ABC) (stage III/IV), neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves local control and surgical outcome. However, about approximately 20 to 30% of advanced cancers show either no or poor response to chemotherapy. To prevent unnecessary treatment, a capability of predicting clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of ABC is highly desirable. Vascularity index (VI) of breast cancers was derived from the quantification results in 30 ABC patients by using power Doppler sonography. Power Doppler sonography evaluation was performed every one to two weeks during chemotherapy. The overall response rate for 30 advanced patients tested was 70%, when 50% or more reduction in tumor size was the objective clinical response. Chemotherapy response was unrelated to the original tumor size (p = 0.563) or chemotherapy agents used (p = 0.657). The median VI for all 30 patients was 4.99%. The response rates for hypervascular tumors vs. hypovascular tumors, based on initial median value, were 86.7% and 53.3%, respectively (p = 0.109). The average VIs in responders and nonresponders were 7.67 +/- 4.77% and 4.01 +/- 3.82% (p = 0.052). There was a tendency for responders who have a relatively high initial vascularity. The VI change in responder group shows a pattern of initial increasing in vascularity followed by decreasing in vascularity. All patients (17/17) with a VI increment of >5% during chemotherapy had good chemotherapy response, whereas in patients with a VI increment of <5%, the response rate was 30.8% (4/13) (p < 0.001). For patients with a peak VI of >10% during chemotherapy, the response rate was 94.1% (16/17). However, in patients with a peak VI of <10%, the response rate was 38.5% (5/13) (p = 0.001). This prediction was made mostly within one month (25.47 +/- 12.96 d for VI increments >5% and 25.44 +/- 12.41 d for VI increased to >10%). In the meantime, the differences in size reduction shown in B-mode sonography were insignificant between responders and nonresponders (patient group with VI increment >5%, p = 0.308; patient group with peak VI >10%, p = 0.396). In conclusion, we propose that VI as determined by using power Doppler sonography is a good and inexpensive clinical tool for monitoring vascularity changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ABC patients. Two parameters--VI increment >5% and peak VI >10%--are potential early predictors for good responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy within one month in patients with ABC.

Prognostic imaging in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally-advanced breast cancer should be cost-effective

INTRODUCTION

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cases of locally advanced breast cancer has been steadily increasing, and is also in wider use for other cancers. As a consequence, a growing number of studies have focused on the question of how best to assess the therapeutic response to various chemotherapy or systemic therapy regimens. Prognostic imaging of response to therapy early in the course of a planned chemotherapy regimen could be of considerable value, particularly if shifting to another therapy regimen would be more effective.

METHODS

A cost effectiveness analysis was completed, specific to imaging of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer, to determine the dominant parameters that would make imaging systems cost effective. The cost analysis was completed with respect to a system for near infrared spectral imaging, but the costs are not dramatically different for other systems such as PET or MRI. Using a standard metric of $25,000 per discounted life year gained as a measure of a successful system.

RESULTS

It is shown that system specificity and patient average life expectancy are not dominant factors. Increases in cure rate and the efficacy of the initial chemotherapy are dominant factors. As long as the initial chemotherapy was less than 90% effective, most imaging systems would be cost effective, and if the cure rate of the disease could be increased as little as 1% through a change to alternate therapy, then the cost effectiveness of the system would be acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Based upon this simple economic analysis, diagnostic imaging of neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears warranted, assuming that it can be shown that the early shift from ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy to a more effective one has a measurable benefit in cure rate. This study indicates that the most important issue is to assess the added benefit of individualized chemotherapy in patient management, and clinical trials in this area would then provide the data required to justify analysis of prognostic imaging procedures.

Doppler ultrasound scoring to predict chemotherapeutic response in advanced breast cancer

Background

Doppler ultrasonography (US) is increasingly being utilized as an imaging modality in breast cancer. It is used to study the vascular characteristics of the tumor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard modality of treatment in locally advanced breast cancer. Histological examination remains the gold standard to assess the chemotherapy response. However, based on the color Doppler findings, a new scoring system that could predict histological response following chemotherapy is proposed.

Methods

Fifty cases of locally advanced infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast were studied. The mean age of the patients was 44.5 years. All patients underwent clinical, Doppler and histopathological assessment followed by three cycles of CAF (Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and 5-Fluorouracil) chemotherapy, repeat clinical and Doppler examination and surgery. The resected specimens were examined histopathologically and histological response was correlated with Doppler findings. The Doppler characteristics of the tumor were graded as 1–4 for <25%, 25–50%, >50% and complete disappearance of flow signals respectively. A cumulative score was calculated and compared with histopathological response. Results were analyzed using Chi square test, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.

Results

The maximum Doppler score according to the proposed scoring system was twelve and minimum three. Higher scores corresponded with a more favorable histopathological response. Twenty four patients had complete response to chemotherapy. Sixteen of these 24 patients (66.7%) had a cumulative Doppler score more than nine. The sensitivity of cumulative score >5 was 91.7% and specificity was 38.5%. The area under the ROC curve of the cumulative score >9 was 0.72.

Conclusion

Doppler scoring can be accurately used to objectively predict the response to chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and it correlates well with histopathological response.

Monitoring therapeutic efficacy in breast carcinomas

The aim of imaging during and after neoadjuvant therapy is to document and quantify tumor response: has the tumor size been accurately measured? Certainly, the most exciting information for the oncologists is: can we identify good or nonresponders, and can we predict the pathological response early after the initiation of treatment? This review article will discuss the role and the performance of the different imaging modalities (mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET imaging) for evaluating this therapeutic response. It is important to emphasize that, at this time, clinical examination and conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasound) are the only methods recognized by the international criteria. Magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET imaging are very promising for predicting the response early after the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.