Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the spleen

Diagnostic insights into splenic pathologies: the role of multiparametric ultrasound

Ultrasound (US) evaluation of the spleen is mandatory in the assessment of patients with chronic liver disease, and splenomegaly can be a sign of systemic diseases. However, due to the lack of distinctive ultrasound findings in specific splenic pathologies, clinical diagnosis can be very challenging. Splenomegaly, defined by increased splenic dimensions, can indicate underlying systemic conditions and is a common manifestation of portal hypertension (PH). Ultrasound and Doppler techniques help assessing splenic involvement in PH. Splenic stiffness measurement, using elastography, offers additional diagnostic accuracy, especially when liver stiffness measurements are inconclusive. CEUS enhances the diagnostic capability for focal splenic lesions, differentiating between benign and malignant lesions by their distinct enhancement patterns, and plays also a critical role in the context of splenic traumatic pathology. Overall, CEUS significantly improves the characterization of splenic pathology, reducing the need for invasive procedures and ensuring appropriate patient management. This review article describes the normal US findings of the spleen and examines the role of multiparametric US in the evaluation of the most common splenic pathologies encountered in the daily clinical practice.

Cystic splenic lesions: a sonographic approach-retrospective study in 111 patients

OBJECTIVES

To describe and categorize splenic cystic-appearing lesions (S-CAL) with B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study investigated S-CALs in 111 patients between 2003 and 2023 in an interdisciplinary ultrasound center with B-mode ultrasound, color Doppler sonography (CDS), and CEUS. S-CAL was characterized by echogenicity, diameter, and shape, as well as additional features like septation, calcification, or wall thickening, and CDS/CEUS were used to identify perfusion. Histological examination or imaging follow-up was necessary to determine the nature of S-CAL. Moreover, 'S-CAL with risk' was defined, necessitating further procedures. Four types (0-III) of S-CALs were defined based on ultrasound parameters. Fisher's exact test was used to compare non-parametric data.

RESULTS

S-CAL of 111 patients (58 female, 53 men-average age: 58.6 years) was examined. Final diagnoses were: splenic cyst (n = 64, 57.7%); splenic abscess (n = 10, 9.0%); intrasplenic pseudoaneurysm (n = 10, 9.0%); splenic metastasis (n = 10, 9.0%); splenic infarction (n = 6, 5.4%); splenic hematoma (n = 4, 3.6%); other (n = 7, 6.3%). S-CAL groupings were type 0 (n = 11, 9.9%), type I (n = 33, 29.7%), type II (n = 24, 21.6%), and type III (n = 43, 38.7%). 'S-CAL with risk' was diagnosed in n = 41 (36.9%). Malignant S-CAL was only seen in type II (n = 2, 8.2%) and type III (n = 9, 20.9%) (p < 0.001). 'S-CALs with risk' were found more frequently in type 0 (n = 11, 100%), type II (n = 16, 66.7%) and type III (n = 13, 30.2%) than in type I (n = 1, 3%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

B-mode ultrasound, CDS, and CEUS are useful to further characterize and follow-up S-CAL and identify 'S-CAL with risk', requiring further procedures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Ultrasound imaging is valuable for the detection, categorization, and monitoring of cystic-appearing lesions of the spleen, as well as for the identification of those with risk.

KEY POINTS

An S-CAL may introduce uncertainty in clinical practice as imaging-based risk stratification is missing. B-mode and CEUS, along with the clinical context and follow-up, assist in characterizing and identifying 'S-CAL with risk'. S-CALs encompass various lesions, including simple cysts, metastases, abscesses, and intrasplenic pseudoaneurysms.

The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of focal splenic lesions

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization of non-traumatic focal splenic lesions. Focal splenic lesions are less common than in other abdominal organs like the liver. Conventional ultrasound and Doppler ultrasound have a limited role in the characterization of splenic lesions, resulting in many of them unspecified. Contrast ultrasound is an accessible, cheap, and safe technique which can help in the immediate characterization of lesions incidentally detected in the ultrasound examination, being a good alternative to others imaging techniques. We review in detail the technique and the main indications. We also analyze imaging findings and enhancement pattern by using representative case of the main splenic lesions for both benign (epithelial cyst, cystic lymphangioma, hemangioma, hamartoma, infarction, sclerosing angiomatous nodular transformation, abscesses, sarcoidosis), and malignant (lymphoma, metastasis) and its pathological correlation in some cases.

Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Current Role in Adults and Children for Various Indications

Intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a rapidly evolving imaging technique that uses a microbubble contrast agent to enhance ultrasonographic images by augmenting characterization of blood vessels and organ perfusion. CEUS is considered as a useful problem-solving tool and as an indicated first-line imaging modality in select settings. CEUS technique has an inherent advantage over its predecessor B-mode and Doppler imaging. This article reviews different approved and off-label use of CEUS in the pediatric and adult population and also discusses Food and Drug Administration-approved contrast agents in the United States, their reported side effects, and ongoing efforts in the field.

Differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions: a meta-analysis and pictorial review of imaging features

OBJECTIVES

Splenic lesions might exhibit overlapping imaging features, varying from benign entities like cysts and hemangiomas to malignancies such as lymphoma and angiosarcoma. This meta-analysis aims to delineate imaging characteristics that distinguish malignant from benign splenic lesions.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies on imaging features differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions. We extracted data on splenic pathology and imaging characteristics and assessed the methodological quality via QUADAS-2. Odds ratio meta-analyses were performed using STATA (Version 17.0, Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Portal phase hypoenhancement, hypovascular enhancement pattern, diffusion restriction, and late phase hypoenhancement, with odds ratios above 10, highly indicate malignancy. Other features suggestive of malignancy include solid morphology, lymphadenopathy, presence of perisplenic fluid, arterial hypoenhancement, hypoechogenicity on ultrasound, splenomegaly, and presence of multiple lesions. In contrast, cystic morphology, hypervascular-washout and hypervascular-persistent pattern of enhancement, late phase hyperenhancement, anechogenicity on ultrasound, portal phase hyperenhancement, well-defined borders, and calcification are in favour of benign pathology.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores the critical role of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing malignant from benign splenic lesions, emphasizing the role of features like portal phase hypoenhancement and restricted diffusion in diagnosing malignancies. Additionally, the study emphasizes the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, which allows for the visualization of key contrast-enhancement patterns without the risk of ionizing radiation exposure.

Diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities for splenic malignancies: A comparative meta-analysis

Background and objectives

The spleen hosts both benign and malignant lesions. Despite multiple imaging modalities, the distinction between these lesions poses a diagnostic challenge, marked by varying diagnostic accuracy levels across methods. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of various imaging techniques for detecting malignant splenic lesions.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases for studies evaluating imaging techniques in detecting malignant splenic lesions. Data extraction included diagnostic accuracy metrics, and methodological quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Diagnostic Test Accuracy meta-analyses were conducted using R (version: 4.2.1). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to compare different modalities and clinical settings.

Results

Our study included 28 studies (pooled sample size: 2358), primarily using retrospective designs with histopathology as the reference standard. PET scan demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 92 %), demonstrating a sensitivity of 93 % (95 % CI: 80.4 % - 97.7 %) and a specificity of 82.8 % (95 % CI: 71.1 % - 90.4 %). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), Contrast-enhanced CT scan, and contrast-enhanced MRI also showed impressive performance with AUCs of 91.4 %, 90.9 %, and 85.3 %, respectively. Differences among these modalities were not statistically significant, but they outperformed non-contrast-enhanced methods. PET and CEUS exhibited higher specificity for lymphoma cases compared to studies including other malignancies.

Conclusion and clinical implications

Overall, PET emerges as the best modality for splenic malignancies, and CEUS and CE-MRI show promise as potential alternatives, notably due to their reduced radiation exposure. Further research is essential for precise malignancy differentiation.

[Standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in clinical acute and emergency medicine and critical care (CEUS Acute) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGK, ÖGUM, SGUM and DEGUM]

The present document describes the possible applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in emergency examinations. Guidelines on contrast medium ultrasound in acute and emergency care and intensive care medicine have not yet been published. Evidence-based CEUS guidelines were first provided by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) and the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB). The presented recommendations describe the possible applications and protocols of CEUS in acute care.

[Alternatives of histological material collection - When and how is histological confirmation by ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or endosonography (EUS) useful?]

Histological classifications of tumorous lesions together with adequate staging are necessary for stage-appropriate and personalized therapies. The indications, technical possibilities, and limitations as well as potential complications of image-guided needle biopsy by ultrasound, computed tomography, and endosonography are described. Which procedure for which organ and which lesion?

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the spleen, pancreas and gallbladder in children

Gray-scale and color/power Doppler ultrasound (US) are the first-line imaging modalities to evaluate the spleen, gallbladder and pancreas in children. The increasing use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a reliable and safe method to evaluate liver lesions in the pediatric population promises potential for imaging other internal organs. Although CEUS applications of the spleen, gallbladder and pancreas have been well described in adults, they have not been fully explored in children. In this manuscript, we present an overview of the applications of CEUS for normal variants and diseases affecting the spleen, gallbladder and pancreas. We highlight a variety of cases as examples of how CEUS can serve in the diagnosis and follow-up for such diseases in children. Our discussion includes specific examination techniques; presentation of the main imaging findings in various benign and malignant lesions of the spleen, gallbladder and pancreas in children; and acknowledgment of the limitations of CEUS for these organs.

Focal splenic lesions: Imaging spectrum of diseases on CT, MRI and PET/CT

The spleen can be affected by a variety of diseases. Some of them are readily identified as variations of normal or benign diseases on imaging. However, for a substantial number of focal splenic abnormalities, the diagnosis can be difficult so that histopathologic analysis may be required for a definite diagnosis. In this review, the typical splenic abnormalities that can be diagnosed with imaging with a high degree of confidence are illustrated. The complementary role of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/CT that helps make a diagnostic approach is discussed. Finally, current applications and future trends of radiomics and artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of splenic diseases are addressed.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Children: Implementation and Key Diagnostic Applications

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) utilization is expanding rapidly, particularly in children, in whom the modality offers important advantages of dynamic evaluation of the vasculature, portability, lack of ionizing radiation, and lack of need for sedation. Accumulating data establish an excellent safety profile of ultrasound contrast agents in children. Although only FDA-approved for IV use in children for characterizing focal liver lesions and for use during echocardiography, growing off-label applications are expanding the diagnostic potential of ultrasound. Focal liver lesion evaluation is the most common use of CEUS, and the American College of Radiology Pediatric LI-RADS Working Group recommends including CEUS for evaluation of a newly discovered focal liver lesion in many circumstances. Data also support the role of CEUS in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal trauma, and CEUS is becoming a potential alternative to CT in this setting. Additional potential applications that require further study include evaluation of pathology in the lung, spleen, brain, pancreas, bowel, kidney, female pelvis, and scrotum. This review explores the implementation of CEUS in children, describing basic principles of ultrasound contrast agents and CEUS technique and summarizing current and potential IV diagnostic applications based on pediatric-specific supporting evidence.

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Focal Splenic Lesions

Purpose

To identify and validate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions.

Patients and Methods

Splenic lesions in 123 patients who underwent conventional ultrasound (B-mode US) and CEUS were included in this study. Two radiologists evaluated the sonograms of B-mode and CEUS. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant imaging predictors for splenic malignant lesions. Two other radiologists independently reviewed B-mode and CEUS sonograms and diagnosed the lesions based on proposed criteria as 1) benign, 2) probably benign, 3) probably malignant or 4) malignant. The diagnostic efficiency between B-mode US and CEUS was compared.

Results

Common imaging findings of malignant lesions included hypoechoic, ill-defined margin, absence of cystic/necrotic portion, presence of splenomegaly on B-mode US, and hypoenhancement, rapid washout and presence of intralesional vessels on CEUS (P < 0.05). Among them, three independent features were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis: hypoechoic pattern, hypoenhancement pattern and intralesional vessels. When three of these findings were combined as a predictor for splenic malignant lesions, 22 (55.0%) of 40 malignant splenic lesions were identified with a specificity of 100%. The diagnostic performance of two readers using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 0.622 and 0.533, respectively, for B-mode US, which was significantly improved to 0.908 and 0.906 for CEUS (P < 0.001). The degree of other diagnostic efficiency and inter-reader agreement also increased with CEUS compared to B-mode US.

Conclusion

CEUS may provide more useful information than B-mode US and improve the diagnosis efficiency for distinguishing malignant from benign splenic lesions.

[Spleen biopsy: "pros and cons" or better "when and when not?"]

Due to the relatively high complication rate, the necessity of a spleen biopsy is controversially discussed. In establishing its indication, the clinical background and performed diagnostics must be considered. Based on the medical history, imaging procedures and sonographic course, different clinical scenarios are conceivable. The aim of this review is to describe the indications of splenic biopsy considering various clinical scenarios.

Vascular pattern and diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in spleen alterations

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been used as an additional imaging technique in order to clarify rare focal splenic lesions (FSL). CEUS is a safe and cost-effective modality for assessment of perfusion.

OBJECTIVE

To validate contrast enhancement pattern and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in unclear FSL.

METHODS

CEUS examinations of the spleen in 50 patients between 2012 and 2018 were included in the study. Examinations were performed using B-mode, colour-coded Doppler ultrasound (CCDS) and CEUS after injection of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles and interpreted in consensus by two experienced radiologists. Reference standard was defined as histopathological report and clinical course (treatment response, long term follow up).

RESULTS

All patients were successfully examined by CEUS without an adverse reaction. CEUS presented the correct differentiation of benign and malignant alterations in 49/50 (98%). Lesion washout was found in all malignant but also 16.7% of all benign lesions. Matched to the histopathological report and clinical follow up, CEUS represented a sensitivity of 100% (95% -CI, 57-100), a specificity of 98% (95% -CI, 88-100), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83% (95% -CI, 44-97) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (95% -CI, 92-100).

CONCLUSION

CEUS may provide additional information by visualization of dynamic contrast enhancement pattern to differentiate benign and malignant lesions. Nevertheless, established criteria for malignancy (early enhancement or washout) in FSL should be considered with caution since they are also found in benign lesions.

Ultrasound imaging of abdominal sarcoidosis: State of the art

Since it has been recognized that sarcoidosis (SA) is not an exclusive disorder of the lungs but can also affect other organs such as the liver and spleen, efforts have been made to define specific imaging criteria for the diagnosis of the single organ involvement, and the concept has been reinforced that the exclusion of alternative causes is important to achieve the correct diagnosis. Ultrasound (US) is a useful tool to evaluate patients with suspected abdominal SA, such as of the liver, spleen, kidney, pancreas and other organs, showing findings such as organomegaly, focal lesions and lymphadenopathy. While the diagnosis of abdominal SA is more predictable in the case of involvement of other organs (e.g., lungs), the problem is more complex in the case of isolated abdominal SA. The recent use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography has provided additional information about the enhancement patterns and tissue rigidity in abdominal SA. Here we critically review the role of US in abdominal SA, reporting typical findings and limitations of current evidence and by discussing future perspectives of study.

What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II)

In “What should be known prior to performing EUS exams, Part I,” the authors discussed the need for clinical information and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking EUS examinations. Herewith, we present part II which addresses some (technical) controversies how EUS is performed and discuss from different points of view providing the relevant evidence as available. (1) Does equipment design influence the complication rate? (2) Should we have a standardized screen orientation? (3) Radial EUS versus longitudinal (linear) EUS. (4) Should we search for incidental findings using EUS?

Ultrasound contrast agents

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays an important role in imaging of the mediastinum and abdominal organs. Since the introduction of US contrast agents (UCA) for transabdominal US, attempts have been made to apply contrast-enhanced US techniques also to EUS. Since 2003, specific contrast-enhanced imaging was possible using EUS. Important studies have been published regarding contrast-enhanced EUS and the characterization of focal pancreatic lesions, lymph nodes, and subepithelial tumors. In this manuscript, we describe the relevant UCA, their application, and specific image acquisition as well as the principles of image tissue characterization using contrast-enhanced EUS. Safety issues, potential future developments, and EUS-specific issues are reviewed.

The value of contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted MR imaging for distinguishing benign and malignant splenic masses

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging for differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 51 patients with 35 benign and 16 malignant focal splenic lesions. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced dynamic and DW MR imaging. Two radiologists evaluated the MR images in consensus. Significant imaging findings on univariate and multivariate analyses were identified and their diagnostic performance for predicting the malignant splenic lesion was analyzed. Using receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut-off of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value corresponding to the maximal Youden's index (J) for differentiating the two groups was determined.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, low signal intensity (SI) on the arterial, portal and 3-min delayed-phase images, high or iso SI on the DW image, iso or low SI on the ADC map, the presence of diffusion restriction and arterial hypovascularity with a progressive enhancement pattern were more frequently observed (p < 0.05) in malignant splenic lesions. The ADC value was significantly lower for malignancy than for benignancy (0.78 ± 0.24 vs 1.16 ± 0.53 × 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1); p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off ADC value for differentiating the two groups was 0.995 × 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1). In multivariate analysis, findings that differentiated malignant from benign splenic lesions were low SI on the 3-min delayed-phase image [odds ratio (OR), 27.68; p = 0.006] and the presence of diffusion restriction (OR, 48.01; p = 0.002). When two of these criteria were combined, 12 (75.0%) of 16 malignant splenic masses were identified with a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced dynamic and DW MR imaging may be helpful for differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions. A low SI on the 3-min delayed phase and diffusion restriction are the most reliable findings for the differentiation of malignant from benign splenic lesions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Dynamic and DW MR imaging help in distinguishing malignant from benign splenic lesions. A low SI on the 3-min delayed phase and diffusion restriction are the most reliable findings for the differentiation of malignant from benign splenic lesions.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the spleen

Abnormalities in the spleen are less common than in most other abdominal organs. However, they will be regularly encountered by ultrasound practitioners, who carefully evaluate the spleen in their abdominal ultrasound studies. Conventional grey scale and Doppler ultrasound are frequently unable to characterise focal splenic abnormalities; even when clinical and laboratory information is added to the ultrasound findings, it is often not possible to make a definite diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is easy to perform, inexpensive, safe and will usually provide valuable additional information about splenic abnormalities, allowing a definitive or short differential diagnosis to be made. It also identifies those lesions that may require further imaging or biopsy, from those that can be safely dismissed or followed with interval ultrasound imaging. CEUS is also indicated in confirming the nature of suspected accessory splenic tissue and in selected patients with abdominal trauma. This article describes the CEUS examination technique, summarises the indications for CEUS and provides guidance on interpretation of the CEUS findings in splenic ultrasound.

Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abscess drainage--feasibility and clinical value

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of intracavitary-applied contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICCEUS) with BR1 in ultrasound-guided puncture and drainage of abdominal and pelvic abscesses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 71 consecutive patients received ICCEUS after placement of a drainage catheter or a needle in abdominal or pelvic abscesses. Portions of 0.1 ml of BR1 and 20 ml of saline were injected through the drainage catheter or needle. Ultrasound recordings were evaluated to answer the following questions: correct placement of the catheter by showing enhancement in the cavity and the drain - ICCEUS findings suggesting incomplete enhancement in all abscess cavities - enhancement in non-abscess structures.

RESULTS

About 52% of patients had liver, 14% of patients had intraperitoneal, 11% had subphrenic, 14% had retroperitoneal, 6% had splenic, and 4% had pelvic abscesses. The majority of the patients received drain placement with 10-F using trocar technique. Enhancement in the drain or needle was seen in all patients. In 2% of patients, during the initial approach, a dislodgment of the catheter from the abscess cavity was diagnosed. Due to non-enhancing abscess compartments, in 36% of the patients more than one drainage treatment was necessary at the time of the first approach. In 14% of the patients communication with surrounding structures was diagnosed. Additional treatment resulted in 4% of cases.

CONCLUSION

ICCEUS was helpful in all patients to confirm correct placement of drain or puncture needle. In 40% of patients, as a consequence of ICCEUS, additional therapy was scheduled, either additional drainage or abscess puncture, endoscopic retrograde drainage of the biliary or pancreatic duct or thoracic intervention.

Contrast-enhanced sonography for the identification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The use of contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) has yielded promising results in the differentiation of thyroid nodules. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess its performance in identifying and distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published through the end of December 2013. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. For the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules worldwide, the overall mean rates of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88-93%) and 86% (95% CI, 83-89%), respectively. The summary diagnostic odds ratio was 52.83 (95% CI, 21.71-128.55), and the area under the curve for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicates that CEUS may be a valuable supplemental method, with high rates of sensitivity and specificity, to use for identifying and distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Hepatosplenic sarcoidosis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings and implications for clinical practice

Sarcoidosis is a complex granulomatous disease that affects virtually every organ and tissue, with a prevalence that varies significantly among the sites involved. The role of conventional imaging, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, in the assessment of hepatosplenic sarcoidosis is well established by revealing organ enlargement, multiple discrete nodules, and lymphadenopathy. In this review, we aim to describe contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings in liver and spleen involvement by sarcoidosis, reporting evidence from the literature and cases from our experience, after a brief update on safety profile, cost-effectiveness, and clinical indications of this novel technique. Furthermore, we highlight potential advantages of CEUS in assessing hepatosplenic sarcoidosis that may be useful in the clinical practice.

Postoperative isolated splenic metastasis from gallbladder cancer: report of a case

We present a rare case of metachronous splenic metastasis from gallbladder cancer. A 65-year-old female with gallbladder cancer underwent a partial hepatectomy with en-bloc resection of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile duct. Ten months later, she presented with isolated splenic metastasis and underwent splenectomy with distal pancreatectomy. The histological diagnosis confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma from gallbladder cancer. She had no signs of recurrence 4 years after the second surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of isolated splenic metastasis from gallbladder cancer.

Focal splenic lesions: US findings

Ultrasound (US) imaging of the spleen was considered of little use in the past and was performed only to distinguish between cystic and solid lesions. However, in the last decade due to experience acquired and the introduction of second-generation contrast agents, this technique has been re-evaluated as contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) allows detection and characterization of most focal lesions of the spleen with a high sensitivity and a good specificity. Gray-scale US presents a low specificity in splenic infarctions with a high rate of false negative cases, whereas specificity reaches 100 %, if the examination is performed using US contrast agents. Gray-scale US can provide a correct diagnosis in simple cysts, whereas CEUS is useful when cystic lymphangioma is suspected. In the study of splenic lesions, the most important problem is to differentiate between angioma, hamartoma, lymphoma, and metastasis. CEUS reaches a good specificity in the differentiation of benign from malignant splenic lesions, as hypo-enhancement in the parenchymal phase is predictive of malignancy in 87 % of cases. In conclusion, Gray-scale US and particularly CEUS are at present widely indicated in the study of focal splenic lesions.

Errors made in the ultrasound diagnostics of the spleen

Ultrasonography, like any imaging method, entails the risk of errors. From among all means of imaging, it is the most subjective and dependent on the examiner's knowledge and experience. This paper presents the causes of examiner-dependent errors as well as those which result from technical settings and preparation of the patient for the examination. Moreover, the authors discuss the most frequent errors in the diagnosis of splenic conditions, which result from insufficient knowledge concerning anatomical variants of this organ, wrong measurements and incorrect examination technique. The mistakes made in the differentiation of focal lesions of the spleen and its hilum are also discussed. Additionally, the differentiation of collateral circulation, lymph nodes and accessory spleens is mentioned. The authors also draw attention to erroneous interpretation of the left liver lobe as a fragment of the spleen as well as the prominent tail of the pancreas filled with gastric contents and intestinal loops as abnormal masses or fluid cisterns in the area of the splenic hilum. Furthermore, the pathologies of the hilum are discussed such as tumors of the splenic flexure of the colon, lesions arising from the left kidney or the left adrenal gland. The authors list characteristic imaging features of the most common focal lesions visualized in a standard ultrasound scan as well as enhancement patterns appearing in contrast-enhanced examinations. The article discusses the features and differentiation of, among others, infarction, splenic cysts including hydatid ones, abscesses and angiomas. The ultrasound appearance of lymphoma and secondary involvement of the spleen by other malignant neoplasms is also mentioned. Moreover, the authors provide useful tips connected with imaging techniques and interpretation of the findings. The ultrasound examination carried out in compliance with current standards allows for an optimal assessment of the organ and reduction of the error-making risk. This article is based on the publication of the experts from the Polish Ultrasound Society of 2005 and updated with the latest findings in pertinent literature. The photographic documentation, which provides images of the discussed lesions, is attached to this article.

Pitfalls of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of splenic sarcoidosis

By observing the real-time behavior of focal liver lesions at three vascular phases (arterial, portal-venous, and late), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been successfully applied to differentiate benign from malignant hepatic nodules. In recent years, numerous studies highlighted the usefulness of CEUS also for other applications such as abdominal trauma, renal, pancreatic, thyroid, and inflammatory bowel diseases, supporting its role even in differentiating benign from malignant splenic nodules. Therefore, the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) recently updated the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents in clinical practice, pointing out the indication to characterize splenic parenchymal inhomogeneity or suspected lesions found on conventional ultrasound (BUS). We describe the case of a patient with a history of colon cancer and finding, at BUS and CEUS, of hypoechoic lesions with a highly suggestive pattern for metastases, subsequently histologically proved to be splenic localizations of a benign and multisystemic granulomatous disease such as sarcoidosis. We therefore reviewed the current literature focusing on the role of CEUS in differentiating benign from malignant splenic lesions, emphasizing on the lack of data and numerical shortage of sarcoidosis derived-lesions in the available studies. We conclude that sarcoidosis remains a diagnosis of exclusion and new studies are needed before defining precise indications of CEUS in these patients.

Standards of the Polish Ultrasound Society - update. Spleen examination

Ultrasound scan of the spleen is an integral part of the overall abdominal examination. Due to its anatomical position, physical examination of the spleen is frequently supplemented with an ultrasound which plays a special role in the differential diagnostics of splenic diseases and facilitates the determination of further diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Similarly to other types of ultrasound scans, the examiner should be familiar with all significant clinical information as well as results of examinations and tests conducted so far. This enables to narrow the scope of search for etiological factors and indicate specific disease entities in the findings as well as allows for accurate assessment of coexistent pathologies. The article presents the standards of the Polish Ultrasound Society concerning the apparatus, preparation for the examination, technique and description of the findings. The authors discuss the normal anatomy of the spleen and the most common pathologies ranging from splenomegaly to splenic traumas. The indications for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound and characteristic patterns of enhancement of individual focal lesions are presented. This article is supplemented with photographic documentation, which provides images of the discussed lesions. The ultrasound examination, if carried out in compliance with current standards, allows for accurate interpretation of detected changes. This article has been prepared on the basis of the Ultrasound Examination Standards of the Polish Ultrasound Society (2011) and updated with the current knowledge.

Splenic hemangiomas: contrast-enhanced sonographic findings

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to illustrate the baseline appearance and enhancement patterns of splenic hemangiomas on contrast-enhanced sonography.

METHODS

Two experienced radiologists retrospectively reviewed by consensus baseline and contrast-enhanced sonographic examinations of 27 patients (14 women and 13 men; mean age, 58.7 years) with 27 splenic hemangiomas (mean size, 2 cm) confirmed by splenectomy, biopsy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging and follow-up.

RESULTS

On baseline sonography, 77.8% of the lesions showed a homogeneous echo texture that was mainly hyperechoic. Color Doppler imaging did not show any signal in 81.5% of the cases. After contrast agent injection, 59.2% of the splenic hemangiomas showed different degrees of contrast enhancement in the arterial phase followed by isoenhancement in the late parenchymal phase. Among these, 2 hemangiomas showed peripheral globular enhancement in the arterial phase, followed by progressive centripetal fill-in. In 29.6% of the cases, some degree of contrast enhancement was appreciable, but the hemangiomas remained substantially hypoechoic throughout the contrast-enhanced sonographic examinations, whereas in 11.1%, the combination of contrast enhancement in the arterial phase followed by wash-out in the late parenchymal phase was evident.

CONCLUSIONS

Isoechogenicity to spleen parenchyma in all phases is the most frequent typical enhancement pattern of splenic hemangiomas observed on contrast-enhanced sonography. Nevertheless, these lesions may show atypical contrast enhancement patterns; therefore, further assessment with cross-sectional techniques is needed.

Characterization of nontraumatic focal splenic lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography

PURPOSE

To compare contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) with contrast-enhanced CT in the assessment of nontraumatic focal lesions of the spleen.

METHODS

CEUS and CT findings in 22 patients with fever of unknown origin and ultrasound-detected splenic focal lesions were analyzed retrospectively. CEUS was performed using an ultrasound unit equipped with a 3.6-MHz probe and contrast-specific software. A 4-ml bolus of second-generation contrast medium was used. The CEUS examinations included a 4-minute recording following injection of the contrast medium. MRI, splenic biopsy, or ultrasound follow-up were used if findings from CT were inconclusive.

RESULTS

The final diagnoses were as follows: seven splenic infarcts, five hemangiomas, three lacerations, two benign cysts, one lymphoma, one granuloma, one abscess, and two lesions of unknown etiology. CEUS and CT had the same specificity (77.2%). Both CEUS and CT failed to characterize nodular hypovascular lesions with a hypoenhancing pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS is as effective as CT for characterizing nontraumatic focal lesions of the spleen. If CEUS findings are consistent with a benign splenic lesion, CT seems to be of limited additional value.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the spleen: an introduction and pictorial essay

A wide variety of pathologies can produce focal lesions within the spleen. These are being more frequently encountered as imaging technology improves. It is vital that radiologists are aware of these pathologies to enable accurate diagnosis. The role of ultrasound contrast in splenic disease will be discussed and illustrated with cases likely to be encountered by general and abdominal radiologists.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of primary splenic lymphoma

We report a case of primary splenic lymphoma incidentally detected on abdominal ultrasound as a well-defined homogenous hypoechoic splenic mass. Further characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed the mass to enhance homogenously during the arterial phase to a degree similar to that of the normal splenic parenchyma followed by rapid washout becoming hypoenhanced on delayed phase.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: The evolving applications

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a major breakthrough for ultrasound imaging in recent years. By using a microbubble contrast agent and contrast-specific imaging software, CEUS is able to depict the micro- and macro-circulation of the targeted organ, which in turn leads to improved performance in diagnosis. Due to the special dual blood supply system in the liver, CEUS is particularly suitable for liver imaging. It is evident that CEUS facilitates improvement for characterization of focal liver lesions (FLLs), detection of liver malignancy, guidance for interventional procedures, and evaluation of treatment response after local therapies. CEUS has been demonstrated to be equal to contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for the characterization of FLLs. In addition, the applicability of CEUS has expanded to non-liver structures such as gallbladder, bile duct, pancreas, kidney, spleen, breast, thyroid, and prostate. The usefulness of CEUS in these applications is confirmed by extensive literature production. Novel applications include detecting bleeding sites and hematomas in patients with abdominal trauma, guiding percutaneous injection therapy and therefore achieving the goal of using interventional ultrasonography in managing splenic trauma, assessing the activity of Crohn’s disease, and detecting suspected endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair. Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (US) and intracavitary use of CEUS have been developed and clinically studied. The potential use of CEUS involves sentinel lymph node detection, drug or gene delivery, and molecular imaging. In conclusion, the advent of CEUS has greatly enhanced the usefulness of US and even changed the status of US in clinical practice. The application of CEUS in the clinic is continuously evolving and it is expected that its use will be expanded further in the future.