Resolution of complete placenta previa: does prior cesarean delivery matter?

A Multicenter, Retrospective Comparison Study of Pregnancy Outcomes According to Placental Location in Placenta Previa

Background: We investigated the association between placental location and pregnancy outcomes in placenta previa. Methods: This multi-center retrospective study enrolled 781 women who delivered between May 1999 and February 2020. We divided the dataset into anterior (n = 209) and posterior (n = 572) groups and compared the baseline characteristics and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. The adverse obstetric outcomes associated with placenta location were evaluated using a multivariate logistic analysis. Results: Gestational age at delivery in the anterior group (253.0 ± 21.6) was significantly lower than that in the posterior group (257.6 ± 19.1) (p = 0.008). The anterior group showed significantly higher parity, rates of previous cesarean section, non-vertex fetal positions, admissions for bleeding, emergency cesarean sections, transfusions, estimated blood loss, and combined placenta accrete spectrum (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the anterior group had higher rates of transfusion (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.50-3.30), placenta accreta spectrum (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.21-3.97), and non-vertex fetal positions (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.09-5.88). Conclusions: These findings suggest that more caution is required in the treatment of patients with anterior placenta previa. Therefore, if placenta previa is diagnosed prenatally, it is important to determine the location of the body and prepare for massive bleeding in the anterior group.

Risk factors and perinatal outcomes for persistent placenta previa in nulliparas

BACKGROUND

Placenta previa diagnosed on midtrimester ultrasound often resolves by the third trimester. Multiparity and previous cesarean delivery have been associated with persistence of placenta previa at delivery. Risk factors for persistent placenta previa in nulliparas are not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify risk factors for persistent placenta previa in the nulliparous population, and evaluate differences in outcomes between persistent and resolved placenta previa.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b), a prospective cohort study that observed 10,037 nulliparous individuals throughout pregnancy. Nulliparas diagnosed with placenta previa on midtrimester ultrasound were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics and delivery outcomes of nulliparas with persistent placenta previa were compared with those of nulliparas with resolved placenta previa. Multivariate logistic regression with stepwise model selection was used for adjusted analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 171 nulliparas (1.7%) in the nuMoM2b study were diagnosed with placenta previa on midtrimester ultrasound, of whom 17% (n=29) had persistent placenta previa at delivery. When compared with those with resolved placenta previa, nulliparas with persistent placenta previa were more likely to be older (median, 32 years [interquartile range, 30-37] vs 29 years [interquartile range, 25-31]; P<.01), have a previous pregnancy of <20 weeks (48.3% vs 22.5%; P=.01), have a previous dilation and curettage/evacuation procedure (27.6% vs 10.6%; P=.03), or have a pregnancy that resulted from assisted reproductive technology (31% vs 4.9%; P=.01). After adjusting for potential confounders, maternal age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.21), in vitro fertilization (adjusted odds ratio, 9.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-41.14), and previous pregnancy of <20 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-6.95) remained statistically significant risk factors for persistent placenta previa. Persistent placenta previa was also associated with higher likelihood of antepartum admission (10.3% vs 0%; P<.01), preterm delivery (34.5% vs 12%; P<.01), lower neonatal birthweight (median, 2847 g [interquartile range, 2655-3310] vs 3263 g [interquartile range, 2855-3560]), and cesarean delivery (100% vs 20.4%; P<.001), but there were no differences in overall pregnancy or neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In nulliparous individuals diagnosed with placenta previa on midtrimester ultrasound, older maternal age, previous pregnancy of <20 weeks, and in vitro fertilization are associated with persistent placenta previa at delivery.

Impact of Pelvic Rest Recommendations on Follow-Up and Resolution of Placenta Previa and Low-Lying Placenta

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of resolution of placenta previa and low-lying placenta (LLP) and the effect of pelvic rest recommendations on the timing of follow-up imaging.

METHODS

Retrospective review of pregnancies with previa/LLP detected on mid-trimester exam at our ultrasound unit from 2019 to 2021. LLP was defined as the lower edge of placenta located within 2 cm of the internal cervical os. Previa was defined as any portion of the placenta touching with the internal os. Demographics, placental location, activity restrictions, and delivery outcomes were analyzed. Timing of follow-up imaging was stratified by individuals advised and not advised pelvic rest.

RESULTS

Exactly 144 patients had previa and 266 had LLP on the mid-trimester exam with complete records. Previa resolution happened in 51.4% (74/144) of cases. Exactly 62% (46/74) of previa resolutions occurred by the 28-week ultrasound. Exactly 45% (65/144) of previa patients were advised pelvic rest. Most pelvic rest and non-pelvic rest patients had a 28-week scan. Even when clearance occurred, most patients in both groups had a repeat ultrasound at 32 weeks. Exactly 75% of LLP resolved by the 28-week scan, and the remainder by delivery. Exactly 12% (32/259) of LLP patients were advised pelvic rest.

CONCLUSION

Most societies recommend follow-up imaging at 32 weeks; however, our results suggest this may be done sooner and closer to 28 weeks. Pelvic rest did not affect timing of repeat imaging or delivery.

Which second trimester placenta previa remains a placenta previa in the third trimester: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The far majority of women with a placenta previa in the second trimester will no longer have a placenta that overlies the internal os in the third trimester. Women with a placenta previa in the third trimester are at risk for complication such as preterm birth and blood loss. Four counselling purposes we aim to identify which women with a second trimester placenta previa have a low-risk and a high-risk for persistence of the placenta previa.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study of women with a placenta previa in the second trimester between 2014 and 2019. The odds for having a placenta previa in the third trimester were calculated for different baseline characteristics. Multilevel likelihood ratios for ranges of the placenta overlying the internal os in the second trimester and the corresponding ROC curve were calculated to identify the optimal cut-off values.

RESULTS

We included 313 women with a placenta previa in the second trimester. The placenta was more frequently located on the posterior wall (62 %) than on the anterior wall (38 %). At evaluation in the third trimester, 37 women (14 %) still had a placenta previa. Women with a larger distance of the placenta overlying the internal os, women having a previous cesarean delivery and women after a conception with assisted reproductive technique had a significant higher risk of placenta previa persistence (p-values <0.001). Women with a placenta overlying less than 14 mm can be considered as low-risk, indicated by a likelihood ratio of 0. Women with a placenta with more than 55 mm overlap can be considered as high-risk, indicated a the likelihood ratio of ∞.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the second trimester placenta previa will no longer overly the internal os in the third trimester. Placenta previa persistence is associated with the distance overlying the internal os, a previous cesarean delivery and assisted reproductive techniques. In the second trimester, women can be identified as low-risk and high-risk for persistence of placenta previa. This can be used for risk stratification, counselling and individualized care for women with a second trimester placenta previa.

Maternal risk factors associated with persistent placenta previa

INTRODUCTION

Maternal risk factors associated with placenta previa are well documented in the literature. However, there are limited studies identifying maternal characteristics associated with the persistence of placenta previa. The objective of the study was to determine maternal characteristics associated with the persistent placenta previa.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in which 705 pregnant women diagnosed with low-lying placenta or placenta previa between 17 and 24 weeks gestation were identified from a single institution between 2003 and 2017. The primary outcome included persistent placenta previa (i.e., persistent placental tissue within 2 cm of the internal os) at or after 36 weeks 0 days. Those with abnormal placentation (e.g., vasa previa, placenta accreta) or delivery prior to 36 weeks 0 days were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was utilized to determine significant maternal characteristics associated with persistent placenta previa among women diagnosed with either placenta previa or low-lying placenta.

RESULTS

Women with a prior cesarean delivery were seven times more likely to have persistent placenta previa (odds ratio, 7.0, 95% confidence interval, 3.7-13.1). A history of intrauterine curettage or evacuation in the setting of placenta previa increases the likelihood of persistent placenta previa almost 3-fold (odds ratio, 2.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.3-5.0).

DISCUSSION

To date, our study is the largest, retrospective cohort study assessing maternal risk factors associated with persistent placenta previa; and is the first to detect a statistically significant correlation between a history of intrauterine surgeries and persistent placenta previa.

Resolution of a Low-Lying Placenta and Placenta Previa Diagnosed at the Midtrimester Anatomy Scan

OBJECTIVES

To identify the incidence and resolution rates of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa and to assess the optimal time to perform follow-up ultrasonography (US) to assess for resolution.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with a diagnosis of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa at routine anatomic screening. Follow-up US examinations were reviewed to estimate the proportion of women who had resolution. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was generated to estimate the median time to resolution. The distance of the placental edge from the internal cervical os was used to categorize the placenta as previa or low-lying (0.1-10 or ≥ 10-20 mm). A time-to-event analysis was used to estimate predictive factors and the time to resolution by distance from the os.

RESULTS

A total of 1663 (8.7%) women had a diagnosis of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa. The cumulative resolution for women who completed 1 or more additional US examinations was 91.9% (95% confidence interval, 90.2%-93.3%). The median time to resolution was 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 7-13) weeks. The distance from the internal cervical os was known for 658 (51.0%) women. The probability of resolution was inversely proportional to the distance from the internal os: 99.5% (≥10-20 mm), 95.4% (0.1-10 mm), and 72.3% (placenta previa; P < .001). The median times to resolution were 9 (IQR, 7-12) weeks for 10 to 20 mm, 10 (IQR, 7-13) weeks for 0.1 to 10 mm, and 12 (IQR, 9-15) weeks for placenta previa (P = .0003, log rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

A low-lying placenta or placenta previa diagnosed at the midtrimester anatomy survey resolves in most patients. Resolution is near universal in patients with an initial distance from the internal os of 10 mm or greater.

Placental location, postpartum hemorrhage and retained placenta in women with a previous cesarean section delivery: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Women previously giving birth with cesarean section have an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and retained placenta. The objective of this study was to determine if anterior placental location increased the risk of PPH and retained placenta in such women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study on 400 women with cesarean section delivery in a previous pregnancy. Ultrasound examinations were performed at gestational week 28-30, and placental location, myometrial thickness, and three-dimensional vascularization index (VI) were recorded. Data on maternal age, parity, BMI, smoking, gestational week at delivery, induction, delivery mode, oxytocin, preeclampsia, PPH, retained placenta, and birth weight were obtained for all women. Outcome measures were PPH (≥1,000 mL) and retained placenta.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PPH was 11.0% and of retained placenta 3.5%. Twenty-three women (11.8%) with anterior placenta had PPH compared to 12 (6.9%) with posterior or fundal locations. The odds ratio was 1.94, but it did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant risk increase for retained placenta in women with anterior placentae. Seven of eight women with placenta previa had PPH, and four had retained placenta.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of PPH and retained placenta was high for women with previous cesarean section. Anterior location of the placenta in such women tended to impose an increased risk for PPH but no risk increase of retained placenta. Placenta previa in women with previous cesarean section is associated with a high risk for PPH and retained placenta.

Relationship between placenta location and resolution of second trimester placenta previa

This prospective study was conducted to assess the rate of resolution of second trimester placenta previa in women with anterior placenta and posterior placenta, and that in women with and without previous cesarean section. In this study, placenta previa was defined as a placenta lying within 20 mm of the internal cervical os or overlapping it. We recruited 183 women diagnosed with previa between 20⁺⁰ weeks and 25⁺⁶ weeks. They were grouped according to their placenta location (anterior or posterior) and history of cesarean section. Comparative analysis was performed on demographic data, resolution rate of previa and pregnancy outcomes between anterior group and posterior group, and on those between cesarean section group and non-cesarean section group. Women with an anterior placenta tended to be advanced in parity (P=0.040) and have increased number of dilatation and curettage (P=0.044). The women in cesarean section group were significantly older (P=0.000) and had more parity (P=0.000), gravidity (P=0.000), and dilatation and curettage (P=0.048) than in non-cesarean section group. Resolution of previa at delivery occurred in 87.43% women in this study. Women with a posterior placenta had a higher rate of resolution (P=0.030), while history of cesarean section made no difference. Gestational age at resolution was earlier in posterior group (P=0.002) and non-cesarean section group (P=0.008) than in anterior group and cesarean section group correspondingly. Placenta location and prior cesarean section did not influence obstetric outcomes and neonatal outcomes. This study indicates that it is more likely to have subsequent resolution of the previa when the placenta is posteriorly located for women who are diagnosed with placenta previa in the second trimester.