Use of pelvic computed tomography and sonography in women of reproductive age in the emergency department

Yield of pelvic CT in emergency department patients undergoing CT torso for generalized or multiple complaints

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of pelvic computed tomography (CT) in emergency department (ED) patients undergoing chest CT angiogram (CTA) for chest pain or suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) followed by abdominopelvic CT in the same session for additional multisystem or generalized complaints.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive adult ED patients from January 2017 to December 2019 who underwent CTA for suspected PE followed by portovenous abdominopelvic CT for multisystem or generalized complaints. Patient demographics, vitals, laboratory values, exam indication, malignancy history, and recent surgery/intervention were recorded. CT reports were reviewed for acute chest, abdomen, and/or pelvic pathology.

RESULTS

There were 400 patients with 243 (61%) women and mean age of 59.8 years. Acute pelvic findings were seen in 11% (45/400). In 53% (24/45) of these, pelvic pathology could be diagnosed based on the abdominal portion of the CT. Five percent (21/400) of patients demonstrated isolated acute pelvic findings with 86% of these (18/21) clinically suspected prior to imaging. Acute pelvic pathology was associated with female gender (p = 0.015) and elevated white blood cell count (WBC) (p = 0.03). Specific pelvic CT indications and female gender were significantly associated with (p = 0.02 each) and independent predictors of isolated acute pelvic pathology.

CONCLUSION

In ED patients undergoing chest CTA for chest pain or suspected PE combined with abdominopelvic CT, the presence of acute pelvic-related pathology not visualized on abdominal CT is low. For this ED patient cohort, pelvic CT may not be necessary in men with normal WBC and a low pre-imaging clinical suspicion for acute pelvic pathology.

Point-of-care ultrasound for abdominal pain in obstetrics and gynecological diseases

Ultrasound is a minimally invasive technique recommended for the evaluation of abdominal pain in young, premenopausal women and pregnant women. Ectopic pregnancy, ovarian cyst torsion, ovarian hemorrhage, myoma degeneration, and pyometra can be detected with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the case of acute abdominal pain. This article describes the utility of POCUS in females with abdominal pain in obstetrics and gynecological diseases.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Postmenopausal Acute Pelvic Pain

Acute pelvic pain is a common presenting complaint in both the emergency room and outpatient settings. Pelvic pain of gynecologic origin in postmenopausal women occurs less frequently than in premenopausal women; however, it has important differences in etiology. The most common causes of postmenopausal pelvic pain from gynecologic origin are ovarian cysts, uterine fibroids, pelvic inflammatory disease, and ovarian neoplasm. Other etiologies of pelvic pain are attributable to urinary, gastrointestinal, and vascular systems. As the optimal imaging modality varies for these etiologies, it is important to narrow the differential diagnosis before choosing the initial diagnostic imaging examination. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound are the best initial imaging techniques when the differential is primarily of gynecologic origin. CT with intravenous (IV) contrast is more useful if the differential diagnosis remains broad. MRI without IV contrast or MRI without and with IV contrast, as well as CT without IV contrast may also be used for certain differential considerations. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery

AIM

There is a requirement for an expansive and up to date review of the management of emergency colorectal conditions seen in adults. The primary objective is to provide detailed evidence-based guidelines for the target audience of general and colorectal surgeons who are responsible for an adult population and who practise in Great Britain and Ireland.

METHODS

Surgeons who are elected members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Emergency Surgery Subcommittee were invited to contribute various sections to the guidelines. They were directed to produce a pathology-based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence-based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after two votes were included in the guidelines.

RESULTS

All aspects of care (excluding abdominal trauma) for emergency colorectal conditions have been included along with 122 recommendations for management.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence-based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of emergency colorectal conditions and should serve as practical text for clinicians managing colorectal conditions in the emergency setting.

Proceedings: Beyond Ultrasound First Forum on Improving the Quality of Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology

The Beyond Ultrasound First Forum was conceived to increase awareness that the quality of obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound can be improved, and is inconsistent throughout the country, likely due to multiple factors, including the lack of a standardized curriculum and competency assessment in ultrasound teaching. The forum brought together representatives from many professional associations; the imaging community including radiology, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine among others; in addition to government agencies, insurers, industry, and others with common interest in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound. This group worked together in focus sessions aimed at developing solutions on how to standardize and improve ultrasound training at the resident level and beyond. A new curriculum and competency assessment program for teaching residents (obstetrics and gynecology, radiology, and any other specialty doing obstetrics and gynecology ultrasound) was presented, and performance measures of ultrasound quality in clinical practice were discussed. The aim of this forum was to increase and unify the quality of ultrasound examinations in obstetrics and gynecology with the ultimate goal of improving patient safety and quality of clinical care. This report describes the proceedings of this conference including possible approaches to resident teaching and means to improve the inconsistent quality of ultrasound examinations performed today.

Proceedings: Beyond Ultrasound First Forum on improving the quality of ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology

The Beyond Ultrasound First Forum was conceived to increase awareness that the quality of obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound can be improved, and is inconsistent throughout the country, likely due to multiple factors, including the lack of a standardized curriculum and competency assessment in ultrasound teaching. The forum brought together representatives from many professional associations; the imaging community including radiology, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine among others; in addition to government agencies, insurers, industry, and others with common interest in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound. This group worked together in focus sessions aimed at developing solutions on how to standardize and improve ultrasound training at the resident level and beyond. A new curriculum and competency assessment program for teaching residents (obstetrics and gynecology, radiology, and any other specialty doing obstetrics and gynecology ultrasound) was presented, and performance measures of ultrasound quality in clinical practice were discussed. The aim of this forum was to increase and unify the quality of ultrasound examinations in obstetrics and gynecology with the ultimate goal of improving patient safety and quality of clinical care. This report describes the proceedings of this conference including possible approaches to resident teaching and means to improve the inconsistent quality of ultrasound examinations performed today.

Patients Presenting to the Emergency Unit with Gynaecological Lower Abdominal Pain, with and without Pathological Clinical Findings - Service Utilisation, Pain History, Implications

Introduction: Few studies have evaluated the utilisation of emergency gynaecological services, although lower abdominal pain (LAP) is one of the most common symptoms prompting emergency presentation. Although such pain may be caused by potentially life-threatening gynaecological diseases, very often no clinical cause is found. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of emergency presentations in order to enable quicker identification of real emergencies in routine clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Standardised, so-called first aid cards of 1066 consecutive patients with LAP presenting acutely to one emergency unit were analysed in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. Results: Over one third of cases did not constitute actual medical emergencies on objective criteria, with investigations yielding "no pathological findings". Parameters were identified that more often lead to hospital admission, e.g. palpation of a mass/resistance or at least one pathological ultrasound finding. In addition, it was found that symptoms of longer duration (average 8 days), and not only acute LAP, were also often experienced by patients as emergencies. Conclusion: A diagnosis of "no pathological findings", which was common in our study, suggests a subjective experience of an emergency from the patient's point of view, although the possibility of unrecognised pathology has to be borne in mind. Apart from functional disorders, the origins of symptoms may include psychosomatic causes and psychosocial problems, which cannot be further defined in the emergency care setting. Also, the phenomenon of increased utilisation of emergency services parallel to the assumed opening hours of routine outpatient care facilities must be seen in a critical light.

Point-of-care ultrasound versus radiology department pelvic ultrasound on emergency department length of stay

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to compare the time to overall length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) versus radiology department ultrasound (RDUS).

METHODS

This was a prospective study on a convenience sample of patients who required pelvic ultrasound imaging as part of their emergency department (ED) assessment.

RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 194 patients who were on average 32 years-old. Ninety-eight (51%) patients were pregnant (<20 weeks). Time to completion of RDUS was 66 minutes longer than POCUS (95%CI 60-73, P<0.01). Patients randomized to the RDUS arm experienced a 120 minute longer ED length of stay (LOS) (95%CI 66-173, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients who require pelvic ultrasound as part of their diagnostic evaluation, POCUS resulted in a significant decrease in time to ultrasound and ED LOS.

The Effect of a Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Pelvic Pain on Length of Stay in the Emergency Department

Length of stay (LOS) is a key measure of emergency department (ED) efficiency and a marker of overcrowding. The use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has been shown to decrease the time spent in the ED. The objective of this study was to determine whether the utilization of a CPG for evaluation of acute pelvic pain in the ED would reduce patient LOS. This before-and-after study was conducted at a large urban Level II ED over the course of 2 years. A retrospective review of 134 electronic patient records: 67 charts prior to protocol implementation; 67 after implementation of a CPG for the evaluation of acute pelvic pain. Length of stay was based on the time from triage to discharge. The before-and-after protocol groups were compared using an independent-samples t test. Length of stay was actually increased in the protocol group (n = 67, M = 5:16, SD = 4:14 [hr:min]; p = 0.092). The use of diagnostic imaging was associated with longer LOS, varying with the specific imaging performed. Because of financial restructuring, the radiology unit reduced the availability of in-house sonography to 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, which also possibly affected the LOS. Of significance was the willingness of the health care providers to utilize the CPG (86%). Time of day, availability of in-house ultrasound, and individual provider judgment influence ED LOS and subsequent imaging performed. Future research is necessary to determine how these and other factors can be incorporated into a model for predicting LOS, reducing provider disparities, and ensuring patient safety.