Orthostatic Tremor is Responsive to Bilateral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation: Report of Two Cases Performed Asleep

TMS of the left primary motor cortex improves tremor intensity and postural control in primary orthostatic tremor

A ponto-cerebello-thalamo-cortical network is the pathophysiological correlate of primary orthostatic tremor. Affected patients often do not respond satisfactorily to pharmacological treatment. Consequently, the objective of the current study was to examine the effects of a non-invasive neuromodulation by theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsal medial frontal cortex (dMFC) on tremor frequency, intensity, sway path and subjective postural stability in primary orthostatic tremor. In a cross-over design, eight patients (mean age 70.2 ± 5.4 years, 4 female) with a primary orthostatic tremor received either rTMS of the left M1 leg area or the dMFC at the first study session, followed by the other condition (dMFC or M1 respectively) at the second study session 30 days later. Tremor frequency and intensity were quantified by surface electromyography of lower leg muscles and total sway path by posturography (foam rubber with eyes open) before and after each rTMS session. Patients subjectively rated postural stability on the posturography platform following each rTMS treatment. We found that tremor frequency did not change significantly with M1- or dMFC-stimulation. However, tremor intensity was lower after M1- but not dMFC-stimulation (p = 0.033/ p = 0.339). The sway path decreased markedly after M1-stimulation (p = 0.0005) and dMFC-stimulation (p = 0.023) compared to baseline. Accordingly, patients indicated a better subjective feeling of postural stability both with M1-rTMS (p = 0.007) and dMFC-rTMS (p = 0.01). In conclusion, non-invasive neuromodulation particularly of the M1 area can improve postural control and tremor intensity in primary orthostatic tremor by interference with the tremor network.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Orthostatic Tremor: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Primary orthostatic tremor (OT) can affect patients' life. Treatment of OT with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) is described in a limited number of patients. The Vim and posterior subthalamic area (PSA) can be targeted in a single trajectory, allowing both stimulation of the Vim and/or dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRT). In essential tremor this is currently often used with positive effects.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of Vim/DRT-DBS in OT-patients, based on standing time and Quality of Life (QoL), also on the long-term. Furthermore, to relate stimulation of the Vim and DRT, medial lemniscus (ML) and pyramidal tract (PT) to beneficial clinical and side-effects.

METHODS

Nine severely affected OT-patients received bilateral Vim/DRT-DBS. Primary outcome measure was standing time; secondary measures included self-reported measures, neurophysiological measures, structural analyses, surgical complications, stimulation-induced side-effects, and QoL up to 56 months. Stimulation of volume of tissue activated (VTA) were related to outcome measures.

RESULTS

Average maximum standing time increased from 41.0 s ± 51.0 s to 109.3 s ± 65.0 s after 18 months, with improvements measured in seven of nine patients. VTA (n = 7) overlapped with the DRT in six patients and with the ML and/or PT in six patients. All patients experienced side-effects and QoL worsened during the first year after surgery, which improved again during long-term follow-up, although remaining below age-related normal values. Most patients reported a positive effect of DBS.

CONCLUSION

Vim/DRT-DBS improved standing time in patients with severe OT. Observed side-effects are possibly related to stimulation of the ML and PT.

Deep brain stimulation for orthostatic tremor: A single-center case series

Background

Orthostatic tremor (OT) is a high-frequency weight-bearing tremor of the legs and trunk associated with progressive disability and is often refractory to medications. Case reports suggest that thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective. We report 5 female patients with medication-refractory OT who underwent bilateral thalamic DBS at the Mayo Clinic and assess factors associated with a successful DBS outcome.

Methods

Demographic, clinical, electrophysiology, and DBS data were abstracted. Outcomes were change in tremor-onset latency, standing time, standing ADLs, and patient and clinician global impression of change (PGIC; CGIC).

Results

All 5 patients had improved standing time (72 vs 408 seconds, p ≤ 0.001) and improved standing ADLs after surgery, without change in tremor-onset latency (16 vs 75 seconds, p = 0.14). Maximal benefit was reached up to 3 years after surgery and sustained for up to 6 years. CGIC was "much improved" in all; PGIC was "much improved" in 4 and "minimally improved" in 1. There were no major complications. Postoperative electrophysiology (n = 1) showed lower tremor amplitude and slower tremor ramp-up on vs off stimulation.

Conclusions

Bilateral thalamic DBS improved OT symptoms with benefit lasting up to 6 years. A modest increase in standing time of several minutes was associated with meaningful improvement in standing ADLs. Microlesional effect and bilateral stimulation are likely favorable features, while baseline standing time of several minutes may be unfavorable. These findings may inform clinician and patient counseling and require confirmation in larger studies.

The Top 50 Most-Cited Articles in Orthostatic Tremor: A Bibliometric Review

Background

Article-level citation count is a hallmark indicating scientific impact. We aimed to pinpoint and evaluate the top 50 most-cited articles in orthostatic tremor (OT).

Methods

The ISI Web of Knowledge database and 2017 Journal Citation Report Science Edition were used to retrieve the 50 top-cited OT articles published from 1984 to April 2019. Information was collected by the Analyze Tool on the Web of Science, including number of citations, publication title, journal name, publication year, and country and institution of origin. Supplementary analyses were undertaken to clarify authorship, study design, level of evidence, and category.

Results

Up to 66% of manuscripts were recovered from five journals: Movement Disorders (n = 18), Brain (n = 4), Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology (n = 4), Neurology (n = 4), and Clinical Neurophysiology (n = 3). Articles were published between 1984 and 2018, with expert opinion as the predominant design (n = 22) and review as category (n = 17). Most articles had level 5 evidence (n = 26). According to their countries of origin, 34% of articles belonged to the United States (n = 17) leading the list, followed by United Kingdom (n = 15). University College London yielded the greater number of articles (n = 12), followed by the University of Kiel (n = 9). Most popular authors were G. Deuschl (n = 10), C.D. Marsden (n = 6), J. Jankovic (n = 5), P.D. Thompson (n = 5), J.C. Rothwell (n = 5), L.J. Findley (n = 4), and P. Brown (n = 4), who together accounted for 48% of them. All papers were in English.

Discussion

Publishing high-cited OT articles could be facilitated by source journal, study design, category, publication language, and country and institution of origin.