Risk factors for renal allograft compartment syndrome. Int Surg. 2014;99:851-856. [PMID: 25437599 DOI: 10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00214.1]

Small donors for small recipients - excellent growth and long-term function of single kidney grafts

Small-donor kidneys (≤20 kg donor weight, SDK) are preferably transplanted en bloc in adults. Concerns about thrombotic complications or hyperfiltration hinder their use in children, particularly as single grafts. Low centre experience and donor-to-recipient size are rated critical regarding outcomes. We evaluated SDK transplantation (SDTx) in paediatric recipients at a specialized transplant centre. Between 2008 and 2018, SDTx was performed in 40 children (mean age 5.4 ± 1.4 years, single grafts n = 38, donor weight ≤10 kg: n = 10). Perioperative complications were rare (n = 3), mainly thromboses despite immediate heparinization and resulted in graft loss in one patient. Overall, early and long-term GFR were excellent (76 ± 21 and 100 ± 11 ml/min/1.73 m² , first month and year 5, respectively). Three patients presented with delayed graft function. Graft volume increased significantly (69 ± 38 vs. 111 ± 33 ml within 5 years; P < 0.0001). Patients showed catch-up growth to normal range (SDS for height -2.06 ± 1.6 to -1.60 ± 1.5). Stratification by recipient age and donor weight revealed superior results in young recipients (≤3 years) and ≤10 kg donors, respectively. Outcome of single SDK grafts was excellent. Gain of GFR and graft volume was even higher in patients with very small donor or recipient size, regardless of a reduced donor-to-recipient weight ratio. Therefore, SDTx should be considered favouring small paediatric recipients.

Complications during multiorgan retrieval and pancreas preservation

In pancreas transplantation, complications can arise at each step of the process, from the initial selection of donors and recipients through the surgical technique itself and the post-operative period, when lifelong immunosuppression is required. In the early steps, careful retrieval and preservation of the pancreas are crucial for the viability of the organ and ultimate success of the transplant. The pancreas is a low-flow gland, making it highly sensitive to transplantation conditions and presenting risk of pancreatitis due to periods of ischemia. The two groups of donors - after brain death (DBD) or after cardiac arrest (DCD) - require different strategies of retrieval and preservation to avoid or reduce the risk of complications developing during and after the transplantation. For DBD donor transplantation, multiorgan retrieval and cold preservation is the conventional technique. Asystole donor (DCD) transplantation, in contrast, can benefit from the newest technologies, such as hypothermic and especially normothermic preservation machines (referred to as NECMO), to optimize organ preservation. The latter has led to an increase in the pool of donors by facilitating recuperation of organs for transplantation that would have been discarded otherwise.

Imaging of Renal Transplant Complications throughout the Life of the Allograft: Comprehensive Multimodality Review

The kidney is the most commonly transplanted solid organ. Advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression regimens, surveillance imaging, and histopathologic diagnosis of rejection have allowed prolonged graft survival times. However, the demand for kidneys continues to outgrow the available supply, and there are efforts to increase use of donor kidneys with moderate- or high-risk profiles. This highlights the importance of evaluating the renal transplant patient in the context of both donor and recipient risk factors. Radiologists play an integral role within the multidisciplinary team in care of the transplant patient at every stage of the transplant process. In the immediate postoperative period, duplex US is the modality of choice for evaluating the renal allograft. It is useful for establishing a baseline examination for comparison at future surveillance imaging. In the setting of allograft dysfunction, advanced imaging techniques including MRI or contrast-enhanced US may be useful for providing a more specific diagnosis and excluding nonrejection causes of renal dysfunction. When a pathologic diagnosis is deemed necessary to guide therapy, US-guided biopsy is a relatively low-risk, safe procedure. The range of complications of renal transplantation can be organized temporally in relation to the time since surgery and/or according to disease categories, including immunologic (rejection), surgical or iatrogenic, vascular, urinary, infectious, and neoplastic complications. The unique heterotopic location of the renal allograft in the iliac fossa predisposes it to a specific set of complications. As imaging features of infection or malignancy may be nonspecific, awareness of the patient's risk profile and time since transplantation can be used to assign the probability of a certain diagnosis and thus guide more specific diagnostic workup. It is critical to understand variations in vascular anatomy, surgical technique, and independent donor and recipient risk factors to make an accurate diagnosis and initiate appropriate treatment.^©RSNA, 2019.

Retroperitoneal Compartment Syndrome in Renal Transplantation: How to Salvage the Graft?

OBJECTIVE

Early allograft dysfunction may be caused by several technical factors including vascular complications such as thrombosis, kinking, or extrinsic compression. Renal allograft compartment syndrome (RACS) is an unrecognized cause of early allograft dysfunction. This complication is characterized by increased pressure of the iliac fossa that reduces the blood supply to the graft with a potentially devastating consequence. The main objective when recognizing this condition is to create a tension-free muscle closure. Many approaches have been proposed involving mesh such as the mesh hood fascial closure technique.^1-4 PATIENT AND METHODS: We describe in the video an RACS during an operation. The recipient is a 23-year-old young man with a body mass index of 22, with renal failure secondary to chronic reflux. Past history of failure to peritoneal dialysis currently on hemodialysis. He received a living donor's kidney. After performing a standard anastomosis, his urine output was brisk. The fascia was then closed with no force, at which point he stopped making urine. A RACS was suspected; intraoperative examination and ultrasound showed no flow in the graft, with no signs of kinking. Immediately, reexploration was performed, showing the graft with abnormal color and turgor. After relieving the pressure, the graft returned to normal. The closure was redone with a large ellipsoid piece of polypropylene mesh draped loosely and without tension over the graft.

RESULTS

A Doppler ultrasound, after the skin closure was performed, showed good flow, and the postoperative course was unremarkable. There was minimal bulking in the right iliac area, making it cosmetically acceptable.

CONCLUSION

RACS could be associated with a lack of compliance in the retroperitoneal cavity.⁵ The RACS required a prompt intervention. The timely suspicion is a watershed in the prognosis of this rare pathology. We propose that mesh hood fascial closure is easy, effective, and a safe method to treat these complications.