Delayed Appendectomy Is Safe in Patients With Acute Nonperforated Appendicitis

Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether delaying appendectomy until the following morning is non-inferior to immediate surgery in those with acute appendicitis presenting at night.

BACKGROUND

Despite a lack of supporting evidence, those with acute appendicitis who present at night frequently have surgery delayed until the after morning.

METHODS

The delay trial is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial conducted between 2018 and 22 at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Canada. Adults with imaging confirmed acute appendicitis who presented at night (8:00 pm -4:00 am ). Delaying surgery until after 6:00 am was compared with immediate surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications. An a prior noninferiority margin of 15% was deemed clinically relevant.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven of the planned 140 patients were enrolled in the Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy (DELAY) trial (59 in the delayed group and 68 in the immediate group). The two groups were similar at baseline. The mean time between the decision to operate and surgery was longer in the delayed group (11.0 vs 4.4 hours, P < 0.0001). The primary outcome occurred in 6/59 (10.2%) of those in the delayed group versus 15/67 (22.4%) of those in the immediate group ( P = 0.07). The difference between groups met the a priori noninferiority criteria of +15% (risk difference -12.2%, 95% CI: -24.4% to +0.4%, test of noninferiority P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The DELAY study is the first trial to assess delaying appendectomy in those with acute appendicitis. We demonstrate the noninferiority of delaying surgery until the after morning.

Analysis of deferral times in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis

INTRODUCTION

There are still controversies regarding the time of surgical management for acute appendicitis (AA). The main objective of this study was to recognize the surgical deferral time in patients with acute appendicitis and its relationship with the severity of presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of all patients with acute appendicitis undergoing appendectomy from August 2018 to August 2020 in an academic, public hospital. Elapsed time from arrival to the emergency room to skin incision was determined. Patients were divided into three groups based on the elapsed time: less than 6 h, between 6 and 12 h, and more than 12 h.

RESULTS

A total of 782 patients were included. Of them, 443 (56.6%) patients had a surgical deferral time of less than 6 h, 238 (30.4%) patients between 6 and 12 h, and 101 (13%) patients of more than 12 h. Patients with more than 12 h of surgical deferral time had a more complicated clinical presentation (P = 0.013), a higher frequency of abscess formation (P = 0.022), higher requirement for the use of surgical drainage (P = 0.018), and longer length of hospital stay (P = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical deferral >12 h was associated with a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis, intra-abdominal abscesses, and overall hospital stay. However, in the multivariate analysis, only total evolution time, from the first symptom to surgery, was a significant independent predictor of complicated appendicitis.

Demonstration of a new entity of non-perforated appendicitis through studying cluster of appendicitis

Differential diagnosis and management for perforated appendicitis and non-perforated appendicitis are current hot topics. The aim of this study is to demonstrate a new entity of non-perforated appendicitis, “acute hemorrhagic appendicitis” through studying cluster of acute appendicitis among Tibetan students at a high school in central China. Over the 11-year period, there were 120 patients with more female patients (102 of 499, 20.4%) than male patients (18 of 474, 3.8%) among 973 Tibetan students. 117 patients’ clinical data were available. Clinical manifestations were identical to classic appendicitis. However, axilla temperature, white blood cell counts and neutrophil level were elevated mildly in 12 (10.3%), 19 (16.2%) and 12 (10.3%) patients respectively. Pathologically, the resected appendices exhibited focal or diffuse hemorrhages in mucosa and/or submucosa, and infiltration by eosinophil and by lymphocytes. No patients had perforated appendicitis. The median time from the onset to surgery was 3 days (IQR, 2–4). All patients were discharged with full recovery. In conclusion, “acute hemorrhagic appendicitis” represented a new entity of non-perforated appendicitis with unique cause and pathogenesis, which might be treated with antibiotics alone or self-limited. Studying the cluster is a reliable method to find new entity of appendicitis.

Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may contribute to the prediction of postoperative infectious complications in patients with acute appendicitis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have assessed various clinical variables to identify risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with acute appendicitis. However, few studies have focused on the relationships between systemic inflammatory variables and postoperative complications in patients with acute appendicitis. We investigated the relationships between postoperative complications and systemic inflammatory variables, and assessed the clinical utility of these variables as predictors of postoperative complications in patients with acute appendicitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 181 patients who underwent immediate appendectomy for acute appendicitis. All postoperative complications were classified as infectious or noninfectious, and we evaluated the relationships between postoperative complications and clinical factors including the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.

RESULTS

In total, 28 patients (15.5%) had postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II-IV complications; 17 patients (9.4%) and 11 patients (6.1%) were categorized as the infectious and noninfectious complication groups, respectively. The cutoff value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for all complications was 11.3, and multivariate analysis revealed that the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was an independent predictor of any postoperative complication (odds ratio: 4.223, 95% confidence interval: 1.335-13.352; P = 0.014). The cutoff value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for infectious complications was 11.4, and multivariate analysis revealed that the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was an independent predictor of infectious complications (odds ratio: 4.235, 95% confidence interval: 1.137-15.776; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute appendicitis, the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be a useful predictor of all postoperative complications, especially infectious complications.

Delayed vs. Early Appendectomy (DELAY) trial for adult patients with acute appendicitis: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Early appendectomy in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis is the current standard of treatment in North America. Timely intervention is suggested to avoid the complications associated with perforated appendicitis; however, safety of nighttime operating is a competing concern, with mixed results demonstrated thus far.

OBJECTIVES

This multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial aims to assess whether delaying appendectomy until the following morning versus early appendectomy overnight affects the rate of surgical complications in adult patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis in the evening hours.

METHODS

This is a randomized, controlled trial across two academic institutions with blinded outcome assessors. Patients presenting with imaging-confirmed appendicitis with an expected appendectomy between 8 pm and 4 am and within 6 h of decision to operate will be randomized to early appendectomy (with 6 h of randomization, control arm) or delayed to the following morning (after 6 am, intervention arm). Primary outcome will be 30 day postoperative complications, defined as a composite of: mortality, readmission to hospital, emergency department visit, percutaneous drain insertion, reoperation, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days), and postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures are operative time, length of stay, time to emergency department visit and compliance to treatment.

DISCUSSION

This is a feasible and pragmatic clinical trial, intended to provide evidence for challenging decision making for the most common surgical disease worldwide. Results of this study will aid surgeons and health care administrators on how to appropriately triage appendectomies for patients with acute appendicitis who present overnight.

Factors affecting the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy: A single center study

AIM

This study aimed to explore factors may affect the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy.

METHODS

The data of 636 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy between July 2016 and July 2019 in Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A (hospital stay ≤3 days, 348 patients) and group B (hospital stay >3 days, 288 patients) according to their hospital stay.Sex, age, disease onset time(time from onset to admission), nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, peritonitis, comorbidities, and history of appendicitis; preoperative body temperature (T), white blood cell (WBC) count, percentage of neutrophilic granulocytes, and preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level; time from diagnosis to surgery. appendix diameter, appendicolith, and ascites in ultrasound or CT; surgical time(the surgery start time was the time of skin incision, and the end time was the time the anesthesia intubation was removed), intraoperative blood loss (the volume of blood infiltrating into a gauze was calculated by weighing the gauze infiltrated with water and calculating the volume of water), intraoperative adhesions or effusions, and stump closure methods, convert to open appendectomy, appendix pathology(perforated or gangrenous appendicitis were defined as complicated appendicitis and simple or suppurative appendicitis were defined as uncomplicated appendicitis) and antibiotic treatment schemes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant differences were detected between group A and group B in age (37.10 ± 13.52y vs 42.94 ± 15.57y, P<0.01), disease onset time (21.36 ± 16.56 h vs 32.52 ± 27.99 h, P <0.01), time from diagnosis to surgery (8.63 ± 7.29 h vs 10.70 ± 8.47 h, P<0.01); surgical time(64.09 ± 17.24 min vs 86.19 ± 39.96 min, P < 0.01); peritonitis(52.9% vs 74%, P < 0.01), comorbidities (12.4% vs 20.5%, P < 0.01), appendicolith (27.6% vs 41.7%, P < 0.01), ascites before the surgery(13.8% vs 22.9%, P < 0.01), intraoperative adhesions or effusions(56% vs 80.2%, P < 0.01); preoperative temperature (37.11 ± 0.64°C vs 37.54 ± 0.90°C, P < 0.01); preoperative WBC count (13.06 ± 3.39 × 109/L vs 14.21 ± 4.54 × 109/L, P = 0.04);preoperative CRP level(18.99 ± 31.72 mg/L vs 32.46 ± 46.68 mg/L, P < 0.01); appendix diameter(10.22 ± 2.59 mm vs 11.26 ± 3.23 mm, P < 0.01); intraoperative blood loss (9.36 ± 7.29 mL vs 13.74 ± 13.49 mL, P < 0.01); using Hem-o-lok for stump closure(30.7% vs 38.5%, P = 0.04); complicated appendicitis (9.5% vs 45.8%, P < 0.01); and using ertapenem for antibiotic treatment after the surgery(4.3% vs 21.5%, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (OR = 1.021; 95%CI = 1.007-1.036), peritonitis (OR = 1.603; 95% CI = 1.062-2.419), preoperative WBC count (OR = 1.084; 95% CI = 1.025-1.046), preoperative CRP level (OR = 1.010; 95% CI = 1.005-1.015), time from diagnosis to surgery (OR = 1.043; 95% CI = 1.015-1.072), appendicolith (OR = 1.852; 95% CI = 1.222-2.807), complicated appendicitis (OR = 3.536; 95% CI = 2.132-5.863), surgical time (OR = 1.025; 95% CI = 1.016-1.034), use of Hem-o-lok for stump closure (OR = 1.894; 95% CI = 1.257-2.852), and use of ertapenem for antibiotic treatment (OR = 3.076; 95% CI = 1.483-6.378) were the risk factors for a prolonged hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient with appendicitis was older and had peritonitis, higher preoperative WBC count or CRP level, longer time from diagnosis to surgery, appendicolith, and complicated appendicitis, predicting a prolonged hospital stay. Shorter surgical time and the use of silk ligation for stump closure and cephalosporins + metronidazole for antibiotic treatment might be better choices to obtain a shorter hospital stay.

Is postponed laparoscopic appendectomy justified for patients with acute appendicitis?

INTRODUCTION

Recent meta-analyses revealed that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a feasible procedure even for patients with complicated appendicitis. More than a few patients with acute appendicitis arrive at the hospital during night shifts and have their operation postponed for various reasons. However, the feasibility and disadvantages of this so-called "postponed laparoscopic appendectomy" (PLA) remain controversial.

METHODS

We included 149 patients who underwent LA for acute appendicitis within 48 h of diagnosis between January 2013 and May 2018. Patients were divided into an immediate LA group (patients who underwent LA within 4 h of diagnosis, n = 84) and a PLA group (patients who underwent LA 4-48 h after diagnosis, n = 65). Comparisons were made between these groups.

RESULTS

The preoperative characteristics of the patients in the immediate LA and PLA groups were not significantly different. Operative time was significantly longer in the PLA group than in the LA group (92.5 ± 40.8 vs 78.1 ± 29.7 min, P = 0.012). The incidence of postoperative complications (grade II or higher) was significantly greater in the PLA group than in the LA group (32.3% vs 17.8%, P = 0.041). Multivariate analysis revealed that a preoperative CT finding of periappendiceal fluid (P = 0.005, odds ratio = 4.71) and surgery 4-48 h after diagnosis (P = 0.005, odds ratio = 4.425) were independent risk factors of postoperative complications (grade II or higher).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with acute appendicitis, surgeons should perform immediate LA, if that is the patient's preferred surgical treatment, as long as there is no special reason to postpone surgery.

In-hospital perforation risk in acute appendicitis: Age matters

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding how quickly an adult with appendicitis requires surgery to prevent perforation, and recent literature on antibiotic use as definitive treatment has complicated this question further. Since perforation is associated with worse outcomes, particularly in the elderly, efforts to prevent this complication are warranted. We studied risk factors for in-hospital perforation in patients diagnosed by admission CT with non-perforated acute appendicitis.

METHODS

We evaluated baseline demographics, symptom duration, and time from admission to antibiotics and surgery. Outcome measure was perforation diagnosed intra-operatively by attending surgeon.

RESULTS

Of 700 patients, 84 (12%) sustained in-hospital perforation; time from admission to operation or antibiotics were not associated. Duration of symptoms >24 h (aOR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.33-3.72, p < 0.001) increased perforation risk. Patient age over 46 years (aOR = 4.54, 95% CI = 2.04-10.06, p < 0.001) was also associated with higher risk that increased with increasing age.

CONCLUSION

Time to operation and antibiotic timing were not associated with in-hospital perforation in a general adult population. However, these findings suggest a possible benefit to expedient surgery in older patients.

Non-Operative Management is More Cost-Effective than Immediate Operation in Perforated Appendicitis Patients with Seven or More Days of Symptoms

BACKGROUND

Management of perforated appendicitis in children remains controversial. Nonoperative (NO) and immediate operative (IO) strategies are used with varying outcomes. We hypothesized that IO intervention for patients with perforated appendicitis would be more cost-effective than NO management.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients with appendicitis from 2012 to 2015 was performed. Patients with perforated appendicitis were defined by evidence of perforation on imaging. We excluded patients who presented with sepsis, organ failure, and ventriculoperitoneal shunts. NO management was determined by surgeon preference. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

IO was performed on 145 patients with perforated appendicitis, whereas 83 were treated with NO management. Compared to IO patients, NO patients incurred higher overall costs, greater length of stay, more readmissions, complications, peripherally inserted central venous catheter lines, interventional radiology drains, and unplanned clinic and emergency department visits (P < 0.0001 for all). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, days of symptoms, admission C-reactive protein and white blood cell count revealed that NO management was independently associated with increased costs (OR 1.35, 1.12-1.62, 95% CI). Cost curves demonstrated that total cost for IO surpasses that of NO management when patients present with greater than 6.3 d of symptoms (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that IO is more cost-effective than NO management for patients with perforated appendicitis who present with less than 6.3 d of symptoms, after which point, NO management is more cost-effective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Meta-analysis of in-hospital delay before surgery as a risk factor for complications in patients with acute appendicitis

Background

The traditional fear that every case of acute appendicitis will eventually perforate has led to the generally accepted emergency appendicectomy with minimized delay. However, emergency and thereby sometimes night‐time surgery is associated with several drawbacks, whereas the consequences of surgery after limited delay are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess in‐hospital delay before surgery as risk factor for complicated appendicitis and postoperative morbidity in patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched from 1990 to 2016 for studies including patients who underwent appendicectomy for acute appendicitis, reported in two or more predefined time intervals. The primary outcome measure was complicated appendicitis after surgery (perforated or gangrenous appendicitis); other outcomes were postoperative surgical‐site infection and morbidity. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using forest plots if possible. Unadjusted data were pooled using generalized linear mixed models.

Results

Forty‐five studies with 152 314 patients were included. Pooled adjusted ORs revealed no significantly higher risk for complicated appendicitis when appendicectomy was delayed for 7–12 or 13–24 h (OR 1·07, 95 per cent c.i. 0·98 to 1·17, and OR 1·09, 0·95 to 1·24, respectively). Meta‐analysis of unadjusted data supported these findings by yielding no increased risk for complicated appendicitis or postoperative complications with a delay of 24–48 h.

Conclusion

This meta‐analysis demonstrates that delaying appendicectomy for presumed uncomplicated appendicitis for up to 24 h after admission does not appear to be a risk factor for complicated appendicitis, postoperative surgical‐site infection or morbidity. Delaying appendicectomy for up to 24 h may be an acceptable alternative for patients with no preoperative signs of complicated appendicitis.

Delay is safe

Association of Hospital Resources and Imaging Choice for Appendicitis in Pediatric Emergency Departments

OBJECTIVE

Abdominal pain and concern for appendicitis are common chief complaints in patients presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED). Although many professional organizations recommend decreasing use of computed tomography (CT) and choosing ultrasound as first-line imaging for pediatric appendicitis, significant variability persists in imaging utilization. This study investigated practice variation across children's hospitals in the diagnostic imaging evaluation of appendicitis and determined hospital-level characteristics associated with the likelihood of ultrasound as the first imaging modality.

METHODS

This was a multicenter (seven children's hospitals) retrospective investigation. Data from chart review of 160 consecutive patients aged 3-18 years diagnosed with appendicitis from each site were compared with a survey of site medical directors regarding hospital resource availability, usual practices, and departmental-level demographics.

RESULTS

In the diagnostic evaluation of 1,090 children with appendicitis, CT scan was performed first for 22.4% of patients, with a range across PEDs of 3.1% to 83.8%. Ultrasound was performed for 54.0% of patients with a range of 2.5% to 96.9%. The only hospital-level factor significantly associated with ultrasound as the first imaging modality was 24-hour availability of in-house ultrasound (odds ratio = 29.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-691.8).

CONCLUSION

Across children's hospitals, significant practice variation exists regarding diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of patients with appendicitis. Variation in hospital-level resources may impact the diagnostic evaluation of patients with appendicitis. Availability of 24-hour in-house ultrasound significantly increases the likelihood of ultrasound as first imaging and decreases CT scans. Hospitals aiming to increase the use of ultrasound should consider adding 24-hour in-house coverage.

Imaging in acute appendicitis: What, when, and why?

Acute appendicitis (AA) is the commonest cause of pain abdomen requiring surgical intervention. Diagnosis as well as management of acute appendicitis is mired in controversies and contradictions even today. Clinicians often face the dilemma of balancing negative appendectomy rate and perforation rate if the diagnosis is based on clinical scoring alone. Laboratory results are often non-specific. Imaging has an important role not only in diagnosing appendicitis and its complication but also suggesting alternate diagnosis in appropriate cases. However, there is no universally accepted diagnostic imaging algorithm for appendicitis. Imaging of acute appendicitis needs to be streamlined keeping pros and cons of the available investigative modalities. Radiography has practically no role today in the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. Ultrasonography (USG) should be the first line imaging modality for all ages, particularly for children and non-obese young adults including women of reproductive age group. If USG findings are unequivocal and correlate with clinical assessment, no further imaging is needed. In case of equivocal USG findings or clinico-radiological dissociation, follow-up/further imaging (computed tomography (CT) scan/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) is recommended. In pediatric and pregnant patients with inconclusive initial USG, MRI is the next option. Routine use of CT scan for diagnosis of AA needs to be discouraged. Our proposed version of a practical imaging algorithm, with USG first and always has been incorporated in the article.

Risk and outcomes of 24-h delayed and weekend appendectomies

BACKGROUND

Time interval from hospital admission to operative intervention has been suggested as a crucial risk factor for a number of surgical procedures. In this study, we aim to compare postappendectomy outcomes for operations performed 24 h after admission or on the weekend to within 24 h and weekday operations, respectively.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, 2004-2009. The study population included patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

RESULTS

A total of 265,972 records were identified, of which 221,745 (83.4%) patients had appendectomy on the same day of admission, whereas 16.6% had the procedure the following day. Next day operations were more likely to be associated with postoperative complications (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = [1.19-1.33], P < 0.001). A hospital stay of >3 d was also more common for next day interventions (P < 0.001). Appendectomies performed on weekends had a higher risk of complications compared to other days (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = [1.02-1.14], P = 0.005). Teaching and urban hospitals were more likely to perform appendectomies on the day after admission (P < 0.05). Older patients (≥35 years), females, Blacks and Hispanics, and those on Medicaid or Medicare were all at higher risk of next day intervention (P < 0.01 each). The average cost of next day operations was higher compared to same day operations ($9890.11 ± 119.64 versus $8744.57 ± 77.67, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Appendectomies performed 1 d after admission or on the weekend are associated with disadvantageous outcomes. Demographic factors, in addition to hospital attributes, place certain subpopulations at higher risk of next day appendectomies.