Cocaine-induced Psychosis and Brain-derived Neurothrophic Factor in Patients with Cocaine Dependence: Report of Two Cases

Impact of sleep disorders and disease duration on neurotrophins levels in cocaine use disorder

INTRODUCTION

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its precursor proBDNF contribute to brain plasticity and neuronal remodeling. Recently, the ratio between proBDNF and BDNF (RpB) has been proposed as a possible marker in major psychiatric disorders. Convergent lines of evidence suggest neurotrophins alterations could be involved into the pathophysiology of Cocaine Use Disorder (CUD) and insomnia. The aims of the present study are to evaluate the correlations between neurotrophins levels, insomnia and clinical features among CUD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects with a moderate to severe CUD were recruited. ProBDNF, BDNF and consequently RpB values were analyzed using ELISA technique. Insomnia severity index (ISI) scale was used to assess the severity of insomnia. Sociodemographic characteristics and CUD habits (e.g., years of cocaine use) were also collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-four subjects (mean age 39.3 ± 6.7 years) were recruited. Correlation analysis showed that lower values of RpB were associated with higher ISI score (r = -0.469; p = 0.021), longer history of cocaine use (r = -0.584, p = 0.022) and higher amount of cocaine used (r = -0.655, p = 0.004).

DISCUSSION

These preliminary findings may offer a novel insight on neurobiological alterations sustaining cocaine use. Lower RpB, as observed both in high insomnia levels and in chronic cocaine use, could induce a neuroprotective state as a synaptic homeostatic response to chronic damage. These findings also highlight the important role of neurotrophins balance on neurobiological alterations induced by cocaine misuse and insomnia, suggesting that RpB could be considered as a marker of neurotrophic and metabolic state of neural tissue.

Psychosis is an extension of mood swings from the perspective of neuronal plasticity impairments

We previously hypothesized that depressive and manic states may be consecutive presentations of the same underlying neuronal plasticity, and that moderate impairments in neuronal plasticity cause depressive states while further impairment to neuronal plasticity causes manic states. Psychopathological or biological relationships between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia have also been revealed. Therefore, in addition to depressive and manic states, psychosis may also be considered a manifestation resulting from additional impairments to neuronal plasticity. In the present manuscript, we hypothesize that moderate and more severe impairments to neuronal plasticity cause depressive and manic states, respectively, and that more serious impairments to neuronal plasticity cause psychosis. Many studies have suggested that impairments in neuronal plasticity contribute to schizophrenia and other mental disorders with psychotic features, and that the impairment of neuronal plasticity in schizophrenia is more severe than that in bipolar disorder. Therefore, we hypothesize more specifically that impairments in neuronal plasticity may be more severe in the order of the cases featuring psychosis, mania, and depression. This progression notably overlaps with the arrangement of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depressive disorder in the DSM-5. Psychotic symptoms are thought to appear further towards the base of the psychopathological hierarchy than are manic or depressive symptoms. If impairments to neuronal plasticity contribute to this psychopathological hierarchy, as we contest that they do, our hypothesis may serve as a bridge between clinical psychopathology, diagnosis, and biological psychiatry.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in substance use disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is associated with several neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. It is not clear, however, whether BDNF levels are modified in substance use disorders (SUDs).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases to identify studies comparing peripheral plasma or serum BDNF levels in adults with SUDs vs. non-user controls. Forty studies were included in the meta-analysis involving a total of 2238 participants with SUDs and 2574 controls.

RESULTS

After trim and fill adjustment, current drug users presented lower serum BDNF levels (SMD = -0.99, 95%CI -1.40 to -0.58, I² = 95.9) than non-user controls. However, this difference disappears during withdrawal. Studies using serum or plasma BDNF samples have shown different results. Subgroup analysis revealed lower levels of serum BDNF in alcohol users (SMD = -0.70, 95%CI -1.15 to -0.25, I² = 89.81) and crack/cocaine users (SMD = -1.78, 95%CI -2.92 to -0.65, I² = 97.59) than controls. Meta-regression analysis revealed that gender, age, and age of first use moderate the effects of drug use in peripheral BDNF levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral BDNF levels are decreased in the serum, but not the plasma, of active drug users. Altogether, these findings suggest that BDNF levels may be related to acute use and addiction severity and also point to BDNF's potential utility as a biomarker in this population.

Peripheral levels of BDNF and opiate-use disorder: literature review and update

Several neurobiological factors are related to opiate-use disorder (OUD), and among them, neurotrophins have a relevant role. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a central neurotrophin involved in many neuronal processes, and it has been related to several psychiatric diseases and addictive disorders. BDNF can be measured in plasma and serum; its levels may reflect BDNF concentrations in the central nervous system (CNS) and, indirectly, CNS processes. Hence, peripheral BDNF could be a biomarker in clinical practice. This manuscript explores the findings about peripheral BDNF and OUD in humans. Opiates induce neurotoxicity in the CNS, which may be correlated with modifications in BDNF expression. Thus, basal levels of peripheral BDNF in OUD patients may be altered, which could be modified with abstinence. Also, opiates may modify epigenetic processes that may be associated with peripheral concentrations of BDNF, and in this line, withdrawal could reflect recovering processes in the CNS. Additionally, treatment modifies the peripheral concentrations of BDNF, but the clinical implications of those changes are yet not elucidated. No specific conclusion can be performed and more investigation in this area is necessary to elucidate the real potential of peripheral BDNF as a biomarker.

Higher severity of cocaine addiction is associated with tactile and somatic hallucinations

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to describe the features of cocaine-dependent patients who have had cocaine-induced tactile/somatic hallucinations (CITSH), and to analyze the association with addiction-related variables and psychiatric comorbidity, comparing patients with CITSH, patients with cocaine psychotic symptoms (CIP) and no CITSH, and patients without any psychotic symptom.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 767 cocaine-dependent patients in an outpatient treatment center for addictions. The following data were obtained: sociodemographic characteristics, CIP information, addiction-related variables and psychiatric comorbidity. A bivariate and multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the whole sample, 6.6% reported CITSH at some point of their lives, 48.4% had suffered some CIP other than CITSH, and 45% had not experienced any psychotic symptom. According to multivariate analysis, risk of overdose increases by 12.1 (OR) times the probability of having had CITSH compared patients with CIP-no-CITSH. Other variables associated to patients with CITSH were: age of drug use onset, presence of episodes of overdose, prevalence of psychotic disorder induced by cocaine. In general, in all variables studied, patients with CITSH presented worse clinical features (addiction variables and psychiatric comorbidity) than patients with CIP without CITSH and non-CIP group.

CONCLUSION

CITSH are usually associated with other psychotic symptoms induced by cocaine. The patients who experienced CITSH are more severe cases compared both with patients with CIP without CITSH and patients without CIP. Increased risk of overdose is an important issue in this type of patients.