Can Propofol Lead to an Increase in Seizure Threshold Over the Course of Electroconvulsive Therapy?

Does Lidocaine Shorten Seizure Duration in Electroconvulsive Therapy?

BACKGROUND

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective short-term treatment for schizophrenia and depression, amongst other disorders. Lidocaine is typically added to reduce pain from intravenous propofol injection. However, depending on the dose used in the ECT setting, it can shorten seizure duration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine dose on seizure duration.

METHODS

This retrospective, naturalistic cohort study included 169 patients treated with ECT. We examined 4714 ECT sessions with propofol or propofol plus lidocaine. Ictal quality was manually rated by visual inspection. The main outcome of this study was the relation of lidocaine with seizure duration after controlling for socio-demographic, ECT, and other anesthetic variables.

RESULTS

There was a significant negative association between lidocaine usage and seizure duration. Multivariate analyses showed that seizure duration was shortened by an average of 3.21 s in sessions with lidocaine. Moreover, in this subgroup, there was a significant negative dose-dependent association between lidocaine dose and seizure length. Complementarily, a significant positive association between preictal BIS and seizure length was found in the subgroup of sessions where preictal was used.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide additional evidence highlighting the importance of caution regarding lidocaine dosing due to the effect on seizure length in the ECT setting. It is advisable for clinicians to exercise caution when administering lidocaine regarding its dosing and seizure length in ECT settings. Future investigation is needed to assess causal relationships by studying certain vulnerable groups or employing other charge calculation techniques, such as the titration method.

Intraoperative Seizure Under General Anesthesia Not Detected by EEG: A Case Report

Intraoperative seizures under general anesthesia are infrequent. However, seizure activity under general anesthesia confirmed by contemporaneous EEG has been reported. We describe the case of a 39-year-old female undergoing right frontal brain tumor resection who experienced an intraoperative seizure. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was utilized and included four channels of EEG, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), and transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP). During this operation, characteristic motor manifestations of a seizure occurred. However, the EEG did not demonstrate seizure activity due to limitations in EEG lead placement. Post-operatively in the ICU, motor manifestations of seizure activity continued, and subsequent EEG recordings demonstrated classic seizure activity. Due to the previous hemicraniectomy, corkscrew EEG electrodes were not placed over the right skull defect, thereby failing to detect the intraoperative seizure. Anesthesiologists should be aware that limitations with EEG electrode placement can fail to detect intraoperative seizures, and treatment to extinguish the seizure should proceed in an emergent fashion.

Ictal Electroencephalogram Visual Pattern Recognition of Seizure Adequacy During Electroconvulsive Therapy Treatment: A Step-by-Step Approach

Background

The NEURON (Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation Unit) electroconvulsive therapy electroencephalogram (ECT-EEG) Algorithmic Rating Scale (NEARS) is a step-by-step approach to ictal electroencephalogram visual pattern recognition of seizure adequacy based on recruitment, amplitude, symmetry, duration and degree of post-ictal suppression. The objectives of this clinical audit were to determine the degree of agreement on the NEARS operational criteria between two neuropsychiatrists, the reliability of electroconvulsive therapy practitioners' administration of NEARS during ECT procedures and the correlation of NEARS scores with Clinical Global Impression scale scores after each ECT treatment session.

Methods

Systematic random sampling was conducted. Even numbers of ictal tracings were selected for analysis from the total samples collected over 8 consecutive days of ECT overseen by a total of eight different ECT practitioners. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to measure the inter-rater reliability of the two neuropsychiatrists and determine the level of agreement between NEARS scores and those of the ECT practitioners. The correlation using NEARS scores and post-ECT Clinical Global Impression scores was measured with Spearman's test. The significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Cohen's kappa showed perfect agreement between the two neuropsychiatrists, at κ = 1.00 (SE = 0.001; P < 0.001), and strong agreement between NEARS scores of overall seizure adequacy and the scores interpreted by the ECT practitioners, at κ = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.99; P < 0.001). Spearman's test showed a weak negative association between NEARS scores and post-ECT Clinical Global Impression scores (r = -0.018; P = 0.900).

Conclusion

NEARS may facilitate a brief, objectively reliable and practical assessment of ictal electroencephalogram quality. The scale is readily applicable by any trained ECT practitioner during an ongoing ECT procedure, especially when a prompt treatment decision is required.

The superiority of ketofol and etomidate against propofol or thiopental anesthesia for ECT

OBJECTIVES

Most anesthetic drugs used for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) have dose-dependent anticonvulsive effects, counter-acting seizure induction, lowering seizure quality. However, a consummate drug for ECT anesthesia has not yet been established. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of etomidate, thiopental, propofol and co-administration of ketamine-propofol (ketofol) on seizure quality and hemodynamic safety.

METHODS

Registries of 121 patients (1077 sessions) were retrospectively evaluated. The effects of anesthetics on ECT-related parameters (stimulation charge, central seizure duration, number of failed stimulation trials, mean arterial pressure, and peak heart rate) were analyzed via linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Overall, the seizure duration decreased, and the stimulation charge increased in time with continuing sessions within a course of ECT. The decrease in seizure duration and the increase in required stimulation charge was significantly lower with etomidate and ketofol. Additionally, ketofol was significantly related to a lower number of failed stimulation trials compared to propofol. Ketofol and propofol use was associated with a significantly lower postictal mean arterial pressure.

CONCLUSION

Ketofol and etomidate were equivalently superior in the rate of decrease in seizure duration and the required elevation in stimulus charge, which would interpret into valuable clinical guidance, especially for "seizure resistant" patients, and their use may potentially lower ECT related cognitive side effects.

Evaluating Factors Affecting the Time Interval Between Propofol Injection and Induction of Electro-convulsion and Relationship Between These Factors and Duration of Convulsion

Background

Current evidence on the effect of anesthetic-ECT time interval (AETI) is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the time interval between propofol injection and electro-convulsion induction and the relationship between these factors and the duration of convulsion.

Methods

In this study, 102 patients (616 sessions of ECT) were studied. Demographic and clinical data (age, gender, receiving or not receiving medications that affected the seizure threshold, the total number of ECT sessions, clinical severity of admission scores, clinical diagnosis, propofol dose, seizure duration, and AETI) were collected in special forms and analyzed by appropriate statistical methods.

Results

Sessions with long-term AETI had longer seizure time than sessions with short-term AETI (33.47 ± 8.46 vs. 28.68 ± 9.74, P value < 0.05). The duration of seizures was significantly longer in the group with long AETI in sessions 1, 2, and 4 than in the other group (P value < 0.05). There was a significant relationship between the duration of seizures and propofol dose, AETI, and receiving drugs effective in the seizure threshold (P value < 0.05).

Conclusions

The results showed that increasing AETI and injecting a lower dose of propofol to induce anesthesia would increase the duration of seizures. Also, taking medications that would affect the seizure threshold reduces the duration of seizures.

Comparison of the target-controlled infusion and the manual infusion of propofol anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy: an open-label randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol is a well-established method of procedural sedation and has been used in Japan for anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). However, the usefulness of the TCI of propofol for ECT has yet to be determined. This study aimed to compare the TCI and manual infusion (MI) of propofol anesthesia during ECT.

METHODS

A total of forty psychiatric inpatients receiving bitemporal ECT were enrolled in the present study and randomized into the TCI group (N = 20) and the MI group (N = 20). Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were measured before and after ECT. The clinical outcomes, anesthesia-related variables, and ECT-related variables were compared between the two groups. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to model the comparison throughout the course of ECT.

RESULTS

A total of 36 subjects completed the present study, with 18 subjects in each group. Both the groups didn't significantly differ in the post-ECT changes in CGI and MoCA scores. However, concerning MoCA scores after 6 treatments of ECT, the MI group had improvement while the TCI group had deterioration. Compared with the MI group, the TCI group had higher doses of propofol, and longer procedural and recovery time. The TCI group seemed to have more robust seizures in the early course of ECT but less robust seizures in the later course of ECT compared with the MI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study does not support the use of TCI of propofol for anesthesia of ECT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT03863925 . Registered March 5, 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

Various Psychiatric Manifestation in DiGeorge Syndrome (22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome): A Case Report

This case report aimed to describe various psychiatric manifestation and treatment course in a patient with DiGeorge syndrome. Psychiatric symptoms and treatment course in a female patient with DiGeorge syndrome were described. This patient showed psychotic symptoms, mood symptoms, and intellectual disability. As well as various psychiatric symptoms, treatment response and sensitivity of side effect by antipsychotics were different from typical characteristics in psychiatric disorders. This case suggests that the genetic defect in DiGeorge syndrome might have a great association with psychiatric problems and response of antipsychotics.

Important Consideration in Choosing Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Risk of Convulsion

The prevalence of epilepsy and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is higher than in the general population. Recent study on adults with 22q11.2DS reported that the most common trigger for provoked seizures was the use of antipsychotics and antidepressants. In this paper, blonaserin was used because aripiprazole, quetiapine, paliperidone were not effective. The patient had convulsion on the fourth day of taking blonaserin. Neurological and cardiac examination was carried out, and lamotrigine was added at the advice of neurologist. Than the patient didn’t have any convulsions and the symptoms gradually improved. When treating patients with 22q11.2DS, the medicine should be chosen carefully, and the patient should be observed closely, paying attention to the possibility of convulsions.