1
|
Layek SS, Kanani S, Doultani S, Gohil T, Patil S, Sudhakar A, Raval KB, Kuppusamy K, Gorani S, Raj S, Sangameshwari R, Jadeja H, P. MM. Analyzing Cell-free Genomic DNA in Spent Culture Media: Noninvasive Insight into the Blastocysts. Glob Med Genet 2024; 11:227-232. [PMID: 39045037 PMCID: PMC11265834 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
A commonly accepted standard protocol for noninvasive techniques for the genetic evaluation of an embryo remains elusive due to inconclusiveness regarding the volume of spent media to be acquired and the possibility of acquiring the same for subsequent analysis. Single embryo culture is imperative for standardizing noninvasive preimplantation testing using cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) released by individual developing embryos. This study aims to compare the development dynamics of single-drop embryonic culture against with group embryonic culture to establish a standardized protocol for noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) in bovine. A total of 239 cumulus-oocyte complexes were aspirated and subjected to in vitro maturation and fertilization. Among these, 120 embryos of day 3 were transferred to single-drop culture until the blastocyst stage. The single-drop culture drops were prepared using microdrops of 30 μL. At the blastocyst stage, spent media from all single-drop embryos were utilized for extracting cell-free genomic DNA to standardize the protocol. The blastocyst rate indicates no significant difference between the two culture methods, suggesting that single-drop culture is suitable for the process. Additionally, the extracted spent media yielded sufficient quantities of cf-DNA, supporting its potential use for PGT ( p < 0.05). These findings support the hypothesis that single-drop embryo culture is a viable method for cf-DNA extraction and confirm the potential of using DNA fragments from spent media as a reliable source for noninvasive PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shrushti Kanani
- Department of Clinical Embryology, MGM School of Biomedical Sciences, MGM Institute of Health Sciences, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shilpa Doultani
- Department of Zoology, Gujarat University, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Tejas Gohil
- Sabarmati Ashram Gaushala, Kheda, Gujarat, India
| | - Sanket Patil
- National Dairy Development Board, Anand, Gujarat, India
| | | | | | | | - Sanjay Gorani
- National Dairy Development Board, Anand, Gujarat, India
| | | | - Rafiya Sangameshwari
- Department of Clinical Embryology, MGM School of Biomedical Sciences, MGM Institute of Health Sciences, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Himali Jadeja
- Department of Clinical Embryology, MGM School of Biomedical Sciences, MGM Institute of Health Sciences, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mini Mol P.
- Department of Anatomy, MGM Medical College, MGM Institute of Health Sciences, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaposy C. Prospects for limiting access to prenatal genetic information about Down syndrome in light of the expansion of prenatal genomics. New Bioeth 2022:1-21. [PMID: 36206180 DOI: 10.1080/20502877.2022.2130720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Down syndrome (Trisomy 21) is a mild to moderate intellectual disability. Historically, this condition has been a primary target for prenatal testing. However, Down syndrome has not been targeted for prenatal testing because it is an especially severe illness. The condition was just one that could be easily identified prenatally using the techniques first available decades ago. We are moving into an era in which we can prenatally test for a vast range of human traits. I argue that when we can test for anything, there is no longer any reason to continue targeting Down syndrome. I present an argument based on the value of nondiscrimination. It is justified to set limits on access to prenatal information if the information is going to be used for discriminatory purposes. I use the examples of (1) prenatal testing for misogynistic fetal sex selection, and (2) homophobia-motivated prenatal testing for potential homosexuality, as compelling analogies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Kaposy
- Centre for Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choi H. Informed choice of pregnant women regarding noninvasive prenatal testing in Korea: a cross-sectional study. KOREAN JOURNAL OF WOMEN HEALTH NURSING 2022; 28:235-249. [PMID: 36403575 PMCID: PMC9619159 DOI: 10.4069/kjwhn.2022.09.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explored the degree to which pregnant women in Korea made informed choices regarding noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and investigated factors influencing whether they made informed choices. METHODS In total, 129 pregnant women in Korea participated in a web-based survey. Multidimensional measures of informed choice regarding NIPT and decisional conflict were used to measure participants' levels of knowledge, attitudes, deliberation, uptake, and decisional conflict related to NIPT. Additional questions were asked about participants' NIPT experiences and opinions. RESULTS All 129 pregnant women were recruited from an online community. Excluding those who expressed neutral attitudes toward NIPT, according to the definition of informed choice used in this study, only 91 made an informed choice (n=63, 69.2%) or an uninformed choice (n=28, 30.8%). Of the latter, 75.0% had insufficient knowledge, 39.3% made a value-inconsistent decision, and 14.3% did not deliberate sufficiently. No difference in decisional conflict was found between the two groups. A significant difference was found between the two groups in the reasons why NIPT was introduced or recommended (p=.021). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that pregnant women who were knowledgeable (odds ratio [OR], 4.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.17- 10.47) and deliberated (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57-0.98) were significantly more likely to make an informed choice. CONCLUSION The results of this study help healthcare providers, including nurses in maternity units, understand pregnant women's experiences of NIPT. Counseling strategies are needed to improve pregnant women's knowledge of NIPT and create an environment that promotes deliberation regarding this decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunkyung Choi
- Corresponding author: Hyunkyung Choi College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, 680 Gukchaebosang-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 41944, Korea Tel: +82-53-200-4791 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ravitsky V, Birko S, Le Clerc-Blain J, Haidar H, Affdal AO, Lemoine MÈ, Dupras C, Laberge AM. Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Views of Canadian Pregnant Women and Their Partners Regarding Pressure and Societal Concerns. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021; 12:53-62. [DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1829173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vardit Ravitsky
- Bioethics, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stanislav Birko
- Bioethics, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jessica Le Clerc-Blain
- Metabolic and Cardiovascular Health, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hazar Haidar
- Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Aliya O. Affdal
- Bioethics, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Ève Lemoine
- Bioethics, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Charles Dupras
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Metabolic and Cardiovascular Health, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marcon AR, Ravitsky V, Caulfield T. Discussing non-invasive prenatal testing on Reddit: The benefits, the concerns, and the comradery. Prenat Diagn 2020; 41:100-110. [PMID: 33058217 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As the use of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) increases, its benefits and concerns are being examined through surveys, qualitative studies, and bioethical analysis. However, only scant research has examined public discourse on the topic. This research examined NIPT discussions on the social media platform Reddit. METHOD Content and qualitative description analysis was performed on 98 NIPT discussions (2682 comments), obtained by inputting "NIPT" into Reddit's search engine. RESULTS Detailing of benefits and concerns was found in collaborative and supportive discussions. Overall, NIPT is seen as valuable and desirable. Some concerns focused on cost-related barriers to access, anxiety related to testing, and interpretation of results. NIPT is often portrayed as offering peace of mind and is sometimes described as a means of preparing for possible outcomes. CONCLUSION In the discussions analyzed, NIPT is seen, overall, as valuable and greater access to it is desired. Some questions and concerns about NIPT were evident. Reddit stands as a valuable and appreciated tool for individuals wishing to discuss NIPT and to solicit and share information, opinions, and experiences. Health care providers should consider the ways social platforms such as Reddit can be engaged to better inform and educate the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro R Marcon
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murdoch B, Caulfield T. Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening: Navigating the Relevant Legal Norms. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 42:1271-1275. [PMID: 32694073 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The implementation of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in Canada will be affected by legal norms. The law can shape physician behaviour, help to crystallize standards of care, influence utilization patterns, and reflect and reinforce patient expectations. In Canada, failure to inform a patient about NIPS, or misinterpretation of NIPS results, could result in a successful "wrongful birth" claim if the patient subsequently gives birth to a child with a condition that had been detectable. Given that research shows that physicians' decisions are influenced by concerns about liability, malpractice law seems likely to encourage increased recommendation and use of NIPS. Physicians' fiduciary and negligence-based disclosure standards require they consider both objective factors as well as a specific patient's subjective and reasonable beliefs, fears, desires, and expectations. Thus, physicians likely must address dominant public discourses and controversies relevant to NIPS. Given the existence of spin, hype, and misinformation about NIPS, there is an increasing need for a robust consent process and, when appropriate, genetic counselling. In sum, the law will define and bound the acceptable behaviour of physicians recommending or administering NIPS, and nudge the technology's implementation forward. Physicians and policymakers should be aware of the potential impact of these legal norms on both utilization and public expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake Murdoch
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Governing the futures of non-invasive prenatal testing: An exploration of social acceptability using the Delphi method. Soc Sci Med 2020; 304:112930. [PMID: 32216981 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers numerous benefits to pregnant women and their families. It also raises ethical, legal and social concerns regarding, for instance, the possible effects of a routinization of prenatal genetic testing on free and informed decision-making by prospective parents, and the role of the state in governing its use. Technological advances are allowing cfDNA analyses to detect an increasing number of genetic risks and conditions in the fetus, potentially further exacerbating such concerns. From May 2015 to December 2016, we conducted a three-round Policy Delphi study (NR1 = 61, NR2 = 58, NR3 = 47; overall retention rate = 77.0%) to explore the social acceptability (SA) of current and potential future uses of NIPT in Canada according to participants with relevant professional, research or advocacy expertise. Participants came from four groups: healthcare professionals (NR3 = 14), social sciences and humanities researchers (NR3 = 13), patients/disability rights advocates (NR3 = 14), and cultural/religious communities advocates (NR3 = 6). This paper presents SA criteria and contextual contingencies relevant to the assessment of NIPT's SA according to the group. It also reports what uses (conditions or motives) participants thought should be banned, permitted, publicly funded, or promoted as a public health strategy. According to them, conditions resulting in severe pain or early death, as well as trisomies (13, 18, 21) and sex chromosome abnormalities, should be covered by Canadian public health insurance. However, there was wide agreement that direct-to-consumer NIPT should be legally banned, and that testing for fetal sex for non-medical reasons using NIPT should be either proscribed or discouraged. In addition to identifying areas of consensus, our results point to disagreement regarding, for instance, the required level of governance of whole-genome sequencing and testing for late onset conditions with low penetrance. This study also provides a model for exploring the SA of emerging technologies using the Policy Delphi method.
Collapse
|
8
|
Haidar H, Vanstone M, Laberge AM, Bibeau G, Ghulmiyyah L, Ravitsky V. Implementation challenges for an ethical introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views from Lebanon and Quebec. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:15. [PMID: 32041603 PMCID: PMC7011468 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-0455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies is currently transforming the landscape of prenatal screening in many countries. Since it is noninvasive, safe and allows the early detection of abnormalities, NIPT expanded rapidly and the test is currently commercially available in most of the world. As NIPT is being introduced globally, its clinical implementation should consider various challenges, including the role of the surrounding social and cultural contexts. We conducted a qualitative study with healthcare professionals in Lebanon and Quebec as case studies, to highlight the relevance of cultural contexts and to explore the concerns that should be taken into account for an ethical implementation of NIPT. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals (HCPs), 10 from each country, practicing in the field of prenatal screening and follow up diagnostic testing, including obstetricians and gynecologists, nurses, medical geneticists and, genetic counselors. We aimed to 1) explore HCPs’ perceptions and views regarding issues raised by NIPT and 2) to shed light on ways in which the introduction of the same technology (NIPT) in two different contexts (Lebanon and Quebec) raises common and different challenges that are influenced by the cultural norms and legal policies in place. Results We identified challenges to the ethical implementation of NIPT. Some are common to both contexts, including financial/economic, social, and organizational/ educational challenges. Others are specific to each context. For example, challenges for Lebanon include abortion policy and financial profit, and in Quebec challenges include lobbying by Disability rights associations and geographical access to NIPT. Conclusions Our findings highlight the need to consider specific issues related to various cultural contexts when developing frameworks that can guide an ethically sound implementation of NIPT. Further, they show that healthcare professional education and training remain paramount in order to provide NIPT counseling in a way that supports pregnant women and couples’ choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazar Haidar
- Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Meredith Vanstone
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster Program for Education Research, Innovation and Theory, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, and Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine; and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Gilles Bibeau
- Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Labib Ghulmiyyah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|