Clinical significance of posttraumatic intracranial hemorrhage in clinically mild brain injury: a retrospective cohort study

External validation of the updated Brain Injury Guidelines for complicated mild traumatic brain injuries: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 10% of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have intracranial bleeding (complicated mTBI) and 3.5% eventually require neurosurgical intervention, which is mostly available at centers with a higher level of trauma care designation and often requires interhospital transfer. In 2018, the Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were updated in the United States to guide emergency department care and patient disposition for complicated mild to moderate TBI. The aim of this study was to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the updated BIG (uBIG) for predicting the need for interhospital transfer in Canadian patients with complicated mTBI.

METHODS

This study took place at three level I trauma centers. Consecutive medical records of patients with complicated mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 13-15) who were aged ≥ 16 years and presented between September 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a penetrating trauma and those who had a documented cerebral tumor or aneurysm were excluded. The primary outcome was a combination of neurosurgical intervention and/or mTBI-related death. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 477 patients were included, of whom 8.4% received neurosurgical intervention and 3% died as a result of their mTBI. Forty patients (8%) were classified as uBIG-1, 168 (35%) as uBIG-2, and 269 (56%) as uBIG-3. No patients in uBIG-1 underwent neurosurgical intervention or died as a result of their injury. This translates into a sensitivity for predicting the need for a transfer of 100% (95% CI 93.2%-100%) and a specificity of 9.4% (95% CI 6.8%-12.6%). Using the uBIG could potentially reduce the number of transfers by 6% to 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients in uBIG-1 could be safely managed at their initial center without the need for transfer to a center with a higher level of neurotrauma care. Although the uBIG could decrease the number of transfers, further refinement of the criteria could improve its specificity.

Impact of Repeat Head Computed Tomography on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients With Abbreviated Injury Score 1-2 Injuries

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) routinely undergo repeat head Computed Tomography (CT) scans with the goal of identifying progressing hemorrhage early and providing timely intervention. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) are typically used to grade the severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and triage subsequent management. However, most patients receive a repeat head CT scan within 6 hours of the initial insult, regardless of these clinical scores. We investigated the yield of a repeat CT scan for mild blunt TBI (GCS 13-15, AIS 1-2).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective chart review at a level 1 trauma center between 2009 and 2019. Our primary outcome was medical or surgical intervention directly resulted from change in CT head findings. We used multivariate regression to identify predictors of surgical and medical intervention.

RESULTS

234 mild TBI patients met inclusion criteria. 33.7% of all patients had worsening ICH. 7.7% of patients required a surgical intervention, and 27.4% received a medical intervention. Multivariate analysis found that a decline in GCS (OR 8.64), and polytrauma (Injury Severity Score >15; OR 3.32) predicted surgical intervention. Worsening ICH did not predict surgical or medical intervention. Patients requiring medical intervention were more likely to have a decline in GCS (OR 2.53, P = .02) and be older (age >65, OR 2.06, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

In the population of blunt traumatic injury, worsening ICH did not predict surgical or medical intervention. Routine repeat imaging for this population is low yield, and clinical exam should guide the decision to reimage.

Predictors of neurosurgical intervention in complicated mild traumatic brain injury patients: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the predicting demographic, clinical and radiological factors for neurosurgical intervention in complicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients.

METHODS

Design: retrospective multicenter cohort study. Participants: patients aged ≥16 presenting to all level-I trauma centers in Quebec between 09/2016 and 12/2017 with mTBI(GCS 13-15) and complication on initial head CT (intracranial hemorrhage/skull fracture). Procedure: Consecutive medical records were reviewed and separated into two groups: no neurosurgical intervention and neurosurgical intervention (NSI). Main outcome: neurosurgical intervention. Analysis: multiple logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seventy-eight patients were included and 40 underwent NSI. One patient had radiological deterioration but no clinical deterioration prior to surgery. Subdural hemorrhage ≥4 mm width (OR:3.755 [95% CI:1.290-10.928]) and midline shift (OR:7.507 [95% CI: 3.317-16.989]) increased the risk of NSI. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was associated with a lower risk of NSI (OR:0.312 [95% CI: 0.136-0.713]). All other intracranial hemorrhages were not associated with NSI.

CONCLUSION

Radiological deterioration was not associated with the incidence of NSI. Subdural hemorrhage and midline shift should be predicting factors for neurosurgery. Some patients with isolated findings such as subarachnoid hemorrhage could be safely managed in their original center without being transferred to a level-I trauma center.