Cardiotoxicity after cancer treatment: a process map of the patient treatment journey

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish CardioToxicity Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of the CardioToxicity Management Self-Efficacy Scale (NSS-CTC) in Turkey.

METHOD

This methodological and descriptive study was undertaken with 204 oncology nurses. Information was gathered using a descriptive questionnaire and the NSS-CTC instrument. In the validity analysis of the scale, explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used. In the reliability analysis, Cronbach α coefficient and Pearson correlation analysis were used to examine item-total score correlations, and Student t-test was used for test-retest analysis.

RESULTS

The scale, characterized by a two-dimensional structure confirmed through factor analysis, exhibited an explained variance rate of 60.44%. The factor loadings exceeded the threshold of 0.30, and all fitness indices surpassed the criterion of 0.90. Furthermore, the root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) fell below 0.080 and demonstrated statistical significance. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency, as indicated by the overall Cronbach α coefficient of 0.930, with its subdimensions exhibiting similarly high reliability, reflected in Cronbach α values of 0.871 and 0.912, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The NSS-CTS is a valid and reliable tool specifically developed for evaluating nurses' self-efficacy in the context of oncology wards, particularly in managing cardiotoxicity resulting from cancer treatments.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

This newly developed scale holds significant promise in gauging nurses' confidence levels when confronted with the intricacies of cardiotoxicity management. It responds to the growing imperative for nurses to continually enhance their knowledge and skills to effectively address the evolving challenges associated with cardiotoxicity in cancer care.

Efficacy of exercise training for improving vascular dysfunction in people with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analyses

PURPOSE

Cancer treatments exert vascular toxic effects that can lead to the development of cardiovascular disease. Exercise training has the potential to prevent or reduce cancer treatment-induced damage to vascular structure and function. This systematic review with meta-analyses aimed to determine the isolated effects of exercise training on vascular outcomes in people with cancer.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases were searched on 20 September 2021 to identify randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised trials, pilot and cohort studies. Included studies implemented a structured exercise intervention and assessed vascular structure and/or function in people during or following cancer treatment. Meta-analyses examined the effects of exercise training on endothelial function (via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation) and arterial stiffness (via pulse wave velocity). Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Quality Assessment tool and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Appraisal tool. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Ten studies (discussed across 11 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of the included studies was moderate (71% average). Exercise improved vascular function when compared to control (standardised mean difference = 0.34, 95% CI (0.01, 0.67); p = 0.044: studies = 5, participants = 171), but not pulse wave velocity (standardised mean difference = - 0.64, 95% CI (- 1.29, 0.02); p = 0.056: studies = 4, participants = 333). The certainty of evidence was moderate for flow-mediated dilation and low for pulse wave velocity.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to usual care, exercise training significantly improves flow-mediated dilation (endothelial function) but not pulse wave analysis, in people treated for cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Exercise may improve vascular health in individuals during and following cancer treatment.

Critical appraisal of clinical guidelines for prevention and management of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity

OBJECTIVE

Doxorubicin is a valuable chemotherapeutic drug; however, it is associated with a high risk of cardiotoxicity. Several institutions and organizations have developed guidelines for risk factor assessment, monitoring and prevention strategies against chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. This review aimed to assess the quality of current practice guidelines, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II). This tool was used to compare the recommendations with regards to their strength and evidence recommendations were based on.

DATA SOURCES

This review identified guidelines in literature from January 1960 to February 6, 2022, through a systematic search that included PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database and Google Scholar. The quality, consistency and the strength of supporting evidence was evaluated using the AGREE II method.

DATA SUMMARY

Eight guidelines met the inclusion criteria and 144 recommendations were extracted from these guidelines. The results from the AGREE II evaluation showed that the total assessment scores of guidelines ranged from 2 to 5, indicating the guidelines need modifications. The recommendations were evaluated according to the references used, and it was found that 12 (11%) recommendations had high evidence, 36 (33%) had moderate evidence, 38 (35.19%) had low and 22 (20.37%) had insufficient evidence. Recommendations for risk factors assessment, prophylaxis of cardiotoxicity, management of cardiotoxicity and monitoring of cardiotoxicity were quite varied amongst the different guidelines evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

All studied guidelines need modifications as per the AGREE II evaluating tool. Several shortcomings were identified, including a lack of evidence-based studies supporting the recommendations in the guidelines.

Cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer survivors: A retrospective descriptive study using electronic health records from a Korean tertiary hospital

PURPOSE

The population overlap of breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has increased due to early breast cancer detection and treatment and aging population trends. Moreover, breast cancer patients are at an increased risk for CVDs consequent to cancer treatments. We aimed to understand the characteristics of breast cancer patients with pre-existing CVDs and of those diagnosed with CVDs after receiving chemotherapy, and cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction's occurrence among Korean breast cancer patients with CVDs.

METHODS

This retrospective descriptive study, which collected clinical data from electronic health records from a Korean tertiary hospital, included 1200 female breast cancer patients with CVDs, aged 15-75 years.

RESULTS

A total of 45.7% had pre-existing CVDs, and 91.6% were classified as very high-risk for cardiotoxicity in the pre-existing CVDs group. Among the 1200 breast cancer patients with CVDs, only 439 patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) data during their cancer treatment, and 121 received baseline assessment for LVEF. Of the 439 patients with LVEF data, 134 patients have been classified into cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), and the median period from cancer diagnosis to CTRCD occurrence was 26.5 months.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high cardiotoxicity risk of breast cancer patients with pre-existing CVDs, baseline studies of the risk assessment before chemotherapy were insufficient to support the prevention and early detection of cardiotoxicity. Therefore, it is paramount to consider how nurses focus on risk stratification before chemotherapy and support the regular monitoring of breast cancer survivors' cardiac functioning, to maintain optimal health status.

Monoclonal-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and breast cancer: A retrospective study in an oncology clinic

Monoclonal antibodies, such as trastuzumab and rituximab, significantly contribute to the oncological therapeutic arsenal. However, they may be associated with the development of cardiotoxicity. This study collected data from clinical records of patients in the use of rituximab and trastuzumab in a private oncology clinic from 2017 to 2019. It also investigated cardiovascular adverse drug reactions and associated risk factors. Cardiotoxicity was defined as symptomatic in the presence of signs and symptoms suggestive of heart failure (HF) such as dyspnea, nocturnal cough, and fatigue, among others. Asymptomatic HF was confirmed by the decline in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥10% of baseline or LVEF ≤50%. Among the 57 patients undergoing trastuzumab, 12 patients (21%) had cardiotoxicity and 8 patients (67%) had extreme or high-risk scores in the cardiotoxicity risk assessment algorithm. Among the 37 patients treated with rituximab, 3 patients (8%) had cardiotoxicity. The presence of previous diabetes mellitus significantly increased the risk of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (p = 0.02). However, none of the other risk factors influenced the incidence of trastuzumab- and rituximab-induced cardiotoxicity, which the sample size may explain. More studies are needed to investigate the association of risk factors with cardiotoxicity induced by trastuzumab and rituximab, aiming to establish strategies to prevent and manage this effect early.

LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review

Purpose of Review

The prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is increasing due to improved cancer survival. Serial monitoring of cardiac function is essential to detect CTRCD, guiding timely intervention strategies. Multigated radionuclide angiography (MUGA) has been the main screening tool using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to monitor cardiac dysfunction. However, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) may be more suitable for serial assessment. We aimed to assess the concordance between different non-radiating imaging modalities with MUGA to determine whether they can be used interchangeably.

Recent Findings

In order to identify relevant studies, a PubMed search was performed. We included cross-sectional studies comparing MUGA LVEF to that of 2D TTE, 3D TTE, and CMR. From 470 articles, 22 were selected, comprising 1017 patients in total. Among others, this included three 3D TTE, seven 2D harmonic TTE + contrast (2DHC), and seven CMR comparisons. The correlations and Bland-Altman limits of agreement varied for CMR but were stronger for 3D TTE and 2DHC.

Summary

Our findings suggest that MUGA and CMR should not be used interchangeably whereas 3D TTE and 2DHC are appropriate alternatives following an initial MUGA scan. We propose a multimodality diagnostic imaging strategy for LVEF monitoring in patients undergoing cancer treatment.

Cardio-oncology: rationale, aims and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular comorbidity among cancer patients is a growing clinical problem with the dramatic improvements in cancer survival. Cardio-oncology has developed as a new medical field dedicated to addressing the complex issues faced by patients who have both cancer and cardiovascular disease. This article explains to the reader what cardio-oncology services provide and the nature of cardiovascular problems caused by the growing array of modern cancer therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The list of potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapeutic agents is ever growing and dedicated cardio-oncology experts are required to tackle cardiovascular complications with minimal delay to necessary cancer therapy. Cardio-oncology services originated in academic centres but are now being set up around the world in all hospitals and clinics that provide care to cancer patients. Cardio-oncology plays an increasingly active role at every stage of cancer therapy including baseline risk assessment pretreatment, surveillance and prevention during treatment, response to acute complications and assessment in survivors post cardiotoxic treatments. New treatment strategies exist to optimize cancer treatment so it can be completed safely.

SUMMARY

In the present review, we explore the rationale, aims and roles of cardio-oncology, as well as future directions, which will certainly require multidisciplinary international collaboration.