Pulmonary Surface Irregularity Score as a New Quantitative CT Marker for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-a Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and inter-observer agreement of a quantitative pulmonary surface irregularity (PSI) score on high-resolution chest CT (HRCT) for predicting transplant-free survival in patients with IPF. For this IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective single-center study, adult patients with IPF and HRCT imaging (N = 50) and an age- and gender-matched negative control group with normal HRCT imaging (N = 50) were identified. Four independent readers measured the PSI score in the midlungs on HRCT images using dedicated software while blinded to clinical data. A t-test was used to compare the PSI scores between negative control and IPF cohorts. In the IPF cohort, multivariate cox regression analysis was used to associate PSI score and clinical parameters with transplant-free survival. Inter-observer agreement for the PSI score was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The technical failure rate of the midlung PSI score was 0% (0/100). The mean PSI score of 5.38 in the IPF cohort was significantly higher than 3.14 in the negative control cohort (p < .001). In the IPF cohort, patients with a high PSI score (≥ median) were 8 times more likely to die than patients with a low PSI score (HR: 8.36; 95%CI: 2.91-24.03; p < .001). In a multivariate model including age, gender, FVC, DLCO, and PSI score, only the PSI score was associated with transplant-free survival (HR:2.11 per unit increase; 95%CI: 0.26-3.51; p = .004). Inter-observer agreement for the PSI score among 4 readers was good (ICC: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.84-0.91). The PSI score had high accuracy and good inter-observer agreement on HRCT for predicting transplant-free survival in patients with IPF.

Role of Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

With the expansion in cross-sectional imaging over the past few decades, there has been an increase in the number of incidentally detected renal masses and an increase in the incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). The complete characterization of an indeterminate renal mass on CT or MR images is challenging, and the authors provide a critical review of the best imaging methods and essential, important, and optional reporting elements used to describe the indeterminate renal mass. While surgical staging remains the standard of care for RCC, the role of renal mass CT or MRI in staging RCC is reviewed, specifically with reference to areas that may be overlooked at imaging such as detection of invasion through the renal capsule or perirenal (Gerota) fascia. Treatment options for localized RCC are expanding, and a multidisciplinary group of experts presents an overview of the role of advanced medical imaging in surgery, percutaneous ablation, transarterial embolization, active surveillance, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Finally, the arsenal of treatments for advanced renal cancer continues to grow to improve response to therapy while limiting treatment side effects. Imaging findings are important in deciding the best treatment options and to monitor response to therapy. However, evaluating response has increased in complexity. The unique imaging findings associated with antiangiogenic targeted therapy and immunotherapy are discussed. An invited commentary by Remer is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Objective comparison of errors and report length between structured and freeform abdominopelvic computed tomography reports

PURPOSE

To objectively compare structured and freeform abdominopelvic CT reports based on the number and types of errors as well as report length.

METHODS

90 structured and 89 freeform reports from abdominopelvic CT scans with IV contrast obtained for the indication of abdominal pain were randomly selected for review. Each report was reviewed for errors, which were counted and categorized based on the type of error. The total number of words in each report was tallied.

RESULTS

105 total errors were found in the structured reports, compared to 157 total errors in freeform reports. There were 1.16 errors per structured report and 1.76 errors per freeform report (p < 0.001). 48% of structured reports contained at least one error, while 71% of freeform reports contained at least one error (p = 0.002). When a difference existed between the styles with regard to error categories, more errors were observed in freeform reports, with the exception of the duplicated period error where structured reports had more errors. No difference on the basis of average words per report existed, with 219.2 words per report for each reporting style.

CONCLUSION

The use of structured reporting for abdominopelvic CT results in less errors in the report when compared to freeform reporting, potentially reducing clinically significant adverse outcomes in patient care. The report length on the basis of number of words per report is not different between the two reporting styles.

MR Imaging Texture Analysis in the Abdomen and Pelvis

Add "which is a" before "distribution"? Texture analysis (TA) is a form of radiomics that refers to quantitative measurements of the histogram, distribution and/or relationship of pixel intensities or gray scales within a region of interest on an image. TA can be applied to MR images of the abdomen and pelvis, with the main strength quantitative analysis of pixel intensities and heterogeneity rather than subjective/qualitative analysis. There are multiple limitations of MRTA. Despite these limitations, there is a growing body of literature supporting MRTA. This review discusses application of MRTA to the abdomen and pelvis.