A randomized trial of TLR-2 agonist CADI-05 targeting desmocollin-3 for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Randomized controlled trial to evaluate synergy between taxane plus platinum chemotherapy and CADI-05, a Toll like receptor-2 agonist targeting desmocollin-3 as a first-line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB or IV) were randomized to cisplatin-paclitaxel (chemotherapy group, N = 112) or cisplatin-paclitaxel plus CADI-05 (chemoimmunotherapy group, N = 109). CADI-05 was administered a week before chemotherapy and on days 8 and 15 of each cycle and every month subsequently for 12 months or disease progression. Overall survival was compared using a log-rank test. Computed tomography was carried out at baseline, end of two cycles and four cycles. Response rate was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria by an independent radiologist.

Results

As per intention-to-treat analysis, no survival benefit was observed between two groups [208 versus 196 days; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.19; P = 0.3804]. In a subgroup analysis, improvement in median survival by 127 days was observed in squamous NSCC with chemoimmunotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.95; P = 0.046). In patients receiving planned four cycles of chemotherapy, there was improved median overall survival by 66 days (299 versus 233 days; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.98; P = 0.04) in the chemoimmunotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy group. This was associated with the improved survival by 17.48% at the end of 1 year, in the chemoimmunotherapy group. Systemic adverse events were identical in both the groups.

Conclusion

There was no survival benefit with the addition of CADI-05 to the combination of cisplatin-paclitaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC; however, the squamous cell subset did demonstrate a survival advantage.

A multicenter phase II study of cetuximab in combination with chest radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab has demonstrated improved efficacy in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We evaluated the integration of cetuximab in the combined modality treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with surgically unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were treated with chest radiotherapy, 73.5 Gy (with lung and tissue heterogeneity corrections) in 35 fractions/7 weeks, once daily (63 Gy without heterogeneity corrections). Cetuximab was given weekly during radiotherapy and continued during consolidation therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel up to a maximum of 26 weekly doses. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Baseline tumor tissue was analyzed for EGFR by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled in this phase II study. The median overall survival was 19.4 months and the median progression-free survival 9.3 months. The best overall response rate in 31 evaluable patients was 67%. No grade 3 or 4 esophagitis was observed. Three patients experienced grade 3 rash; 16 patients (69%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia during consolidation therapy. One patient died of pneumonitis, possibly related to cetuximab. EGFR gene copy number on baseline tumor tissues, analyzed by FISH, was not predictive of efficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of cetuximab to chest radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy was tolerated well and had modest efficacy in stage III NSCLC. Taken together with the lower incidence of esophagitis, our results support evaluation of targeted agents instead of chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy in this setting.

Identifying the target NSCLC patient for maintenance therapy: an analysis from a placebo-controlled, phase III trial of maintenance pemetrexed (H3E-MC-JMEN)

Background

This was a post hoc analysis of patients with non-squamous histology from a phase III maintenance pemetrexed study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

The six symptom items' [average symptom burden index (ASBI)] mean at baseline was calculated using the lung cancer symptom scale (LCSS). Low and high symptom burden (LSB, ASBI < 25; HSB, ASBI ≥ 25) and performance status (PS: 0, 1) subgroups were analyzed for treatment effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for demographic/clinical factors.

Results

Significantly longer PFS and OS for pemetrexed versus placebo occurred in LSB patients [PFS: median 5.1 versus 2.4 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, P < 0.0001; OS: median 17.5 versus 11.0 months, HR 0.63, P = 0.0012] and PS 0 patients (PFS: median 5.5 versus 1.7 months, HR 0.36, P < 0.0001; OS: median 17.7 versus 10.3 months, HR 0.54, P = 0.0019). Significantly longer PFS, but not OS, occurred in HSB patients (median 3.7 versus 2.8 months, HR 0.50, P = 0.0033) and PS 1 patients (median 4.4 versus 2.8 months, HR 0.60, P = 0.0002).

Conclusions

ASBI and PS are associated with survival for non-squamous NSCLC patients, suggesting that maintenance pemetrexed is useful for LSB or PS 0 patients following induction.

Phase Ib safety and pharmacokinetic study of volociximab, an anti-α5β1 integrin antibody, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This phase Ib study evaluated volociximab, an anti-α5β1 integrin antibody, in combination with carboplatin (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) and paclitaxel (Taxol) in advanced, untreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three cohorts were treated with volociximab (10, 20, or 30 mg/kg) for up to six 3-week cycles in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy and continued as maintenance therapy for patients with stable disease (SD) or better. Dose-limiting toxic effects, adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics, and anti-volociximab antibodies were assessed.

RESULTS

A maximum tolerated dose was not reached up to the maximum planned dose of 30 mg/kg. In 29 patients who received volociximab, the most common grade≥3 AEs were neutropenia (24%), hyponatremia (17%), and fatigue (10%). Three patients experienced volociximab-related serious AEs. No hemorrhages were observed. Of 33 patients enrolled, 8 (24%) achieved a partial response and 17 (52%) had SD. The median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval 5.5-8.1). Levels of potential biomarkers of angiogenesis or metastasis were reduced following six cycles of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Volociximab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel was generally well-tolerated and showed preliminary evidence of efficacy in advanced NSCLC.

Recent clinical developments and rationale for combining targeted agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

While chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), efforts have shifted toward evaluating novel targeted agents in an attempt to improve outcome. These targeted agents are directed toward key components in several signalling pathways such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-IR). There is also increasing interest in using combinations of targeted agents to inhibit more than one pathway; for example, inhibition of VEGFR + EGFR and VEGFR + PDGFR + EGFR. Further investigation is needed to identify the most appropriate combinations of these targeted agents in select patient subgroups, and to define optimal treatment doses to thereby achieve the best therapeutic index. This review outlines the rationale for combining targeted agents for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

A randomized, phase III multicenter trial of gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin or paclitaxel versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel-carboplatin is used as the standard regimen for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This trial was designed to compare gemcitabine + carboplatin or gemcitabine + paclitaxel to the standard regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1135 chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 5.5 on day 1 (GC), gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 (GP), or paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin AUC 6.0 on day 1 (PC). Stratification was based on disease stage, baseline weight loss, and presence or absence of brain metastases. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles or disease progression.

RESULTS

Median survival (months) with GC was 7.9 compared with 8.5 for GP and 8.7 for PC. Response rates (RRs) were as follows: GC, 25.3%; GP, 32.1%; and PC, 29.8%. The GC arm was associated with a greater incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic events but a lower rate of neurotoxicity and alopecia when compared with GP and PC.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-platinum and non-paclitaxel gemcitabine-containing doublets demonstrate similar overall survival and RR compared with the standard PC regimen. However, the treatment arms had distinct toxicity profiles.

EORTC Elderly Task Force and Lung Cancer Group and International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) experts' opinion for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in an elderly population

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a common health issue in the elderly population. Nevertheless, the paucity of large, well-conducted prospective trials makes it difficult to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for these patients. The present paper reviews the currently available evidence regarding treatment of all stages of NSCLC in elderly patients. Surgery remains the standard for early-stage disease, though pneumonectomy is associated with higher incidence of postoperative mortality in elderly patients. Given the lack of demonstrated benefit for the use of adjuvant radiotherapy, it is also not recommended in elderly patients. Elderly patients seem to derive the same benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy as younger patients do, with no significant increase in toxicity. For locally advanced NSCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be offered to selected elderly patients as there is a higher risk for toxicity reported in the elderly population. Third-generation single-agent treatment is considered the standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy needs to be evaluated in prospective trials. Unfortunately, with the exception of advanced/metastatic NSCLC, prospective elderly-specific NSCLC trials are lacking and the majority of recommendations made are based on retrospective data, which might suffer from selection bias. Prospective elderly-specific trials are needed.

Pharmacokinetic study of pegylated liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) in patients with advanced malignancies

S-CKD602 is a pegylated liposomal formulation of CKD-602. This study is the first to evaluate the factors affecting the high interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic disposition of S-CKD602. S-CKD602 was administered intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks as part of a phase I study. Pharmacokinetics studies of the liposomal encapsulated and released CKD-602 in plasma were performed. The pharmacokinetic variability of S-CKD602 is associated with both linear and nonlinear clearances. Patients > or =60 years of age have a 2.7-fold higher exposure of S-CKD602 as compared with patients <60 years of age (P = 0.02). Patients with a lean body composition have a higher plasma exposure of S-CKD602 (P = 0.02). Patients who have received prior therapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) have a 2.2-fold higher exposure of S-CKD602 as compared with patients who have not received PLD (P = 0.045). Prolonged exposure of the encapsulated drug in plasma over 1-2 weeks provides significant pharmacologic advantages. The high interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic disposition of S-CKD602 was associated with age, body composition, saturable clearance, and prior PLD therapy.

Maintenance pemetrexed (Pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (Plac) plus BSC: A randomized phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

CRA8000

Background: Pemetrexed's efficacy, favorable tolerability profile, and ease of administration provided a strong rationale for evaluation as maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. We present the final analyses for all outcomes, including overall survival (OS), from a phase III study of Pem vs. Plac (Ciuleanu, J Clin Oncol 26, 2008, A 8011) in pts with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: In this double-blind trial, pts were randomized 2:1 to receive Pem (500 mg/m2, day 1) plus BSC or Plac plus BSC in 21-day cycles until disease progression. All pts received vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone. The final OS analysis was performed using an unadjusted Cox model. Overall α = 0.05 for PFS and OS. Results: In the 663 randomized pts (Pem 441: Plac 222), Pem resulted in significantly better OS (13.4 vs. 10.6 mos [HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65–0.95, P = 0.012]). As reported earlier, Pem also had better PFS (P <0.00001) and response (P <0.001) ( Table ). The improvements in PFS and OS were observed primarily in patients with non-squamous histology (PFS HR = 0.47 and OS HR = 0.70). Treatment by histology interaction for OS was significant (P = 0.038). Drug-related grade 3/4 toxicities were higher for Pem (16% vs 4%; P <0.001); specifically, fatigue (5% vs 0.5%) and neutropenia (2.9% vs. 0%). Grade 3/4 toxicities did not increase significantly in pts who received ≥6 and ≥10 cycles of Pem. There were no Pem-related deaths. Fewer pts in the Pem arm (51.5% vs 67.1%; P <0.001) received systemic post-discontinuation therapy. Conclusions: Pem maintenance therapy is well tolerated and offers superior OS and PFS compared with Plac, making it a new treatment paradigm for patients with advanced NSCLC who respond to initial therapy. This trial further validates that Pem has greater efficacy in patients with non-squamous histology.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Outcomes for the elderly (≥70 years) from a three-arm phase III trial of gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin (GC) or paclitaxel (GP) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

8052

Background: Approximately 50% of lung cancer patients (pts) are ≥ 70 y, however, this population has been historically underrepresented in clinical trials. Even among pts ≥ 70 y, doublet chemotherapy has been shown to be superior to single-agent therapy (Lilenbaum JCO 2005, Sederholm JCO, 2005), and the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy doublets in NSCLC pts ≥ 70 years with good PS have been reported to be similar to those in younger pts (Fossella, ASCO 2003, #2528, Kelly, ASCO 2001, A-1313). The current analysis examined whether any differences were present by age in a three arm trial of GC or GP versus a standard regimen of PC. Methods: 1135 chemonaïve pts with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to receive: G 1000 mg/m2 d 1,8 plus C AUC 5.5 d 1; or G 1000 mg/m2 d 1,8 plus P 200 mg/m2 d 1; or P 225 mg/m2 plus C AUC 6.0 d 1. Stratification was based on stage, baseline weight loss, and brain metastases. Cycles were repeated every 21 days up to 6 cycles or disease progression. Clinical results were retrospectively analyzed in by patient age. Results: See Table . Conclusions: In this trial of commonly used regimens for advanced NSCLC, pts 70–74 years of age had significantly longer survival than pts 75–79 years of age. Pts 80+ years of age also had lower survival than the 70–74 year age group, but this difference was not statistically significant. No pts 80+ years of age had brain metastases at study entry. There was no clear pattern with respect to the effectiveness of individual treatment regimens by age group.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Maintenance pemetrexed (Pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (Plac) plus BSC: A randomized phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

CRA8000

The full, final text of this abstract will be available in Part II of the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, distributed onsite at the Meeting on May 30, 2009, and as a supplement to the June 20, 2009, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[Table: see text]

Incidence and outcomes associated with brain metastases (BM) in a three-arm phase III trial of gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin (GC) or paclitaxel (GP) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

8076

Background: A limited number of randomized phase III studies of advanced or metastatic NSCLC have included a mixed population of patients (pts) with and without BM at presentation. Analyses of pts with lung cancer from the 1970s and 1980s indicated that the incidence of BM at the time of diagnosis was approximately 10%. Methods: 1135 chemonaïve pts with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to receive: G 1000 mg/m2 d 1, 8 plus C AUC 5.5 d 1; or G 1000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus P 200 mg/m2 d 1; or P 225 mg/m2 plus C AUC 6.0 d 1. Stratification was based on stage, baseline weight loss, and presence or absence of BM. Cycles were repeated every 21 d up to 6 cycles or disease progression. Pts who developed BM as the only evidence of progression were able to be treated with whole brain radiation and steroids and remained on study. Results were retrospectively analyzed in by presence or absence of BM at study entry. Results: BM rates by subgroup were as follows (%): overall (17.1), nonsquamous (19.3), squamous (6.9), <70 y (21.3), ≥ 70 y (7.1), female (19.2), male (15.7), Caucasian (16.7), African American (18.8%), Hispanic (22.2), PS 0 (12.9), PS 1 (19.7), weight loss <5% (18.3), weight loss ≥ 5% (15.1), and stage IV (19.0). Among pts with (N=194) and without (N=941) BM, response rates=28.9% and 29.1%, median survival = 7.7 mos (95% CI: 6.7, 9.3) and 8.6 mos (95% CI: 7.9, 9.5), and median time to progression = 4.3 mos (95% CI: 3.4, 5.6) and 4.6 mos (95% CI: 4.2, 5.1), respectively. Rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were not different among pts with and without BM. Median survival among pts with BM was 7.6 mos for GC (N=66, 95% CI: 6.3, 10.1), 8.2 mos for GP (N=64, 95% CI: 4.6, 10.5), and 7.7 mos for PC (N=64, 95% CI: 6.1, 10.2). Conclusions: 1) The higher incidence of BM (17.1%) observed in this trial may be related to the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma, or to the increasing sensitivity of imaging modalities. 2) There was no difference in response, time to progression or survival for pts with or w/o BM.

[Table: see text]

Phase II study of RAD001 (everolimus) in previously treated small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

8107

Background: Everolimus (E) is an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a novel target for anti-cancer therapy that plays a central role in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and other pathways that mediate tumor growth, proliferation, and angiogenesis. E has shown preclinical activity in SCLC cell lines and xenograft models. Methods: Eligibility included SCLC with disease progression after up to 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function. Patients (pts) were treated with E 10 mg, orally, once daily. Primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), i.e. complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD), after 2 cycles of E (6 weeks) in pts who received at least 1 cycle. A 2-stage design was followed. PI3K/AKT signaling pathway molecular biomarkers (AKT, pAKT, PTEN, P-S6, p-4E- BP1) will be evaluated on baseline tumor tissue. Results: 40 pts were enrolled; 14 males/26 females; median age 64 years (44–80); PS 0: 17, PS 1: 23; prior chemotherapy status: 1 prior regimen/sensitive relapse (i.e. relapse >60 days from completion of first-line chemotherapy): 23 pts; 1 prior regimen/refractory: 4 pts; 2 prior regimens: 13 pts. 28 pts (70%) received ≥ 2 cycles of E, 7 (18%) 1 cycle and 5 (12%) did not complete the first cycle of E due to adverse events or early progression. Best response in 35 evaluable patients: 1 (3%) PR, 8 (23%) SD and 26 (74%) progression; DCR at 6 weeks was 26% with a duration of disease control of 2.7–6.3 months; median progression-free survival 1.4 months; and median overall survival 5.5 months. No grade 4 toxicity was seen. Grade 3 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (2), neutropenia (2), infection (1), pneumonitis (1), fatigue (1), elevated transaminases (1), hyperglycemia (1), diarrhea (1), and acute renal failure due to dehydration from diarrhea and poor oral intake (1). Conclusions: E is well tolerated but has limited single-agent antitumor activity in unselected patients with pretreated SCLC.

[Table: see text]

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDAC), for first-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NCI 7863)

8004

Background: Vorinostat, a HDAC inhibitor, enhances paclitaxel and platinum-mediated anti-cancer activity in preclinical studies by enhanced tubulin acetylation and DNA fragmentation respectively. Promising activity with carboplatin (C), paclitaxel (P), and vorinostat in patients with advanced NSCLC in the phase I study (Ramalingam et al, Clin Cancer Res, 2007) prompted this placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study. Methods: Pts. with stage IIIB (wet) or IV NSCLC, performance status (PS) 0/1, no prior therapy and adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function were randomized (2:1) for therapy with PC with either vorinostat or placebo. Treatment consisted of C: AUC=6 mg/ml.min; and P 200 mg/m2 both given on day 3 along with either vorinostat (400 mg PO QD) or placebo on days 1–14 of each 3 wk cycle to a maximum of 6 cycles. The estimated sample size to demonstrate a 50% improvement in response rate for vorinostat over placebo was 93 pts. (one-sided P, type I error 10%). Results: Ninety-four pts. were enrolled (vorinostat-64; placebo-32). Pts. baseline characteristics were similar between the two arms (median age 64, male 60%, PS 0 40%, brain mets 16%). Median # cycles: vorinostat-3.5; placebo - 4. The confirmed response rate was superior with vorinostat over placebo (34% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.02). At the time of analysis, the preliminary median PFS for vorinostat and placebo were 5.75 and 4.1 m respectively (ITT). Follow up for survival is ongoing. Common grade 3/4 toxicities (vorinostat vs. placebo): neutropenia (44% vs. 47%); thrombocytopenia (33% vs. 16%); fatigue (13% vs. 3%); hyponatremia (21% vs. 6%); diarrhea (5% vs. 0). Discontinuation from study after cycle 1 was higher with vorinostat (27% vs. 16%). Biomarker studies on baseline tumor tissue and peripheral blood cells are ongoing. Conclusions: Administration of vorinostat with carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in a significantly superior response rate for pts.with advanced NSCLC. HDAC inhibition is a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of NSCLC. Supported by ASCO Career Development Award to S.S.Ramalingam, and NCI NO1-CM-62209, NO1-CM-62201, NO1-CM-62208.

[Table: see text]

A phase II study of the halichondrin B analog, E7389, in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with a taxane. A California Consortium/University of Pittsburgh/University of Chicago NCI/CTEP sponsored trial

8056

Background: E7389 is a structurally simplified synthetic macrocyclic ketone analog of halichondrin B and has a unique mechanism of microtubule binding and interaction, distinct from other agents in this class. Thus, it was our hypothesis that pts with prior taxane based therapy would respond to this agent. We conducted a phase II trial of E7389 in prior taxane-treated NSCLC pts. Methods: Eligible pts included: histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC, previous treatment with platinum-based therapy and a taxane, no more than 2 prior regimens, measurable disease, Zubrod performance status ≤ 2. Pts were classified by taxane-sensitivity status: taxane sensitive (TS) (progression >90 days after taxane) or taxane resistant (TR) (progression during or ≤90 days after taxane). Treatment: E7389 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously over 1–2 minutes on day 1 and 8 of a 21 day schedule until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 41 pts were entered. There were 3 (15%) objective responses (7.2+, 8.5+, 10.6 mo) of 20 TS pts; and no response of 21 TR pts. Stable disease rate was 60% and 24% in TS and TR pts. respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) is 6.3 mos TS pts. 95%CI (2.5–8.6 mos) and 1.2 mos TR pts. 95%CI (1.1–4.1 mos). Median number of cycles (range): TS 4 (1–14); TR 2 (1–7). Major toxicity included: 19 pts (46%) with grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity including only 1 episode of febrile neutropenia and 8 pts (20%) with grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity attributable to drug including: fatigue (1), dehydration (2), nausea (2), constipation (2). Only 1 pt developed grade 3 neuropathy (course 9). Conclusions: E7389 was well tolerated with encouraging objective response, PFS and disease control rate in the TS cohort. This cohort will be expanded, using a 2-stage design, to accrue up to another 25 pts.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and early efficacy results from a phase I study of volociximab (V) in combination with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) in patients (pts) with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

e13513

Background: Volociximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that blocks fibronectin binding to α5β1 and induces apoptosis in proliferating endothelial cells. Its anti-angiogenic actions are independent of the VEGF pathway. This is the first clinical study of voloxicimab in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: This phase 1b multi-center open-label, dose-escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of V in combination with full doses of C (AUC=6mg/ml.min) P (200mg/m2) with cycles repeated every 3 wks for a maximum of 6 cycles followed by a maintenance treatment with V alone. Eligible pts had histologically confirmed untreated stage IIIb or IV NSCLC. In cohorts 1 and 2, pts received V at 10 mg/kg and 20mg/kg IV, respectively, on days 1 and 8, of the first 21 day cycle then every 21 days. In cohort 3, pts received V 30 mg/kg IV every 21 days from day 1. We present here the interim safety analysis and RECIST response data of the combination therapy. Results: A total of 22 patients (9, 6 and 7 in cohorts 1, 2 and 3 respectively) who received at least one dose of treatment constitute the safety population. Reported salient adverse events (any grade) were constipation (68%), asthenia (64%), nausea (59%), arthralgia (55%) and paresthesia (46%). Grade 3 bowel obstruction in one patient was considered a DLT in cohort 2. No DLT's were observed in cohort 3. Seven pts reported at least one serious adverse event (all Grade 3) including deep vein thrombosis (1), peripheral arterial occlusion (1), proteinuria (1), pneumonitis (1), small intestinal obstruction (1), pleural effusion (1), hypoxia (1), dehydration (1) and orthostatic hypotension (1). Partial response was seen in 6 pts and stable disease in 12 out of 18 pts who were evaluable for response by RECIST. Conclusions: The highest dose of V tested (30 mg/kg q3w) in combination with CP appears well tolerated and the regimen has promising clinical activity in advanced NSCLC.

[Table: see text]

Population pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2545

Background: CKD-602, a semi-synthetic analogue of campothecin, is a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor. S-CKD602, a PEGylated long-circulating liposomal formulation of CKD-602, was developed to achieve a longer intra-tumoral exposure of CKD602 and a higher therapeutic index. Age and body composition were reported to affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of S- CKD602 (Zamboni, ASCO'07). A population PK model for encapsulated and released CKD-602 following administration of S- CKD602 was developed to assess factors that may influence S-CKD602 PK. Methods: Plasma samples from 45 patients (pts) with solid tumors were collected in a phase I study. S-CKD602 was administered as a 1 h IV infusion with doses ranging from 0.1 to 2.5 mg/m2. Plasma concentrations of encapsulated (n=292) and released (n=268) CKD-602 were measured by LC-MS/MS, and population PK modeling was performed using NONMEM. Results: Pts were classified as linear and nonlinear pts according to the clearance (CL) of encapsulated CKD-602 using a classic two stage PK modeling approach. Mean ± SD ratio of total body weight to ideal body weight of pts with linear and nonlinear CL of encapsulated CKD-602 was 1.13 ± 0.16 and 1.53 ± 0.29, respectively (P = 0.003). PK of encapsulated CKD-602 was described by 1-compartment model with nonlinear CL (Michaelis-Menten kinetics). PK of released CKD-602 was described by a 2- compartment model with linear CL for all pts. The presence of primary or metastatic tumor(s) located in the liver decreased the inter- individual variability (IIV) in the CL of encapsulated CKD-602 by 13%. Typical values of Vmax of encapsulated CKD-602 in pts with and without hepatic tumor(s) were 156 and 103 μg/h, respectively (P < 0.001). The inclusion of age decreased IIV in the release of CKD-602 from S-CKD602 by 22%. Typical values of release of CKD-602 from S-CKD602 in pts < 60 years old (yo) and pts ≥ 60 yo were 0.21 and 0.10 L/h, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: These data suggest that older patients (pts ≥ 60 yo) have a reduced release of CKD-602 from S-CKD602. In addition, pts with tumors in the liver may have an increased clearance of S-CKD602. These observations have potential implications in the optimal dosing of liposomal agents.

[Table: see text]

The effect of P53 gene status on the interaction of vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid-SAHA) with carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines

10567

Background: Vorinostat, a Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor is a novel targeted antineoplastic agent with promising activity when combined with carboplatin-paclitaxel against NSCLC. The exact molecular mechanism underlying its growth inhibitory and apoptotic effects is not well understood. We investigated the influence of p53 gene status on the interaction of vorinostat and carboplatin (a DNA targeting agent) in various NSCLC cell lines. Methods: NSCLC cells with wild type p53 (A549, 128.88T), mutant p53 (201T) and p53 null phenotype (Calu-1) were used. Cytotoxicity induced by serial dilution of carboplatin in the presence and absence of a fixed dose (1μM) of vorinostat was assessed by MTT [3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay. In a separate experiment, cells were also transiently transfected with a p21 promoter-luciferase reporter construct to assess p53 activation following a 24 h exposure to vorinostat, carboplatin, or vorinostat/Carboplatin combination. Luciferase activity was quantified by luminometry and corrected for total protein. Results: Vorinostat displayed single agent activity in each cell line, with greater growth inhibition observed in the p53 mutant and null cells. Synergistic interactions between carboplatin and vorinostat were observed in p53 wild type cells and the IC50 for carboplatin was reduced 3- to 5-fold. In contrast, the interaction between vorinostat and carboplatin was additive or less than additive in p53 mutant and p53 null cells. Vorinostat also increased expression of the p21 reporter construct in each of the cell lines. Conclusions: Vorinostat regulates p21 gene expression and elicits anti-tumor activity in NSCLC cells independent of their p53 status. Vorinostat potentiates carboplatin-induced cytotoxicity in NSCLC with wild type p53 but not p53 deficient cells, suggesting involvement of a p53 dependent pathway. The addition of vorinostat may allow for a reduction in standard dose of carboplatin with improvement in overall therapeutic index. A phase II/III clinical trial is in progress to evaluate vorinostat in combination with carboplatin-based regimen in advanced NSCLC. Support: CA099168–01, ASCO Foundation CDA

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of irinotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

18011

Background: Recurrent SCLC has a poor prognosis and is devoid of treatment options that improve overall survival. Irinotecan and paclitaxel are both active agents against SCLC, and have synergistic preclinical interactions. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent SCLC. Methods: Patients with SCLC who relapsed following one prior chemotherapy regimen were eligible. Other pertinent inclusion criteria were: ECOG performance status 0–2, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function and willingness to provide informed consent. Patients with untreated brain metastasis were excluded. Paclitaxel (75 mg/m2) and irinotecan (50 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 & 8 of every 3-week cycle. Treatment was continued until progression up to a maximum of 6 cycles or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate. Toxicity was graded by CTC version 2.0. The simon two-stage design was utilized and the estimated sample size was 55 patients (stage I - 23 patients; stage 2 - 32 patients). The study has a 90% power to detect a response rate of 30%, with an alpha error rate of 10%. Results: 55 patients have been enrolled and complete data are available for 32 patients at the time of this report. Patient baseline characteristics are: male 53%, PS 0–44%; PS 1–47% and PS 2–6%. The median age is 61 years. Fifteen patients received ≥ 4 cycles. Salient grades 3–5 toxicities seen: neutropenia (13%), fatigue (13%); diarrhea (3%), hypersensitivity (3%) and hyponatremia (3%).The objective response rate is 37% (95% CI 19%-55%) with 9 PRs and 1 CR. Additional 8 patients (24%) had stable disease. The median survival is 19.6 weeks (95% CI 15.1–29.4) and the 1-year survival rate is 15%. Conclusions: The combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel is well tolerated and has promising anti-cancer activity in recurrent SCLC. Updated data on all 55 patients will be available at the time of the presentation.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Outcomes for elderly advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) treated with bevacizumab (B) in combination with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P): Analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4599 study

7535

Background: PC administered in combination with bevacizumab extends survival for advanced non-squamous NSCLC pts. Based on SEER data, elderly pts (age ≥70 years) represent >50% of all new cases of lung cancer and present unique therapeutic challenges. The ECOG 4599 database was analyzed to compare the outcomes in elderly pts treated with PCB vs. PC alone. Methods: Pts ≥ 70 years at study entry constituted the elderly cohort. Each arm (PCB vs. PC) and age group (≥70 vs. <70) was compared with respect to baseline pt characteristics, response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), survival and toxicity. Results: Out of 850 eligible pts, 26% (N=224) were ≥ 70 years of age (1.6% ≥ 80 years). Median age for the elderly was 74 yrs; 44% were ≥ 75 yrs. Baseline characteristics of the elderly cohort were similar to the younger group except for a higher proportion of males (62% vs. 52%, P = 0.005). For the elderly pts, there was a trend towards superior response rate (29% vs. 17%, P = 0.067) and median PFS (5.9 mos vs. 4.9 mos, P = 0.063) with PCB when compared to PC, though there was no difference in overall survival (PCB = 11.3 mos; PC = 12.1 mos; P = 0.4). Grades 3–5 toxicities (CTC version 2.0) were noted in 87% of elderly pts treated with PCB compared to 61% with PC (P < 0.001). Treatment-related death rates with PCB vs. PC were 6.3% vs. 1.8% (NS) for the elderly. Febrile neutropenia (6% vs. 0.9%), proteinuria (8% vs. 0) and hypertension (6% vs. 0.9%) were more common with PCB than PC among the elderly. When compared to younger pts, the elderly experienced more neutropenia (34% vs. 22%), bleeding (7.9% vs. 3.2%), proteinuria (7.9% vs. 1.3%), muscle weakness (7.9% vs. 2.2%) and motor neuropathy (3.5% vs. 0.6%) with PCB. Conclusions: The proportion of elderly patients in ECOG 4599 is the highest recorded among ECOG phase III studies for advanced NSCLC. Increased toxicity with the addition of bevacizumab in those ≥ 70 yrs may have contributed to the absence of survival benefit for PCB vs PC, but this observation is limited by its post-hoc, retrospective nature.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with carboplatin and docetaxel for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

7643

Background: Cetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody against the external domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has demonstrated single-agent activity against NSCLC. When administered in combination with carboplatin and docetaxel, a commonly used regimen for advanced NSCLC, cetuximab exhibits synergistic interaction in preclinical studies. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of cetuximab, carboplatin, and docetaxel for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients = 18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed stage IIIB (w/ effusion) or stage IV NSCLC received cetuximab (400 mg/m2 on day 1 and 250 mg/m2 on days 8 and 15) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC=6 on day 1) every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Thereafter, patients without evidence of disease progression (CR/PR/SD) were continued on single-agent cetuximab (250 mg/m2/week) for a maximum of 1 year or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was response rate. Results: 81 patients were enrolled and 76 are evaluable for response. Patient characteristics included: gender male/female, 43/38; median age 63 years (range 42–83); ECOG performance status 0/1/, 31/50; and stage IIIB/IV- 5/76. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range 1–6). The response rate (CR/PR) was 14.5% (95% CI, 7.5 to 24.4), with a median progression-free survival of 4.7 months and a median overall survival of 11 months. With combination therapy, the salient grade 3/4 events were neutropenia (28%), febrile neutropenia (3.8%), hypotension (4%), hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia (5%), hypersensitivity (1%), acne-like rash (3%), peripheral neuropathy (1%), and myalgia (1%). Twenty-five patients received maintenance therapy with single-agent cetuximab (median duration of treatment was 12 weeks) and this was well tolerated. Conclusions: This large multicenter phase II study of the novel combination of cetuximab with docetaxel and carboplatin shows promising efficacy for patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC and has an acceptable toxicity profile.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Elderly subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial of gemcitabine (G) in combination with carboplatin (Cb) or paclitaxel (P) compared to paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced (stage IIIB, IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

7665

Background: Efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy doublets in elderly (ELD) NSCLC pts with good PS have been reported to be similar to those in younger pts (N-ELD). However, little data exists about which of the standard regimens are suitable for the ELD. To compare efficacy and safety of doublet regimens in the ELD, we conducted a retrospective age-specific subgroup analysis of our Phase 3 randomized trial comparing 3 regimens for advanced NSCLC (Treat, et al: Abst#7025, Proc ASCO 2005). Methods: A Phase 3 study in advanced (Stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC chemonaive patients with ECOG PS <2 was designed to compare the efficacy of a G-containing platinum regimen GCb (G 1000 mg/m2 IV D 1, 8 plus Cb AUC 5.5, D 1) to a nonplatinum G doublet GP (G 1000 mg/m2 IV D 1,8 plus P 200 mg/m2, D 1) and a reference regimen of PCb (P 225 mg/m2 plus Cb AUC 6.0, D 1). Outcome data of ELD pts (age =70) vs. N-ELD pts (age <70) were compared. Survival (OS) was the primary endpoint with secondary endpoints being response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and toxicity. Data from all 3 arms were pooled for this analysis. Results: A total of 314 ELD and 746 N- ELD pts were analyzed (GCb 111/245, GP 100/251, PCb 103/250). There were no significant differences in the OS or TTP distributions in ELD compared to N-ELD pts ( Table 1 ). In general, the incidence and grade of toxicity in ELD vs. N-ELD were comparable. ELD experienced moderately higher incidences of Grade 3–4 constitutional (12.6% vs. 7.1%), neurologic (16.1% vs. 8.9%), and pulmonary (12.3% vs. 7.9%) toxicities compared with N-ELD pts. Conclusion: Use of G-containing doublets as first-line chemotherapy showed similar efficacy to the standard PCb regimen in ELD and N-ELD patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC as defined by OS, RR, and TTP. ELD tolerated these regimens well despite experiencing slightly more toxicity than younger patients.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

[Table: see text]

Analysis of renal function in patients entered onto CTEP-sponsored phase I studies since 1979

2519

Background: The NCI and FDA utilize different criteria for classifying renal dysfunction. We analyzed renal function in all patients entered onto CTEP-sponsored phase I clinical trials since 1979 to evaluate the percentage of patients with acceptable renal function according to criteria utilized by the National Cancer Institute, as compared with those advocated by the Food and Drug Administration. Methods: Data from 12575 patients entered onto CTEP-sponsored phase I studies since 1979 were evaluated. Renal function was characterized by calculating creatinine clearance (CrCl) by three different formulae (Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe, and Levey), as well as GFR according to MDRD. Results: Of the 12,575 patients, data were available to calculate renal function with all the 4 formulae in 5,177. Distributions of CrCl and GFR were defined, and patients were classified as having normal renal function or severe, moderate, or mild renal dysfunction according to FDA or NCI criteria. The resulting distributions are indicated in the table below. Conclusions: Approximately 40% of patients entered into CTEP-sponsored phase I trials have mild renal dysfunction according to FDA criteria and approximately 95% have CrCls > 50 ml/min. These data imply that moderate and severe are the only renal dysfunction categories that need to be evaluated in renal dysfunction studies of novel antineoplastic agents and that FDA guidelines should be applicable. Whether patients in the NCI database with CrCls of 50–80 ml/min experience more toxicities than those with creatinine clearances > 80 ml/min is undergoing evaluation.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) model of docetaxel (Doc) and neutropenia in humans

2567

Background: We have scaled our previously described murine Doc PBPK model (Florian et. al, Proc. AACR, 2006) to humans to determine if it predicts human plasma Doc concentration. The resulting human plasma Doc predictions were then coupled to a low- order neutrophil model from the literature (Karlsson et. al, Clin. Cancer Res., 2006), and individual patient absolute neutrophil count (ANC) predictions were compared with actual ANC data. Methods: Plasma Doc concentration vs. time data were obtained from 75 patients given 1-h Doc infusions and sampled out to 48 h. 67 patients received 50–75 mg/m2 q3wk, and 8 patients received 35 mg/m2 weekly. Plasma Doc concentrations were determined by LC-MS, & ANC were measured weekly during cycle 1. Human organ volumes & blood flow rates for humans were obtained from the literature and scaled based on individual patient weight. Intra-tissue exchange rates & liver clearance rate from the mouse PBPK model were used unchanged as parameters in the scaled model. The PBPK model was used to drive the ANC model, which had been developed with data from patients treated on a q3wk schedule. Simulations were performed using MATLAB, and model predictions were compared with actual data based on a weighted sum squared error metric. Results: The initial, scaled PBPK model performed well in describing actual plasma Doc concentrations during the infusion & at times after 5 h, but not at the intermediate time points. Consequently, transition rates for the “other” compartment were estimated for the human population. The updated model was more accurate in predicting human plasma Doc concentrations (mean improvement 17%; range -3 to 70%). When the scaled PBPK model was coupled with the neutrophil model, the resulting predicted neutrophil profiles agreed with those from patients dosed on a q3w regimen, but not with those dosed weekly. Conclusions: This unique PBPK/PD model allows the prediction of human plasma Doc concentrations provided the patient weight & dose are known. Further validation of the coupled PBPK/PD model, including predicted tumor concentrations, is ongoing.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Subgroup analysis of African American patients from a randomized phase 3 trial of gemcitabine (G) in combination with carboplatin (Cb) or paclitaxel (P) compared to P plus Cb in advanced (stage IIIB, IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

18066

Background: A relationship between race and prognosis in patients with NSCLC has been suggested with African Americans (AA) having higher incidence and lower survival rates compared to whites (W) with a similar stage of disease. However, due to under representation of AA in clinical trials there is little data to substantiate this hypothesis. To investigate the possibility of a race effect on the efficacy and safety of standard chemotherapy doublet regimens in AA pts, we conducted a retrospective subgroup analysis of our Phase 3 randomized trial comparing 3 regimens for advanced NSCLC (Treat, et al: Abst#7025, Proc ASCO 2005). Methods: A Phase 3 study in advanced (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC chemonaive patients with ECOG PS <2 was designed to compare the efficacy of a G-containing platinum regimen GCb (G 1000 mg/m2 IV D 1, 8 plus Cb AUC 5.5, D 1) to a nonplatinum G doublet GP (G 1000 mg/m2 IV D 1,8 plus P 200 mg/m2, D 1) and a reference regimen of PCb (P 225 mg/m2 plus Cb AUC 6.0, D 1). Outcome and toxicity data of AA pts vs. W pts were compared. Survival (OS) was the primary endpoint with secondary endpoints being response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and toxicity. Data from all 3 arms were pooled for this analysis. Results: A total of 128 AA and 906 W pts were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the OS or TTP distributions in AA compared to W pts ( Table 1 ). The incidence and grade of hematologic toxicity in AA vs. W pts were comparable. AA demonstrated slightly lower incidences of Grade 3–4 constitutional (5.1% vs. 9.0%), hemorrhage (1.4 % vs. 2.5 %), and metabolic (4.4% vs. 7.0%) toxicities compared with W pts. Conclusions: Use of standard chemotherapy doublets as first-line chemotherapy in AA pts with advanced NSCLC demonstrated similar efficacy and safety compared to W pts treated under similar conditions.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Effect of ketoconazole administration on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors

13016

Background: Bortezomib (btz; VELCADE) is a first-in-class small molecule proteasome inhibitor used to treat patients with multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that btz is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. We conducted a study to evaluate the effect of inhibition of CYP3A4 with ketoconazole (keto) on the PK of btz in humans. Methods: The study enrolled patients with advanced malignancies for whom standard therapy was not available. Patients received btz 1.0mg/m2 (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle, and were randomized to receive keto 400mg (PO) on days 6, 7, 8, and 9 of either the first or second cycle of treatment. Blood samples for plasma btz determination were collected over 72 hours following the Day 8 dose in Cycles 1 and 2. PK parameters were computed non-compartmentally. PD parameters were derived from an Emax model of percentage proteasome inhibition in whole blood. Results: Of the 21 patients enrolled, 13 had sufficient PK sampling in Cycles 1 and 2 to assess the effect of keto on the PK of btz. No statistically significant difference in AUC0–72h for btz ± keto was observed (p=0.2248). The mean AUC0–72h ratio was 1.22 (90% CI, 0.92–1.61). The exposure-PD relationships for btz ± keto were similar (Table). Adverse events were similar in the presence and absence of keto. Conclusions: Although the AUC0–72h difference was not statistically significant, the 90% CI for the AUC0–72h ratio extends beyond the FDA- specified range of 0.80–1.25 for DDI studies, precluding a declaration of no effect. The presence of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor increased mean btz exposure by only 22% and had no apparent effect on the exposure-PD relationship.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of 17-allylamino-17 demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) in combination with weekly paclitaxel for advanced solid malignancies

14028

Background: 17-AAG inhibits heat shock protein 90, promotes degradation of oncoproteins & exhibits synergy with paclitaxel in vitro. We conducted a phase I study in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the combination of 17-AAG & paclitaxel. Methods: Key eligibility criteria were: histologically confirmed malignancy; lack of standard or proven treatment options; age > 18 years; ECOG PS 0–2; adequate hepatic, renal & bone marrow function & willingness to sign informed consent. Patients with neuropathy > grade 1 and those on therapeutic anticoagulation were excluded. 17-AAG (80–225 mg/m2) was given on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15 & 18 of each 4-week cycle to sequential cohorts of patients. Paclitaxel (80–100 mg/m2) was administered on days 1, 8 & 15. PK sampling was done on days 1, 4 & 8 of cycle 1. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed during cycle 1. 17-AAG & paclitaxel were quantitated with validated HPLC and LC/MS assays, respectively. Results: 25 pts were accrued to 5 dose levels. Patient demographics were: male 18; median age 61; PS 0–14 pts, 1–10 pts, 2–1 pt. Primary tumor sites were prostate (5), lung (4), esophagus (4), ovary (2), colon (2) & others (8). The median number of cycles was 2. Chest pain (Gr 3) & fatigue (Gr 4) were dose-limiting at dose level 4 (17-AAG 225 mg/m2, paclitaxel 80 mg/m2). Other toxicities included neutropenia, fatigue, neuropathy, nausea, arthralgia and myalgia. The RP2D for the regimen is 17-AAG (175 mg/m2 administered biweekly) & paclitaxel (80 mg/m2/wk.) for 3 weeks in a 4 wk. cycle. None of the 6 patients at this dose level experienced DLT. One patient with fibrosarcoma experienced a PR & 4 (esophageal, prostate, gall bladder cancer) had SD. Paclitaxel PK were compatible with previous reports in literature and were similar on days 1 & 8. 17-AAG PK were linear and similar when given alone and in combination with paclitaxel. Conclusions: The combination of biweekly 17-AAG (175 mg/m2) and weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2/week) is tolerated well and was associated with anti-cancer activity. There was no evidence of drug-drug PK interactions. Support: NCI U01 CA099168–01, NIH/NCCR/GCRC grant 5M01RR 00056

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Age and body composition related-effects on the pharmacokinetic disposition of STEALTH liposomal CKD- 602 (S-CKD602) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2528

Background: STEALTH liposomes (SL), which contain lipids conjugated to polyethylene glycol (PEG), prolong the circulation time of a drug in plasma, achieve high and extended drug exposure in tumor, and are eliminated via the reticuloendothelial system (RES). S- CKD602 is a SL formulation of CKD-602, a camptothecin analogue. CKD-602 released from S-CKD602 is eliminated by the kidney. There is significant interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic (PK) disposition of S-CKD602. Thus, there is a need to identify factors associated with the PK variability. We hypothesize that older patients (pts) have a reduced capacity to eliminate SL agents due to age-related impairment of the RES and that body composition alters the disposition of SL. Methods: PK studies of S-CKD602 were performed in a phase I study of S-CKD602 at 0.1 to 2.5 mg/m2 IV q 21 d in pts with solid tumors. Concentrations of encapsulated (E), released (R), and sum total (E + R) CKD-602 in plasma and CKD-602 in urine were measured by LC-MS/MS. Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) was calculated and normalized by dose (AUC/dose). The ratio of total body weight to ideal body weight (TBW/IBW) was calculated as a measure of body composition. Results: Mean ± SD S-CKD602 sum total AUC/dose in pts < 60 (n = 13) and = 60 (n = 17) years of age (yo) were 4.5 ± 5.0 and 11.2 ± 11.0 (μg/ml·h)/(mg/m2), respectively (P<0.05). Controlling for age, there was a statistically significant inverse relationship between TBW/IBW and S-CKD602 AUC/dose where low TBW/IBW was associated with high AUC/dose in both age groups (P<0.05). The cumulative amount of CKD-602 recovered in the urine was 2.2-fold higher in pts < 60 yo compared with = 60 yo. Conclusions: These data suggest that pts = 60 yo have a reduced clearance of S-CKD602 and reduced release of CKD-602 from S- CKD602 compared with pts < 60 yo. In addition, pts < 60 and = 60 yo with a lean body composition may have a reduced tissue distribution and an increased plasma exposure of S-CKD602. The clinical significance of these differences and the factors associated with them need to be evaluated for S-CKD602 and other liposomal and nanoparticle anticancer agents.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy and safety of continuous daily sunitinib dosing in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from a phase II study

7542

Background: Sunitinib malate (SU), an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, and FLT3, has demonstrated activity in recurrent advanced NSCLC on the 4/2 schedule (4 weeks [wks] on treatment followed by 2 wks off), with a partial response (PR) rate of 11% (Socinski, ESMO 2006). A continuous dosing (CD) schedule of SU was additionally evaluated for safety and efficacy in this multicenter phase II study. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had stage IIIB/IV NSCLC previously treated with 1–2 chemotherapy regimens, ECOG PS =1, and adequate organ function. Pts with brain metastases or recent gross hemoptysis were excluded. Pts received oral SU 37.5 mg/day continuously in 4-wk cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Results: Forty-seven pts were treated on the CD schedule: median age 60 yrs (range 37–81); male 57%; ECOG PS 0/1/2 49%/49%/2%; adenocarcinoma 53%, squamous cell carcinoma 15%, other 32%; median number of SU cycles initiated: 3 (range 1–10). One pt (2%) had a confirmed PR and 8 pts (17%) had stable disease >3 months. Median PFS was 12.1 wks (95% CI: 8.6–13.7). SU was generally well tolerated; most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1/2 and included fatigue/asthenia, pain/myalgia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, and stomatitis/mucosal inflammation. Grade =3 AEs included fatigue/asthenia (15%), hypertension (6%), hypoxia (6%), dyspnea (4%), and hemoptysis (2%). Treatment-related serious AEs included congestive heart failure (CHF; 1 pt), gastrointestinal bleeding (1 pt), hypomagnesemia (1 pt), and hypoxic respiratory failure (1 pt). One pt died due to possible treatment-related CHF. Conclusions: SU on a CD schedule is associated with an acceptable safety profile when administered to previously treated NSCLC pts, and there is documented preliminary evidence of activity, with 1 PR and a median PFS of 12.1 wks. These data support further study of continuous dosing of SU in combination with other treatments for NSCLC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus weekly versus three-weekly paclitaxel in previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel (Taxol) each provides an efficacious non-platinum option for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the optimal dosage and schedule of the two agents used in combination are not well defined.

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive gemcitabine-paclitaxel on a traditional three-weekly schedule (Arm A) or a novel weekly schedule (Arm B) as follows-Arm A (three-weekly): gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 infused>30 min on days 1 and 8 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 infused>3 h on day 1 of a 21-day cycle or Arm B (weekly): gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 infused>30 min and paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 infused>1 h, both administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

One hundred patients received at least one dose of treatment. The weekly schedule, Arm B, was more efficacious and less hematologically toxic than Arm A. Confirmed complete and partial response rates were 28.2% and 26.8%, respectively. Median survival was 10.3 months on Arm B and 7.9 months on Arm A (log-rank P=0.10); 1- and 2-year survival rates also favor Arm B: 42.0% versus 34.0% and 18.0% versus 6.0%. Progression-free survival was 5.8 versus 4.8 months, again favoring Arm B (log-rank P=0.06). There was a two-fold lower frequency of grade 3/4 hematologic events with Arm B as follows: neutropenia (16% versus 30%), thrombocytopenia (4% versus 8%), and anemia (2% versus 6%). One patient (2%) in each treatment group developed febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

In this trial, both schedules were efficacious and tolerable, although the weekly schedule resulted in improved survival and lower hematologic toxicity compared with a three-weekly schedule. The weekly schedule of gemcitabine-paclitaxel indicates an improved therapeutic index.

Phase I, pharmacokinetic (PK), & pharmacodynamic (PD) study of 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, (17DMAG, NSC 707545) in patients with advanced solid tumors

3021

Background: 17DMAG is a water-soluble analog of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG), the first geldanamycin compound to enter clinical trials. 17DMAG causes oncoprotein degradation by binding to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) & has greater in-vitro activity than 17AAG. In animals treated with 17DMAG, liver toxicity is dose-limiting. The objectives of this first-in-human study are to: establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); recommend a phase 2 dose; & characterize the PK & PD of 17DMAG. Methods: Using a modified accelerated schema, escalating doses of 17DMAG are given IV over 1 h daily x 5 (schedule A) or daily x 3 (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Plasma 17DMAG concentrations during cycle 1 are quantitated by LC/MS. HSP70 & ILK levels in peripheral mononuclear cells are measured by western blot at baseline & 24 h on d 1. Results: 37 pts have been enrolled. On schedule A, dose levels are 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12 & 16 mg/m2/d (n = 20). On schedule B, the starting dose was 2.5 mg/m2/d. Based on safety information from schedule A, subsequent schedule B dose levels were 14, 19, 25 & 34 mg/m2/d (n = 17). One DLT was noted in schedule A (16 mg/m2) & consisted of reversible liver enzyme elevation. End-of-infusion (EOI) 17DMAG concentrations (33–2074 ng/ml) & AUC0–24 (200–5200 ng/ml x h) increase linearly with dose. Interpatient PK variability was substantial, with CV% of 16–59%. The daily administration schedule precluded precise definition of 17DMAG t1/2 & clearance, but estimates of t1/2 & clearance ranged from 10.8 to 77 h & 19–160 ml/min/m2, respectively. Between 0 & 24 h, 20.5 ± 8.6% (range 4–43.8%) of the administered dose was excreted in urine. HSP70 increased between 0.2 & 3.7 fold above baseline in PBMCs at 24 h at 12, 16, & 25 mg/m2. There is an indication of ILK degradation in 3 of 4 patients evaluated at 25 mg/m2. Conclusions: 17DMAG is well tolerated at current dose levels & maximal tolerated dose has not been reached. 17DMAG plasma PK are linear over the doses delivered to date, & there is evidence of a target effect as manifested by↑HSP70 & ↓ILK. Support: U01CA099168–01, U01CA62502, U01CA69912, R01CA90390 & NIH/NCCR/GCRC grants #5M01 RR 00056 & M01 RR00080

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study to determine tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SB-743921, a novel kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor

2000

Background: SB-743921, a potent and selective inhibitor of KSP (Ki =100 pM; >40,000-fold selectivity vs other kinesins), causes mitotic arrest, potent inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, and demonstrates activity in a broad range of human tumor xenografts. Methods: A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and PK profile of SB-743921 when administered IV over 60 minutes every 21 (Q 21) days (d). Results: 44 patients (pts) (M/F 19/25), median age 61.5 yrs (range 32–80, with solid tumors were treated at doses of 2 (n=2), 4 (n=27), 5 (n=6), 6 (n=3), and 8 (n=6) mg/m2 (median cycles 2, range 1–10, total cycles 101). Frequent tumor types included colorectal (n=11), ovarian (n=5), NSCLC (n=5), esophageal (n=4), and pancreatic (n=4). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 8 mg/m2 consisted of (max CTC grade/pt) prolonged grade (gr) 4 neutropenia (n=2), gr 3 elevated ALT/AST (n=1), and gr 3 elevated bilirubin (n=1). DLTs at 6 mg/m2 were gr 3 hyponatremia (n=1) and prolonged gr 4 neutropenia (n=1). DLTs at 5 mg/m2 were limited to febrile neutropenia (n=2). The 4 mg/m2 dose level was determined as the phase II dose. Toxicities at 4 mg/m2 included gr 1 fatigue (n=8) and neutropenia [gr 1 (n=4), gr 2 (n=7), gr 3 (n=3), gr 4 (n=2)]. Neutropenia nadir was day 6–8 with recovery to gr ≤2 by day 15. Gr 3 non-hematologic toxicities at 4 mg/m2 included gr 3 ALT (n=1), gr 3 AST (n=2), gr 3 hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), gr 3 hypophosphatemia (n=1), and gr 3 alkaline phosphatase elevation (n=1). Median PK values in cycle 1 at 4 mg/m2 were: Cmax 473 ng/ml, AUC0-∞ 5207 ng.hr/ml, and t½ 36 hr. AUC0-∞ and Cmax were proportional to dose. No consistent correlation was observed between DLTs and PK parameters. Stable disease for ≥ 4 cycles (range 4–11) was observed in 6 pts (4 pts at 4 mg/m2; 1 pt at 6 mg/m2; 1 pt at 8 mg/m2). A pt with cholangiocarcinoma had evidence of radiographic tumor regression (post cycle 10) and a >50% decrease in her CA 19–9. Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of SB-743921 on the Q 21 day schedule is 4 mg/m2. The observed toxicities at the recommended phase II dose are manageable and reversible. The onset and duration of neutropenia is predictable.

[Table: see text]

Phase I study of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin (Cb) and paclitaxel (P) for patients with advanced solid malignancies (NCI #6922)

2077

Background: Vorinostat (SAHA) induces differentiation & growth arrest in a variety of human carcinoma cell lines by inhibiting HDAC. It also enhances the efficacy of chemotherapy. We are conducting a phase I study to evaluate the combination of vorinostat, Cb & P for patients with advanced solid malignancies. Methods: Patients with advanced solid malignancies who were candidates for combination therapy with Cb & P were eligible. Vorinostat was given orally on d 1–14 of each 21-d-cycle, except in cycle 1 when begun on d -4 to facilitate PK studies. Cb & P were given on d 1 of each cycle. Plasma concentrations of vorinostat, & its 2 major metabolites were quantitated with a novel LC-MS/MS assay. Results: Dose level 4 has been determined as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for the combination, since the RP2D of single agent vorinostat is 400 mg on this schedule. Observed toxicities included nausea, vomiting, neutropenia & thrombocytopenia, none of which were dose-limiting. Of 9 patients evaluable for response, 4 had PR (1 head & neck cancer, 3 non-small cell lung cancer), & 2 had stable disease. Vorinostat was rapidly absorbed & AUC increased with dose. Vorinostat PK parameters included Tmax 0.5–2 h, t1/2 1.6 ± 0.5 h, & CL/F 5.8 ± 1.7 l/min. Cb & P did not alter vorinostat PK. 4-Anilino-4-oxobutanoic acid was the major, & long-lived, vorinostat metabolite, with Cmax 1.5–7 fold > vorinostat Cmax & t ½ ∼6h. Vorinostat glucuronide Cmax was 1–5 fold > vorinostat Cmax & glucuronide t ½ ∼2h. The RP2D cohort is being expanded to 12 patients to obtain additional clinical & PK data. Conclusions: Vorinostat can be safely administered in combination with Cb & P at their recommended doses. Vorinostat PK are not altered by Cb & P. Promising anti-cancer activity has been noted in patients with advanced NSCLC. Support: U01CA099168–01, U01CA62505, NIH/NCCR/GCRC grant 5M01RR 00056.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Final results of a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of STEALTH liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2013

Background: S-CKD602 is a pegylated STEALTH liposomal formulation of CKD-602, a semi-synthetic analogue of camptothecin (CPT) and topoisomerase I inhibitor. Preclinical studies have shown that prolonged exposure to CPT achieves the greatest antitumor activity. STEALTH liposomes prolong the circulation time in plasma, achieve high and extended drug exposure in tumor, and provide a convenient dosing schedule. Methods: Patients (pts) were administered S-CKD602 IV over 1 h once every 3 wks. Modified Fibonacci escalation was used (3–6 pts/cohort), and dose levels ranged from 0.1–2.5 mg/m2. Serial plasma samples were obtained prior to administration to 96 h after administration, and on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1. Plasma samples were processed to measure concentrations of encapsulated (E), released (R), and sum total (E+R) CKD602 total (lactone + hydroxyl acid) by LC-MS/MS. Area under the plasma conc versus time curve (AUC0-∞) and t1/2 were estimated. Results: 45 pts (21 male) have been treated: median age 62 y (range: 33–79 y); ECOG status: 0 and 1 (43 pts), 2 (2 pts). The majority of reported adverse events were grade (G) 1 and 2. Frequent nonhematological toxicities were asthenia, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and anorexia. Dose-limiting toxicities of G3 mucositis occurred in 1/6 pts at 0.3 mg/m2, G3/4 bone marrow suppression in 2/3 pts at 2.5 mg/m2, and G3 febrile neutropenia in 1/6 pts at 2.1 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose was 2.1 mg/m2. Stable disease for ≥ 6 cycles occurred in 5 pts (hepatocellular carcinoma (CA), thyroid, prostate, 2 pts sarcoma). Partial responses occurred in 2 pts with ovarian CA (1.7 and 2.1 mg/m2). At 2.1 mg/m2, the mean ± SD AUC and t1/2 of sum total S-CKD602 were 44 ± 33 μg/mL·h and 18 ± 8 h, respectively. In all plasma samples, >90% of drug was encapsulated. Conclusions: S-CKD602 represents a promising new STEALTH liposomal CPT agent with manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity. Phase II studies of S-CKD602 at 2.1 mg/m2 IV once every 3 wks are planned. Prolonged plasma exposure over 1 to 2 wks is consistent with STEALTH liposomes and provides extended exposure compared with non-liposomal CPT. (Supported by ALZA and NIH/NCCR/GCRC #5M01 RR 00056).

[Table: see text]

Phase II study of lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase 1 and 2 (Her2/Neu) in patients (pts) with advanced biliary tree cancer (BTC) or hepatocellular cancer (HCC). A California Consortium (CCC-P) Trial

4010

Background: Advanced BTC (gallbladder, bile duct) and HCC respond poorly to systemic chemotherapy. Lapatinib is an oral inhibitor of EGFR and Her/2-neu with evidence of activity in a number of tumor types. Both BTC and HCC overexpress EGFR 1 and 2. In addition, Her2/neu somatic mutations have been reported in HCC, and may predict response to EGFR targeted agents (Bekaii-Saab et al, A 4037, ASCO 2005). This trial conducted by the CCC-P and Univ. Chicago, is designed to determine the efficacy of lapatinib in BTC and HCC pts. Methods: A two-stage design is utilized and pts are stratified by tumor type (BTC or HCC); the study has a 90% power to detect a true response rate ≥20%. Two initial groups of 17 patients for BTC and HCC were accrued; one response from each was required to proceed with accrual to a total of 37 patients in each group. Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function is required. Eligible pts are in Child A group and have ECOG PS of 0–2. One prior treatment regimen is allowed. Lapatinib dose is 1,500 mg/d orally without interruption. One cycle is 28 days and radiological assessment is done every 8 weeks. Results: 49 pts have been accrued (BTC 19 and HCC 30). Pt Characteristics: Male 59%, ECOG PS 0 (18 pts), ECOG PS 1 (22 pts). Median age 66 yrs (range19–82). Median cycles 2 (range 1–12). Grade 3/4 toxicity was noted in 19 pts and included fatigue in 4 pts, elevation of liver enzymes in 4 pts and diarrhea in 2 pts. Nausea, vomiting, rash, anemia and thrombocytopenia were noted in 1 pt each. There was no evidence of cardiac dysfunction. In 17 evaulable pts with BTC, no responses were observed, 5 had stable disease (SD). Among the first 17 pts with HCC, 2 confirmed partial responses have been recorded. In addition 8 pts have SD. The progression free survival is 1.8 mo for both BTC and HCC. Tumor and blood specimens are being analyzed for expression of EGFR, HER-2/neu, status of downstream signal pathway molecules, and correlation to response. Conclusions: Lapatinib is well-tolerated. No activity in BTC was noted and that cohort is closed. Lapatinib activity in HCC is encouraging, and study is close to completion. Source of support: NCI-NO1-CM-57018–16.

[Table: see text]