Drain Usage in Head and Neck Surgery: A National Survey of Thirty-five Surgeons across Ten Units

Introduction Drain usage is commonplace in head and neck surgery. There is an increasing body of literature disputing their routine placement in certain procedures. The aim of this study is to explore modern-day practice in terms of drain usage and the use of haemostatic agents. Methods A simple questionnaire was devised and sent to 35 ENT Surgeons across 10 units nationally. Results There was an overall response rate of 77.1% (n=27). There was considerable heterogeneity amongst surgeons in terms of indication for insertion, how the decision is made to remove the drain and if any alternative/adjunctive haemostatic agents are being used. Discussion The management of drains is poorly defined and guidelines are lacking. With increased pressure on resources, the risk of infection and discomfort to the patient, further reflection is required to evaluate if careful patient selection rather than habitual drain insertion in every case is more appropriate.

DOCSS: doctors on-call smartphone study

INTRODUCTION

Smartphones have revolutionised our demands for constant access to information. The usage of smartphones in the clinical setting is becoming widespread. The aim of our study was to assess smartphone ownership and usage across a cohort of interns.

METHODS

A voluntary novel questionnaire was distributed to interns in two university hospitals. Details regarding smartphone ownership and usage were assessed. Likert scales were utilised for analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-one (74.4 %) interns responded to the survey. Sixty (98.4 %) owned a smartphone with iPhone(®) being the most popular (76.7 %). Fifty-five (91.6 %) interns have downloaded medical applications ('apps'), while 29 (52.3 %) reported paying for them. Regarding smartphone use on-call, 30 (50 %) interns agreed it aids diagnoses, 26 (43 %) agree it helped in interpreting laboratory values, 31 (51.7 %) agreed it helped in dosing of medication and 33 (55 %) agreed it was of assistance in medical emergency protocols. Forty-two (70 %), 42 (70 %) and 46 (76.7 %) interns agreed or strongly agreed smartphones have a positive influence on them in terms of levels of stress, confidence and level of knowledge, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Smartphone usage is widespread among our intern cohort. The introduction of hospital applications with local guidelines would be welcomed; however, this may require informed patient consent regarding their use.