Caregiver Burden and Quality of Life Across Alzheimer's Disease Severity Stages

INTRODUCTION

The objective is to estimate the caregiver burden in terms of informal care time, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and societal costs by disease severity (mild, moderate, or severe) and living situation (community-dwelling or institutionalized) of persons with AD (PwAD); and PwAD HRQoL.

METHODS

Caregivers were recruited through an online panel provider in the Netherlands. The survey used validated instruments, including iMTA Valuation of Informal Care Questionnaire, CarerQoL, and EQ-5D-5L.

RESULTS

One hundred two caregivers participated. PwADs received, on average, 26 hours of informal care per week. Informal care costs were higher for community-dwelling PwADs compared with institutionalized PwADs (€480 and €278, respectively). On the EQ-5D-5L, caregivers scored on average 0.797, reflecting a utility decrement of 0.065 compared with an age-matched population. Proxy-rated utility scores for PwADs decreased with increasing disease severity (0.455, 0.314, and 0.212 for mild, moderate, and severe AD, respectively). Institutionalised PwADs had lower utility scores than community-dwelling PwADs (0.590 vs. 0.421). There was no difference in informal care time, societal costs, CarerQol scores, and caregiver EQ-5D-5L scores between disease severities.

CONCLUSION

The burden of AD extends to caregivers in terms of HRQoL and time investment, regardless of the disease severity of the target population. These impacts should be incorporated into the evaluation of new AD interventions.

Determinants of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Health-Related Quality of Life in Memory Clinic Patients Without Dementia

OBJECTIVE

To identify determinants within 3 different domains (ie, somatic comorbidities, cognitive functioning, and neuropsychiatric symptoms [NPS]) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over time in memory clinic patients without dementia.

METHODS

This longitudinal multicenter cohort study with a 3-year observation period recruited 315 individuals (age: 69.8 ± 8.6, 64.4% males, Mini-Mental State Examination score 26.9 ± 2.6). A multivariable explanatory model was built using linear mixed effects models (forward selection per domain) to select determinants for self-perceived HRQoL over time, as measured by the EuroQoL-5D visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

RESULTS

Mean HRQoL at study entry was 69.4 ± 15.6. The presence of agitation, appetite and eating abnormalities, and eyes/ears/nose (ie, sensory impairment) comorbidities were associated with a change in HRQoL over time. Agitation was most strongly associated with HRQoL over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of somatic comorbidities and NPS in memory clinic patients with course of HRQoL shows that these should receive more awareness, detection, and monitoring by clinicians.

Combinations of Service Use Types of People With Early Cognitive Disorders

OBJECTIVES

Understanding which persons most likely use particular combinations of service types is important as this could lead to a better understanding of care pathways. The aim of this study is to identify combinations of service use within a sample of community-dwelling people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia and identify factors related to these service use combinations.

METHODS

A latent class analysis performed at baseline on a merged dataset (n = 530) was used to classify care recipients based on following service use types: general practitioner visits, physiotherapist visits, hospital outpatient specialist visits, emergency room visits, hospital inpatient visits with stay over, day care visits, use of domestic homecare, use of personal homecare, and informal care on (instrumental) activities of daily living. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with service use combinations using clinical characteristics of the care recipient and demographic characteristics of the care recipient and caregiver.

RESULTS

Three service use classes were identified; a formal homecare class (10% of participants), an informal care class (46% of participants), and a low user class (44% of participants). Factors increasing the likelihood of being in the formal homecare class compared with the low service use class included a diagnosis of MCI or dementia, activities of daily living impairment, older age of the care recipient, and care recipient not living together with the caregiver.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides a diagnosis of MCI or dementia, other factors (activities of daily living impairment, age, and living situation) were associated with service use. We recommend using these factors alongside the diagnostic label for care indication.

The benefit of a geriatric nurse practitioner in a multidisciplinary diagnostic service for people with cognitive disorders

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether adding a geriatric nurse practitioner (GNP) to an outpatient diagnostic multidisciplinary facility for patients with cognitive disorders (Diagnostic Observation Center for PsychoGeriatry, DOC-PG) could improve quality of care. DOC-PG combines hospital diagnostics and care assessment from a community mental health team and provides the general practitioner (GP) with advice for treatment and management. In a previous study, we found that 28.7% of the advice made by this service was not followed up on by the GP.

Methods

Two cohorts were studied: a group of patients with added GNP (n = 114) and a historical reference sample (n = 137). Both groups followed the same diagnostic protocol and care approach, but, in the GNP group, a care coordinator was added in order to communicate the advice from the DOC-PG to the GP. The primary outcome was the concordance rate of GPs regarding the advice. At the patient level, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed. Self-Rated Burden and care-related quality of life were measured at the informal caregiver level. Measures were conducted immediately after DOC-PG diagnosis and after 6 and 12 months. Univariate analyses, logistic regression analyses, and mixed model multilevel analyses were used to test differences between both groups.

Results

Total concordance rates were significantly higher in the GNP group compared to the reference sample (82.1 and 71.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). No improvement in patient HRQoL was identified. Among the informal caregivers, a significant reduction of Self-Rated Burden was found in the GNP group at 12 months (adjusted mean difference −1.724, 95% CI −2.582 to −0.866; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Adding a GNP to an outpatient diagnostic multidisciplinary facility for patients with cognitive disorders may improve the GP concordance rate of the advice from the DOC-PG and reduce subjective burden of the informal caregiver.

Optimizing the use of expert panel reference diagnoses in diagnostic studies of multidimensional syndromes

Background

In the absence of a gold standard, a panel of experts can be invited to assign a reference diagnosis for use in research. Available literature offers limited guidance on assembling and working with an expert panel for this purpose. We aimed to develop a protocol for an expert panel consensus diagnosis and evaluated its applicability in a pilot project.

Methods

An adjusted Delphi method was used, which started with the assessment of clinical vignettes by 3 experts individually, followed by a consensus discussion meeting to solve diagnostic discrepancies. A panel facilitator ensured that all experts were able to express their views, and encouraged the use of argumentation to arrive at a specific diagnosis, until consensus was reached by all experts. Eleven vignettes of patients suspected of having a primary neurodegenerative disease were presented to the experts. Clinical information was provided stepwise and included medical history, neurological, physical and cognitive function, brain MRI scan, and follow-up assessments over 2 years. After the consensus discussion meeting, the procedure was evaluated by the experts.

Results

The average degree of consensus for the reference diagnosis increased from 52% after individual assessment of the vignettes to 94% after the consensus discussion meeting. Average confidence in the diagnosis after individual assessment was 85%. This did not increase after the consensus discussion meeting. The process evaluation led to several recommendations for improvement of the protocol.

Conclusion

A protocol for attaining a reference diagnosis based on expert panel consensus was shown feasible in research practice.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-014-0190-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of economic evaluations

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on economic evaluations of interventions for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders and to describe their general and methodological characteristics. We focused on the diagnostic aspects of the decision models to assess the applicability of existing decision models for the evaluation of the recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD.

METHODS

PubMed and the National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation database were searched for English-language publications related to economic evaluations on diagnostic technologies. Trial-based economic evaluations were assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. Modeling studies were assessed using the framework for quality assessment of decision-analytic models.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 2109 items, from which eight decision-analytic modeling studies and one trial-based economic evaluation met all eligibility criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Diversity among the study objective and characteristics was considerable and, despite considerable methodological quality, several flaws were indicated. Recommendations were focused on diagnostic aspects and the applicability of existing models for the evaluation of recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD.

Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study

Background

New research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have recently been developed to enable an early diagnosis of AD pathophysiology by relying on emerging biomarkers. To enable efficient allocation of health care resources, evidence is needed to support decision makers on the adoption of emerging biomarkers in clinical practice. The research goals are to 1) assess the diagnostic test accuracy of current clinical diagnostic work-up and emerging biomarkers in MRI, PET and CSF, 2) perform a cost-consequence analysis and 3) assess long-term cost-effectiveness by an economic model.

Methods/design

In a cohort design 241 consecutive patients suspected of having a primary neurodegenerative disease are approached in four academic memory clinics and followed for two years. Clinical data and data on quality of life, costs and emerging biomarkers are gathered.

Diagnostic test accuracy is determined by relating the clinical practice and new research criteria diagnoses to a reference diagnosis. The clinical practice diagnosis at baseline is reflected by a consensus procedure among experts using clinical information only (no biomarkers). The diagnosis based on the new research criteria is reflected by decision rules that combine clinical and biomarker information. The reference diagnosis is determined by a consensus procedure among experts based on clinical information on the course of symptoms over a two-year time period.

A decision analytic model is built combining available evidence from different resources among which (accuracy) results from the study, literature and expert opinion to assess long-term cost-effectiveness of the emerging biomarkers.

Discussion

Several other multi-centre trials study the relative value of new biomarkers for early evaluation of AD and related disorders. The uniqueness of this study is the assessment of resource utilization and quality of life to enable an economic evaluation. The study results are generalizable to a population of patients who are referred to a memory clinic due to their memory problems.

Trial registration

NCT01450891

Rational decision-making about treatment and care in dementia: a contradiction in terms?

OBJECTIVE

To gain caregivers' insights into the decision-making process in dementia patients with regard to treatment and care.

METHODS

Four focus group interviews (n=29).

RESULTS

The decision-making process consists of three elementary components: (1) identifying an individual's needs; (2) exploring options; and (3) making a choice. The most important phase is the exploration phase as it is crucial for the acceptance of the disease. Furthermore, the decision is experienced more as an emotional choice than a rational one. It is influenced by personal preferences whereas practical aspects do not seem to play a substantial role.

CONCLUSION

Several aspects make decision-making in dementia different from decision-making in the context of other chronic diseases: (1) the difficulty accepting dementia; (2) the progressive nature of dementia; (3) patient's reliance on surrogate decision-making; and (4) strong emotions. Due to these aspects, the decision-making process is very time-consuming, especially the crucial exploration phase.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A more active role is required of both the caregiver and the health care professional especially in the exploration phase, enabling easier acceptance and adjustment to the disease. Acceptance is an important condition for reducing anxiety and resistance to care that may offer significant benefits in the future.

[The costs and benefits of an integrated approach to dementia]

BACKGROUND

An integrated approach to dementia is generally recommended because no one discipline is adequately equipped it deal with the complex psychic, physical and social problems that are inherent in dementia. A multidisciplinary approach, however, leads inevitably to higher costs. It is not known what the cost/benefit ratio will be.

AIM

To describe our research into the costs and benefits of an integrated approach to dementia involving the use of a diagnostic research centre for psycho-geriatrics and thereafter to compare our findings with the results of other studies of the costs and benefits of an integrated approach.

METHOD

We performed a prospective and randomised efficiency study and we compared our findings with the results of other studies of the costs and benefits of an integrated approach. We reviewed recent literature.

RESULTS

The DRC-PG was more effective than normal care as far as the patients' quality of life was concerned, but was not more expensive. It can therefore be regarded as a cost-effective facility for ambulatory patients with dementia. Three other studies provided additional empirical evidence of the success of a similar integrated approach in various sectors involved in the care of patients with dementia.

CONCLUSION

An integrated approach with regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of dementia produces favourable results. More research is needed into the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of integrated care programmes. This should result in improvements in the care and treatment of patients with dementia.

Empowered or overpowered? Service use, needs, wants and demands in elderly patients with cognitive impairments

BACKGROUND

Examination of clinical practice reveals that current treatment options are often not sufficiently utilized by patients suffering from dementia or mild cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate to what extent and in what way these patients utilize the available treatment options, as well as to identify factors and reasons that play a role in the non-utilization of these options.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews by telephone were held with the patients' caregivers.

RESULTS

Counseling, medication, activities and home care were the options that were most frequently utilized by the 252 patients and caregivers who were included in the study. Group guidance and admissions were the main treatment categories that had not been utilized (although they were proposed). The most important reasons given were refusal by the patient and the fact that help was not necessary yet according to the caregiver. Burden of care and cognition were the most important factors in predicting which of the treatment options were not utilized.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients and caregivers are not aware of the treatment options available to them. Awareness of these options is necessary to avoid situations in which patients and caregivers find themselves with their backs against the wall and the need for care support has become an acute necessity. Health care professionals should play an important role with regard to this empowerment.

Economic evaluation of an integrated diagnostic approach for psychogeriatric patients: results of a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT

Because of the increasing number of elderly people with dementia, the costs of dementia and dementia care are expected to grow rapidly in the coming decades. Cost-effectiveness results are relevant for decision making about new strategies in dementia care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an integrated multidisciplinary diagnostic facility for diagnosing dementia in ambulatory psychogeriatric patients.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial with an economic evaluation component.

SETTING

The Maastricht Evaluation of a Diagnostic Intervention for Cognitively Impaired Elderly, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

PATIENTS

A total of 137 patients who received care in the multidisciplinary diagnostic facility and 93 who received usual care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the main outcome measure and cognition and behavioral problems as secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Compared with patients receiving usual care, patients who visited the diagnostic facility gained a mean 0.05 QALY at the extra cost of euro65. The incremental cost per QALY amounted to euro1267. This point estimate lies beneath commonly accepted thresholds and is within an acceptable range of uncertainty. With regard to the secondary analyses, cost-effectiveness results showed a substantial amount of uncertainty and were therefore indecisive.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the main cost-per-QALY analysis, the use of the integrated multidisciplinary diagnostic facility is cost-effective for the diagnosis and management of dementia in ambulatory patients.

Integrated multidisciplinary diagnostic approach for dementia care: randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

An integrated multidisciplinary approach to dementia is often recommended but has rarely been evaluated.

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical effects of an integrated multidisciplinary diagnostic facility for psychogeriatric patients.

METHOD

Patients suspected of having complex psychogeriatric problems were randomly allocated to the intervention (n=137) or to treatment as usual (n=93). They were assessed at baseline, and at 6 months and 12 months follow-up by means of personal interviews with the patient's proxy. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life, assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the EuroQd measure, EQ-5D.

RESULTS

Health-related quality of life had improved at 6 months in the intervention group, whereas that of the control group had decreased. Furthermore, more patients in the intervention group experienced a clinically relevant improvement of 10 points or more on the VAS at both follow-up measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

An integrated multidisciplinary approach improves dementia care.

Relationship between measures of dementia severity and observation of daily life functioning as measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is mostly regarded as the core symptom of dementia, but several other domains (such as daily functioning) are equally relevant to assess the severity of dementia. The relationship between these domains is unclear. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a relatively unexplored instrument in people with dementia, measuring severity by direct observation.

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship between the AMPS and scores on several commonly used outcome measures for the assessment of dementia severity, and to examine the possible influence of neuropsychiatric symptoms on these relationships in patients with cognitive disorders.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data of 118 patients with cognitive disorders were used; data on cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE; CAMCOG), global severity (Global Deterioration Scale, GDS), daily life functioning (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, IADL), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, NPI) were collected and analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. Different combinations of the severity measures were tested for their ability to predict the AMPS process ability scores.

RESULTS

Scores on the MMSE, CAMCOG and GDS were moderately associated with the AMPS process ability score. These measures explained between 27 and 44% of the variance in the AMPS score. The presence of apathy influenced the association between the cognitive measures and the AMPS score.

CONCLUSION

Commonly used measures of dementia severity are only moderately associated with observation of performance on daily activities. This underlines the need for direct observation of daily activities in dementia patients. This relationship between several approaches of assessing dementia severity needs further study.

GP concordance with advice for treatment following a multidisciplinary psychogeriatric assessment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the concordance of General Practitioners (GPs) with advice for treatment after a multidisciplinary psychogeriatric assessment by the Diagnostic Observation Centre for PsychoGeriatric patients (DOC-PG).

METHOD

Concordance checklists, listing the recommendations from the multidisciplinary team, were sent to the GPs in order to establish GP concordance. Regression models were used to study the associations between various patient and GP characteristics and level of concordance. Furthermore, results of a questionnaire (to identify the level of satisfaction regarding the services provided by the DOC-PG) were compared with the level of GP concordance.

RESULTS

Based on 530 recommendations, the overall GP concordance rate amounted to 71%. The most common types of advice pertained to medication, GP follow-up/advice and referral. GP concordance with advice regarding admissions was the highest, followed by advice concerning the arrangement of daycare, home care and the adaptation of medication. GP concordance was lowest for referral recommendations to other specialties and recommendations regarding psychoeducation. Concordance was higher for patients who lived alone, for patients with fewer cognitive problems, when the number of recommendations did not exceed six and in group practices. Concordance was dependent on the type of advice. Satisfaction with DOC-PG did not correlate with the level of concordance.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, GPs showed a high level of concordance with advice from the DOC-PG. Enhancement of GP concordance can be achieved by limiting the number of recommendations, giving detailed explanations about the purpose of recommendations and educating GPs by doing.

The added value of a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosing dementia: a review

BACKGROUND

The impact of dementia constitutes a major public health challenge to our society. A multidisciplinary approach to dementia is generally recommended.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to give an overview of the reported empirical studies on the added value of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosing dementia, i.e. whether differences can be found between diagnostic multidisciplinary approaches, and/or monodisciplinary ones with respect to the diagnostic outcomes, the impact of diagnostics and their effects on quality of life and costs.

METHOD

Critical review of studies which involve a multidisciplinary assessment of dementia. Literature was systematically searched in a number of international databases (Medline, PsychInfo, Pubmed and EconLit). A first selection was based on screening titles by one author. Interrater reliability was determined by scoring all abstracts by two authors. The reliability of selecting full articles was based on scoring a random sample by two authors. Kappa values were calculated. The Kappa statistic (k) was also used as an indicator of the diagnostic agreement between single disciplines and multidisciplinary teams.

RESULTS

Five studies were identified as relevant for the purpose of this review. The most important outcome was the level of diagnostic agreement between single disciplines and multidisciplinary teams (MTs). Overall, there was substantial agreement (kappa: 0.37-0.76) on the diagnosis dementia (syndrome), but not on the subtypes (aetiology) (AD: 0.26-0.60; VD: 0.35-0.52; depression: 0.30-0.46). Diagnoses also differed between the disciplines.

CONCLUSIONS

Merely studies on diagnostic accuracy were found, all using different reference standards. Kappa values were chosen as outcome measure and every diagnosis was considered of equal value. Therefore, the added value could not definitively be demonstrated. However, the potential added value of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosing dementia probably lies in the ability to differentiate among the subtypes of dementia and to detect comorbid psychiatric conditions such as depression. Disciplines within an MT complement each other in establishing a specific diagnosis, which is considered to be the added value of such a multidisciplinary team.