Comparison of spirapril, isradipine, or combination in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: effects on LVH regression and arrhythmogenic propensity

This study was designed to evaluate in 45 hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) the effects of a 6-month course with one of three different antihypertensive regimens (the calcium channel blocker isradipine, the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor spirapril in monotherapy, or a combination of the two drugs, n = 15 per group) on blood pressure, LVH regression, and various functional correlates of LVH. All three treatment modalities decreased significantly LV mass index by an average of 10%, although the combination had the greatest blood pressure-lowering effect and spirapril had the least, as assessed by office resting pressures, ambulatory monitoring, and isometric grip testing. There was no correlation between magnitude of blood pressure lowering and degree of LVH regression. The effects of treatment on pressor hormone profiles differed among groups, as spirapril tended to suppress angiotensin II and norepinephrine, whereas isradipine had opposite effects. Exercise tolerance was prolonged by all three regimens, but significantly more by the combination. All three regimens decreased significantly the double product by 10% to 15%. Indices of electrophysiologic stability calculated from analysis of ambulatory electrocardiogram exhibited significant improvement in several parameters such as QRS duration, presence of late potentials, and measures of heart rate variability, resulting in fewer episodes of simple or complex ventricular arrhythmia. We conclude that all three regimens produce significant LVH regression associated with improved functional capacity and electrical stability. These results reflect the sum of the differential hemodynamic and hormonal effects exerted by each treatment modality.

Hemodynamic and humoral correlates in essential hypertension: relationship between patterns of LVH and myocardial ischemia

While evaluating 45 hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) for enrollment in a clinical research protocol, we had the opportunity to compare anatomic and functional characteristics of those with LVH and ischemia on an exercise tolerance test (ETT), but without coronary artery disease by angiography (group I, n=8), versus those with a normal ETT (group II, n=37). There were no differences in age, sex, severity, and duration of hypertension between the two groups, but group I patients were significantly more overweight and had a worse lipid profile. Blood pressure at peak ETT was higher in group I despite shorter exercise duration, although resting and ambulatory pressures were similar. Group I patients had evidence of more pronounced cardiac enlargement and LVH by both ECG and echo criteria and a characteristic pattern of more pronounced thickening at the apex, but both groups had equally good systolic function and similar degrees of mild diastolic dysfunction. Analysis of 24-hour ambulatory ECG showed a significantly greater propensity to ventricular arrhythmias in group I, as shown by the presence of late potentials in 4 patients, the presence of couplets in 3, runs of ventricular tachycardia in 2 (while none of group II patients had late potentials or complex arrhythmias), and an average frequency of isolated premature ventricular contractions approximately three times higher in group I than group II patients. Our data demonstrate that hypertensives with LVH associated with myocardial ischemia at stress but with normal coronary arteriograms tend to be more overweight, attain a higher systolic blood pressure at ETT despite a shorter duration, have a higher propensity for severe arrhythmias, and have an adverse lipid profile. LVH in these subjects is more pronounced by both ECG and echo criteria and is characterized by predominantly apical hypertrophy with left atrial and ventricular dilatation rather than overall LV wall thickening.