Caring for patients after kidney transplantation

This article examines the care and management of patients following solid organ transplantation. It focuses on kidney transplantation and the nursing role in optimising long-term patient outcomes and quality of life.

Predicting early renal allograft function using clinical variables

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal early graft function following renal transplantation remains a significant challenge. It is suggested that clinical variables (or scoring systems based thereon) may predict the occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF), defined as post-operative dialysis requirement. However, data is conflicting, and suboptimal renal function not requiring dialysis has been little investigated. This study tested the ability of clinical variables to predict suboptimal early function variably assessed by: (i) DGF (dialysis requirement during the first week); (ii) DGF duration; (iii) slow graft function (creatinine>3 mg/dl on day 5); (iv) creatinine reduction ratio on day 2.

METHODS

Details on 217 consecutive renal transplant recipients were collected. All received ciclosporin-based immunosuppression. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess the association between individual clinical variables and suboptimal early graft function. Also tested were three scoring systems incorporating clinical variables [US Renal Database System (USRDS score), deceased donor score (DDS) and expanded criteria donor kidneys]. Receiver operated-characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the predictive power of clinical variables and scoring systems.

RESULTS

Early graft function was associated with donor age, donor body mass index, donor hypertension, donation following cardiac death, black recipient ethnicity, recipient weight and cold ischaemic time (P<or=0.05 for all). All scoring systems showed associations with early graft function, although only USRDS score remained in the multiple regression model. The overall utility of the USRDS score in predicting DGF was moderate at best, although improved at extreme scores (specificity: 95%; positive predictive value: 73%; for USRDS score>or=150).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical variables and scores have moderate predictive ability for early graft function and although of potential use in clinical practice, caution should be exercised before altering patient management based solely on them.

Cholestasis in pregnancy associated with ciclosporin therapy in renal transplant recipients

Obstetric cholestasis (OC) presents with pruritus in the second half of pregnancy and is associated with increased risk of foetal distress, intra-uterine death and premature delivery. From a tertiary referral, renal-obstetric clinic, we report the occurrence of OC in 5/23 pregnancies of women with renal transplants maintained on ciclosporin treatment (European incidence 0.1-1.5% of pregnancies). All required premature delivery for foetal reasons at 33-37/40 (median 34/40). Ciclosporin, at therapeutic concentrations, inhibits bile salt excretion pump (BSEP) function in rats and humans. We propose that OC developed in our patients because the mild inhibition of the canalicular pumps by ciclosporin was only revealed in pregnancy when increases in progesterone metabolites overwhelmed pump function. We suggest that all pregnant women receiving ciclosporin should be closely monitored from the second trimester for the development of OC. If detected, enhanced foetal and maternal monitoring to optimize time of delivery and pregnancy outcome is required.

Low-density lipoprotein subfraction profiles in chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Small low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, a newly recognized risk factor for cardiovascular disease in the general population, is frequently associated with hypertriglyceridaemia, the predominant plasma lipid abnormality present in uraemia.

METHODS

Plasma lipids and LDL subfraction profiles were examined in 33 non-dialysed patients with chronic renal failure (predial), 40 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), 42 haemodialysis patients (HD), 47 renal transplant recipients (RTR), and 44 controls. LDL subfractions separated by gel electrophoresis were scored by densitometric analysis (higher scores indicate profiles comprising smaller particles).

RESULTS

All groups with renal failure had significantly elevated (mean+/-SD) LDL scores (predial 1.36+/-0.6, CAPD 1.71+/-0.9, HD 1.68+/-0.9, RTR 1.92+0.8 vs control 0.87+0.4, all P<0.001), this being the only lipid abnormality detected in the predialysis patients. In CAPD and HD patients, LDL scores were associated with serum triglyceride (r=0.81, P<0.001 and r=0.70, P<0.001 respectively), cholesterol (r=0.55, P<0.001 and r=0.49, P<0.01) and HDL-cholesterol (r= -0.43, P<0.01 and r= -0.51, P<0.01), whilst no such relationship was seen in the predialysis and RTR groups, suggesting that other factors were important.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of small LDL particles appears to be an early and unexplained feature of the uraemic dyslipidaemia. This abnormality persists after renal transplantation and may represent an important atherogenic risk factor.