Techniques and results of palate fistula repair following palatoplasty: a 234-case multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Palate fistula is the most frequent complication following palatoplasty. The objectives of this study were: to describe the most widely used repair techniques; to study results and recurrence rate; to analyze potentially predictive recurrence variables; and to assess whether a specific technique is superior according to fistula size and location.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of patients undergoing palate fistula repair in 7 healthcare facilities from 2008 to 2018. All facilities had at least 20 new cases of cleft lift and palate annually (range: 20-80), with a fistula incidence of 14% (range: 1.5-20%). Minimum follow-up was 1 year. 8 variables were collected for statistical analysis purposes.

RESULTS

234 fistula patients underwent surgery. Most fistulas occurred in complete bilateral cleft lift and palate (Veau type IV). The most frequent location was the hard palate (Pittsburgh types IV and V (63.2%)), and fistulas were mostly large (42.1%) and medium (39.5%). The most frequent repair technique was re-palatoplasty (34.2%). Recurrence rate was 22%. The multivariate analysis demonstrated more recurrences in re-palatoplasty repaired type III fistulas in patients over 3 years old.

CONCLUSION

A tendency towards using flap repair in large hard palate fistulas, re-palatoplasty in medium hard palate and soft and hard palate junction fistulas, and local flaps or re-palatoplasty in small fistulas at any location was observed. However, it could not be statistically demonstrated whether a specific repair technique was superior in different clinical situations.