Dyeless optical detection of ammonia in the gaseous phase using a pH-responsive polymer--characterization of the sorption process

pH-responsive polymers enable the dyeless optical detection of acidic or basic pollutants in air. The characterization of the sorption process and the optimization of the response time of the sensitive layers were high-lighted. The swelling of a pH-responsive polysiloxane induced by sorption of gaseous ammonia was investigated by measurement techniques such as spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) and infrared spectroscopy (IR). Furthermore, the pH-responsive polymer was applied for the detection of gaseous ammonia using the LED-based reflectometric interference spectroscopy set-up (RIfS4lambda). A limit of detection of 0.30 mg/m3 ammonia and a response time (t90%) of 35 s could be verified. The application of pH-responsive polymers can be a powerful alternative to dye-based optical sensing, since photobleaching or leaching of the sensitive functional unit cannot occur applying this approach, and since the properties of the sensitive layer proved to be very promising.

[Comparison of addition of theophylline to inhaled steroid with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroid in asthma]

The anti-asthmatic effect of theophylline may supplement those of inhaled steroids in asthma. The aim of the present trial was to study how the addition of theophylline compares to doubling the dose of inhaled steroid in asthmatics who remain symptomatic on beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 400 micrograms/day. The trial was designed as a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in several European countries. 69 patients were treated for 6 weeks with theophylline plus BDP 400 micrograms/day, compared to 64 patients treated with BDP 800 micrograms/day. The mean +/- SD serum theophylline concentration was 10.1 +/- 4.2 mg/l. Lung function measurements were made throughout the study and patients kept daily records of peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), symptoms and salbutamol usage. Forced expiratory volume in one second and PEF at week 6 were significantly increased by both treatments (p < 0.01). PEF variability was reduced by about 30% in both groups. There were significant improvements in asthma symptoms and rescue medication use (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups. The study demonstrated clinical equivalence of theophylline plus beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day and beclomethasone dipropionate 800 micrograms/day in patients whose asthma is not controlled on beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/d. The results support the use of theophylline as steroid-sparing agent. The combination of low-dose inhaled steroid plus theophylline is a suitable treatment for moderate asthma.

Asthma management: the challenge of equivalence

Increasing prevalence and severity of asthma worldwide encourage the development of new antiasthmatic drugs, alternative treatment regimens and improved formulations of established drugs. Whereas the efficacy of new chemical entities (NCEs) is usually demonstrated by superiority over placebo or a subtherapeutic dose of the active drug, equivalence concepts have to be used in the following situations: the need to replace chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants for inhalative asthma medications by suitable alternatives, and the need to demonstrate that an alternative treatment regimen is not clinically inferior to an established reference treatment. To cover both situations, the recent ICH guidance on biostatistics clearly distinguishes between two-sided equivalence trials and one-sided non-inferiority trials. In this context, non-inferiority always means "not inferior by a clinically relevant amount". After having confirmed non-inferiority, superiority of the alternative test treatment over the reference treatment can additionally be tested without the need to adjust the significance level. The definition of equivalence acceptance limits becomes crucial, particularly in studies conducted in the flat range of the dose-response curve of inhaled steroids. In order to assess the non-inferiority of steroid sparing add-on treatments we propose a one-sided test based on post-/pre-ratios which have substantially reduced coefficients of variation compared to the post-treatment values themselves. The non-inferiority acceptance limit of 0.90 - as opposed to 0.80 in bioequivalence assessment - reflects clinically irrelevant changes of lung function variables. The proposed methodology is illustrated by 2 examples from randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies comparing inhaled steroid plus theophylline versus doubling the steroid dose in asthmatics who are symptomatic on low-dose inhaled steroid.

Comparison of addition of theophylline to inhaled steroid with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroid in asthma

The anti-asthmatic effects of theophylline may supplement those of inhaled steroids in asthma. The aim of the present trial was to study how the addition of theophylline compares to doubling the dose of inhaled steroid in asthmatics who remain symptomatic on beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 400 microg x day(-1). The trial was designed as a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in several European countries. Sixty nine patients were treated for 6 weeks with theophylline plus BDP 400 microg x day(-1), compared to 64 patients treated with BDP 800 micro x day(-1). The mean+/-SD serum theophylline concentration was 10.1+/-4.2 mg x L(-1). Lung function measurements were made throughout the study and patients kept daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptoms and salbutamol usage. Forced expiratory volume in one second and PEF at week 6 were significantly increased by both treatments (p<0.01). PEF variability was reduced by about 30% in both groups. There were significant improvements in asthma symptoms and rescue medication use (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups. The study demonstrated clinical equivalence of theophylline plus beclomethasone dipropionate 400 microg x day(-1) and beclomethasone dipropionate 800 microg x day(-1) in patients whose asthma is not controlled on beclomethasone dipropionate 400 microg x day(-1). The results support the use of theophylline as a steroid-sparing agent. The combination of low-dose inhaled steroid plus theophylline is a suitable treatment for moderate asthma.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the P-glycoprotein modulator dexniguldipine-HCL

Dexniguldipine (DNIG) is the R-enantiomer of the dihydropyridine derivate niguldipine. DNIG showed a binding affinity to the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and therefore it is to be assumed to block the P-gp pumping mechanism. This open phase I study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of intravenously administered DNIG alone and in combination with vinblastine in patients with a metastatic or locally advanced cancer. Additionally, serum levels of DNIG were assessed and compared between dosage groups to investigate the intravenous dose linearity. The study was divided into two parts concerning DNIG administration. In part I the patients received DNIG for four hours daily over four consecutive days and additionally 0.15 mg/kg vinblastine at day 3. Treatment was started with 1 mg/kg/4h, and whenever the drug was well tolerated the dosage was increased. In part II the patients received up to three courses of a four-hour infusion (5 and 7 mg/kg/4h) of DNIG followed by a continuous infusion for 48 hours (5 and 7 mg/kg/24h). Twenty-six patients entered this trial and were given at least one infusion of DNIG; vinblastine was given immediately after the 4-hour infusion. One to seven courses and dosages from 1-11 mg/kg were administered. In five patients the dose limiting toxicity was seen in cardiovascular adverse events such as a drop in blood pressure, decreased heart rate and in one patient an AV block III. Most frequent adverse events were nausea, dizziness, vomiting, peripheral paresthesia, atactic gait, mild constipation, polyuria, hypocalcemia; all disappeared within 24 hours after discontinuation of infusion. A linear increase in DNIG serum concentration with increasing doses was found following intravenous infusion of DNIG over a four-hour period. Long-term infusion regimes over a period of two or five days resulted in reasonably constant DNIG serum levels. MTD was determined at 5 mg/kg/4h. It is to be assumed that the MTD for continuous infusion of DNIG is higher than 5 mg/kg/24h, but this was not followed up in the study and must be the aim of a later trial.

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of dexniguldipine-HCl, a new anticancer drug

Dexniguldipine-HCl is a new dihydropyridine derivative with antineoplastic activity and potency for overcoming multidrug resistance. In this pharmacokinetic study the bioavailability of 3 doses of an oral formulation of dexniguldipine was to be determined. Fourteen patients with malignant disease not eligible for higher priority treatment and sufficient general condition were included. In 12 patients all pharmacokinetic investigations were available for evaluation. A single 4-h infusion of 2 mg per kg body weight of dexniguldipine was given as reference. Thereafter 3 increasing oral dosages (750, 1,500, 2,250 mg/d) were given on a 3-time daily basis for 3 consecutive weeks. On day 7 (under steady state conditions) of each period, a pharmacokinetic profile was done. Absolute bioavailability at the 3-dose levels was 3, 4, and 5%, respectively, thus slightly increasing with dose, but generally low. After intravenous administration terminal half life was 22.4 h, clearance 36.9 l/h and volume of distribution 1,193 1. Toxicity was tolerable with main adverse events being loss of appetite, nausea, and vomiting. Cardiovascular effects and a decrease in serum calcium were reported in several patients. Patients were allowed to continue treatment if a benefit was expected, and 2 patients showed tumor regression during treatment. One patient with renal cell carcinoma achieved a partial remission. Bioavailability of this oral formulation seems too low for routine clinical use, despite the fact that clinical effects have been observed.

Tolerance, safety, and kinetics of the new antineoplastic compound dexniguldipine-HCl after oral administration: a phase I dose-escalation trial

Dexniguldipine-HCl is a new dihydropyridine compound that exerts selective antiproliferative activity in a variety of tumor models and, in addition, has a high potency in overcoming multidrug resistance. The purpose of this trial was to determine the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of dexniguldipine and to establish a recommended dose for phase II trials. A total of 37 patients with cancer were treated with oral dexniguldipine in increasing doses for up to 7 days. The main parameters evaluated were subjective tolerance and laboratory and cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure and ECG). Blood samples were drawn for analysis of the drug's pharmacokinetics. Dizziness and nausea were the major adverse events observed in seven patients, but episodes were generally mild and not clearly dose-related. Vomiting occurred in one patient. Hypotensive effects and orthostatic dysregulation were observed in some patients but were not considered to be dose-limiting. Therefore, no dose-limiting toxicity was found and the maximally tolerable dose could not be determined. Pharmacokinetic data showed wide interindividual variation and a dose-dependent increase in steady-state serum concentrations at doses of up to 1,000 mg daily, with no clear further increase being observed at higher doses. Consistently high concentrations were achieved with the 2,500-mg dose. Despite the lack of dose-limiting toxicity, higher doses of dexniguldipine do not appear to be useful for clinical evaluation because of the pharmacokinetic properties of the compound: therefore, 2,500 mg/day is recommended as the daily dose for phase II trials.