1
|
Assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics for the evaluation of patients with different ventricular geometry. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Over the last decades growing evidence have demonstrated the promising role of intracardiac flow dynamic analysis in evaluating cardiac performance. Diastolic forces contribute to the formation of vortices, complex structures capable of kinetic energy storage and responsible of a smoother transition of blood from left ventricular (LV) inlet to outlet. Change in shape and location of these structures has been related with cardiovascular disease and prognosis.
Purpose
To investigate quantitative changes in vortices parameters in patients with different ventricular geometry.
Methods
We enrolled 72 consecutive patients (age 66±11 years, 49 male, 68%) with LV concentric hypertrophy (CH, n=15), eccentric hypertrophy (EH, n=13), concentric remodeling (CR, n=15) and normal LV geometry (CTRL, n=29). Each patient underwent a complete echocardiographic examination and a non-invasive intracardiac fluid dynamic analysis by Color Vector Flow Mapping. A 3-chamber apical view with a frame rate between 22 and 25 Hz has been acquired and subsequently analyzed offline by a semi-automatic software obtaining the following parameters: vortex area (VA) (the ratio between the total vortex area and the left ventricular (LV) area); vortex length (VL) (the longitudinal length of the vortex relative to the total LV length; vortex depth (VD) (the distance of the vortex center from the LV base relative to the total LV long axis). Bland Altman Plot has been used to assess intra and inter-observer variability.
Results
Mean VD was higher in CR, CH and EH compared to CTRL (p=0.013, p=0.001 and p=0.022, respectively). Moreover, CH showed higher VL (p=0.006) and larger VA (p=0.012) compared to CTRL. A similar trend was noticed in EH patients, despite did not reach statistical significance (p=0.21 and p=0.07 for VA and VL respectively). No significative differences in vortices parameters have been observed between CH and EH.
Conclusion(s)
This is the first study providing quantitative echocardiographic parameters of vortex location and morphology in different LV geometries. Higher values of VD were found in CR, CH and EG. Quantitative intra dynamic fluid assessment was feasible and reliable in the whole population and could provide additional information to the standard echocardiographic examination.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
|
2
|
Assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics for the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Assessment of intracardiac flows and turbulence has acquired rising significance in the past few years, due to the development and introduction of technologies for non-invasive cardiovascular imaging. Recent studies have shown that alterations in intracardiac fluid dynamics can be helpful to identify abnormalities in cardiac function.
Purpose
This study investigates the additional information provided by the quantitative assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics for the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis (AS), by using an advanced echocardiography vortex-based approach.
Methods
Sixty-one patients with severe AS (33 females) and 38 healthy sex- and BSA-matched controls (CTRL) (15 females) were prospectively included and underwent echocardiographic assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics. Echocardiographic measurements were performed on apical three chamber views. The HyperDoppler software adapted to the echo-scanner without contrast injection was used to assess intracardiac vortex properties. The following parameters were obtained: vortex area (VA) (the ratio between the total vortex area and the left ventricular (LV) area); vortex length (VL) (the longitudinal length of the vortex relative to the total LV length; vortex depth (VD) (the distance of the vortex center from the LV base relative to the total LV long axis). Inter-rater variability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between two independent operators.
Results
Patients with severe AS (mean gradient: 47,5±13,9 mmHg; aortic valve area: 0.7±0.2 cm2; ejection fraction: 53±7%) had increased LV wall thickness (p<0.001) and mass index (p<0.001) compared with controls. Greater indexed left atrial volume (p<0.001), E/e' (p<0.001) and trans-tricuspid gradient (p<0.001) were also observed in the AS group. The assessment of VA, VL and VD was feasible in the whole population. Their calculation was reliable, as ICCs were very good for VA (0.878, p=0.033), VL (0.960, p=0.004) and VD (0,905, p=0.021). Mean VA was significantly larger in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared with CTRL (p=0.033). VL and VD (p=0.026 and p>0.001, respectively) were significantly higher in AS patients compared with CTRL. Among those who underwent TAVR, we observed a significant difference in the delta values of VA and VL pre-postTAVR in patients with and without significant paravalvular leak (p<0.05).
Conclusions
The newly defined VA, VL and VD, quantitative indices of vortical flow, were significantly increased in the LV cavity of patients with severe AS compared to normal subjects. These indices, whose measurement was feasible and reliable, might provide complementary information to standard echocardiography, useful for the further diagnostic and prognostic characterization of the heterogeneous population of patients with severe AS.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
|