Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the APHINITY Trial: 6 Years' Follow-Up

PURPOSE

APHINITY, at 45 months median follow-up, showed that pertuzumab added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy significantly improved invasive disease–free survival (IDFS) (hazard ratio 0.81 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.00], P = .045) for patients with early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer (BC), specifically those with node-positive or hormone receptor (HR)–negative disease. We now report the preplanned second interim overall survival (OS) and descriptive updated IDFS analysis with 74 months median follow-up.

METHODS

After surgery and central HER2-positive confirmation, 4,805 patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative BC were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 1-year pertuzumab or placebo added to standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1-year trastuzumab.

RESULTS

This interim OS analysis comparing pertuzumab versus placebo did not reach the P = .0012 level required for statistical significance ( P = .17, hazard ratio 0.85). Six-year OS were 95% versus 94% with 125 deaths (5.2%) versus 147 (6.1%), respectively. IDFS analysis based on 508 events (intent-to-treat population) showed a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91) and 6-year IDFS of 91% and 88% for pertuzumab and placebo groups, respectively. The node-positive cohort continues to derive clear IDFS benefit from pertuzumab (hazard ratio 0.72 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.87]), 6-year IDFS being 88% and 83%, respectively. Benefit was not seen in the node-negative cohort. In a subset analysis, IDFS benefit from pertuzumab showed a hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.92) for HR-positive disease and a hazard ratio of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.10) for HR-negative disease. Primary cardiac events remain < 1% in both the treatment groups. No new safety signals were seen.

CONCLUSION

This analysis confirms the IDFS benefit from adding pertuzumab to standard adjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive HER2-positive early BC. Longer follow-up is needed to fully assess OS benefit.

GAIN-2: Neo-/adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense chemotherapy (CT) to tailored dose-dense CT in patients (pts) with high risk early breast cancer (EBC): Results on safety and interim invasive disease-free survival (iDFS)

516

Background: GAIN-2 (NCT01690702) compared efficacy and safety of intense, dose-dense epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) vs dose-dense, dose-tailored epirubicin/ cyclophosphamide followed by dose-dense, dose-tailored docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant or neoadjuvant CT for node-positive or high risk node-negative EBC. Here, we report safety results and interim analysis (IA) of the primary endpoint iDFS. Methods: Pts (luminal A ≥N2; luminal B N+; HER2+ and TNBC) were randomized between iddEnPC (E 150 mg/m2, nP 330 mg/m2, C 2000 mg/m2, all q2w x 3) or dtEC-dtD (dtEC q2w x 4 followed after 1 week rest by dtD q2w x 4). Primary objective was to compare iDFS. 797 events are needed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.819 with a 2-sided log-rank-test with 80% power and α=0.05. The IA of iDFS was planned after 50% of the events have occurred. Safety and compliance were secondary objectives. Results: Between 10/2012 and 09/2018, 2887 pts were randomized and 2857 started treatment (iddEnPC 1429; dtEC-dtD 1428). Median age was 51 (range 18-75) years. Overall, 18.1% were luminal A, 31.5% luminal B/HER2-, 18.8% hormone-receptor (HR)+/HER2+, 8.5% HR-/HER2+ and 23.2% TNBC. Overall, 88.1% of pts completed all treatment in both arms. 66.8% with iddEnPC vs 58.8% with dtEC-dtD delayed CT dose (p<0.001). Grade 3-4 non-hematological adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with iddEnPC (iddEnPC 50.8% vs dtEC-dtD 45.1%, p=0.002). Grade 3-4 leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, arthralgia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy were significantly higher with iddEnPC. There were 1464 serious AEs (iddEnPC 870 vs dtEC-dtD 594) and 26 (9 vs 17) predefined AEs of special interest (anaphylaxis, any AE affecting cranial nerves, macula edema). Two deaths occurred during dtEC-dtD. After a median follow-up of 45.8 months, there was no difference in iDFS between arms (log-rank p=0.9102, hazard ratio iddEnPC vs dtEC-dtD 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.23). Conclusions: No new safety concerns were observed. Use of both iddEnPC and dtEC-dtD appears feasible in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of high risk EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT01690702 .

Sorafenib plus topotecan versus placebo plus topotecan for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (TRIAS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic therapy has known activity in ovarian cancer. The investigator-initiated randomised phase 2 TRIAS trial assessed the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib combined with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial at 20 sites in Germany. Patients (≥18 years) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer previously treated with two or fewer chemotherapy lines for recurrent disease were stratified (first vs later relapse) in block sizes of four and randomly assigned (1:1) using a web-generated response system to topotecan (1·25 mg/m² on days 1-5) plus either oral sorafenib 400 mg or placebo twice daily on days 6-15, repeated every 21 days for six cycles, followed by daily maintenance sorafenib or placebo for up to 1 year in patients without progression. Investigators and patients were masked to allocation of sorafenib or placebo; topotecan treatment was open label. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01047891.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 18, 2010, and Sept 19, 2013, 185 patients were enrolled, 174 of whom were randomly assigned: 85 to sorafenib and 89 to placebo. Two patients in the sorafenib group had serious adverse events before treatment and were excluded from analyses. 83 patients in the sorafenib group and 89 in the placebo group started treatment. Progression-free survival was significantly improved with sorafenib versus placebo (hazard ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·43-0·83; p=0·0018). Median progression-free survival was 6·7 months (95% CI 5·8-7·6) with sorafenib versus 4·4 months (3·7-5·0) with placebo. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (57 [69%] of 83 patients in the sorafenib group vs 47 [53%] of 89 in the placebo group), neutropenia (46 [55%] vs 48 [54%]), and thrombocytopenia (23 [28%] vs 20 [22%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 49 (59%) of 83 sorafenib-treated patients and 45 (51%) of 89 placebo-treated patients. Of these, events were fatal in four patients (5%) in the sorafenib group (dyspnoea and poor general condition, septic shock, ascites and dyspnoea, and sigma perforation) and seven (8%) in the placebo group (pulmonary embolism in two patients, disease progression in two patients, and one case each of sepsis with fever, pleural effusion, and tumour cachexia). Sorafenib was associated with increased incidences of grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction (three [13%] vs 0 patients) and grade 2 alopecia (24 [29%] vs 12 [13%]).

INTERPRETATION

Sorafenib, when given orally in combination with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy, showed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. These encouraging results support the crucial role of antiangiogenesis as the treatment backbone in combination with chemotherapy, making this approach attractive for further assessment with other targeted strategies.

FUNDING

Bayer, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Efficacy of niraparib on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) with partial response (PR) to the last platinum-based chemotherapy

5517

Background: Therapeutic paradigms for recurrent OC vary by geography. Maintenance following response to platinum-based chemotherapy (Plat) is standard in Europe, whereas in the US maintenance is considered following complete response (CR) vs treatment for partial response (PR). Niraparib is a highly selective PARP 1/2 inhibitor (PARPi). In preclinical studies it concentrates in the tumor relative to plasma, delivering > 90% durable PARP inhibition and antitumor effects. Niraparib demonstrated significantly longer PFS vs placebo (P) in pts with recurrent OC following a CR or PR to Plat in the randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Methods: Pts with recurrent OC, no prior PARPi use, ≥2 prior courses of Plat, and response to most recent Plat were eligible. Pts were assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts on the basis of g BRCA testing (g BRCAmut or non-g BRCAmut) and randomized 2:1 within each cohort to niraparib 300 mg or P qd until progressive disease (PD). Randomization occurred up to 8 weeks after last dose of the most recent Plat. Pts were stratified by time to progression after penultimate Plat (6 to < 12 months or ≥12 months), prior use of bevacizumab (yes/no), and response to most recent Plat (CR or PR). PFS was measured from time of randomization to death or earliest PD as assessed by independent review committee. Results: 49% of pts (niraparib: 67/138; P: 32/65) in the g BRCAmut and ~49% of pts (niraparib: 117/234 [50%]; P: 56/116 [48%]) in the non-g BRCAmut cohorts entered NOVA with a PR following their most recent Plat. At time of unblinding, 30 (45%) niraparib and 23 (72%) P pts in the g BRCAmut and 65 (56%) niraparib and 45 (80%) P pts in the non-g BRCAmut cohorts had PFS events. PFS hazard ratios (95% CI) were 0.24 (0.131–0.441) in g BRCAmut and 0.35 (0.230–0.532) in non-g BRCAmut cohorts for pts who had a PR to their most recent platinum regimen. This compared favorably to the overall NOVA study results, where PFS hazard ratios (95% CI) were 0.27 (0.173–0.410) in g BRCAmut and 0.45 (0.338–0.607) in non-g BRCAmut cohorts. Conclusions: Niraparib treatment provided significant benefit to pts with recurrent OC who achieved a PR following Plat. Clinical trial information: NCT01847274.

Influence of zoledronic acid on disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow and survival: results of a prospective clinical trial

Background

The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in bone marrow (BM) of breast cancer patients is associated with reduced clinical outcome. Bisphosphonate treatment was shown to eradicate DTC from BM in several studies. This controlled randomized open-label multi-center study aimed to investigate the influence of zoledronic acid (ZOL) on DTC and survival of breast cancer patients (Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT00172068).

Methods

Patients with primary breast cancer and DTC-positive bone marrow were randomized to treatment with ZOL plus adjuvant systemic therapy (n = 40) or adjuvant systemic therapy alone (n = 46) between 03/2002 and 12/2004. DTC were identified by immunocytochemistry using the pancytokeratin antibody A45B/B3 and by cytomorphology. The change in DTC numbers at 12 months and 24 months versus baseline, as well as patient outcomes were evaluated.

Results

86 patients could be included into survival analysis (median follow-up: 88 months, range: 8–108 mths). Patients in the control group were more likely to die during follow-up than those in the ZOL-group (11% vs. 2%, p = 0.106). 15% of patients in the control group presented with relapse whereas only 8% of ZOL group patients developed metastatic or recurrent disease during follow-up (p = 0.205). At 24 months, 16% of patients from the control group were still DTC positive, whereas all patients treated with ZOL became DTC negative (p = 0.032). Patients presenting with persistent DTC 12 months after diagnosis had significantly shorter overall survival (p = 0.011).

Conclusions

Bisphosphonate therapy contributes to eradication of disseminated tumor cells. The positive influence of bisphosphonates on survival in the adjuvant setting may be due to their effects on DTC.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00172068 [Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Breast Cancer With Minimal Residual Disease in the Bone Marrow (MRD-1)].

Adding epoetin alfa to intense dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: randomized clinical trial

Background

The AGO-ETC trial compared 5-year relapse-free survival of intense dose-dense (IDD) sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin (E), paclitaxel (T), and cyclophosphamide (C) (IDD-ETC) every 2 weeks vs conventional scheduled epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (EC→T) (every 3 weeks) as adjuvant treatment in high-risk breast cancer patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epoetin alfa in a second randomization of the intense dose-dense arm.

Methods

One thousand two hundred eighty-four patients were enrolled; 658 patients were randomly assigned to the IDD-ETC treatment group. Within the IDD-ETC group, 324 patients were further randomly assigned to the epoetin alfa group, and 319 were randomly assigned to the non–erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) control group. Primary efficacy endpoints included change in hemoglobin level from baseline to Cycle 9 and the percentage of subjects requiring red blood cell transfusion. Relapse-free survival, overall survival, and intramammary relapse were secondary endpoints estimated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Except for the primary hypothesis, all statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Epoetin alfa avoided the decrease in hemoglobin level (no decrease in the epoetin alfa group vs –2.20g/dL change for the control group; P < .001) and statistically significantly reduced the percentage of subjects requiring red blood cell transfusion (12.8% vs 28.1%; P < .0001). The incidence of thrombotic events was 7% in the epoetin alfa arm vs 3% in the control arm. After a median follow-up of 62 months, epoetin alfa treatment did not affect overall survival, relapse-free survival, or intramammary relapse.

Conclusions

Epoetin alfa resulted in improved hemoglobin levels and decreased transfusions without an impact on relapse-free or overall survival. However, epoetin alfa had an adverse effect, resulting in increased thrombosis.

A randomized phase III study to determine the efficacy of capecitabine in addition to a taxane and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer

1082

Background: Conventional chemotherapy combined with novel molecular targeted agents has been proven effective and tolerable in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Taxanes (T) plus bevacizumab (B) and T plus capecitabine (X) showed a benefit in progression free survival (PFS) compared to T alone. Life-threatening or highly symptomatic situations require poly-chemotherapies in MBC patients; therefore a combination of all 3 drugs appears reasonable. Methods: TABEA (NCT01200212) is a prospective, randomized, open label, phase III trial comparing T plus B +/- X as 1st-line therapy in MBC. Patients with histologically confirmed HER2- locally advanced or MBC were included. All patients received T (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 i.v. d1,8,15 q22 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. d1 q22) and B (15 mg/kg i.v. d1 q22) (TB) and were randomized to X (1800 mg/m² daily d1-14 q22) in addition and concurrently to TB (TBX) or TB alone. Randomization was stratified by receptor status, planned taxane, and disease free interval (≤ or >12 months). Primary objective was PFS. Secondary objectives were response rate and duration, clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, stable disease ≥ 24 weeks), 3yr overall survival, PFS in patients ≥ 65 years, toxicity, and compliance. Sample size calculation assumed a PFS of 10 and 13.3 months for TB and TBX, respectively (HR=0.75) requiring 432 patients and 386 events with 2-sided α=0.05 and β=0.2. Interim analysis was planned after 25% of required events (n=96). Results: Planned interim futility and safety analyses after 100 documented events in 202 patients have shown no efficacy benefit and higher toxicity in the TBX arm. For PFS, HR=1.061, 95% CI (0.715, 1.576) was observed, futility boundary was crossed. Overall grade 3-4 adverse events (e.g., thrombopenia, diarrhea, hand-foot-syndrome) (72.3 vs. 57.4%, p=0.039)and serious adverse events (40.6 vs. 24.8%, p=0.016) rates were higher for TBX after 16.3 months median follow up. There were 6 deaths in the TBX vs. 1 in the TB arm. Recruitment and therapy were stopped on 5th Oct 2012 following the advice from the IDMC. Conclusions: TABEA failed to show an improvement using the 3 drug regimen TBX in high-risk MBC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT 01200212.

A national treatment survey on the chemotherapy (CTX) treatment for patients (Pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in Germany

e17544

Background: The optimal CTX regimens and their sequence is the subject of ongoing debates esp. on the use of anthracycline/taxane (AT)-based adjuvant therapy (tx). Methods: Since 2004 a biennial survey is performed to evaluate routine CTX practice in MBC A total of 1,966 German sites were contacted. From 515 (26.2%) patient data were used for evaluation in order to achieve a representative sample for a chart review between June and August 2012. The current analysis is based on data from 291 sites on characteristics and tx of 741 pts undergoing first (1L), second (2L) or third (3L) line CTX for MBC in May 2012. Results: Data from 417 pts in 1L, 203 pts in 2L, and 121 pts in 3L were evaluated. Median age was 60 years (yrs). Patient characteristics were: 74% hormone receptor positive, 24% HER2-positive at primary diagnosis, 67% premenopausal, 60% had metastases in ≥ 2 organs, 66% had visceral disease. Prior tx (excluding M1 pts) was: no systemic tx 10%, endocrine tx only 13%, adjuvant CTX 58% (40% A and 44% AT-based), neoadjuvant CTX 20% (12% A and 75% AT-based). Median time from primary diagnosis to start of any treatment for MBC was 4.5 yrs for node-negative and 2.1 yrs for node-positive disease. Median time from primary diagnosis to current CTX was 4.9 yrs in 1L, 5.1 yrs in 2L and 5.8 yrs in 3L. Combination CTX was given in 21% of 1L, 12% of 2L and 9% of 3L pts, and its use decreased with increasing age. Agents used most frequently in 1L were taxanes in 61% (paclitaxel (P) 52%, docetaxel (D) 6%, nab-paclitaxel (Nab) 3%), capecitabine (X) 21%, vinorelbin (V) 19%, Epirubicin 6%, carboplatin 5%. 1L taxane tx was given to 73% of pts with prior A-based and 46% of pts with prior AT-based (neo-)adjuvant tx. Agents used most frequently in 2L were X 31%, P 20%, V 20%, gemcitabine (G) 7%, Nab 6% and in 3L V 27%, X 22%, eribulin 15%, Nab 12% P 7%, G 5%. Targeted tx was given in 54% of pts (20% trastuzumab, 4% lapatinib, and 30% bevacizumab), additional tx were bisphosphonates in 58%, and radiotherapy in 20%. Conclusions: The survey showed a high concordance of routine treatment and the existing national guidelines regarding CTX. Taxanes still dominate CTX in MBC including a significant amount of taxane rechallenge after their use in (neo-)adjuvant tx.

Everolimus (RAD) as treatment in breast cancer patients with bone metastases only: Results of the phase II RADAR study

556

Background: RAD001 is an orally bioavailable rapamycin ester analogue, which acts by selectively inhibiting mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), a key player in downstream signaling of different pathways. In vitro, RAD stops formation and activity of osteoclasts. Treating progressive bone metastases in breast cancer (bc) with RAD seems reasonable. Methods: We evaluated RAD in a placebo-controlled, phase II, randomized discontinuation study in bc patients (pts) with bone metastases only. Pts were eligible if they had HER2-negative, hormone-receptor (HR)-positive or –negative bc, with a maximum of 2 previous lines of endocrine therapy (ET) and 1 previous line of chemotherapy (CT). All pts received zoledronate and pts with HR-positive bc could receive ET. All pts started with RAD during a run-in phase of 8 weeks. Pts with stable disease were randomized to RAD or placebo; pts with response continued with RAD and pts with progression went off study. Primary outcome was time to progression (TTP) in pts being stable on 8 weeks of RAD. It was assumed that placebo would obtain a median TTP of 8 weeks which would be increased to 16 weeks, thus requiring 76 randomized pts. It was expected that 70% of all pts would have stable disease after the run-in phase. Overall, 110 pts were needed. Due to slow recruitment and dysbalance between randomized and discontinued pts, recruitment stopped in 12/ 2010. Results: From 11/06 until 12/10, 89 pts were enrolled. Median age was 59.5 years. 93% had HR-positive disease. 15% had prior chemotherapy; 58% had prior ET for metastases. 1/3 received concomitant ET. Three pts did not start therapy, 41 discontinued during run-in phase, 32 due to progression. Six continued as responder. 39 pts with SD after run in phase were randomized to RAD or placebo. Twenty-seven stopped due to progression; 9 discontinued due to AE, 4 are still on treatment. 15 pts had 20 serious adverse events; 1 hyperglycemia and one alveolitis. The TTP in patients with RAD was 8.5 months vs. 2.9 months with placebo (HR: 0.559; 95% CI [0.284-1.10] p=0.092. Conclusions: Pts with bone metastases only had a longer TTP on RAD compared to pts on placebo. Overall 7/89 showed a sustained response on RAD + zoledronate ± ET.

Intense Dose-Dense Sequential Chemotherapy With Epirubicin, Paclitaxel, and Cyclophosphamide Compared With Conventionally Scheduled Chemotherapy in High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer: Mature Results of an AGO Phase III Study

Purpose

Patients with primary breast cancer who have extensive axillary lymph node involvement have a poor prognosis after conventional adjuvant therapy. We compared intense dose-dense (IDD) adjuvant chemotherapy with conventionally scheduled adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

In this randomized, phase III trial, a total of 1,284 eligible patients with four or more involved axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive IDD sequential epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (IDD-ETC) every 2 weeks or conventionally scheduled epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel every three weeks. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS).

Results

At a median follow-up of 62 months, 5-year event-free survival rates were 62% in the conventional arm and 70% in the IDD-ETC arm, representing a 28% reduction of the relative risk of relapse (P < .001). This benefit was independent of menopausal, hormone receptor, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. The 5-year overall survival rates were 77% versus 82%, representing a 24% reduction of the relative risk of death (P = .0285). IDD therapy was associated with significantly more nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities, but no treatment-related death occurred. Four occurrences of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were observed in the IDD-ETC arm. No severe congestive heart failure was reported.

Conclusion

IDD-ETC was less well tolerated compared with conventional chemotherapy but significantly improved event-free and overall survivals in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer who had four or more positive axillary lymph nodes.

Triple-negative and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers exhibit an elevated risk and an earlier occurrence of cerebral metastases

PURPOSE

Evaluation of the influence of immunohistochemically defined breast cancer (BC) subtypes and other risk factors on the development of cerebral metastases (CM).

METHODS

Exploratory analysis of a hospital-based prospective tumour registry including all patients with primary BC treated in our EUSOMA breast unit between 1998 and 2006.

RESULTS

The study cohort contained 2441 patients, including 284 patients (11.6%) with triple-negative (oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2-negative) and 245 patients (10.1%) with HER2-overexpressing BC subtypes. Overall, 80 patients (3.3%) developed CM within a median follow-up period of 47 months, 19 (23.8%) of them with triple-negative and 19 (23.8%) with HER2-positive tumours. Therefore, 6.7% of all patients with triple-negative and 7.8% of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer developed CM. Multivariate analysis indicated that the highest risk for CM was triple-negative breast cancer. Further independent risk factors were: HER2-overexpression, early onset BC (age<50 years), and large tumour size (pT3/4). Among those patients developing CM, triple-negative BC showed the shortest interval between primary diagnosis and occurrence of CM with a median of 22 months, compared to 30 and 63.5 months in HER2-positive and ER+/HER2- BC, respectively. Survival after occurrence of CM did not differ among the subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with triple-negative or HER2-positive BC have a higher risk for CM compared with patients bearing the ER+/HER2- phenotype and develop CM earlier in the course of disease. A risk profile for CM might help adjust surveillance in high risk populations and identify patients with a need for new treatment strategies.

Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: role of peritoneal carcinomatosis: exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I Trial about risk factors, surgical implications, and prognostic value of peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Almost all retrospective trials pointed out that a benefit of surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer may be limited to patients in whom a macroscopic complete resection could be achieved. Peritoneal carcinomatosis has been reported to be either a negative predictor for resectability or a negative prognostic factor, or both. The role of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a multicenter trial was investigated.

METHODS

Exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I trial (multicenter trial of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer, 2000 to 2003).

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients (50%) who underwent surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer had peritoneal carcinomatosis. Univariate analyses showed worse overall survival for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis compared with patients without carcinomatosis (P < .0001). Patients with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis had a complete resection rate of 26% and 74%, respectively (P < .0001). This corresponded with the observation that patients with complete resection had a better prognosis than those with minimal residual disease of 1 to 5 mm, which commonly reflects peritoneal carcinomatosis (P = .0002). However, patients who underwent complete resection, despite peritoneal carcinomatosis, had a 2-year survival rate of 77%, which was similar to the 2-year survival rate of patients with completely debulked disease who did not have peritoneal carcinomatosis (81%) (P = .96). Analysis of prognostic factors did not show any independent effect of peritoneal carcinomatosis on survival in patients who underwent complete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal carcinomatosis was a negative predictor for complete resection but had no effect on prognosis if complete resection could be achieved. Improving surgical skills might be one step to increase the proportion of patients who might benefit from surgery for recurrent disease.

Addition of Epirubicin As a Third Drug to Carboplatin-Paclitaxel in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Prospectively Randomized Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens

Purpose

Despite the progress that has been achieved, long-term survival rates in patients with advanced ovarian cancer are still disappointing. One attempt to improve results could be the addition of non–cross-resistant drugs to platinum-paclitaxel combination regimens. Anthracyclines were among the candidates for incorporation as a third drug into first-line regimens.

Patients and Methods

We performed a prospectively randomized phase III study comparing carboplatin-paclitaxel (TC; area under the curve 5/175 mg/m2, respectively) with epirubicin 60 mg/m2 added to the same combination (TEC) in previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. All drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 of a 3-week schedule for a planned minimum of six courses.

Results

Between November 1997 and February 2000, 1,282 patients were randomly assigned to receive either TC (635 patients) or TEC (647 patients), respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic and some nonhematologic toxicities (nausea/emesis, mucositis, and infections) occurred significantly more frequently in the TEC arm. Accordingly, quality-of-life analysis showed inferiority of TEC versus TC. Median progression-free survival time was 18.4 months for the TEC arm and 17.9 months for the TC arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.07; P = .3342). Median overall survival time was 45.8 months for the TEC arm and 41.0 months for the TC arm (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.08; P = .3652). Similar nonsignificant differences were observed when strata were analyzed separately.

Conclusion

Addition of epirubicin to TC did not improve survival or time to treatment failure in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; therefore, it cannot be recommended for clinical use in this population.

A phase II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage IC-IV (AGO-OVAR protocol OVAR-8)

PURPOSE

A multicenter, nonrandomized, phase II study was initiated to evaluate the tolerability, toxicity, and activity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine combination in previously untreated ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemonaive patients who had radical debulking surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IC-IV received sequentially paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC 5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on day 8, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

From October 2001 to July 2002, 55 patients were treated and evaluated. Main toxicities were hematological with NCI-CTC grade 3/4 anemia 12.7%, leukopenia 70.9%, neutropenia 76.3%, and thrombocytopenia 45.5. However, febrile neutropenia occurred only in 1.8%. Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities were rare and occurred in less than 10% of patients. Toxicity-induced treatment delays occurred in 3.1% of cycles and resulted in early treatment cessation in four patients. Dose intensity reached 90.8% for carboplatin and paclitaxel, and 73.3% for gemcitabine. Objective response was observed in 10 of 14 patients with measurable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The triplet combination of paclitaxel-carboplatin-gemcitabine is feasible and active, with manageable hematological toxicity and no unexpected nonhematological toxicity. This regimen has proceeded to phase III evaluation.

Anthracycline and trastuzumab in breast cancer treatment

This study was designed to evaluate the cardiac safety of the combined treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with trastuzumab (Herceptin) plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) in comparison with EC alone in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients included those with metastatic breast cancer without any prior anti-HER2 treatment, anthracycline therapy, or any other chemotherapy for metastatic disease. This was a nonrandomized, prospective, dose-escalating, multicenter, open-label, phase I study in Germany. A control group of 23 patients received EC 90/600 mg/m2 3-weekly for six cycles (EC90 alone). A total of 26 HER2-positive patients were treated with trastuzumab, or H (2 mg/kg weekly after an initial loading dose of 4 mg/kg), and EC 60/600 mg/m2 3-weekly for six cycles (EC60+H); another 25 HER2-positive patients received H and EC 90/600 mg/m2 3-weekly for six cycles. Asymptomatic reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of more than 10% points were detected in 12 patients (48%) treated with EC60+H and in 14 patients (56%) treated with EC90+H vs 6 patients (26%) in the EC90 alone cohort. LVEF decreases to <50% occurred in one patient in the EC60+H cohort and in two patients in the EC90+H cohort during the H monotherapy. No cardiac event occurred in the cohort with EC90 alone. The overall response rates for EC60+H and EC90+H were >60%, vs 26% for EC90 alone. The interim results of this study approve the cardiac safety of the combination of H with EC, with low risk of cardiac toxicity. The combination regimen revealed promising efficacy.