Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction-A Phenotype Waiting to Be Explored

Heart failure (HF) presents a significant global health challenge recognised by frequent hospitalisation and high mortality rates. The assessment of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) plays a crucial role in diagnosing and predicting outcomes in HF, leading to its classification into preserved (HFpEF), reduced (HFrEF), and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) EF. HFmrEF shares features of both HFrEF and HFpEF but also exhibits distinct characteristics. Despite advancements, managing HFmrEF remains challenging due to its diverse presentation. Large-scale studies are needed to identify the predictors of clinical outcomes and treatment responses. Utilising biomarkers for phenotyping holds the potential for discovering new treatment targets. Given the uncertainty surrounding optimal management, individualised approaches are imperative for HFmrEF patients. This chapter examines HFmrEF, discusses the rationale for its re-classification, and elucidates HFmrEF's key attributes. Furthermore, it provides a comprehensive review of current treatment strategies for HFmrEF patients.

Correlation of extent of left ventricular endocardial unipolar low-voltage zones with ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Endocardial electrogram (EGM) characteristics in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have not been explored adequately for prognostication.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study correlation of bipolar and unipolar EGM characteristics with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) in NICM.

METHODS

Electroanatomic mapping of the left ventricle was performed. EGM characteristics were correlated with LVEF. Differences between groups with and without VT and predictors of VT were studied.

RESULTS

In 43 patients, unipolar EGM variables had better correlation with baseline LVEF than bipolar EGM variables: unipolar voltage (r = +0.36), peak negative unipolar voltage (r = -0.42), peak positive unipolar voltage (r = +0.38), and percentage area of unipolar low-voltage zone (LVZ; r = -0.41). Global mean unipolar voltage (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.8), extent of unipolar LVZ (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), and percentage area of unipolar LVZ (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3) were significant predictors of VT. For classification of patients with VT, extent of unipolar LVZ had an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P < .001), and percentage area of unipolar LVZ had an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96; P = .01). Cutoff of >3 segments for extent of unipolar LVZ had the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 67%) and cutoff of 33% for percentage area of unipolar LVZ had the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 60%) for VT.

CONCLUSION

In NICM, extent and percentage area of unipolar LVZs are significant predictors of VT. Cutoffs of >3 segments of unipolar LVZ and >33% area of unipolar LVZ have good diagnostic accuracies for association with VT.

Stent embolization in stented segment: a diagnostic challenge

ABSTRACT

Stent dislodgement during angioplasty is a rare but potentially fatal complication if not properly managed. We described a case of an elderly man who had previously undergone coronary angioplasty and now presented with an inferior wall myocardial infarction and required emergency angioplasty. Because of the loss of antegrade flow during the procedure, the proximal lesion was stented first. Undeployed stent was dislodged into proximal stent during distal stent deployment through proximal stent. This complication was addressed by crushing the undeployed stent and deploying another stent to secure the crushed stent to the arterial wall. Postprocedure patient was stable and discharged after 2 days. An operator should be aware of this risk as well as possible bailout options.