Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Different Materials as Barriers to Coronal Microleakage in Root-Filled Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Aim

To compare the sealing ability of three different materials when used as postendodontic restoration barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth.

Materials and Methods

In the present study, 60 single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were selected. After endodontic treatment was done with protaper files, they were divided into three groups of 20 teeth each, which were restored with Zirconomer (Group I), Hi-Dense (Group II), and Surefil composite (Group III), respectively. After storing in artificial saliva for 10 days, all teeth were then immersed in Rhodamine 6G fluorescent dye. Teeth were then sectioned buccolingually in a longitudinal direction. The coronal microleakage was measured in both halves under a fluorescence microscope and images were taken with a digital camera. Data obtained from the study in the form of scoring as per specific criteria was subjected to statistical analysis.

Result

Results of the study showed that the minimum amount of coronal microleakage was seen in Group II restored with Hi-Dense followed by Group III restored with Surefil Composite and the maximum amount of coronal microleakage was seen in Group I restored with Zirconomer.

Conclusion

On the basis of the results of the present study, it may be concluded that Hi-Dense showed better coronal sealing ability in access cavities. Surefil composite exhibited coronal microleakage less than Zirconomer but more than Hi-Dense.

Correlation between bioelectrical spectroscopy and perometry in assessment of upper extremity swelling

Lymphedema is a common side effect of breast cancer treatment and is associated with increased upper extremity volume, functional impairment, and pain. While there is no cure for lymphedema, physical therapy treatment can often alleviate symptoms. To measure the efficacy of treatment, accurate assessment of the limbs is important. Current methods of assessment are complex (water displacement), marginally accurate (circumferential measurements), or expensive (opto-electrical systems). A new method for estimating tissue fluid is bioelectrical spectroscopy (BIS). This method measures impedance to small currents applied to the body and is easily performed. Acceptance of BIS devices for assessment of limb fluid will be dependent on the establishment of sufficient reliability and validity, and the objective of this study was to evaluate reliability and validity of this device compared to perometry. Both upper limbs of ten subjects previously treated for breast cancer were measured using BIS and perometry. We found that inter-rater reliability (r = 0.987) and intrarater reliability (r = 0.993) were acceptably high for the BIS unit and concurrent validity was r = -0.904, when compared to perometry. These results confirm that BIS can produce valid and reliable data related to the assessment of upper limbs affected by lymphedema.

Epilepsies among twins born in families of Indian probands with epilepsy

Twins have a high frequency of adverse perinatal events and have been reported to have an increased risk of seizures. Contrary to popular belief, a recent study reported that twins do not have an increased risk of seizures. We studied the relationship of twinning and epilepsy in India. The frequency of twinning in families of probands with epilepsy was compared with the frequency of twinning among hospital births in the same region of India. We also compared consecutively ascertained probands with epilepsy for their twin status and the occurrence of epilepsies in their twin and non-twin relatives. The frequency of twin births in families of 524 probands with epilepsy was comparable to the twin births among consecutive deliveries over a 3-year period in another government hospital in the same catchment area (1:99 vs. 1:75). Every 1 in 58 of probands with epilepsy was a twin while a twin was born in these families every 1 in 71 live births. The frequency of epilepsy in non-proband twin relatives was 1.5% compared with 2% among non-proband, non-twin relatives. This data suggests that twin birth is not a major risk factor for seizures even in families of Indian probands with epilepsy. Family data such as ours can be used to study the contribution by genetic factors in the pathogenesis of complex genetic diseases such as human epilepsies.