Host genetic background regulates the capacity for anti-tumor antibody-dependent phagocytosis

Background

Antitumor antibody, or targeted immunotherapy, has revolutionized cancer treatment and markedly improved patient outcomes. A prime example is the monoclonal antibody (mAb) trastuzumab, which targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). However, like many targeted immunotherapies, only a subset of patients benefit from trastuzumab long-term. In addition to tumor-intrinsic factors, we hypothesize that host genetics may influence subsequent immune activation.

Methods

To model the human population, we produced F1 crosses of genetically heterogeneous Diversity Outbred (DO) mice with BALB/c mice (DOCF1). Distinct DOCF1 mice were orthotopically implanted with the BALB/c-syngeneic TUBO mammary tumor line, which expresses the HER2 ortholog rat neu. Treatment with anti-neu mAb clone 7.16.4 began once tumors reached ∼200 mm ³ . Genetic linkage and quantitative trait locus (QTL) effects analyses in R/qtl2 identified loci associated with tumor growth rates. Locus validation was performed with BALB/c F1 crosses with recombinant-inbred Collaborative Cross (CC) strains selected for therapy-associated driver genetics (CCxCF1). The respective roles of natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages were investigated by selective depletion in vivo. Ex vivo macrophage antibody-dependent phagocytosis (ADCP) assays were evaluated by confocal microscopy using 7.16.4-opsonized E2Crimson-expressing TUBO tumor cells.

Results

We observed a divergent response to anti-tumor antibody therapy in DOCF1 mice. Genetic linkage analysis detected a locus on chromosome 10 that correlates to a robust response to therapy, which was validated in CCxCF1 models. Single-cell RNA sequencing of tumors from responder and non-responder models identified key differences in tumor immune infiltrate composition, particularly within macrophage (Mφ) subsets. This is further supported by ex vivo analysis showing Mφ ADCP capacity correlates to in vivo treatment outcomes in both DOCF1 and CCxCF1 models.

Conclusions

Host genetics play a key regulatory role in targeted immunotherapy outcomes, and putative causal genes are identified in murine chromosome 10 which may govern Mφ function during ADCP.

A diversity outbred F1 mouse model identifies host-intrinsic genetic regulators of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes for a variety of malignancies; however, many patients fail to benefit. While tumor-intrinsic mechanisms are likely involved in therapy resistance, it is unclear to what extent host genetic background influences response. To investigate this, we utilized the Diversity Outbred (DO) and Collaborative Cross (CC) mouse models. DO mice are an outbred stock generated by crossbreeding eight inbred founder strains, and CC mice are recombinant inbred mice generated from the same eight founders. We generated 207 DOB6F1 mice representing 48 DO dams and demonstrated that these mice reliably accept the C57BL/6-syngeneic B16F0 tumor and that host genetic background influences response to ICI. Genetic linkage analysis from 142 mice identified multiple regions including one within chromosome 13 that associated with therapeutic response. We utilized 6 CC strains bearing the positive (NZO) or negative (C57BL/6) driver genotype in this locus. We found that 2/3 of predicted responder CCB6F1 crosses show reproducible ICI response. The chromosome 13 locus contains the murine prolactin family, which is a known immunomodulating cytokine associated with various autoimmune disorders. To directly test whether prolactin influences ICI response rates, we implanted inbred C57BL/6 mice with subcutaneous slow-release prolactin pellets to induce mild hyperprolactinemia. Prolactin augmented ICI response against B16F0, with increased CD8 infiltration and 5/8 mice exhibiting slowed tumor growth relative to controls. This study highlights the role of host genetics in ICI response and supports the use of F1 crosses in the DO and CC mouse populations as powerful cancer immunotherapy models.

Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients within a Randomized, Phase II Trial: TBCRC 019

PURPOSE

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are prognostic in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We tested whether EpCAM-based capture system (CellSearch) is effective in patients with triple-negative (TN) MBC, and whether CTC apoptosis and clustering enhances the prognostic role of CTC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

CTC enumeration and apoptosis were determined using the CXC CellSearch kit at baseline and days 15 and 29 in blood drawn from TN MBC patients who participated in a prospective randomized phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) with or without tigatuzumab. Association between levels of CTC and patient outcomes was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Nineteen of 52 (36.5%), 14 of 52 (26.9%), and 13 of 49 (26.5%) patients who were evaluable had elevated CTC (≥5 CTC/7.5 mL whole blood) at baseline and at days 15 and 29, respectively. Patients with elevated versus not elevated CTC at each time point had worse progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.005, 0.0003, 0.0002, respectively). The odds of clinical benefit response for those who had elevated versus low CTC at baseline and days 15 and 29 were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.08-0.84; P = 0.024), 0.19 (95% CI: 0.05-0.17; P = 0.014), and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.33; P = 0.001), respectively. There was no apparent prognostic effect comparing CTC apoptosis versus non-apoptosis. Presence of CTC cluster at day 15 and day 29 was associated with shorter PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

CTC were detected using CellSearch assay in approximately one-third of TN MBC patients. Elevated CTC at baseline and days 15 and 29 were prognostic, and reductions in CTC levels reflected response.

Development of circulating tumor cell-endocrine therapy index in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Endocrine therapy (ET) fails to induce a response in one half of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and almost all will eventually become refractory to ET. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are associated with worse prognosis in patients with MBC, but enumeration alone is insufficient to predict the absolute odds of benefit from any therapy, including ET. We developed a multiparameter CTC-Endocrine Therapy Index (CTC-ETI), which we hypothesize may predict resistance to ET in patients with HR-positive MBC.

METHODS

The CTC-ETI combines enumeration and CTC expression of four markers: estrogen receptor (ER), B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67. The CellSearch System and reagents were used to capture CTC and measure protein expression by immunofluorescent staining on CTC.

RESULTS

The feasibility of determining CTC-ETI was initially established in vitro and then in a prospective single-institution pilot study in patients with MBC. CTC-ETI was successfully determined in 44 of 50 (88%) patients. Eighteen (41%), 9 (20%), and 17 (39%) patients had low, intermediate, and high CTC-ETI scores, respectively. Interobserver concordance of CTC-ETI determination was from 94% to 95% (Kappa statistic, 0.90-0.91). Inter- and cell-to-cell intrapatient heterogeneity of expression of each of the CTC markers was observed. CTC biomarker expression was discordant from both primary and metastatic tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

CTC expression of ER, BCL-2, HER2, and Ki67 can be reproducibly measured with high analytical validity using the CellSearch System. The clinical implications of CTC-ETI, and of the heterogeneity of CTC biomarker expression, are being evaluated in an ongoing prospective trial.

Abstract P1-04-01: Significance of circulating tumor cells in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Results of an open label, randomized, phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with or without the anti-death receptor 5 tigatuzumab (TBCRC 019)

Background: Circulating Tumor cells (CTCs) are prognostic at baseline and first follow-up in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Using the most commonly used assay (CellSearch®), we have previously reported the ability to detect apoptotic vs. non-apoptotic CTCs in patients with MBC. However, there has been concern regarding the performance of the CellSearch® assay in patients with triple negative (TN) MBC. We hypothesized that CellSearch® is an effective assay in patients with TN MBC, and that CTC-apoptosis might further separate prognosis. Therefore, we studied CTCs in patients with TN MBC who participated in a prospective randomized phase II trial testing for activity of tigatuzumab (TIG) in combination with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PAC) conducted by the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (overall results reported by Forero A., et al, ASCO 2013).

Methods: Whole blood (WB) was drawn into a CellSave tube at baseline, day 15, and day 29 and CTC counts were determined using the CXC CellSearch® kit. Apoptosis was characterized by staining with a monoclonal antibody that detects a neo-epitope on fragmented cytokeratin (M-30) and independently by visual inspection (nucleic condensation and/or fragmentation, as well as granular cytokeratin). Association between levels of CTCs and CTC-apoptosis with the overall response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) at baseline, day 15, and day 29 was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Of the 60 patients entered into the trial, 52 were evaluable for CTCs. Of these, 19/52 (36.5%), 14/52 (26.9%), and 13/49 (26.5%) had elevated CTCs (≥5CTC/7.5 ml WB) at baseline, day 15, and day 29, respectively. Patients with elevated CTCs at each time point had worse PFS than patients with low or no CTCs. Hazard rates (HR) at baseline, day 15, and day 29 were 2.38 (95% CI: 1.27-4.45, p = 0.007), 2.87 (95% CI: 1.46-5.66, p = 0.002), and 3.40 (95% CI: 1.68-6.89, p = 0.001), respectively. The odds of overall response for those who had elevated CTCs compared to those who did not at baseline, day 15, and day 29, were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.073-0.81, p = 0.024), 0.18 (95% CI: 0.04-0.67, p = 0.014), and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.28, p = 0.001), respectively. There was no apparent prognostic effect comparing the degree of CTC-apoptosis vs. non-apoptosis.

Conclusions: Similar to observations in other intrinsic subgroups, CTCs were detected in a large fraction of TN MBC patients at baseline using CellSearch® assay, and reductions in CTC levels reflected response. In these homogenously prospectively enrolled TN MBC patients, regardless of treatment, CTCs are prognostic at baseline, day 15, and day 29. It does not appear that analysis of CTC-apoptosis is prognostic.

Supported by Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP), Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation, The AVON Foundation, and The Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-04-01.

Abstract PD6-4: Heterogeneity of expression of estrogen receptor by circulating tumor cells suggests diverse mechanisms of resistance to fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer patients

Introduction: Fulvestrant is a selective estrogen receptor down-regulator (SERD). Recent studies have shown that the efficacy of fulvestrant is dose-related. However, at the higher dose (500 mg/month) most cancers develop resistance and progress. We previously reported expression of several markers, including estrogen receptor (ER) and BCL-2, on breast cancer circulating tumor cells (CTC) using CellSearch®. We now report pilot data showing inter-patient heterogeneity of these markers on CTC in patients with known ER positive breast cancer whose disease is progressing on fulvestrant.

Methods: We conducted a pilot trial to determine the analytical validity of measuring expression of markers of endocrine sensitivity (ER, BCL-2) or resistance (HER-2, Ki-67) with fluorescent-labeled antibodies using the CellSearch® system. Patients with ER positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) whose disease was progressing on any type of therapy were eligible after signed informed consent. This report is limited to the subjects who were progressing on fulvestrant. Whole blood (WB) was characterized for CTC counts and each of the four molecular markers using the CXC CellSearch® kit.

Results: Of 50 enrolled patients, seven were progressing on fulvestrant. Two patients had no detectable CTC, while five patients had an average of ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL WB. Results are shown in a table below:

   CTC-ERCTC-BCL-2Patient #Fulvestrant dose (mg/month)Days since last doseN CTC/7.5 mL of WB% of CTC-ER+N CTC/7.5 mL of WB% of CTC-BCL-2+295002880%110%4550028170%170%2250341010%714%850031812%1735%172507728%367%

These exploratory data suggest widely different mechanisms of resistance to fulvestrant in different patients with ER positive MBC. In two of the patients (29, 45) treated with 500 mg/month, both CTC-ER and CTC-BCL-2 expression were absent, suggesting no signaling through the ER pathway. We hypothesize either that fulvestrant was actively down-regulating ER, but the cancers had adopted other growth and survival pathways, or that ER negative, hormone-independent clones had evolved. In the other three cases, ER was clearly present with evidence of signaling, based on BCL-2 expression. Two of these patients (2, 17) were on the lower dose of fulvestrant, now considered to be less effective. However, the third (8) was on the higher dose and yet still had evidence of ER signaling. This observation suggests that some patients may benefit from even higher doses of SERD therapy.

Conclusions: These pilot results suggest heterogeneous biological or pharmacological mechanisms of resistance to SERD therapy. These data suggest that CTC-ER and CTC-BCL-2 expression could serve as pharmacodynamic monitoring tools for dose escalation of fulvestrant or other SERDs. Further molecular analysis might provide biological bases for resistance to fulvestrant.

Supported by Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP).

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD6-4.