Valid and Invalid Indications for Osteopathic Interventions: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Practices and French Healthcare Society Recommendations

The main aim of this study was to determine the level of evidence in the literature for the main indications of osteopathy as recommended by the French osteopathy societies. This systematic review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and evaluated articles published between January 2012 and January 2022 with one modification: when level one evidence studies were available, level two to five studies were excluded. Sources included PubMed, the Cochrane library, the French National Health Authority (HAS) and its affiliates. Inclusion criteria were level one published studies on the indications for osteopathic treatment in French and English, and level two to three studies when no level one studies were available. The level of evidence assessment was based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence classification. The primary outcome was the level of evidence in the literature supporting osteopathic practices. The secondary outcome was to assess French professional osteopathy recommendations and French HAS guidelines in relation to the scientific literature. A total of 51 articles and nine recommendations from the HAS and its affiliates met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Analysis of the studies revealed 41 osteopathic indications from French osteopathy societies for musculoskeletal, neurosensory, psychological, pediatric, gynecological, digestive, and pulmonary disorders. High-level scientific evidence supported the use of osteopathy for low back pain, sciatica, cervical radiculopathy, and ankle sprain. There was moderate evidence for tension headache, temporomandibular joint disorder, endometriosis, and low back and pelvic pain in pregnant women. HAS recommended five indications, while nine indications were supported in the scientific literature. Osteopathy has been shown to have evidence-based benefits for a range of conditions, in particular for musculoskeletal and neurosensory disorders.

Islet cell hyperplasia: an unusual cause of hypoglycemia in an adult

This is a case presentation of a 32-year-old man with a one year history of symptomatic hypoglycemia and documented elevations of his fasting plasma insulin to glucose ratio, caused by islet cell hyperplasia. Islet cell hyperplasia is a common cause of hypoglycemia in the pediatric population, but is very rare in adults. As in the pediatric group, adults should be treated with subtotal (75-85%) resection of the pancreas and with diazoxide for symptomatic recurrence of hypoglycemia. We suggest that the term islet cell hyperplasia is preferred to designate a diffuse proliferation of endocrine cells that may express itself with different morphologic patterns, varying from case to case. Islet cell hyperplasia, therefore, comprises nesidioblastosis, endocrine cell budding from ductal structures, as well as islet and islet cell hypertrophy, septal islets, islet dysplasia, and adenomatosis. Immunohistochemistry is a valuable method for the demonstration of the polymorphic hormonal content of the proliferated islet cells. We propose that the term nesidioblastosis, previously used to describe some similar cases, should be avoided because of confusion about its definition.