Primary and secondary prostatic adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder

Urinary bladder involvement by prostatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is not well characterized in the literature. Fifteen consecutive cases of PAC diagnosed in the urinary bladder over a period of 10 years were reviewed. All bladder and prostate slides from each patient were evaluated. Eleven patients (group A) had synchronous PAC in the prostate. In these patients, bladder PAC occurred 2 to 11 years after the initial diagnosis of PAC in the prostate and tended to have a higher Gleason score than the original prostatic PAC. Four cases of bladder PAC in group A had areas with features of urothelial carcinoma, with focal positive immunoreactivity for thrombomodulin in 2 cases. Two patients (group B) had undergone radical prostatectomy for PAC 15 years earlier. The lesions in the urinary bladder in both cases showed histopathologic features similar to those seen in the previous prostatic malignancies. Two patients (group C) had histories of previously resected urothelial carcinoma. Bladder PAC was diagnosed at routine follow-up, and repeated prostate biopsy up to 2 years after the diagnosis of bladder PAC showed no evidence of prostatic PAC. PAC in the urinary bladder may be either primary or secondary. Secondary PAC is usually associated with high-grade and high-stage carcinoma in the prostate and may mimic transitional cell carcinoma. Primary bladder lesions may or may not be associated with a history of PAC in the prostate. The prognosis of patients with the primary carcinoma is favorable. HUM PATHOL 32:434-440.

[FPSUND: a pan-Canadian evaluation of a clinical classification of urinary incontinence]

Historically, urinary incontinence is divided into 3 subtypes: stress, urge and mixed. This latter group, which according to many studies can account for up to 50% of the patients, is very heterogenous. For this same reason, the reports of treatments of urinary incontinence are very difficult to analyse using this simple classification. In a attempt to clarify this situation and to help the acquisition of useful clinical information relating to urinary incontinence, were have developed a clinical classification of urinary incontinence (FPSUND) in which 6 symptoms are graded in severity from 0 to 3. In this acronym, the F stands for frequency, the P for the use of protection, the S for stress-related complaints, the U for urge-related complaints, the N for nocturia and the D for the number of daily micturitions. Urologists across Canada were sent the French or English version of the classification and used it to evaluate 148 female patients aged from 18 to 70, suffering from urinary incontinence. A second, independent evaluation, was also performed on the same patients by registered nurses or urodynamic technicians. Reproducibility between observers, as assessed by the weighted Kappa score ranged from 0.47 and 0.74 (p < 0.05), was very good. Generally, the users of the classification found it very easy to use. In summary, we propose the FPSUND clinical classification of urinary incontinence as a useful and accurate tool to classify urinary incontinence and as a means to assess treatment outcome.

Transurethral puncture in management of ectopic ureteroceles

In the past, treatment of ectopic ureteroceles with duplicated collecting systems with little or no function in the upper pole segment has been heminephrectomy, often followed by reconstruction of the ureterovesical junction. Herein we review our initial use of transurethral puncture of ureteroceles to initiate drainage with potential return or improvement of function to the upper pole segment. The initial goal was to do pyelopyelostomy rather than heminephrectomy with less potential morbidity to the patient and preservation of functional renal tissue.