Safety and efficacy of ribociclib plus letrozole in patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: Results from the Spanish sub-population of the phase 3b CompLEEment-1 trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Spanish women. Ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has shown superiority in prolonging survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) vs. ET alone.

METHODS

CompLEEment-1 is a single-arm, open-label phase 3b trial evaluating ribociclib plus letrozole in a broad population of patients with HR+, HER2- ABC. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Here we report data for Spanish patients enrolled in CompLEEment-1.

RESULTS

A total of 526 patients were evaluated (median follow-up: 26.97 months). Baseline characteristics showed a diverse population with a median age of 54 years. At study entry, 56.5% of patients had visceral metastases and 8.7% had received prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Rates of all-grade and Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were 99.0% and 76.2%, respectively; 21.3% of patients experienced a serious AE, and 15.8% of AEs led to treatment discontinuation. AEs of special interest of neutropenia, increased alanine aminotransferase, increased aspartate aminotransferase and QTcF prolongation occurred in 77.8%, 14.8%, 11.4% and 4.0% of patients, respectively. Patients aged >70 years experienced increased rates of all-grade and Grade ≥3 neutropenia and anemia. Efficacy results were consistent with the global study.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from Spanish patients enrolled in CompLEEment-1 are consistent with global data showing efficacy and a manageable safety profile for ribociclib plus letrozole treatment in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, including populations of interest (NCT02941926).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02941926.

Updated Overall Survival of Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy versus Endocrine Therapy Alone in Pre- and Perimenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in MONALEESA-7: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) benefit in the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial of pre-/perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). The median OS was not reached in the ribociclib arm in the protocol-specified final analysis; we hence performed an exploratory OS and additional outcomes analysis with an extended follow-up (median, 53.5 months).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive ET [goserelin plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) or tamoxifen] with ribociclib or placebo. OS was evaluated with a stratified Cox proportional hazard model and summarized with Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population included 672 patients. Median OS was 58.7 months with ribociclib versus 48.0 months with placebo [hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.96]. Kaplan-Meier estimated OS at 48 months was 60% and 50% with ribociclib and placebo, respectively. Subgroup analyses were generally consistent with the OS benefit, including patients who received NSAI and patients aged less than 40 years. Subsequent antineoplastic therapies following discontinuation were balanced between the ribociclib (77%) and placebo (78%) groups. Use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors after discontinuation was higher with placebo (26%) versus ribociclib (13%). Time to first chemotherapy was significantly delayed with ribociclib versus placebo. No drug-drug interactions were observed between ribociclib and either NSAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Ribociclib plus ET continued to show significantly longer OS than ET alone in pre-/perimenopausal patients, including patients aged less than 40 years, with HR+/HER2- ABC with 53.5 months of median follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02278120).

Abstract PD2-04: Updated overall survival (OS) results from the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial of pre- or perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± ribociclib

Background: MONALEESA-7 (NCT02278120), the first large randomized phase III clinical trial dedicated to investigating a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) plus ET vs ET + placebo (PBO) in pre- or perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC, previously demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS with the addition of ribociclib (RIB) to ET vs PBO + ET (median, not reached vs 40.9 months; HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]; P = .00973; Im SA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019). This concluded the protocol-defined final analysis of OS and the patients and investigators were unblinded to their treatment assignment allowing patients on the PBO arm to cross-over to RIB treatment. Longer follow-up allows for more events to further characterize the long-term survival benefits. Here we report an exploratory update of OS after a minimum of ~ four years of follow-up, an additional 20 months since the last report. Methods: Pre- or perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC were randomized 1:1 to receive RIB or PBO plus goserelin with either a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI; letrozole or anastrozole) or tamoxifen. RIB is approved in combination with an NSAI in pre- or perimenopausal patients. Patients who had received a prior CDK4/6i or ET in the advanced setting were excluded. Patients who received ET in the (neo)adjuvant setting or ≤ 1 prior line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were eligible to enroll. Updated OS were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods. Additional post-progression endpoints such as progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), time to chemotherapy (CT) and CT-free survival were also evaluated and summarized. Results: The data cutoff for this updated OS analysis was 29 June 2020, and the median follow-up was 53.5 mo (min, 46.9 mo). These updated results with extended follow-up demonstrated an OS benefit with RIB + ET vs PBO + ET (median, 58.7 vs 48.0 mo; HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.61-0.96]). In patients receiving an NSAI, a similar OS benefit was observed with RIB + NSAI vs PBO + NSAI (median, 58.7 vs 47.7 mo; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.62-1.04]). The survival benefit shown in subgroup analyses was consistent with the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. PFS2, time to chemotherapy (CT), and CT-free survival for the ITT and NSAI populations are in the Table. Among the patients who discontinued study treatment, 77.3% and 78.1% in the RIB + ET vs PBO + ET arms received a subsequent antineoplastic therapy, respectively, and 12.9% and 26.1% received a subsequent line of CDK4/6i. Additionally there were 15 patients in the PBO arm that crossed over to the RIB arm following unblinding and prior to disease progression. Conclusions: With an extended follow-up of more than 4 years, RIB + ET continued to demonstrate a clinically relevant OS benefit compared with ET alone in pre- or perimenopausal patients with a median OS ~5 years with RIB +ET in HR+/HER2− ABC. A similar benefit with RIB was observed for PFS2, time to CT, and CT-free survival.

ITTNSAI cohortRIB + ETn=335PBO + ETn=337RIB + NSAIn=248PBO + NSAIn=247PFS2Events, n (%)177 (52.8)221 (65.6)131 (52.8)159 (64.4)Median, mo44.231.043.630.4HR (95% CI)0.68 (0.56-0.83)0.69 (0.55-0.87)Time to first CTEvents, n (%)144 (43.0)173 (51.3)107 (43.1)129 (52.2)Median, mo50.936.850.936.0ITT HR(95% CI)0.69 (0.56-0.87)0.66 (0.51-0.85)CT-free survivalEvents, n (%)190 (56.7)236 (70.0)139 (56.0)169 (68.4)Median, mo42.426.442.525.9HR (95% CI)0.67 (0.55-0.81)0.64 (0.51-0.81)

Citation Format: Debu Tripathy, Seock-Ah Im, Marco Colleoni, Fabio Franke, Aditya Bardia, Nadia Harbeck, Sara Hurvitz, Louis Chow, Joohyuk Sohn, Keun Seok Lee, Saul Campos-Gomez, Rafael Villanueva Vazquez, Kyung Hae Jung, K Govind Babu, Paul Wheatley-Price, Michelino De Laurentiis, Young-Hyuck Im, Sherko Kümmel, Nagi El-Saghir, Mei-Ching Liu, Sharonjeet Kaur, Claudia Gasch, Craig Wang, Yongyu Wang, Arunava Chakravartty, Yen-Shen Lu. Updated overall survival (OS) results from the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial of pre- or perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± ribociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-04.

Abstract P2-20-08: Validation and comparison of breast graded prognostic assessment score and modified breast graded prognostic assessment in patients with brain metastases as prognostic tool

Background: Brain metastases (BM) occur in 15-35% of patients (p) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), confering bad prognosis and the major limitation of life expectancy and quality of life. Nevertheless, there is a wide prognostic spectrum within this group of p. Clinical scores have been developed trying to classify according to its prognosis. Initially, the Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (B-GPA, Sperduto et al, 2012) Then, it was adapted by adding the number of brain metastases, which is called modified Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (mB-GPA, Subbiah et al 2015). We tried to validate these scores and compare them to determine which is the best prognostic predictor tool.

Method: This is an ambispective study including all patients diagnosed of breast cancer’s brain metastases treated in a single cancer comprehensive center. Identification of patients and updates of follow up were performed through Radiation Oncology department registries and Pathology records. Both clinical and pathological data were collected. B-GPA and mB-GPA were calculated for each P. We analyze the survival after BM (SaBM) determining it as the time from the moment of diagnosis of the BM until the death due to the disease or any other cause. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate SaBM and the univariate analyses was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. ROC curves were performed to compare both scores.

Results: We included 169 P with a median age of 50 years (29-81). At last follow-up (April 2019) 90% of the P had died. Histological subtypes: 41.8% were luminal-like, 36.1% Her2 positive and 22% triple negative tumors. 25% of these P were diagnosed with stage IV. Nineteen percent of p presented only BM as the first site of relapse. A third of the P presented more than 3 brain metastases. WBRT was applied to 68.2% P, while stereotactic radiosurgery and surgery was performed in 18.2% and 18.2% respectively. The median SaBM was 12 months (m) (95% Confidence Interval (CI) [8.0-16.0m]. In the univariated analysis SaBM was longer in Her2 P than Luminal and TN P (26 m vs 11m and 8m p=0.01). Regarding the number of lesions, more than 3 present worse survival than p with 2-3 and only one metastasis (8m vs 11m vs 22m p=0.046). In the univariated analysis B-GPA and mGPA showed significant correlation with prognosis. Patients in group 4 of B-GPA (3.5-4 points) presented a better SaBM than the other groups, being statistically significant (see table 1)

Likewise, group 4 of mB-GPA (3.5-4 points) showed a better stadistically significant survival (see table 1). The ROC curves showed that GPA and mGPA have very similar prognostic capabilities, perhaps slightly in favor of modified GPA (GPA: 0.269 and mGPA: 0.286)

Conclusion: Our series validates the previous results regarding the GPA scores that allow discriminating risk groups with significant different survival. In our series mB-GPA was slightly better predictor of prognostic. In the univariate analysis B-GPA and mB-GPA, number of lesions and histological subtypes were the most important prognosis factors for MBC patients with BM. This situation can allow us to choose and better adjust the therapeutic effort in each patient, which has to be valued by a multidisciplinary team.

Table 1: SaBM regarding GPA scoresB-GPA(group)N°SaBM (months)CI 95% (m)p value0-1 (1)580-18.91.5-2 (2)2164.5-7.52.5-3 (3)29199.3-28.63.5-4 (4)263626.7-46.2p=<0.001mB-GPA (group)N°SaBM (months)CI 95% (m)p value0-1 (1)1040-10.71.5-2 (2)3072.5-11.52.5-3 (3)352717.5-36.53.5-4 (4)73733.5-40.5p=<0.001

Citation Format: Carles Fabregat Franco, Agostina Stradella, Valentin Navarro, Jennifer Linares, Sabela Recalde Peñabad, Roser Velasco Fargas, Marta Simó Parra, Adela Fernandez Ortega, Andrea Vethencourt, Catalina Falo Zamora, Silvia Vazquez Fernandez, Rafael Villanueva Vazquez, Manuel Galdeano, Miguel Gil-Gil. Validation and comparison of breast graded prognostic assessment score and modified breast graded prognostic assessment in patients with brain metastases as prognostic tool [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-20-08.

Abstract CT141: Genetic landscape of premenopausal HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) based on comprehensive circulating tumor DNA analysis and association with clinical outcomes in the Phase III MONALEESA-7 trial

Background: The genetic landscape of premenopausal hormone receptor-positive (HR+) ABC is not well understood. The Phase III MONALEESA-7 study (NCT02278120), the first trial of endocrine therapy ± a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor for premenopausal patients (pts) with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC, demonstrated that the addition of ribociclib (RIB) to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) or tamoxifen (TAM) + goserelin (GOS) significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS; Tripathy D, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018). We conducted a comprehensive ctDNA genomic analysis from MONALEESA-7.

Methods: Premenopausal pts with HR+/HER2- ABC were randomized 1:1 to RIB or placebo (PBO) + NSAI (letrozole [LET] or anastrozole) or TAM + GOS. Plasma samples for ctDNA analysis were collected at baseline and end of treatment. ctDNA was analyzed using next-generation sequencing (targeted panel of 550 genes).

Results: Among the 489 pts with ctDNA analyzed at baseline, the most common alterations were in PIK3CA (28%), TP53 (19%), CCND1 (11%), MYC (8%), and GATA3 (8%). Poorer prognosis in both treatment groups was most evident in patients with TP53 and MYC alterations. A PFS treatment effect in favor of RIB was noted in all subsets, independent of biomarker status (Table). However, based on HR, a trend for more pronounced benefit with RIB + NSAI/TAM + GOS was observed in pts with altered CCND1, GATA3, and genes involved in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.

Conclusions: RIB + NSAI/TAM + GOS provided PFS benefit irrespective of baseline biomarker alteration status and represents recommended first-line therapy for pts with premenopausal HR+/HER2- ABC. The genetic landscape of premenopausal ABC might modulate the magnitude of therapeutic benefit; these novel findings require confirmation in additional biomarker studies.

RIB + NSAI/TAM + GOSPBO + NSAI/TAM + GOSEvents, n/NPFS, median monthsEvents, n/NPFS, median, monthsHRa (95% CI)PIK3CAWT68/18024.6798/17012.190.45 (0.33-0.62)Alt38/6914.7546/7012.850.57(0.36-0.9)TP53WT78/20324.67109/19412.980.48(0.36-0.65)Alt28/469.2335/467.160.47(0.27-0.82)CCND1WT91/22122.11126/21712.880.52(0.39-0.68)Alt15/2811.2718/235.520.21(0.08-0.54)MYCWT90/22924.67125/22112.880.49(0.37-0.65)Alt16/207.3419/197.160.57(0.25-1.31)GATA3WT96/22622.11131/22212.850.52(0.39-0.68)Alt10/23NA13/185.520.18(0.05-0.62)Receptor tyrosine kinasesbWT76/19827.53114/20614.520.5(0.37-0.67)Alt30/5114.5530/345.650.26(0.14-0.47)8p11.23cWT84/21523.03124/21412.780.47(0.36-0.63)Alt22/3412.5220/269.130.51(0.26-1)8p11.23, chromosome 8, short arm, region 11.23; alt, alteration; CCND1, cyclin D1; CI, confidence interval; GATA3, GATA binding protein 3; GOS, goserelin; NA, not applicable; NSAI, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor; MYC, MYC proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor; PBO, placebo; PFS, progression-free survival; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit α; RIB, ribociclib; TAM, tamoxifen; TP53, tumor protein p53; WT, wild type.a HR for PFS of RIB vs PBO. b Receptor tyrosine kinase genes include EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, ERBB4, FGFR1, IGF1, IGF1R, KDR, KIT, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and VEGFA. c Includes FGFR1, WHSC1L1, and ZNF703.

Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Faye Su, Nadia Solovieff, Seock-Ah Im, Joohyuk Sohn, Keun Seok Lee, Saul Campos-Gomez, Kyung Hae Jung, Rafael Villanueva Vazquez, Yen-Shen Lu, Fabio Franke, Sara Hurvitz, Nadia Harbeck, Louis Chow, Karen Rodriguez Lorenc, Tetiana Taran, Naveen Babbar, Debu Tripathy. Genetic landscape of premenopausal HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) based on comprehensive circulating tumor DNA analysis and association with clinical outcomes in the Phase III MONALEESA-7 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT141.