Practical Considerations for Obtaining Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography Accreditation: Collective Experiences at Early-Adopting Centers

The Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) is a nonprofit accrediting organization committed to ensuring the quality of diagnostic imaging and related procedures. It comprises a collaboration of stakeholders spanning numerous medical professionals and specialties. In a recent initiative, IAC Echocardiography introduced a new accreditation specifically for Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography (PTE). This accreditation process is anchored in rigorous clinical peer review to ensure diagnostic quality and report accuracy, thus maintaining high standards of medical care. The authors present the inaugural 4 sites to achieve IAC accreditation for PTE, which have collaborated to share their experiences in achieving this accreditation. This review endeavors to offer actionable insights and proven solutions to navigate the accreditation journey for others. Mirroring the IAC Standards and Guidelines for PTE accreditation, this review is divided into three pivotal sections as follows: (1) organization of a perioperative echocardiography service, including stakeholder engagement to facilitate the application for accreditation; (2) performance of examinations and reporting; and (3) instituting quality improvement strategies and establishing a robust program. The pursuit of accreditation in PTE is to transcend a mere compliance exercise. It signifies a dedication to excellence, continual growth, and, above all, to the well-being of patients.

Multi-Criteria Optimization and RapidPlan for Improved Organs at Risk Sparing in Treatment Planning of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Treatment planning for malignant pleural mesothelioma is complex and time-consuming owing to the large volume of the target as well as its overlap and proximity to critical organs. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) model using RapidPlan (RP) was previously developed and clinically tested at our institution for treatment planning of these cases that had undergone pleurectomy-decortication, and therefore had two intact-lungs. The aim of this work is to investigate if multi-criteria optimization (MCO) can further improve the RP model with respect to organ at risk (OAR) sparing without compromising target coverage.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The RP model was trained with clinically accepted plans of 57 patients that used Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) with 2 partial arcs and 6 MV photons. The dose volume histogram (DVH) estimation model was trained to estimate doses to the heart, ipsilateral lung, total lung, contralateral lung, stomach, esophagus, kidneys and liver. Clinical treatment plans for 12 patients were re-planned using RP as well as a combination of RP and MCO. Application of MCO was after RP and used tradeoff exploration to navigate to the improved dose distribution on a Pareto surface. Selection of a plan that further improved OAR sparing while maintaining coverage constraints of PTV D95 and V95 ≥ 94% was made. Dosimetric parameters for clinical plans (CP), plans using RP as well as plans generated with RP and MCO were all compared for 12 new validation cases. Wilcoxon sign-rank test was used for statistical significance testing.

RESULTS

The mean heart dose was reduced from 20.9 Gy ± 3.2 Gy for CP to 17.1 Gy ± 4.2 Gy with RP and further to 13.8 Gy ± 3.3 Gy with RP and MCO. The heart V30 Gy was reduced from 23.7% ± 8% to 18.2% ± 9.4% with RP and further to 13.6% ± 5.7% with RP and MCO. The corresponding results for contralateral lung V5 Gy were 68.6% ± 14.1% with CP, 50% ± 26.3% with RP and 45.3% ± 22.8% with RP and MCO, while the mean esophagus dose was reduced from 26.5 Gy ± 3.1 Gy to 21.5 Gy ± 4.7 Gy with RP and further to 19.1 Gy ± 4.2 Gy with RP and MCO. All these dosimetric improvements were statistically significant (p<0.001). However, improvements with RP and MCO for the total lung mean and V20 Gy, liver mean, stomach mean and kidney V18 Gy were marginal over the RP. Sparing of ipsilateral lung V20 Gy was maintained at ≥ 50 cc on average for all plans. PTV D95 and V95 were both normalized at 94%.

CONCLUSION

Combination of RP and MCO significantly improved sparing of the OARs, especially the heart, contralateral lung and esophagus without compromising coverage or doses to other structures. Since doses to the heart, and contralateral lung are known to correlate with incidence of radiation pneumonitis, it would be prudent to consider planning with both RP and MCO to help determine the optimal treatment plan for the individual patient's anatomy.

Frequent Friers: Outcomes in Patients Who Receive Multiple Courses of Lung SBRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a definitive therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and solitary pulmonary metastases with high tolerability and excellent survival rates. With longer survival and patients developing subsequent primaries or oligometastatic disease, patients are receiving multiple repeat lung SBRT courses. This study aims to assess safety and efficacy of high-frequency SBRT (HF-SBRT) to the lung, defined as >3 courses.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who received >3 courses of lung SBRT. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of radiation pneumonitis (RP) and worsening pulmonary function (WPF). Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Ninety-four courses of HF-SBRT to the lung were identified among 28 patients. 78% of patients received 3 SBRT courses, 12% received 4 courses, and 7.1% received >5 courses. Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Median age at time of treatment was 73 years-old; 58% males; 42% had an underlying pulmonary comorbidity; 39% prior lung surgery; 52% history of cardiac disease; 52% prior tobacco use; median ECOG 0. Median SBRT dose was 48 Gy. Median interval between courses was 5.6 months. Zero patients experienced greater than grade 2 acute CTCAE v5 toxicity. 7.2% (7) of patients developed RP at median time of 2.6 months [IQR: 1.4,7.4]; grade 1: 3 patients, grade 2: 1 patient, grade 3: 2 patients. Of patients who developed RP, 42% (3) went on to receive further SBRT without experiencing significant adverse events (AEs). History of pulmonary disease, prior lung surgery, and history of tobacco use strongly correlated with WPF but not RP (WPF p-values: <0.001, 0.003, <0.001, respectively). History of cardiac disease did not correlate with WPF or RP. Receiving bilateral lung SBRT treatment (vs unilateral) trended towards correlation with WPF (p = 0.06) and RP (p = 0.08). Time between SBRT courses did not significantly differ for those who developed RP (p = 0.62) or WPF (p = 0.42). No individual or plan sum dosimetric constraint (GTV, PTV, unilateral lung V5, lung V10, lung V20, unilateral mean lung dose, or total lung V20) significantly differed in those who experienced RP. WPF correlated with the plan sum unilateral lung V10 (p = 0.05). LC at 1-year was 100%, 1 local failure occurred at 13 months; 2-year OS was 91.7%, median OS 5.4 years.

CONCLUSION

Overall, HF-SBRT was well tolerated. Development of RP did not correlate with a specific individual or plan sum dosimetric parameter, with patients receiving subsequent courses of SBRT without increased AEs. WPF increasingly occurred with subsequent SBRT courses and correlated with unilateral plan sum V10. This study suggests that in appropriately selected patients, SBRT after RP can still be provided as definitive care, while further studies should validate this and focus attention on mitigating long-term WPF in patients who receive HF-SBRT.

The Role of Coronary Artery Calcium Score to Assess Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Irradiated Esophageal Cancer Patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is an important predictive imaging marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD). While studies have found positive association between CAC score and cardiac toxicity in irradiated lung and breast cancer patients, there are no studies assessing CAC scores in esophageal cancer (EC). While a cardiac-gated CT is required for standard Agatston CAC score, visual assessment of CAC via ordinal scoring on non-gated CT has shown good concordance with Agatston score. In this study, we sought to examine whether visual assessment of CAC, measured on standard of care, non-contrast chest CT, predicts the development of adverse cardiovascular events (ACVE) in irradiated EC patients.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This is a single institution retrospective study of EC patients treated with RT from 2010-2021. We included patients with available PET/CT at diagnosis or chest CT simulation scan without contrast, and excluded those with history of percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary bypass surgery, or prior thoracic RT. Pre-treatment characteristics, clinical factors, and grade ≥ 3 (G3+) adverse cardiovascular events (ACVE) (CTCAEv5.0) were evaluated. Visual assessment of CAC was performed using ordinal method (CAC scored from 0 to 12), by a thoracic radiologist. Fine and Gray regression was used to compute hazard ratios for time to first ACVE. Univariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards were used for overall survival (OS). ACVEs were recorded from start of oncologic treatment and OS calculated after completion of RT.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 16 months. Median age was 67 years, 65% male, 43% white, 59% with EC of distal esophagus, and 59% had squamous cell carcinoma. Median mean heart dose was 21.93 Gy (range 0.15-36.94). 24% developed G3+ ACVEs: atrial fibrillation 9%, stroke 6%, heart failure 4%, pulmonary embolism 4%, pericardial effusion 3%, myocardial infarction 2%, heart block 2%, and cardiac death 1%. On univariate analyses, CAC >1 vs. CAC ≤ 1 trended towards increased risk of ACVE (HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 0.89-4.26; p = 0.094), however it is not predictive of OS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.75-2.30; p = 0.343). Proportion of patients with ACVEs was greater in CAC>1 group (Table). When compared to patients with CAC ≤ 1, those with CAC >1 were older (median age 62 vs 72 years, p = 0.0015), less likely to be never smokers (38% vs 30%, p = 0.0437), and more likely to have hypertension (43% vs 64%, p = 0.0197), and hyperlipidemia (30% vs 47%, p = 0.0557).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to investigate the relationship between CAC score and ACVEs in EC. While the study was underpowered (likely due to low rates of recorded ACVEs), to detect a significant association between CAC score and ACVEs, there was a trend towards increased risk of ACVEs in patients with a CAC score >1 by visual ordinal scoring. Further prospective evaluation with a larger cohort is warranted.

Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Analysis of the Position Statement From the European Society of Cardiology Acute Cardiovascular Care Association, With Perioperative Implications

Effective management of cardiogenic shock (CS) is hampered by a lack of evidence-based information. This is a high-mortality condition, without clear, evidence-based guidelines for perioperative management, specifically-a lack of target endpoints for treatment (e.g.: mean arterial pressure or oxygenation), utility of regional care systems or the benefits of palliative care. The Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently published a position statement that aimed to offer contemporary guidance on the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by CS. Herein, we review this complex clinical topic and review the ACCA statement on AMI associated with CS, with a focus on relevance to perioperative management.

The Role of Novel Transcatheter Procedures in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

The development of percutaneous structural interventions in patients with acquired heart disease is happening at an exponential rate, and some of this technology is being used to treat patients with congenital heart disease. This review describes the pathophysiology of valvular abnormalities specific to congenital heart disease and discusses the application of structural procedures in this population. Although the overall experience has been encouraging, especially in high-risk patients, this article will highlight the reasons that a cautious approach to adoption of this technology is necessary in these patients.

Airway Obstruction by Transesophageal Echocardiography: Is Oblivion Bliss?

•

Severe complications from TEE imaging are uncommon.

•

Airway compression from TEE occurs in children and as rare case reports in adults.

•

This can be caused by an anteflexed probe in an adult with tracheobronchomalacia.

To Clip or Not to Clip: The Use of MitraClip Therapy for Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair of the mitral valve with the MitraClip device has been shown to serve as a safe and effective treatment for severe mitral regurgitation in the high-risk surgical population. Although the device originally was designed for the reduction of degenerative mitral regurgitation resulting from primary leaflet abnormalities, numerous studies have included patients with functional mitral regurgitation from annular or ventricular distortion. Two recent landmark studies examined the use of the MitraClip device for functional mitral regurgitation treatment and found drastically opposing results. Data reconciliation by others has suggested only a subset of those with functional mitral regurgitation may benefit from this treatment. Herein 2 seemingly similar cases to illustrate the subtle differences in patient selection that eventually may change the clinical outcome for this procedure are presented.

The Use of Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Echocardiography to Evaluate Origin of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Regurgitant Jets

Degradation of bioprosthetic aortic valves can eventually lead to both paravalvular and intravalvular regurgitation. However, differentiating between the two may be difficult in the case of multiple lesions in close proximity or highly eccentric jets. Whereas such exact distinction may be of little procedural significance in open cardiac surgery, it is of crucial importance when approaching such lesions in the catheterization laboratory or hybrid operating room. Interventions on one lesion often have a significant effect on the other. For example, guidewires may damage new bioprosthetic valve leaflets and dislodge vascular plugs. Even more concerning is the possibility of undergoing a lengthy and risky procedure on a lesion that does not truly exist. Fortunately, the use of three-dimensional Doppler echocardiography can expand our vision beyond the single imaging plane of a standard two-dimensional examination, allowing extensive manipulation of cutting planes and a wider field of view. Regurgitant jets can thus be tracked in a way that may be otherwise impossible, better quantifying their true origins. Here the authors present a unique case of misdiagnosis after surgical aortic valve degradation, where the use of intraoperative three-dimensional echocardiography significantly altered the preoperative plan and reduced operative time.

A Comparison of Global Longitudinal, Circumferential, and Radial Strain to Predict Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Myocardial strain measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography detects subtle regional and global left ventricular dysfunction. Myocardial strain is measured in the longitudinal, circumferential, and radial dimensions; however, it is unclear which dimension of strain is the best predictor of postoperative outcomes.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from a clinical trial (NCT01187329).

SETTING

The cardiothoracic surgical operating rooms of an academic tertiary-care center.

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiothoracic surgery patients with aortic stenosis having aortic valve replacement (AVR) with or without coronary artery bypass grafting enrolled in a clinical trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Myocardial deformation analysis from standardized investigative transesophageal echocardiographic examinations performed after induction of anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors compared the ability of intraoperative global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS) strain to predict adverse postoperative outcomes, including prolonged hospitalization and the need for pharmacologic hemodynamic support after cardiac surgery. The association of GLS, GCS, and GRS with prolonged hospitalization (>7 days) and the need for pharmacologic hemodynamic support, with epinephrine or norepinephrine after cardiopulmonary bypass, were assessed using separate multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for multiple comparisons. Of 100 patients, 86 had acceptable measurements for GLS analysis, 73 for GCS, and 72 for GRS. Worse GLS was associated with prolonged hospitalization [odds ratio [OR] (98.3% confidence interval [CI]) of 1.21 (1.01-1.46) per-unit worsening in strain (p = 0.01, significance criterion <0.0167)] and the need for inotropic support with epinephrine [OR (99.2% CI) of 1.81 (1.10-2.97) per-unit worsening in strain (p = 0.002, significance criterion <0.0083)], but not norepinephrine. GCS and GRS were not associated with adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

GLS, but not GCS or GRS, predicts prolonged hospitalization and the requirement for inotropic support with epinephrine after AVR.

Intraoperative Acute Multivessel Coronary Vasospasm in Cardiac Allograft: A Case Report

We present a patient who developed acute intraoperative cardiac failure requiring open cardiac message immediately after uncomplicated heart transplantation. After successful resuscitation and establishment of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, coronary angiography showed diffuse multivessel coronary vasospasm, which responded to intracoronary and IV administration of vasodilators. Cardiac function gradually improved and the patient was discharged home after a prolonged hospital course. Cardiac allograft dysfunction associated with coronary vasospasm immediately after heart transplantation has not previously been reported.

Perioperative management of patients with left ventricular assist devices undergoing noncardiac procedures: a survey of current practices

OBJECTIVES

To describe perioperative management of patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) in noncardiac procedures.

DESIGN

Survey of (1) respondent demographic characteristics, (2) anesthetic practices for LVAD patients having endoscopies, and (3) low-risk surgeries requiring general anesthesia.

SETTING

Internet-based.

PARTICIPANTS

Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists membership.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Inpatient endoscopic procedures were done mainly in the endoscopy suite (71.7%) by a solo practitioner or 1:1 staffing ratio 59% of the time. LVAD-specific support personnel were present in more than 80% of all procedures. Both endoscopy and surgical patients used post-anesthesia recovery units and intensive care units for recovery; however, compared with endoscopy patients, surgical patients recovered in the ICU more frequently (45.5% v 29.1%, p<0.001). In addition, 18% of endoscopy patients recovered on site. Regarding patient monitoring, more than 90% of responders used electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, end-tidal CO2, and blood pressure monitors on LVAD patients. Responders reported using arterial catheters to monitor blood pressure in 49% of endoscopy cases and 71% of surgical patients. The reported use of invasive monitors by individual clinicians was related inversely to institutional LVAD volume (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01 in endoscopy and surgical procedures, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This survey found heterogeneity in hospital resource utilization for noncardiac LVAD procedures. There was a decrease in the use of invasive monitors with increased institutional LVAD volume in both endoscopy and surgical procedures.