Imaging for local recurrence of breast cancer

PURPOSE

Isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer (ILRR) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) affect up to 20% of all breast cancer (BC) patients in the first 20 years after primary diagnosis. Treatment options comprise surgical interventions and further systemic therapies depending on the histological subtype. Patients with hereditary breast or ovarian cancer (HBOC) undergo MRI, mammography, and ultrasound in the aftercare of BC, while non-HBOC (nHBOC) patients do not regularly receive MRI. Since early detection is crucial for morbidity and mortality, the evaluation and constant improvement of imaging methods of the breast is necessary.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 1499 former BC patients that received imaging of the breast at a tertiary-care university hospital between 2015 and 2020. The analysis comprised various patient characteristics, such as breast density, age, tumor size and subtype, and their influence on BC detection rates by the different imaging methods.

RESULTS

Within the patient sample, 176 individuals (11.7% of former BC patients) were diagnosed with either ILRR or CBC. CBC was observed in 32.4% of patients, while both ILRR and secondary breast cancer occurred in 20.5% and 23.9% of all patients. Sensitivity of MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for recurrent malignancy was 97.9%, 66.3%, and 67.8%, respectively. ILRR and CBC detection rates were similar for patients with and without HBOC history. Lower breast density and larger tumor size increased the detection rates of all imaging modalities.

CONCLUSION

In breast cancer survivors, MRI might improve the early detection of ILRR and CBC in both HBOC and nHBOC patients.

Potential of employing a quantum iterative reconstruction algorithm for ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT of the hip

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the image quality of a new quantum iterative reconstruction algorithm (QIR) for high resolution photon-counting CT of the hip.

METHODS

Using a first-generation photon-counting CT scanner, five cadaveric specimens were examined with ultra-high-resolution protocols matched for radiation dose. Images were post-processed with a sharp convolution kernel and five different strength levels of iterative reconstruction (QIR 0 - QIR 4). Subjective image quality was rated independently by three radiologists on a five-point scale. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were computed for assessing interrater agreement. Objective image quality was evaluated by means of contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) in bone and muscle tissue.

RESULTS

For osseous tissue, subjective image quality was rated best for QIR 2 reformatting (median 5 [interquartile range 5-5]). Contrarily, for soft tissue, QIR 4 received the highest ratings among compared strength levels (3 [3-4]). Both ICC_bone (0.805; 95% confidence interval 0.711-0.877; p < 0.001) and ICC_muscle (0.885; 0.824-0.929; p < 0.001) suggested good interrater agreement. CNR in bone and muscle tissue increased with ascending strength levels of iterative reconstruction with the highest results recorded for QIR 4 (CNR_bone 29.43 ± 2.61; CNR_muscle 8.09 ± 0.77) and lowest results without QIR (CNR_bone 3.90 ± 0.29; CNR_muscle 1.07 ± 0.07) (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Reconstructing photon-counting CT data with an intermediate QIR strength level appears optimal for assessment of osseous tissue, whereas soft tissue analysis benefitted from applying the highest strength level available.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Quantum iterative reconstruction technique can enhance image quality by significantly reducing noise and improving CNR in ultra-high resolution CT imaging of the hip.