222 TOWARDS A DELIRIUM FRIENDLY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Background

Delirium affects approx. 10-30 % of patients over the age of 65. Up to 70% of cases are missed in the Emergency Department (ED). Delirium results in increased morbidity, mortality, increased length of stay and decreased functional status with increased discharges to residential care centres. Delirium in the ED is an independent predictor of death within 6 months.

Methods

We completed an audit which showed 40% of those > 65 years of age in the ED were delirious and 60% of those had dementia. None of these had been identified as delirious prior to review. We have approx. 5,000 patients >75 years of age attending our ED annually (1/7th of presentations). This audit was used as a catalyst for our quality improvement project. We established a steering group with a small quality improvement sub-committee. We combed the literature, identified areas for improvement and costed our project. We also looked at reliance on 1:1 carers for those with delirium and potential benefits to patient, staff and management.

Results

We used the SPARK ignite programme as a means to gain momentum and also educate ourselves on business management and change management. We competed in the finals with our “delirium package” – focussing on orientation, stimulation, safety and education. These 4 pillars of delirium care have been shown to prevent delirium, reduce hospital stay for those with delirium and also augment their delirium cycle. Competing and winning a prize highlighted the importance of delirium care and brought our project to a bigger stage.

Conclusion

Due to our multi-disciplinary team composed of non-consultant hospital doctors, advanced nurse practitioners and occupational therapists, we have been able to introduce the national dementia programme for early identification of delirium in the emergency department. We now have a space for managing those with delirium and have received funding to put our package in place. This can be replicated in hospitals around the country highlighting the non-pharmacological treatments for delirium.

221 PREVALENCE AND DOCUMENTATION OF DELIRIUM IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Background

Delirium can complicate approximately 10% of all medical admissions and prevalence increases in those with cognitive impairment, increasing age and medical complexity. Delirium is associated with increased morbidity and mortality as well as increased length of stay. Prompt recognition and treatment is essential. The National Delirium Care Bundle suggests assessment and recognition at the earliest opportunity and documentation of delirium if patients screen positive.

Methods

We carried out an audit among patients admitted in all medical wards to identify delirium and assess if it was documented and a care bundle opened. All patients were screened using the 4AT tool at least once over the space of one week. Medical notes were also screened to assess for documentation of delirium.

Results

95 patients were screened and 32 (33%) of these screened positive. Of these only 11 patients had a diagnosis of delirium documented in medical/nursing notes and a delirium care bundle opened. 50% of CCU patients were delirious. The Geriatric Medicine Ward had a lower prevalence of 19% with 66% identified in medical notes.

Conclusion

These results are disappointing with only 34% of patients identified as having a delirium. This audit is part of a quality improvement project with education sessions ongoing and roll out of the national delirium/dementia pathways across the medical wards. We hope to present our interventions and completed audit loop shortly.

Clinico-pathological features of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town

Background

Repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis are usually done to guide treatment or to establish disease chronicity. Their value is not clear from available literature. There are also no available data in Africa to guide clinicians.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing a repeat renal biopsy between January 2003 and December 2014 from a single centre in Cape Town, South Africa. Relevant demographic, clinical and histological records of patients with repeat renal biopsies were documented. Comparison of data from first and second renal biopsy was performed.

Results

Forty-four patients had at least two biopsies done during the study period. Most patients were females (81.8%). The mean biopsy interval was 2.8 ± 1.8 (range 0.38–9.4) years. Proteinuria was the main indication for the repeat biopsy (36.1%). The glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria worsened between the two biopsies ( p = 0.001 and 0.019, respectively) suggesting disease progression. Most patients (65.4%) with a non-proliferative class of lupus nephritis at first biopsy progressed into a proliferative class, whereas patients with initial proliferative lupus nephritis at first biopsy (77.8%) remained as proliferative at repeat biopsy. Treatment was changed in 85% of patients at second biopsy.

Conclusion

Repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis presents a useful means of assessing disease progression and provides guidance regarding modification of treatment. More studies are, however, required to evaluate the value of repeat biopsies and perhaps the need for protocol renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis.