Interpretation of Abdominal CT Findings in Patients Who Develop Acute on Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia

BACKGROUND

We studied whether ischemia-specific computed tomography (CT) findings are consistently detectable in patients who develop acute on chronic mesenteric ischemia (AOCMI), whereas absent in chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with symptomatic angiography-verified atherosclerotic obstruction of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were categorized as AOCMI (n = 27) or CMI (n = 20). Three experienced radiologists blindly evaluated the contrast-enhanced CTs for vascular and intestinal findings. Kappa statistics was used to test interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Two observers had substantial agreement (k = 0.66) that two thirds of AOCMI patients showed ischemia-specific CT findings (decreased bowel wall enhancement, pneumatosis, or thrombotic SMA clot); the third observer agreed only fairly regarding pneumatosis and thrombosis (k = 0.3-0.4). All observers had substantial agreement (k = 0.65-0.71) that most patients with AOCMI had unspecific intestinal findings such as mesenteric fat stranding in up to 96%, bowel lumen dilatation in 93%, and bowel wall thickening in 70%, while only few patients with CMI had such findings (due to chronic ischemic colitis) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

One third of AOCMI patients presented without any ischemia-specific CT signs. However, any intestinal abnormality in CT together with SMA obstruction should raise suspicion of intestinal ischemia. Furthermore, clinicians need to be aware of the interobserver variability in the CT interpretation.

Detecting acute mesenteric ischemia in CT of the acute abdomen is dependent on clinical suspicion: Review of 95 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVES

(1) To evaluate the ability of emergency room radiologists to detect acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) from computed tomography (CT) images in patients with acute abdominal pain. (2) To identify factors affecting radiologists' performance in the CT interpretation and patient outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 95 consecutive patients treated for 97 AMI events between 2009 and 2013 was carried out. The etiology of AMI was embolism in 24 (25%), atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASVD) in 39 (40%), non-obstructive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) in 25 (26%), and mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) in nine (9%) cases. The protocols, referrals and initial radiology reports of the abdominal CTs were analyzed. The CT studies were further scrutinized for vascular and intestinal findings.

RESULTS

The referring clinician had suspected AMI in 30 (31%) cases prior to imaging. The crucial findings of AMI had been stated in 97% of the radiology reports if the clinician had mentioned AMI suspicion in the referral; if not, the corresponding rate was 81% (p=0.04). Patients without suspicion of AMI prior to CT were more prone to undergo bowel resection. CT protocol was optimal for AMI (with contrast enhancement in arterial and venous phases) in only 34 (35%) cases. Intestinal findings were more difficult to detect than vascular findings. Vascular findings were retrospectively detectable in 92% of cases with embolism and 100% in ASVD and MVT. Some evidence of intestinal abnormality was retrospectively found in the CT findings in 92%, 100%, 100% and 67% of cases with embolism, ASVD, NOMI and MVT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AMI is underdiagnosed in the CT of the acute abdomen if there is no clinical suspicion.

Endovascular Therapy as a Primary Revascularization Modality in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

PURPOSE

To evaluate endovascular therapy (EVT) as the primary revascularization method for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive patients treated for AMI during a 5-year period (January 2009 to December 2013). EVT was attempted in all patients referred for emergent revascularization. Surgical revascularization was performed selectively after failure of EVT. Patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes were studied. Failures and complications of EVT were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty patients, aged 79 ± 9 years (mean ± SD), out of 66 consecutive patients with AMI secondary to embolic or thrombotic obstruction of the superior mesenteric artery were referred for revascularization. The etiology of AMI was embolism in 18 (36 %) and thrombosis in 32 (64 %) patients. EVT was technically successful in 44 (88 %) patients. Mortality after successful or failed EVT was 32 %. The rates of emergency laparotomy, bowel resection, and EVT-related complication were 40, 34, and 10 %, respectively. Three out of six patients with failure of EVT were treated with surgical bypass. EVT failure did not significantly affect survival.

CONCLUSIONS

EVT is feasible in most cases of AMI, with favorable patient outcome and acceptable complication rate.